DatingGold.com PPL Ripoff - Page 5 - GoFuckYourself.com

mineistaken · 05-27-2013, 05:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSquealer

Obviously i'm dumb. You have a whole 9 hits to toss around and test traffic on and you're so clever, you wanted to prove you actually command this much traffic. If you say i'm a moron, then i'm a moron.

His point was that he sent WAY MORE traffic and only 9 hits were registered. Is that so difficult to understand for you?

mineistaken · 05-27-2013, 05:39 PM

Regarding not paying for female members, how is that fraud?
I understand when you pay more for female leads than shady webmasters might want to create fake female leads, but if you pay the same amount for female or male lead?

dog-tag · 07-06-2013, 10:38 AM

Why would anyone push traffic to DG?

They're so bad I left $75 in their account, and never contacted them again.
Worst network I've experienced.

itx · 07-06-2013, 10:59 AM

Is a waste of your time and money.

mineistaken · 07-06-2013, 03:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dog-tag

Why would anyone push traffic to DG?

They're so bad I left $75 in their account, and never contacted them again.
Worst network I've experienced.

Don't leave money on the table..

dog-tag · 07-10-2013, 12:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mineistaken

Don't leave money on the table..

Well they won't payout until $100 and it makes no sense to waste traffic on them.

If I send enough traffic for another sale, that would make it a $150 payout then.
But if I sent that same traffic to someone else I would make at least +$400 minimum.

So the maths doesn't add up

Cyber Fucker · 07-10-2013, 12:51 PM

Is it too late for sig spot?

Jayvis · 07-10-2013, 01:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dog-tag

Well they won't payout until $100 and it makes no sense to waste traffic on them.

If I send enough traffic for another sale, that would make it a $150 payout then.
But if I sent that same traffic to someone else I would make at least +$400 minimum.

So the maths doesn't add up

$50 for a check, thought that was pretty normal? Hit me up with your username and I'll see if I can make something happen if a check won't work for you.

signupdamnit · 07-10-2013, 02:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jayvis

$50 for a check, thought that was pretty normal? Hit me up with your username and I'll see if I can make something happen if a check won't work for you.

$50 is normal and fine. And to your credit you guys do try to appeal to affiliates in having a presence. Do you still have that popunder though? And why are people complaining about low hit counts and sales? For example I've seen dog-tag defend other dating programs before on another forum. So I doubt he's just making things up about you.

It seems to me it would be far better to fix these things than to do anything else. I think some programs look at it the wrong way. Even if an affiliate sends you just ten hits a day if you convert those hits (and being honest and running a straight program goes a long way towards this) then there is a good chance they will give you more soon. If you do really well they will probably work more of their time to send you more traffic. So it's clear how to bring a program's affiliate numbers up at all levels (not just with a few people). Not with promos and contests but with such simple things. But it's a mystery how so few programs seem to see this.

InfoGuy · 07-12-2013, 10:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LRS

4 users told me they signed up and verified email. I got 1 lead.
I asked my friend who lives in Texas, US that was looking for cam girls to use my aff link, never got a lead.

there is no way for me to see your source code and prove you are shaving like crazy but where in the hell are my leads?

if its not the male/female then check your "fire pixel" thing cus it works 30% of the time!

Your math is a little off...

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tofu

I've answered that, in my first response. Let me take you all through the http://webcamclub.com signup process, so there is no confusion. This is the same
process we use to verify that pixels are firing:

1. User lands on your user page.

2. Member simply signs up, putting in his/her user name, password, email address and
date of birth [this would be where a single opt join would happen, if WCC offered SOI].

3. Member must go to his/her email account that he/she used to sign up, via your
landing page. There is a big blue button, prompting the user to confirm the sign up.

4. User clicks the button and is whisked away to a confirmation page [this is where the
pixel fires, if one has been implemented. Thus, giving the affiliate/pub credit for 1 (one)
double opt-in webcamclub lead and is tracked in DG stats page, under "Lead", appearing up to 15 minutes after lead was confirmed.

The gender has nothing to do with an affiliate or pub receiving credit for a double opt-in lead, for webcamclub. The "males only" rule applies to our dating program and is not
applicable on our webcams, because gender is irrelevant. It's turning them into paying
customers that we are focused on doing.

I suspect that the pixel firing in #4 is the problem with LRS' test. It's common for current email programs/sites to hide images (either by default or settings). I personally have image blocking turned on to prevent spammers from validating my email address as active with hidden 1x1 pixels. So, it's quite possible that of the 4 test joins sent by LRS, 3 people were blocking images in their DG email and only 1 allowed it.

Quote:

Originally Posted by AK

We added a new security system to ask affiliates update their passwords every 90 days suggested by Payoneer.

This is a pain in the ass as I use a different password for every site. Can I opt out of this?

07-10-2013, 12:51 PM	#207
Cyber Fucker Hmm Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: On an endless road around the world for rock and roll. Posts: 12,642	Is it too late for sig spot? __________________

05-27-2013, 05:39 PM	#202
mineistaken See signature :) Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: ICQ 363 097 773 Posts: 29,656	Regarding not paying for female members, how is that fraud? I understand when you pay more for female leads than shady webmasters might want to create fake female leads, but if you pay the same amount for female or male lead?

07-06-2013, 10:38 AM	#203
dog-tag Registered User Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2011 Posts: 39	Why would anyone push traffic to DG? They're so bad I left $75 in their account, and never contacted them again. Worst network I've experienced.

07-06-2013, 10:59 AM	#204
itx Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2007 Posts: 974	Is a waste of your time and money.