News SpaceX's Falcon 9 rocket explodes on launch

[Barry-xlovecam]

Rocket science is hard

A SpaceX Rocket Just Exploded in Mid-Air

[Bladewire]

Damn that sucks

[SilentKnight]

Musk needs to hire some of the rocket scientists here on GFY.

[just a punk]

This:



No single fatal accident since its first launch in 1966. The 1st world technology rules.

[dyna mo]

Originally Posted by CyberSEO

This:



No single fatal accident since its first launch in 1966. 1st world technology rules.

when you dumbfuckwads start trying to land a rocket like SPaceX, let us know.

[just a punk]

Originally Posted by dyna mo

when you dumbfuckwads start trying to land a rocket like SPaceX, let us know.

Rickert is not intended to land. It's made for a launch, idiot. Go back to school already, clown.

[crockett]

Originally Posted by CyberSEO

This:



No single fatal accident since its first launch in 1966. The 1st world technology rules.

We are talking about a private company here, not a govt space program.. Seriously dude EVERYTHING doesn't have to be about comparing fucking Russia to everything.. You brainwashed tool.

[dyna mo]

Originally Posted by CyberSEO

Rickert is not intended to land. It's made for a launch, idiot. Go back to school already, clown.

you dumbmother fucker, this thread is about SPaceX Falcon 9, which is a fucking rocket that is intended to land. in fucking fact, this launch was launched to test the landing. jtfc,

try and keep up with shit, i know you're stupid, anti-American, drunk and fall for Ruskie propaganda, so really, just gofuckyourself.

[crockett]

Originally Posted by dyna mo

you dumbmother fucker, this thread is about SPaceX Falcon 9, which is a fucking rocket that is intended to land. in fucking fact, this launch was launched to test the landing. jtfc,

try and keep up with shit, i know you're stupid, anti-American, drunk and fall for Ruskie propaganda, so really, just gofuckyourself.

He doesn't know how to recycle.. Russians only made one reusable space craft and it was those dilapidated Space Shuttle clones, which they launched one time and threw it in the trash anyway.

[SekobA]

what a waste and big lose

[L-Pink]

Originally Posted by SilentKnight

Musk needs to hire some of the rocket scientists here on GFY.

[L-Pink]

Originally Posted by CyberSEO

Rickert is not intended to land. It's made for a launch, idiot. Go back to school already, clown.

What's up Sputnik? How many rubles per anti-American post do you get?

[2MuchMark]

Originally Posted by SilentKnight

Musk needs to hire some of the rocket scientists here on GFY.

[just a punk]

Originally Posted by L-Pink

What's up Sputnik? How many rubles per anti-American post do you get?

The "sputinik" is ok. Every single cargo sent with Soyuz is ok and it is does not end up like 3rd-world parcels like those:





Why? Because you have a long way to be called a first world country. 100- or 1000 years and you can join our club ;)

P.S.Won't post to this thread anymore. It's dedicated to those US people who decided they could get to the outer space without Russian technologies. Such naive guys... RIP

[dyna mo]

I'm glad that all russians are not like the POS ruskie who just posted those pics.

[just a punk]

Originally Posted by dyna mo

I'm glad that all russians are not like the POS ruskie who just posted those pics.

What's wrong with those pics, clown? Are they staged or that? Maybe the US technology is not good enough to safely send people to the orbit? That's your taxes and that's your problem. Think on it.

[dyna mo]

Originally Posted by CyberSEO

P.S.Won't post to this thread anymore.

it's very clear to everyone except you who the fucking clown is.

[just a punk]

Originally Posted by dyna mo

it's very clear to everyone except you who the fucking clown is.

"Everyone" is you, right, babe? High taxes, no free medicine, no free education, the world's highest national debt, most prisoners per capita and police shooting 500-1000 civilians every year. Congrats on that, idiot! )) And yes, I won't post to his thread anymore, loser.

[blackmonsters]

[SilentKnight]

Originally Posted by CyberSEO

and it is does not end up like 3rd-world parcels like those:

You're right. Soviet ships don't not end up like U.S. shuttles.

Good job.

[dyna mo]

Originally Posted by CyberSEO

"Everyone" is you, right, babe? High taxes, no free medicine, no free education, the world's highest national debt, most prisoners per capita and police shooting 500-1000 civilians every year. Congrats on that, idiot! )) And yes, I won't post to his thread anymore, loser.

it's a thread about a company trying to figure out how to land a fucking rocket and you think it's an opportunity to continue your piece of shit antiUSA agenda.

you are simply a drunk piece of shit, vomiting on yourself while you flounder in a gutter pointing your pos finger at the rest of us walking by looking down at you.

what a fucking joke.

[Mr Pheer]

Those poor sputnik shuttles, they dont end up in museums like ours because they never actually did anything.

[Relic]

That was a good satellite.

[just a punk]

Originally Posted by Mr Pheer

Those poor sputnik shuttles, they dont end up in museums like ours because they never actually did anything

Poor or cheap, who really cares? How many people were killed by Russian shuttles? Zero? Now go count your loses, clown. FYI: high-tech is not just a term ;)

P.S. How many "astronauts" were sent to the outer space with the US "tech" during thins year? 2014 or 2013 maybe? LOL @ you, redneck ))))))))

Oh, I've posted to the loser thread again? Uh... )))))))))))

[dyna mo]

Originally Posted by CyberSEO

How many people were killed by Russian shuttles? Zero? )

how many people have been killed over the years in ruskie space projects is a ruskie state secret. your government sweeps that shit under the rug and has for fucking decades, you stupid fucking joke.

[crockett]

Originally Posted by CyberSEO

"Everyone" is you, right, babe? High taxes, no free medicine, no free education, the world's highest national debt, most prisoners per capita and police shooting 500-1000 civilians every year. Congrats on that, idiot! )) And yes, I won't post to his thread anymore, loser.

Since you are such an expert in Russian technology and being better than American technolgy.. Can you please tell us why you Russians can't manage to keep your submarines off the bottom of the ocean?

[dyna mo]

what a stupid piece of shit ruskie. we have a reusable shuttle program that lasted 30 fucking years and due to the extreme complexity leading-edge tech of a huge massive program, we certainly experienced tragedy. next, we're trying to sort out how to land a rocket.

meanwhile fuckwad ruskie talks shit while ruskie shuttles are covered in bird shit not ever achieving anything more than a test flight.

[SilentKnight]

Originally Posted by dyna mo

what a stupid piece of shit ruskie. we have a reusable shuttle program that lasted 30 fucking years and due to the extreme complexity leading-edge tech of a huge massive program, we certainly experienced tragedy. next, we're trying to sort out how to land a rocket.

meanwhile fuckwad ruskie talks shit while ruskie shuttles are covered in bird shit not ever achieving anything more than a test flight.

[SilentKnight]

To be fair - Russia has been very busy aside from their space program.

[clickity click]

Originally Posted by dyna mo

what a stupid piece of shit ruskie. we have a reusable shuttle program that lasted 30 fucking years and due to the extreme complexity leading-edge tech of a huge massive program, we certainly experienced tragedy. next, we're trying to sort out how to land a rocket.

meanwhile fuckwad ruskie talks shit while ruskie shuttles are covered in bird shit not ever achieving anything more than a test flight.

You need to learn how to take off first. Best not walk till you can run.

[Mr Pheer]

Today's launch failure was the first in 19 launches for Space-X. Pretty good record so far.

Hey SputnikSEO how many of Russia's launches fail?

[dyna mo]

Originally Posted by SilentKnight

Musk needs to hire some of the rocket scientists here on GFY.

Originally Posted by clickity click

You need to learn how to take off first. Best not walk till you can run.

fire off your resume, dr brainiac. I'm sure SpaceX needs more deep thinkers like yourself.

[SilentKnight]

Originally Posted by dyna mo

fire off your resume, dr brainiac. I'm sure SpaceX needs more deep thinkers like yourself.

"Dammit, Jim...I'm a pornographer...not a rocket man."

[dyna mo]

Originally Posted by SilentKnight

"Dammit, Jim...I'm a pornographer...not a rocket man."

i'm sure you know that wasn't pointed at you!

[SilentKnight]

Originally Posted by dyna mo

i'm sure you know that wasn't pointed at you!

I knew...just always wanted to say that phrase in context.

[MPGdevil]

A pair of HoloLenses went up in flames. May they rest in peace.

[just a punk]

Originally Posted by L-Pink

What's up Sputnik? How many rubles per anti-American post do you get?

Hi Rambo. Haven't you hear anything about freedom of speech? Ah, I forgot... you are the US citizen and you have no idea how does it work. Sorry for you... (

P.S. How stating a fact that Russian "Soyuz" rockets have never killed a single cosmonaut/astronaut makes my post anti-American? Check your brain dude, because you are really mad.

[Mr Pheer]

That Russian launch in April sure was a fucking success, wasnt it?

[Mr Pheer]

Originally Posted by CyberSEO

The "sputinik" is ok. Every single cargo sent with Soyuz is ok

Russian Progress M-27M lost in space | NASASpaceFlight.com

[Mr Pheer]

Originally Posted by CyberSEO

Poor or cheap, who really cares? How many people were killed by Russian shuttles? Zero? Now go count your loses, clown. FYI: high-tech is not just a term ;)

You bunch of drunks had the first fatality ever in the history of spaceflight. Congrats!

[Mr Pheer]

At first, SputnikSEO was like:

Originally Posted by SputnikSEO

P.S.Won't post to this thread anymore. Blah blah blah...(

And then...

Originally Posted by SputnikSEO

What's wrong with those pics, clown? Blah blah blah...

And yes, I won't post to his thread anymore, loser.

And then, shorty after...

Originally Posted by SputnikSEO

Poor or cheap Blah blah blah...

Oh, I've posted to the loser thread again? Uh... )))))))))))

LOL, he's fucking back!

Originally Posted by SputnikSEO

Hi Rambo. Haven't you hear anything about freedom of speech? Blah blah blah...

Nobody here takes you seriously, Sputnik!

[just a punk]

According to the number of your posts. You are just obsessed with me. Get a life already, clown

Originally Posted by Mr Pheer

Russian Progress M-27M lost in space | NASASpaceFlight.com

Are you an idiot? Really? I was talking about "Soyuz" rockets. "Progress" has never been used to send a single human into space. Where did you get your "education"? Ah, you may not answer. I guess I know where... )))))))))))))))))

[woj]

CyberSeo,

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nedelin_catastrophe

100 die during a rocket test... and you guys hid it for decades... so your official stats don't mean shit...

[just a punk]

Originally Posted by woj

CyberSeo,

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nedelin_catastrophe

100 die during a rocket test... and you guys hid it for decades... so your official stats don't mean shit...

1) That was a diversion (an explosion during the fueling procedure - not a test of course). So that's not a catastrophe during the launch and that doesn't hurt Russian tech somehow. Everything can be blown up by a terrorist, even the NYC Twins... That doesn't mean they (the Twins) had some lacks in construction. That means your secret service has failed. The same thing has happened in the USSR on 24 October 1960.
2) How many cosmonauts/astronauts among those who died?
3) Was that rocket used at lest once?
4) How does it relate to "Soyuz" rocket - the only rocket used buy the USSR and Russia to send humans from around the globe to the space?

Please don't use the terrorist act as a an example of bad tech. In other words, don't try to play David Copperfield. That's not yours, man.

[woj]

Is this the same Soyuz rocket that never fails? ->

"The Russian space agency, Roscosmos, determined that the most likely cause of the failure was contamination in the rocket’s fuel lines or stabilizer valve, which caused low fuel supply to the gas generator, Gerstenmaier told lawmakers Oct. 12 during a hearing of the House Science, Space and Technology Committee’s space and aeronautics panel.

The accident occurred when the robotic Progress 44 cargo spacecraft crashed in Siberia after its Soyuz rocket failed shortly after liftoff. The craft and its 2.9 tons of supplies for the space station were lost."

NASA Confirms Russian Soyuz Failure Findings | Progress 44 Soyuz Rocket Accident | Russian Space Agency Investigation

[_Richard_]

just think of how far we would have gotten if both sides were helping each other rather than having a 'my dick is bigger than yours' contest

guess we'll never know, but considering the ISS, easy to make a few guesses

[just a punk]

Originally Posted by woj

Is this the same Soyuz rocket that never fails?

It does. But since it's Russia (not the US of A), we have a catapult for the capsule with humans. At least one "Soyuz" has really blown up during the lift off, but both cosmonauts are still alive because they were saved by the catapulting system. Hint: your shuttles had never have one, so the US astronauts were doomed by default.

Watch this:

[just a punk]

Ah I forgot to add something about catapulting systems. When "Challenger" has blown up, some of the US astronauts have died because... they hit the water. So they were alive all the time after the explosion. If it was Soviet "Buran", nobody would die, because "Buran" shuttles were equipped with catapults to save the crew in situations, similar to the one happened to "Challenger". Almost the same year, but different country and different level of technology.

P.S. A note for the Florida clown. This is not an anti-American post. No way! This is a small historical course for guys like you, whose parents were too poor to pay for your education. Thanks god, there is Wikipedia and you can finally educate yourself and get up to the basic level.

[TimS]

Soyuz 1 dooms cosmonaut: The first fatal accident in a space mission befell Soviet cosmonaut Vladimir Komarov, whose problem-plagued Soyuz 1 capsule crashed onto Russian soil in 1967. 'Gravity' and Reality: History's Worst Space Disasters

Deaths in space: The Soviet space program also suffered the first, and so-far only, deaths in space in 1971, when cosmonauts Georgi Dobrovolski, Viktor Patsayev, Vladislav Volkov died while returning to Earth from the Salyut 1 space station. Their Soyuz 11 craft performed a textbook-perfect landing in 1971. So recovery teams were appalled to find the three-man crew sitting dead in their couches, with dark-blue splotches on their faces and blood dripping from their ears and noses.

An investigation showed that a breathing ventilation valve had ruptured, asphyxiating the cosmonauts. The resulting drop in pressure also exposed the crew to the vacuum of space ? the only human beings to ever experience such a fate

[just a punk]

Originally Posted by TimS

Soyuz 1 dooms cosmonaut: The first fatal accident in a space mission befell Soviet cosmonaut Vladimir Komarov, whose problem-plagued Soyuz 1 capsule crashed onto Russian soil in 1967

A new clown at this board. Welcome to GFY, BTW. The problem with landing parachute has no relation to the Russian rockets. You must be a real idiot and I don't know why your parents have no money for a rubber. Born in a ghetto? Imbecile.

Once again: "Soyuz" is the only rocket we use to send humans to the outer space (ours, yours and any others, including commercial tourists). We have more launches than all humanity together, and one one single person has died during the launch. That's a fact. Period.