How To Cure Cancer - Page 2 - GoFuckYourself.com

SilentKnight · 06-21-2015, 09:17 AM

While we're on the topic - anyone know the specific details of what method Eddie Van Halen used to cure his tongue cancer? He used no chemo or radiation.

I listened to his interview on Howard Stern, but he refused to give specifics because the method was apparently "illegal" (in North America, at least). Eddie funded a clinic with a partner in upstate New York that does cancer research and therapy.

Interesting interview on YT from 9 yrs ago.

fiddy cancer cells

TheSquealer · 06-21-2015, 09:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wehateporn

I'm the only one here who reads through scientific studies as a hobby, keep that in mind

You are not qualified to have a medical opinion on anything
You are not qualified to give medical advice
You are not a scientist and not even qualified to draw conclusions from a study
You are not a medical professional who specializes in the field of the studies
You are not a doctor
You have no education in medicine
You have no understanding of basic anatomy and physiology, much less the complex biochemistry of the body

and the list goes on and on and on and on.

You clearly need help but conveniently, like most schizphrenics you've rationalized that the only people who could help you are the enemy, are against you, will only hurt you etc.

TheSquealer · 06-21-2015, 09:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wehateporn

He kept himself alive with natural cures, he was meant to be dead a long time earlier, with conventional treatments he would have been lucky to last 2 years

You keep forgetting that not many people survive over 5 years with conventional treatment, for some reason you think conventional treatments actually keep people alive indefinitely, Chemo and Radiotherapy are both clear failures

He couldn't cure his cancer "naturally".

He wanted to.

He tried.

He could have easily been saved as his cancer was detected at the earliest possible time.

He ignored all medical advice.

He then later started heading medical advice it when it was too late.

He had organ transplants (apparently trusting those lying doctors and big pharma propaganda)

He then died unnecessarily.

Thanks.

Got it.

That was my point.

TheSquealer · 06-21-2015, 09:35 AM

And... there are many many types of cancer that work inn different ways. You keep saying "cancer" which in itself demonstrates how completely ignorant you are of the topic.

Further, most are now treatable

And most importantly, risk for most cancer types, comes down largely to diet, exercise and stress management - which you never mention because you are clueless.

wehateporn · 06-21-2015, 12:09 PM

TheSquealer you've 100% given away that you're trolling so I won't keep feeding you.

TheSquealer · 06-21-2015, 12:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wehateporn

TheSquealer you've 100% given away that you're trolling so I won't keep feeding you.

Smart move dumbass.

Sly · 06-21-2015, 12:22 PM

Which natural remedies cure leukemia?

I know several people that had leukemia (family included) that have essentially been cured using modern medicine. These are cases that are 22+ years old.

wehateporn · 06-21-2015, 01:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sly

Which natural remedies cure leukemia?

I know several people that had leukemia (family included) that have essentially been cured using modern medicine. These are cases that are 22+ years old.

Treatments here Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) - Cancer Tutor

Here's how modern medicine gets on, these are the dead within 5 years %'s

wehateporn · 06-21-2015, 01:20 PM

He had some of his tongue removed and went down the natural route, he doesn't want to get his doctor struck off so he's got to keep it quiet, Big Pharma make it illegal for doctors not do use the mainstream techniques, this is another dirty trick they play, keeping your doctor as a puppet on a string

Quote:

Originally Posted by SilentKnight

While we're on the topic - anyone know the specific details of what method Eddie Van Halen used to cure his tongue cancer? He used no chemo or radiation.

I listened to his interview on Howard Stern, but he refused to give specifics because the method was apparently "illegal" (in North America, at least). Eddie funded a clinic with a partner in upstate New York that does cancer research and therapy.

Interesting interview on YT from 9 yrs ago.

fiddy cancer cells

CaptainHowdy · 06-21-2015, 04:42 PM

"If theory could cure"...

TheSquealer · 06-21-2015, 04:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wehateporn

He had some of his tongue removed and went down the natural route, he doesn't want to get his doctor struck off so he's got to keep it quiet, Big Pharma make it illegal for doctors not do use the mainstream techniques, this is another dirty trick they play, keeping your doctor as a puppet on a string

So, he immediately resorted to traditional medicine and has the cancer removed. Once it was removed, he "went the natural route"?

You're a funny guy.

MaDalton · 06-21-2015, 04:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wehateporn

Treatments here Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) - Cancer Tutor

Here's how modern medicine gets on, these are the dead within 5 years %'s

so what - 50 years ago probably 100% of all of them would have been dead within 5 years

now show me your stats to all these types of cancer and how the survival rates are for people that treated their cancer with Vitamin C and fasting

wehateporn · 06-21-2015, 04:56 PM

As stated, he avoided the conventional chemo and radiotherapy, went natural instead

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSquealer

So, he immediately resorted to traditional medicine and has the cancer removed. Once it was removed, he "went the natural route"?

You're a funny guy.

wehateporn · 06-21-2015, 05:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MaDalton

so what - 50 years ago probably 100% of all of them would have been dead within 5 years

now show me your stats to all these types of cancer and how the survival rates are for people that treated their cancer with Vitamin C and fasting

Depends on the Cancer, some survival rates have improved a lot, others not so much. We have to be careful though, Breast Cancer for example has a lot of false positive detections, so you end up with perfectly healthy people being treated, thereby making the survival rates look better than the reality. Another problem is that because we are detecting the Cancers earlier then the date the survival length starts from is automatically earlier than it would have been previously with a late detection.

The big problem is that Cancer rates are going up, all the vaccines have warnings on them that they are Carcinogenic, X-Rays are Carcinogenic, we're being put on pills that are known to increase Cancer rates, Chemo is Carcinogenic, Radiotherapy is Carcinogenic, Monsanto Round-Up which gets into the food supply is Carcinogenic, the list goes on and on.

Big Pharma are not interested in studying anything which they cannot patent, so you won't be given any official statistics for Vitamin C

TheSquealer · 06-21-2015, 05:07 PM

Yeah, he went natural by removing the cancer from his body through a conventional surgery/treatment.

Then he didn't have cancer anymore

You are clearly not a genius

wehateporn · 06-21-2015, 05:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSquealer

Yeah, he went natural by removing the cancer from his body through a conventional surgery/treatment.

Then he didn't have cancer anymore

You are clearly not a genius

There was no poisoning involved

wehateporn · 06-21-2015, 05:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MaDalton

so what - 50 years ago probably 100% of all of them would have been dead within 5 years

Here's 1975 compared to 2007, as you can see the situation is not changing much, this because the goal posts are in the wrong place, it's not in the interest of Big Pharma to cure Cancer, they would be shooting their industry in the feet.

"In 1975, the incidence rate for all cancers combined in the United States was 400 new cases for every 100,000 people in the population; the mortality rate was 199 deaths for every 100,000 persons. "

"In 2007, the latest year for which we have updated statistics, the U.S. incidence rate for all cancers combined was 461 new cases diagnosed for every 100,000 people in the population; the mortality rate was 178 deaths for every 100,000 persons."

TheSquealer · 06-21-2015, 05:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wehateporn

There was no poisoning involved

There was no natural cure involved dipshit.

MaDalton · 06-21-2015, 05:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wehateporn

Here's 1975 compared to 2007, as you can see the situation is not changing much, this because the goal posts are in the wrong place, it's not in the interest of Big Pharma to cure Cancer, they would be shooting their industry in the feet.

"In 1975, the incidence rate for all cancers combined in the United States was 400 new cases for every 100,000 people in the population; the mortality rate was 199 deaths for every 100,000 persons. "

"In 2007, the latest year for which we have updated statistics, the U.S. incidence rate for all cancers combined was 461 new cases diagnosed for every 100,000 people in the population; the mortality rate was 178 deaths for every 100,000 persons."

nice how you leave out things that don't suit your agenda

Quote:

Although the incidence rate in 2007 was higher than that in 1975, the increase is largely attributed to earlier diagnosis and aging of the population. This rate has been declining since 1992, when cancer incidence peaked at 510 new cases for every 100,000 people. Similarly, cancer death rates have been declining since 1991, when they peaked at 215 deaths for every 100,000 people.

but that's a common thing for whackjobs like you and your pseudo science

overdose · 06-21-2015, 05:54 PM

marijuana.

ghjghj · 06-21-2015, 08:25 PM

Babylon.

wehateporn · 06-24-2015, 02:38 PM

The contribution of cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adult malignancies.

The contribution of cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adult malignancies. - PubMed - NCBI

Conclusion:

"As the 5-year relative survival rate for cancer in Australia is now over 60%, it is clear that cytotoxic chemotherapy only makes a minor contribution to cancer survival. To justify the continued funding and availability of drugs used in cytotoxic chemotherapy, a rigorous evaluation of the cost-effectiveness and impact on quality of life is urgently required."

NewNick · 06-24-2015, 02:50 PM

I used to get angry and respond to this turd and his bullshit.

Now I have wised up.

I realised you cannot defeat a simpleton with logic.

However I do dispair at the damage that he causes.

Free speece is not all it is cracked up to be.

TheSquealer · 06-24-2015, 03:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wehateporn

The contribution of cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adult malignancies.

The contribution of cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adult malignancies. - PubMed - NCBI

Conclusion:

"As the 5-year relative survival rate for cancer in Australia is now over 60%, it is clear that cytotoxic chemotherapy only makes a minor contribution to cancer survival. To justify the continued funding and availability of drugs used in cytotoxic chemotherapy, a rigorous evaluation of the cost-effectiveness and impact on quality of life is urgently required."

And the survival rate is now over 60% because of modern, traditional medicine. And it simply raises the question "now that we have radically improved survival rates, through a variety of means, we need to look at aggressive treatments and their use.

Thank you.

More and more wins for traditional medicine.

I am assuming you are so fucking stupid you see suffix's like "toxic" or terms like "justify their continued use" and cinch up your tinfoil hat because you have no clue what you are reading.

06-21-2015, 09:35 AM	#54
TheSquealer BANNED Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: In Your Head Posts: 25,094	And... there are many many types of cancer that work inn different ways. You keep saying "cancer" which in itself demonstrates how completely ignorant you are of the topic. Further, most are now treatable And most importantly, risk for most cancer types, comes down largely to diet, exercise and stress management - which you never mention because you are clueless. __________________ . Yes, fewer illegal immigrants working equates to more job opportunities for American citizens. Rochard

06-21-2015, 12:09 PM	#55
wehateporn Promoting Debate on GFY Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 27,173	TheSquealer you've 100% given away that you're trolling so I won't keep feeding you. __________________ Sexy Girls Teasing

06-21-2015, 12:22 PM	#57
Sly Let's do some business! Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Austin, TX Posts: 31,293	Which natural remedies cure leukemia? I know several people that had leukemia (family included) that have essentially been cured using modern medicine. These are cases that are 22+ years old. __________________ Vacares - Web Hosting, Domains, O365, Security & More - Paxum and BTC Accepted Windows VPS now available - just $50/mo Wanted: CCBill pay sites for sale

06-21-2015, 04:42 PM	#60
CaptainHowdy Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Happy in the dark. Posts: 93,082	"If theory could cure"... __________________ FLASH SALE INSANITY! deal with a 100% Trusted Seller Buy Traffic Spots on a High-Quality Network 1 Year or Lifetime — That’s Right, Until the Internet Explodes!

06-24-2015, 02:38 PM	#72
wehateporn Promoting Debate on GFY Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 27,173	The contribution of cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adult malignancies. The contribution of cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adult malignancies. - PubMed - NCBI Conclusion: "As the 5-year relative survival rate for cancer in Australia is now over 60%, it is clear that cytotoxic chemotherapy only makes a minor contribution to cancer survival. To justify the continued funding and availability of drugs used in cytotoxic chemotherapy, a rigorous evaluation of the cost-effectiveness and impact on quality of life is urgently required." __________________ Sexy Girls Teasing

06-21-2015, 09:17 AM	#51
SilentKnight Megan Fox's fluffer Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: shooting pool in Elysium Posts: 24,818	While we're on the topic - anyone know the specific details of what method Eddie Van Halen used to cure his tongue cancer? He used no chemo or radiation. I listened to his interview on Howard Stern, but he refused to give specifics because the method was apparently "illegal" (in North America, at least). Eddie funded a clinic with a partner in upstate New York that does cancer research and therapy. Interesting interview on YT from 9 yrs ago. fiddy cancer cells

06-21-2015, 05:07 PM	#65
TheSquealer BANNED Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: In Your Head Posts: 25,094	Yeah, he went natural by removing the cancer from his body through a conventional surgery/treatment. Then he didn't have cancer anymore You are clearly not a genius

06-21-2015, 05:54 PM	#70
overdose So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2012 Posts: 358	marijuana.

06-21-2015, 08:25 PM	#71
ghjghj So Fucking Banned Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 3,770	Babylon.

06-24-2015, 02:50 PM	#73
NewNick Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 7,033	I used to get angry and respond to this turd and his bullshit. Now I have wised up. I realised you cannot defeat a simpleton with logic. However I do dispair at the damage that he causes. Free speece is not all it is cracked up to be. __________________ "Americas Hitler" JD Vance. “There isn’t really an upside to Trump.” Tucker Carlson. “a convicted felon rapist is now your president” OneHungLow, gfy.com