Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Post New Thread Reply

Register GFY Rules Calendar
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed.

 
Thread Tools
Old 11-14-2013, 08:10 AM   #51
TurboAngel
H.B.I.C.
 
TurboAngel's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: NC
Posts: 30,122
It's all fucking nuts!
TurboAngel is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2013, 08:13 AM   #52
AmeliaG
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
AmeliaG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 10,563
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikesouth View Post
if yer single and making 10-15 dollars an hour you will pay almost nothing for good insurance...Obamacare will subsidize about 70-75% of it...
Obamacare and Romneycare are the same thing, so, if you are cheerleading this debacle because of your team colors, you are mistaken. This is corporate welfare for big pharma and the insurance industry (because the taxpayers didn't give AIG enough)

Are you self-employed and in California? Ya know, like a lot of webmasters are?

Here is the California question for the self-employed on getting help with the insurance they are going to be forced to buy, whether or not they can afford it:

"Gross Income - How much do you earn in self-employment revenues in an average month before you pay your business expenses or taxes?"

It doesn't matter how broke you are, if you are genuinely self-employed, odds are good you will not qualify for help. If you have ever been a pro webmaster, photographer, writer, musician, model, illustrator, designer, creative person or entrepreneur of any kind, you know that the money you get to live on is what is left over after you have paid your business expenses. This is second grade math.
__________________
GFY Hall of Famer

AltStar Hall of Famer




Blue Blood's SpookyCash.com

Babe photography portfolio
AmeliaG is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2013, 08:36 AM   #53
Vendzilla
Biker Gnome
 
Vendzilla's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: cell#324
Posts: 23,200
Democrats are scrambling to make changes to the law. This is what it took for Democrats and Republicans to work together.

Pre existing conditions? Think again, insurance companies are already learning how to get around it.
http://www.nationaljournal.com/healt...tions-20131107

Lower costs? As long as you don't have to use it, deductibles are going way up!


This whole law was about getting Barry's name on something, no one knew what was in it, no one cared

Again, I'm for healthcare for everyone, but this law was passed by idiots that never read the damn thing and the president lied to get it passed
__________________
Carbon is not the problem, it makes up 0.041% of our atmosphere , 95% of that is from Volcanos and decomposing plants and stuff. So people in the US are responsible for 13% of the carbon in the atmosphere which 95% is not from Humans, like cars and trucks and stuff and they want to spend trillions to fix it while Solar Panel plants are powered by coal plants
think about that
Vendzilla is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2013, 08:49 AM   #54
Minte
Babemeister
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Madison
Posts: 7,081
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vendzilla View Post
Democrats are scrambling to make changes to the law. This is what it took for Democrats and Republicans to work together.

Pre existing conditions? Think again, insurance companies are already learning how to get around it.
http://www.nationaljournal.com/healt...tions-20131107

Lower costs? As long as you don't have to use it, deductibles are going way up!


This whole law was about getting Barry's name on something, no one knew what was in it, no one cared

Again, I'm for healthcare for everyone, but this law was passed by idiots that never read the damn thing and the president lied to get it passed
I have to wonder if the population knew before the last election what we know today..would Obama have gotten reelected. This first year has been nothing but drama, scandals and lies.
__________________
You might not be as anonymous as you think you are.
Minte is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2013, 08:51 AM   #55
Minte
Babemeister
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Madison
Posts: 7,081
Quote:
Originally Posted by GFED View Post
Yes, just spoke with Humana on the phone and the cheapest plan they could offer me was $201.09/month with a $6300 deductible.
Keep in mind, this is still the honeymoon period..
__________________
You might not be as anonymous as you think you are.
Minte is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2013, 09:09 AM   #56
Barry-xlovecam
It's 42
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Global
Posts: 18,083
Quote:
Originally Posted by AmeliaG View Post
"Gross Income - How much do you earn in self-employment revenues in an average month before you pay your business expenses or taxes?"
The federal subsidies are based on your BUSINESS INCOME, revenues are not income (that is 10 Grade Accounting) from your Schedule C -- take the annual amount divide it by 12 -- must be 6th Grade math ...

I guess that gives you a clue on today's level of education in California ... Just as bad everywhere else really.

Wait until there is a universal healthcare in a few years, and the payroll tax (or income tax) to support it -- that will be the end result. Then there will really be something to cry about.
Barry-xlovecam is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2013, 09:11 AM   #57
Grapesoda
So Fucking Banned
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Montana
Posts: 46,238
Quote:
Originally Posted by GFED View Post
Haven't really kept up with this obamacare crap, but is it suppose to make healthcare more affordable or is it a bunch of bullshit? I've received numerous mails from healthcare such as Blue Cross that say I should buy their healthcare now because when obamacare takes effect, healthcare prices will rise.
prices are going up to help pay for people that can't afford health care... i.e. if you are using the 'exchange' for health care I am paying for part of your coverage
Grapesoda is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2013, 09:14 AM   #58
Barry-xlovecam
It's 42
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Global
Posts: 18,083
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vendzilla View Post
And that is exactly why there will be a single payer government universal healthcare with a income tax to support it.

Barry-xlovecam is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2013, 09:15 AM   #59
Grapesoda
So Fucking Banned
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Montana
Posts: 46,238
Quote:
Originally Posted by Minte View Post
I have to wonder if the population knew before the last election what we know today..would Obama have gotten reelected. This first year has been nothing but drama, scandals and lies.
yes, because Obama supports don't believe any negative reports about Obama, choosing believe anything negative is only slander by the republicans. that's the best part of being a liberal... selective truth .... and anything 'not true' is just hate filled bigotry from hate filled minds and total moron scum
Grapesoda is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2013, 09:16 AM   #60
Minte
Babemeister
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Madison
Posts: 7,081
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grapesoda View Post
prices are going up to help pay for people that can't afford health care... i.e. if you are using the 'exchange' for health care I am paying for part of your coverage
And rather than getting a thankyou from the government and the *entitled* for your hard effort,you get a fuckyou...give us more!
__________________
You might not be as anonymous as you think you are.
Minte is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2013, 09:40 AM   #61
Tom_PM
Porn Meister
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 16,443
High incomes already pay historically low taxes. Just the facts as some people like to say. Who cares though? They're spending over half a billion dollars already on a fucking website. Lets all come together and bitch about that.
__________________
43-922-863 Shut up and play your guitar.
Tom_PM is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2013, 09:58 AM   #62
Minte
Babemeister
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Madison
Posts: 7,081
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom_PM View Post
High incomes already pay historically low taxes. Just the facts as some people like to say. Who cares though? They're spending over half a billion dollars already on a fucking website. Lets all come together and bitch about that.
Just a reminder...28% of a million dollar income is $280,000
28% of a $75,000 income is $21,000

What does the government do for those in the higher income levels to justify 10+ times more money for the identical services?
__________________
You might not be as anonymous as you think you are.
Minte is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2013, 11:10 AM   #63
Vendzilla
Biker Gnome
 
Vendzilla's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: cell#324
Posts: 23,200
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom_PM View Post
High incomes already pay historically low taxes. Just the facts as some people like to say. Who cares though? They're spending over half a billion dollars already on a fucking website. Lets all come together and bitch about that.
The government is collect more tax revenue than ever before

Yet they want more

Maybe spend the money more carefully first? Then talk about higher taxes

the state websites are very expensive as well as are the people hired to push it
__________________
Carbon is not the problem, it makes up 0.041% of our atmosphere , 95% of that is from Volcanos and decomposing plants and stuff. So people in the US are responsible for 13% of the carbon in the atmosphere which 95% is not from Humans, like cars and trucks and stuff and they want to spend trillions to fix it while Solar Panel plants are powered by coal plants
think about that
Vendzilla is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2013, 11:26 AM   #64
AmeliaG
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
AmeliaG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 10,563
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam View Post
The federal subsidies are based on your BUSINESS INCOME, revenues are not income (that is 10 Grade Accounting) from your Schedule C -- take the annual amount divide it by 12 -- must be 6th Grade math ...

I guess that gives you a clue on today's level of education in California ... Just as bad everywhere else really.

Wait until there is a universal healthcare in a few years, and the payroll tax (or income tax) to support it -- that will be the end result. Then there will really be something to cry about.

Universal healthcare would be awesome. Giving big pharma and insurance companies a bunch of extra money from people who can already barely put food on their tables and gas in their cars -- that is not healthcare.

I know that revenues are not income. Apparently the State of California does not know the difference. That was my point. I am telling you what the government web sites in California calculate to determine eligibility.

How exactly do you think a Federal subsidy is going to work, if a person's state does not make them eligible? If the subsidy happens after there is a Schedule C, then it is too late for someone who did not have the money for the insurance.
__________________
GFY Hall of Famer

AltStar Hall of Famer




Blue Blood's SpookyCash.com

Babe photography portfolio
AmeliaG is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2013, 11:28 AM   #65
AmeliaG
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
AmeliaG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 10,563
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam View Post
The federal subsidies are based on your BUSINESS INCOME, revenues are not income (that is 10 Grade Accounting) from your Schedule C -- take the annual amount divide it by 12 -- must be 6th Grade math ...

I guess that gives you a clue on today's level of education in California ... Just as bad everywhere else really.

Wait until there is a universal healthcare in a few years, and the payroll tax (or income tax) to support it -- that will be the end result. Then there will really be something to cry about.
Also, what wealthy school district did you go to school in that you got to take accounting classes in 10th grade?
__________________
GFY Hall of Famer

AltStar Hall of Famer




Blue Blood's SpookyCash.com

Babe photography portfolio
AmeliaG is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2013, 02:00 PM   #66
kane
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
kane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: portland, OR
Posts: 20,684
Quote:
Originally Posted by Minte View Post
Last night on NBC nightly news with Brian Williams they announced the total enrollment so far in the program.

They can all fit in Texas Stadium.
I read an article about that yesterday as well, but then I read another that had some different numbers so I'm not sure how they count them. The article said that nationwide there have been more than a million people that have applied. The point of the article is that most of those applications were from states that set up their own sites and were handling things themselves while those states that were leaving it all up to the feds were having a harder time and getting fewer applications.
kane is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2013, 02:04 PM   #67
kane
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
kane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: portland, OR
Posts: 20,684
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam View Post
And that is exactly why there will be a single payer government universal healthcare with a income tax to support it.

I agree. I think this is step one towards us ending up with a single payer style system. I don't know when that will happen, but I think it eventually will.
kane is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2013, 03:57 PM   #68
Relentless
www.EngineFood.com
 
Relentless's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 5,697
Quote:
Originally Posted by Minte View Post
Just a reminder...28% of a million dollar income is $280,000
28% of a $75,000 income is $21,000. What does the government do for those in the higher income levels to justify 10+ times more money for the identical services?
Provides roads, currency, military support, national guard, nasa, darpa, food inspection, drug inspection, clean water, clean air, the list goes on and on and on. The idea that the government could spend less or be more efficient is all fine and good. However the notion that someone who earns 21K benefits as much as someone earning 280K from the status quo is simply ridiculous.

Yes, they both breathe air, but the guy making 21K isn't going to be able to act on new technologies that come out of Darpa the way big tech firms do with things like GPS. The guy making 21K doesn't need the police and military to protect his assets, he has none. The guy making 21K is the one who is likely to be IN the military getting shot at overseas to protect the assets of the guy making 280K. The guy making 21K doesn't need a road that handles tractor-trailer traffic nearly as much as the guy who owns a factory. The guy making 21K likely has zero dollars so a reliable currency doesn't matter to him nearly as much as it does to the guy with 280K.

I wholeheartedly agree with you, those of us who are paying more in ought be afforded a level of respect for doing it. We also ought to do it without belittling someone making 21K or in dire need of help to obtain subsistence support like food stamps. If you make 1B you are getting more out of the status quo than if you make 1M. If you make 1M the status quo helps you more than if you make 100K. If you earn 21K, the last thing you want is to keep things as they are now. Even with Obamacare and every other change made in the last 100 years, the government is about protecting the status quo and preventing radical change. Wealthy people get more from that and pay more for it.


**EDIT** I mistakenly wrote "Wealthy people get more from that and pay more for it", in reality it's more accurate to say Barely Rich people get more from it and pay more for it. Wealthy people get the most from it and pay 12% or less ;)
__________________


Website Secure | Engine Food
ICQ# 266-942-896

Last edited by Relentless; 11-14-2013 at 04:02 PM..
Relentless is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2013, 04:08 PM   #69
Minte
Babemeister
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Madison
Posts: 7,081
Quote:
Originally Posted by Relentless View Post
Provides roads, currency, military support, national guard, nasa, darpa, food inspection, drug inspection, clean water, clean air, the list goes on and on and on. The idea that the government could spend less or be more efficient is all fine and good. However the notion that someone who earns 21K benefits as much as someone earning 280K from the status quo is simply ridiculous.

Yes, they both breathe air, but the guy making 21K isn't going to be able to act on new technologies that come out of Darpa the way big tech firms do with things like GPS. The guy making 21K doesn't need the police and military to protect his assets, he has none. The guy making 21K is the one who is likely to be IN the military getting shot at overseas to protect the assets of the guy making 280K. The guy making 21K doesn't need a road that handles tractor-trailer traffic nearly as much as the guy who owns a factory. The guy making 21K likely has zero dollars so a reliable currency doesn't matter to him nearly as much as it does to the guy with 280K.

I wholeheartedly agree with you, those of us who are paying more in ought be afforded a level of respect for doing it. We also ought to do it without belittling someone making 21K or in dire need of help to obtain subsistence support like food stamps. If you make 1B you are getting more out of the status quo than if you make 1M. If you make 1M the status quo helps you more than if you make 100K. If you earn 21K, the last thing you want is to keep things as they are now. Even with Obamacare and every other change made in the last 100 years, the government is about protecting the status quo and preventing radical change. Wealthy people get more from that and pay more for it.
It's a feeble justification. People who continue to cry about how unfair it is that people who are in a higher income bracket always talk about percentages. Convert those percentages to real dollars.

Is it my fault or problem that the guy down the road is a boozer and can't hold a job? He drives the same roads, calls the same police and fire department...has basic freedoms because of the same military. And now I am supposed to give him free healthcare.


Wealthy people don't get more from the system.. They EARN more from it.
__________________
You might not be as anonymous as you think you are.
Minte is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2013, 04:16 PM   #70
crockett
in a van by the river
 
crockett's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 76,806
Why is it, people that always seem to have a axe to grind against Obamacare always claim some ridiculous prices.. Yet anyone else seems to come up with very affordable numbers?
__________________
In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.
crockett is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2013, 04:20 PM   #71
iSpyCams
Amateur Gynecologist
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Medellin
Posts: 4,436
For what the website alone has cost they could have given 2 million dollars to each american man woman and child and said "pay for your own fucking health care - goodbye"
__________________
- As soon as I think up a good sig it's going here.
iSpyCams is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2013, 04:40 PM   #72
kane
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
kane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: portland, OR
Posts: 20,684
Quote:
Originally Posted by pompousjohn View Post
For what the website alone has cost they could have given 2 million dollars to each american man woman and child and said "pay for your own fucking health care - goodbye"
Your math is a little off.

The site cost around 630 million to make. There are around 317 million Americans.

This means that we each could have gotten about $2 not $2 million dollars.
kane is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2013, 04:47 PM   #73
Relentless
www.EngineFood.com
 
Relentless's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 5,697
Quote:
Originally Posted by Minte View Post
Wealthy people don't get more from the system.. They EARN more from it.
"All wealthy people get more from the system.. some earn it" would be a much more accurate slogan to go with, just as some poor people are "boozers." The majority of wealthy people would be willing to admit timing and luck play a role. The majority of poor people would be willing to admit drive and aptitude also play a role.

None of that changes the fact that those 'winning' the game get more out of the status quo than those 'losing' the game, or that government activities are mostly about securing the status quo.
__________________


Website Secure | Engine Food
ICQ# 266-942-896

Last edited by Relentless; 11-14-2013 at 04:49 PM..
Relentless is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2013, 05:00 PM   #74
Axeman
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Swamp
Posts: 5,201
Quote:
Originally Posted by kane View Post
I read an article about that yesterday as well, but then I read another that had some different numbers so I'm not sure how they count them. The article said that nationwide there have been more than a million people that have applied. The point of the article is that most of those applications were from states that set up their own sites and were handling things themselves while those states that were leaving it all up to the feds were having a harder time and getting fewer applications.
Just under 1 million people have "created" an account at the exchanges to shop/compare plans.

106,000 people have actually "selected" a plan. Though not all of them have "paid" for the plans. They have till December 15th to make payment on their plans. What % of those will follow through and pay for it? We shall see.
__________________
XXXRewards - Karups - Boyfun - Jawked. Paying on time since 1997. Contact me at brent [at] xxxrewards.com
Axeman is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2013, 05:02 PM   #75
Minte
Babemeister
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Madison
Posts: 7,081
Quote:
Originally Posted by Relentless View Post
"All wealthy people get more from the system.. some earn it" would be a much more accurate slogan to go with, just as some poor people are "boozers." The majority of wealthy people would be willing to admit timing and luck play a role. The majority of poor people would be willing to admit drive and aptitude also play a role.

None of that changes the fact that those 'winning' the game get more out of the status quo than those 'losing' the game, or that government activities are mostly about securing the status quo.
The number of billionaires in the US is what..maybe 100? So for the sake of clarity, I assume that is who you are talking about as the wealthy.
That group is so small, to spend much time considering how they look at the world is a waste of time.

It's that group under them. The 4-5 million families that are considered millionaires that I am talking about. People who go to work. Do the math on that group 4.5 million people all in that 28% bracket. Just figuring their income at a flat 1m they contribute $1,260,000,000,000.00 annually in taxes.
__________________
You might not be as anonymous as you think you are.
Minte is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2013, 06:12 PM   #76
Relentless
www.EngineFood.com
 
Relentless's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 5,697
Quote:
Originally Posted by Minte View Post
The number of billionaires in the US is what..maybe 100? So for the sake of clarity, I assume that is who you are talking about as the wealthy.
That group is so small, to spend much time considering how they look at the world is a waste of time. It's that group under them. The 4-5 million families that are considered millionaires that I am talking about. People who go to work. Do the math on that group 4.5 million people all in that 28% bracket. Just figuring their income at a flat 1m they contribute $1,260,000,000,000.00 annually in taxes.
The number of billionaires may be around 100, the number of wealthy people who did not earn their wealth through their own aptitude is much higher than that. Someone who inherits 100M and never works a day in their life is wealthy. They have everything to gain and nothing to lose. Someone who earns 100M and has it at risk on new ventures isn't in the same boat. I don't view it as simply a 'number' above or below to qualify.

You consistently underestimate the number of people who are wealthy because of luck or timing more than any drive or aptitude on their part, while grossly overestimating the number of people who are poor because they are willfully stupid, boozers or lazy. I'd agree more driven high-aptitude people are wealthy and more lazy boozers are poor, but the numbers aren't as far apart as you pretend. I've known plenty of wealthy boozers who are quite lazy, and some incredibly driven really bright poor people.

Those winning the game do get more out of the status quo. The losing pay less to keep the game going. Those facts have been true since this civilization began. We can argue how much less is fair, what benefits are within reason... But the notion that you and someone earning 21K get an equal benefit per dollar the government spends is just silly.

Last edited by Relentless; 11-14-2013 at 06:13 PM..
Relentless is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2013, 06:16 PM   #77
Relentless
www.EngineFood.com
 
Relentless's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 5,697
Incidentally, a millionaire in New York isn't even barely rich. A millionaire in Montana may be a wealthy modern day land Barron. Wealthy vs barely rich is a label more of how you earned it and whether or not you are at real risk of losing it, more than it refers to a dollar amount.
Relentless is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2013, 06:22 PM   #78
Elli
Reach for those stars!
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 17,991
Help me out here: how is this so terrible for the rich folks who already have nice insurance plans? Why are they so upset?
__________________
email: [email protected]
Elli is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2013, 06:37 PM   #79
crockett
in a van by the river
 
crockett's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 76,806
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elli View Post
Help me out here: how is this so terrible for the rich folks who already have nice insurance plans? Why are they so upset?
Because they are very bitter people whom have a very strong contempt toward social equality. There have been several studies that have shown that the more money a person has the less empathy they have toward other people. ie.. The term rich snob, didn't come about for no reason..
__________________
In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.
crockett is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2013, 06:52 PM   #80
snowpimp
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: South Lake Tahoe, CA
Posts: 1,099
It's going to be cheaper for me and way better. I'm going from a catastrophic plan only that I pay $148/month and only covers medical expenses above $5900 per year. This ensures that I don't go bankrupt in case something bad happens but I get no actual care, ER visits in Tahoe are around $600 to $1000 each time. I also pay $600/month for my asthma prescriptions so I tend to not take them since I can't afford them and suffer from constant asthma attacks.

With the government subsidies, I now qualify for a $328 plan that I only pay $103 for and I can go to the ER, receive preventative care and get prescriptions for about $20 copay for each incident. SOO MUCH BETTER!

I am very excited for the change.
__________________
HIGH QUALITY ADULT AND NON-ADULT DESIGN/MARKETING WORK SINCE 1997!!

Yan - ICQ # 4790444 - Phone: 530-544-7058

snowpimp is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2013, 07:51 PM   #81
selena
Confirmed User
 
selena's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: On The Edge
Posts: 7,994
I decided to stick with my high deductible HSA for now, and see what happens. My application is stuck or something, and I haven't had time to call them to wait on hold while they figure it out.

But going by the general stuff I saw on the site, I think I am better off paying what I have been.
__________________
~
Doer of Things at
MetArtMoney
Where Flawless Beauty Meets Art
~The MetArt Network ~
selena.delgado9
selena is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2013, 07:51 PM   #82
kane
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
kane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: portland, OR
Posts: 20,684
Quote:
Originally Posted by snowpimp View Post
It's going to be cheaper for me and way better. I'm going from a catastrophic plan only that I pay $148/month and only covers medical expenses above $5900 per year. This ensures that I don't go bankrupt in case something bad happens but I get no actual care, ER visits in Tahoe are around $600 to $1000 each time. I also pay $600/month for my asthma prescriptions so I tend to not take them since I can't afford them and suffer from constant asthma attacks.

With the government subsidies, I now qualify for a $328 plan that I only pay $103 for and I can go to the ER, receive preventative care and get prescriptions for about $20 copay for each incident. SOO MUCH BETTER!

I am very excited for the change.
I'm in the exact same boat. I also have asthma and only have a catastrophic policy that doesn't cover medicine, doctor visits or much of anything. For about the same price I will be able to get actual health insurance with a decent deductible that will cover doctors and give me a small co-pay for meds.
kane is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2013, 08:05 PM   #83
Elli
Reach for those stars!
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 17,991
Quote:
Originally Posted by crockett View Post
Because they are very bitter people whom have a very strong contempt toward social equality. There have been several studies that have shown that the more money a person has the less empathy they have toward other people. ie.. The term rich snob, didn't come about for no reason..
There has to be more to it than that, surely?
__________________
email: [email protected]
Elli is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2013, 08:35 PM   #84
Minte
Babemeister
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Madison
Posts: 7,081
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elli View Post
There has to be more to it than that, surely?
Asking crockett to explain higher income people is like asking Stevie Wonder to explain fine art.
__________________
You might not be as anonymous as you think you are.
Minte is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2013, 07:12 AM   #85
iSpyCams
Amateur Gynecologist
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Medellin
Posts: 4,436
Quote:
Originally Posted by kane View Post
Your math is a little off.

The site cost around 630 million to make. There are around 317 million Americans.

This means that we each could have gotten about $2 not $2 million dollars.
Oh shit well, I tend to fuck up zeroes sometimes. I am trying to even imagine how I fucked up that bad lol. I guess I keep a calculator on my desk for a reason, should use it.
__________________
- As soon as I think up a good sig it's going here.
iSpyCams is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2013, 07:20 AM   #86
crockett
in a van by the river
 
crockett's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 76,806
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elli View Post
There has to be more to it than that, surely?
Well yes you are probably right, it's likely a bit more than that.. If it had the name Romneycare they would likely be jumping in line to support it.
__________________
In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.
crockett is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2013, 10:47 AM   #87
Elli
Reach for those stars!
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 17,991
Quote:
Originally Posted by Minte View Post
Asking crockett to explain higher income people is like asking Stevie Wonder to explain fine art.
So how is it so detrimental to people who already have nice insurance? Why are the rich so hellfire and brimstone upset that the middle-lower classes now have a bit of a safety net? Did the taxes for the rich increase to cover the extra cost?
__________________
email: [email protected]
Elli is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2013, 10:47 AM   #88
Minte
Babemeister
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Madison
Posts: 7,081
Quote:
Originally Posted by crockett View Post
Well yes you are probably right, it's likely a bit more than that.. If it had the name Romneycare they would likely be jumping in line to support it.
But it doesn't..It's obamacare. A poorly designed product with a near pathetic execution and embarrassing release. At the end of the day, the numbers strongly suggest it will hurt more people than it will help. And if you are one the paying side of the equation you aren't happy.

How bad is it? Obama's side is turning on him now. I saw a clip on television where he looked us in the eye and told us(18 times)... You can keep your existing policy.
Obama only wanted it named after him. He clearly never read any of it. And he lied to the people over and over.
__________________
You might not be as anonymous as you think you are.
Minte is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2013, 10:53 AM   #89
Minte
Babemeister
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Madison
Posts: 7,081
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elli View Post
So how is it so detrimental to people who already have nice insurance? Why are the rich so hellfire and brimstone upset that the middle-lower classes now have a bit of a safety net? Did the taxes for the rich increase to cover the extra cost?

THe cost of that insurance has risen again. And I will say that is not unexpected. It would've risen without obamacare. But what I didn't expect was that along with the price hikes the quality of the policy went the other direction.

I can't speak for the rich. I can only speak for me. I am not against lower middle class having health insurance. I am against the way it has been designed and administrated.
And the biggest issue is the cost. It's not the lower middle class or the poor that will pay for it. It's the middle class. And when the average takehome pay has dropped yearly, prices for food and basic living expenses have increased, now was not the time to add more burden.

Keep in mind the US is over $17trillion dollars in debt. The predicted cost of obamacare of 1 trillion has risen to 2.6 trillion. I realize that these numbers are speculative, but when does the federal government ever come in ontime and under budget?
__________________
You might not be as anonymous as you think you are.
Minte is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2013, 11:04 AM   #90
Vendzilla
Biker Gnome
 
Vendzilla's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: cell#324
Posts: 23,200
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elli View Post
So how is it so detrimental to people who already have nice insurance? Why are the rich so hellfire and brimstone upset that the middle-lower classes now have a bit of a safety net? Did the taxes for the rich increase to cover the extra cost?
Didn't you get the memo, the middle class has been cancelled
__________________
Carbon is not the problem, it makes up 0.041% of our atmosphere , 95% of that is from Volcanos and decomposing plants and stuff. So people in the US are responsible for 13% of the carbon in the atmosphere which 95% is not from Humans, like cars and trucks and stuff and they want to spend trillions to fix it while Solar Panel plants are powered by coal plants
think about that
Vendzilla is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2013, 11:14 AM   #91
arock10
Confirmed User
 
arock10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,218
Quote:
Originally Posted by pompousjohn View Post
Oh shit well, I tend to fuck up zeroes sometimes. I am trying to even imagine how I fucked up that bad lol. I guess I keep a calculator on my desk for a reason, should use it.
It is funny, I have seen numerous people say the exact same kind of thing. "Would've been easier to just give everyone $1mil"
It is almost like they read this somewhere and didn't bother to think for themselves....


also you dont need a fucking calculator to know 600million / 300 million = $2
__________________
Sup
arock10 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2013, 11:14 AM   #92
bronco67
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
bronco67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 29,032
Quote:
Originally Posted by Relentless View Post
The number of billionaires may be around 100, the number of wealthy people who did not earn their wealth through their own aptitude is much higher than that. Someone who inherits 100M and never works a day in their life is wealthy. They have everything to gain and nothing to lose. Someone who earns 100M and has it at risk on new ventures isn't in the same boat. I don't view it as simply a 'number' above or below to qualify.

You consistently underestimate the number of people who are wealthy because of luck or timing more than any drive or aptitude on their part, while grossly overestimating the number of people who are poor because they are willfully stupid, boozers or lazy. I'd agree more driven high-aptitude people are wealthy and more lazy boozers are poor, but the numbers aren't as far apart as you pretend. I've known plenty of wealthy boozers who are quite lazy, and some incredibly driven really bright poor people.

Those winning the game do get more out of the status quo. The losing pay less to keep the game going. Those facts have been true since this civilization began. We can argue how much less is fair, what benefits are within reason... But the notion that you and someone earning 21K get an equal benefit per dollar the government spends is just silly.
I'd definitely agree that just because you work hard, its not a guarantee of success. It's definitely a component, but there's so many other variables like timing and connections. Most people who have worked hard and have made lots of money might be hesitant to say they also had outside help, or knew the right people, or got lucky on some things. Or maybe they never factored that into the equation.
__________________
bronco67 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2013, 11:16 AM   #93
mikesouth
Confirmed User
 
mikesouth's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: My High Horse
Posts: 6,334
AmeliaG

Im really not looking at thios as a Republican or a Democrat thing...Im taking the pragmatic view, We have decided, like it or not that healthcare is a right, if you wander into a hospital because you drank too much beer and rode your Harley into ditch and broke your neck and you have neither cash, credit or insurance we will treat you, at the expense of the taxpayers, we wont just let you die, or suffer. Because of that it has to be paid for by someone (meaning all of us taxpayers)

Now pragmatically speaking yes this is romneycare, the whole thing is just the first step to Universal Healthcare because they couldn't pass that one ...and thats what the insurance companies, big pharma and torte lawyers better understand....This is the last country on earth with money that health insurance companies can gouge....so if the want to stay at the trough they better not fuck it up or the next step is eventually Universal healthcare
__________________
Mike South

It's No wonder I took up drugs and alcohol, it's the only way I could dumb myself down enough to cope with the morons in this biz.
mikesouth is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2013, 11:17 AM   #94
arock10
Confirmed User
 
arock10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,218
Quote:
Originally Posted by Minte View Post
THe cost of that insurance has risen again. And I will say that is not unexpected. It would've risen without obamacare. But what I didn't expect was that along with the price hikes the quality of the policy went the other direction.

I can't speak for the rich. I can only speak for me. I am not against lower middle class having health insurance. I am against the way it has been designed and administrated.
And the biggest issue is the cost. It's not the lower middle class or the poor that will pay for it. It's the middle class. And when the average takehome pay has dropped yearly, prices for food and basic living expenses have increased, now was not the time to add more burden.

Keep in mind the US is over $17trillion dollars in debt. The predicted cost of obamacare of 1 trillion has risen to 2.6 trillion. I realize that these numbers are speculative, but when does the federal government ever come in ontime and under budget?
The lower middle class sure had a good thing going with the whole "get sick and die/go bankrupt cause of no health insurance" thing...
__________________
Sup
arock10 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2013, 11:24 AM   #95
Minte
Babemeister
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Madison
Posts: 7,081
Quote:
Originally Posted by arock10 View Post
The lower middle class sure had a good thing going with the whole "get sick and die/go bankrupt cause of no health insurance" thing...
They would continue to do what they do today. Go to an emergency room for treatment.
And if they are able, work out a payment schedule with the hospital or clinic.


What's the plan for healthcare for the 6+ million illegal aliens currently in the uS?
__________________
You might not be as anonymous as you think you are.
Minte is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2013, 11:27 AM   #96
Minte
Babemeister
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Madison
Posts: 7,081
Quote:
Originally Posted by bronco67 View Post
I'd definitely agree that just because you work hard, its not a guarantee of success. It's definitely a component, but there's so many other variables like timing and connections. Most people who have worked hard and have made lots of money might be hesitant to say they also had outside help, or knew the right people, or got lucky on some things. Or maybe they never factored that into the equation.
I don't know a single business person that hasn't said they've had some damn good luck and great timing in their careers. I certainly have had both. I have also had a great banker, attorney and CPA that I talk to all the time to help me guide my company.

in addition.. all my advisors that I listen to are private sector. I have met with state and federal SBA people and to date have not taken any of them up on anything they have to say or offer. The government programs are far to complicated to deal with.
__________________
You might not be as anonymous as you think you are.

Last edited by Minte; 11-15-2013 at 11:30 AM..
Minte is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2013, 11:30 AM   #97
Relentless
www.EngineFood.com
 
Relentless's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 5,697
As long as we attempt to fix one part of the system rather than reboot the whole thing, we will always have messy results that take time to improve. Passing new laws that create a single payer system, institute a national sales tax, reduce and flatten the income tax, remove all personal tax loopholes, provide true banking reform, cut our military spending by 25% and so on in a single year... or single decade is unrealistic. However, if those things did all happen we would be in a much better place than we are today across the board.

The last reboot of that magnitude was the New Deal, which required the Great Depression to gain muster. Hopefully we don't have to sink that low to rise up again.
__________________


Website Secure | Engine Food
ICQ# 266-942-896
Relentless is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2013, 11:41 AM   #98
Minte
Babemeister
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Madison
Posts: 7,081
Quote:
Originally Posted by Relentless View Post
As long as we attempt to fix one part of the system rather than reboot the whole thing, we will always have messy results that take time to improve. Passing new laws that create a single payer system, institute a national sales tax, reduce and flatten the income tax, remove all personal tax loopholes, provide true banking reform, cut our military spending by 25% and so on in a single year... or single decade is unrealistic. However, if those things did all happen we would be in a much better place than we are today across the board.

The last reboot of that magnitude was the New Deal, which required the Great Depression to gain muster. Hopefully we don't have to sink that low to rise up again.
You hit the nail squarely on the head. This is why so many nonliberals are very unhappy with obama and obamacare. None of the things you list were even discussed.

All they wanted was to raise taxes on the wealthy. which in turn raises costs for all the classes. Who reading this doesn't think that the people paying the higher taxes simply won't raise their prices to the ultimate consumer..
__________________
You might not be as anonymous as you think you are.
Minte is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2013, 11:43 AM   #99
Joshua G
dumb libs love censorship
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,198
Quote:
Originally Posted by Relentless View Post
As long as we attempt to fix one part of the system rather than reboot the whole thing, we will always have messy results that take time to improve. Passing new laws that create a single payer system, institute a national sales tax, reduce and flatten the income tax, remove all personal tax loopholes, provide true banking reform, cut our military spending by 25% and so on in a single year... or single decade is unrealistic. However, if those things did all happen we would be in a much better place than we are today across the board.

The last reboot of that magnitude was the New Deal, which required the Great Depression to gain muster. Hopefully we don't have to sink that low to rise up again.
i am with you on every word you said. Im afraid however the government will need to go hopelessly bankrupt before such reforms can even get to the table.
Joshua G is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2013, 12:06 PM   #100
2012
So Fucking What
 
2012's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 17,189
Quote:
Originally Posted by Relentless View Post
The last reboot of that magnitude was the New Deal, which required the Great Depression to gain muster. Hopefully we don't have to sink that low to rise up again.
we're broke. raperoomcare just accelerates us into a collapse not before funnelling shit loads of $$$ to foreign banks. that's the idea. that's the plan, what gave you the idea somebody gave a fuck about you and your health. during the great depression people where self-sufficient. what are they now ? where's my iphone dildo *we *are *fucked
__________________
best host: Webair | best sponsor: Kink | best coder: 688218966 | Go Fuck Yourself
2012 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Post New Thread Reply
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >

Bookmarks



Advertising inquiries - marketing at gfy dot com

Contact Admin - Advertise - GFY Rules - Top

©2000-, AI Media Network Inc



Powered by vBulletin
Copyright © 2000- Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.