Kerry: Syrian chemical weapons are a threat to the U.S. - GoFuckYourself.com

winter_ · 09-08-2013, 05:17 AM

isn't this all too familiar to the iraq weapons of mass destruction? even if the syrian chemical weapons are the iraqi weapons of mass destruction, how could they be a threat to the united states for so long without, until now, them being used on the syrian people? and the united states is only going to do something about it now? for how long has the united states government known they are a threat to them?

www.nzherald.co.nz/world/news/article.cfm?c_id=2&objectid=11121427

Struggle4Bucks · 09-08-2013, 05:56 AM

Syrian chemical weapons are a threat to the U.S.

Phoenix · 09-08-2013, 05:58 AM

how will they be loaded onto a plane and brought there?

what a joke the power plays are becoming

winter_ · 09-08-2013, 06:01 AM

i think i just love how that associated press article was structured.

the headline originally reads the united states government is having some strong opposition to a "strike" or a war, but then half way down the page its like john kerry honestly says oh yeah the weapons are a threat to the united states of america as if it isn't even important enough to emphasis further.

that is just unbelievable.

ajrocks · 09-08-2013, 08:08 AM

So are the ones the US sold to places like Iraq and then told the world they knew they had "Weapons of mass discruction". The US has both nukes and Chemical weapons on hand. Just because they haven't used them doesn't make it any different.

Barry-xlovecam · 09-08-2013, 08:41 AM

This is a job for Saggy

D'oh ...

directfiesta · 09-08-2013, 10:32 AM

.. and the american people will gobble it ... again !

winter_ · 09-08-2013, 10:41 AM

www.nzherald.co.nz/world/news/article.cfm?c_id=2&objectid=11121427

that is crazy!

you mean to tell me the associated press decided to get a reporter to make up a new story about syria and it is for the most part about american's opposing any military action over there? but then these two tinsy winsy paragraphs nearer the end of the report kerry has the smoking gun right then and there by saying in that same article that the weapons are a threat to the united states homeland? am i understanding this correctly?

seriously, i suppose i wouldn't want to be in any well-populated metro area of the united states right now, because that should be cause for a lot of alarm and it has been condensed down in to a oh yeah by the way.

pimpmaster9000 · 09-08-2013, 11:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by winter_

isn't this all too familiar to the iraq weapons of mass destruction? even if the syrian chemical weapons are the iraqi weapons of mass destruction, how could they be a threat to the united states for so long without, until now, them being used on the syrian people? and the united states is only going to do something about it now? for how long has the united states government known they are a threat to them?

www.nzherald.co.nz/world/news/article.cfm?c_id=2&objectid=11121427

EVERYTHING is a THREAT to the USA!!!!!!!!!! EVERYTHING!!!!!!!!!!

The USA is in so much DANGER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Support the toops! Protect Air Force One! Launch Nukes from Ground Zero!

https://youtube.com/watch?v=IhnUgAaea4M

winter_ · 09-08-2013, 12:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crucifissio

https://youtube.com/watch?v=IhnUgAaea4M

i have actually seen that movie and i didn't particularly enjoy it.

DWB · 09-08-2013, 12:44 PM

Apparently, freedom is a threat to the USA now.

waxy · 09-08-2013, 04:11 PM

Al-Quaeda and Al-Nusra terrorists in Syria who lead the opposition have chemical weapons too and they use it in Aleppo (big city in the north of Syria), but apparently those people are not threat to US government now

that's called double standard policy

09-08-2013, 05:17 AM	#1
winter_ So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2013 Location: Perth, Adelaide, Auckland, Seattle Posts: 750	Kerry: Syrian chemical weapons are a threat to the U.S. isn't this all too familiar to the iraq weapons of mass destruction? even if the syrian chemical weapons are the iraqi weapons of mass destruction, how could they be a threat to the united states for so long without, until now, them being used on the syrian people? and the united states is only going to do something about it now? for how long has the united states government known they are a threat to them? www.nzherald.co.nz/world/news/article.cfm?c_id=2&objectid=11121427

09-08-2013, 05:56 AM	#2
Struggle4Bucks Sieg Hi! Industry Role: Join Date: May 2011 Location: Lissabon Posts: 3,614	Syrian chemical weapons are a threat to the U.S. __________________ Half troll half amazing!

09-08-2013, 05:58 AM	#3
Phoenix BACON BACON BACON Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Poems everybody, the laddie fancies himself a poet Posts: 35,457	how will they be loaded onto a plane and brought there? what a joke the power plays are becoming __________________ Skype Phoenixskype1 Telegram PhoenixBrad https://quantads.io

09-08-2013, 08:08 AM	#5
ajrocks Confirmed User Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: On Uranus Posts: 4,526	So are the ones the US sold to places like Iraq and then told the world they knew they had "Weapons of mass discruction". The US has both nukes and Chemical weapons on hand. Just because they haven't used them doesn't make it any different. __________________ SEO Strategy - Digital Strategy - Cannabis Lead Generation Skype aj.durden1

09-08-2013, 10:32 AM	#7
directfiesta Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Punta Cana, DR Posts: 29,583	.. and the american people will gobble it ... again ! __________________ I know that Asspimple is stoopid ... As he says, it is a FACT ! But I can't figure out how he can breathe or type , at the same time ....

09-08-2013, 06:01 AM	#4
winter_ So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2013 Location: Perth, Adelaide, Auckland, Seattle Posts: 750	i think i just love how that associated press article was structured. the headline originally reads the united states government is having some strong opposition to a "strike" or a war, but then half way down the page its like john kerry honestly says oh yeah the weapons are a threat to the united states of america as if it isn't even important enough to emphasis further. that is just unbelievable.

09-08-2013, 08:41 AM	#6
Barry-xlovecam It's 42 Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: Global Posts: 18,083	This is a job for Saggy D'oh ...

09-08-2013, 10:41 AM	#8
winter_ So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2013 Location: Perth, Adelaide, Auckland, Seattle Posts: 750	www.nzherald.co.nz/world/news/article.cfm?c_id=2&objectid=11121427 that is crazy! you mean to tell me the associated press decided to get a reporter to make up a new story about syria and it is for the most part about american's opposing any military action over there? but then these two tinsy winsy paragraphs nearer the end of the report kerry has the smoking gun right then and there by saying in that same article that the weapons are a threat to the united states homeland? am i understanding this correctly? seriously, i suppose i wouldn't want to be in any well-populated metro area of the united states right now, because that should be cause for a lot of alarm and it has been condensed down in to a oh yeah by the way.

09-08-2013, 12:44 PM	#11
DWB Registered User Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Encrypted. Access denied. Posts: 31,779	Apparently, freedom is a threat to the USA now.

09-08-2013, 04:11 PM	#12
waxy Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2008 Posts: 417	Al-Quaeda and Al-Nusra terrorists in Syria who lead the opposition have chemical weapons too and they use it in Aleppo (big city in the north of Syria), but apparently those people are not threat to US government now that's called double standard policy __________________ Up to 5$ CPM Rate \| Popups - Direct URL - CPC- Interstital