do you think AEG has any liability in MJs death? - GoFuckYourself.com

Joshua G · 06-10-2013, 10:58 AM

I thought the answer was absolutely no. MJ was a drug addict & murray was his enabler. & AEG just played ball with the superstar.

But randy phillips is making me second guess this. It does seem the suits knew he was not healthy, not able to perform, but were pushing forward anyway.

when a promoter puts up millions, & has millions to lose & to gain, morality tends to go out the window.

is that enough to say AEG has some liability?

JFK · 06-10-2013, 11:00 AM

I think my answer would be NO, he signed a contract to perform, for huge amounts of money, with that comes responsibility

Joshua G · 06-10-2013, 02:38 PM

& the correct answer is...nobody cares

all i will add this that it is the height of disgusting that MJ was so private, but his family so money grubbing they need to expose his life & all this chicanery. That family has made a fortune, because he died! the estate was flat broke while MJ was frittering away his wealth.

shame on the jackson family.

dyna mo · 06-10-2013, 03:01 PM

while i don't think they should have any liability, i do wonder why phillips blew off the news about mj. he could have tried to help another person, period, maybe he didn't want to open a can of worms with mj's emotional state. but he could have tried to help the guy, imo.

but the fact is they shit head jacksons can sue and they will probably present a case portraying the producers as money grubbing scum, the irony.

06-10-2013, 10:58 AM	#1
Joshua G dumb libs love censorship Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2008 Posts: 8,198	do you think AEG has any liability in MJs death? I thought the answer was absolutely no. MJ was a drug addict & murray was his enabler. & AEG just played ball with the superstar. But randy phillips is making me second guess this. It does seem the suits knew he was not healthy, not able to perform, but were pushing forward anyway. when a promoter puts up millions, & has millions to lose & to gain, morality tends to go out the window. is that enough to say AEG has some liability?

06-10-2013, 11:00 AM	#2
JFK FUBAR the ORIGINATOR Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: FUBARLAND Posts: 67,382	I think my answer would be NO, he signed a contract to perform, for huge amounts of money, with that comes responsibility __________________ FUBAR Webmasters - The FUBAR Times - FUBAR Webmasters Mobile - FUBARTV.XXX For promo opps contact jfk at fubarwebmasters dot com

06-10-2013, 02:38 PM	#3
Joshua G dumb libs love censorship Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2008 Posts: 8,198	& the correct answer is...nobody cares all i will add this that it is the height of disgusting that MJ was so private, but his family so money grubbing they need to expose his life & all this chicanery. That family has made a fortune, because he died! the estate was flat broke while MJ was frittering away his wealth. shame on the jackson family.

06-10-2013, 03:01 PM	#4
dyna mo The People's Post Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: invisible 7-11 Posts: 63,911	while i don't think they should have any liability, i do wonder why phillips blew off the news about mj. he could have tried to help another person, period, maybe he didn't want to open a can of worms with mj's emotional state. but he could have tried to help the guy, imo. but the fact is they shit head jacksons can sue and they will probably present a case portraying the producers as money grubbing scum, the irony.