Tech One reason the Tubes do so well in search - Page 2 - GoFuckYourself.com

CurrentlySober · 05-18-2016, 05:11 AM

Fiddy reasons the Tubes do so well in search...

& i like poo...

Why · 05-19-2016, 10:51 AM

is this post from 2008? this is all really old, basic SEO knowledge. and non-seo friendly URLs rank just fine as long as they arent changing... google is smart enough to know any route can change at any time.

Bladewire · 05-19-2016, 11:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PornWorx

Ugh...blah blah blah blah blah blah blah...blah blah blah. Blah? Blah!!!

freecartoonporn · 05-19-2016, 12:53 PM

youtubew uses ugly urls, pornhub uses ugly urls.,
yet both are top sites.
many big site using ugly urls., it doesnt matter , if user likes the site, google can sense it and favors the site./

one more thing i learned hard way, is dont give google a fucking sitemap., keep pages interlinked, and let the google bot find internal pages . it will take time, but its worth it, uploading sitemap, makes us look desperate and google does not like it. maybe after 4-5 months of launch , but not right away

Paul Markham · 05-19-2016, 01:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AdultKing

No, it really doesn't. Because nothing posted in this thread hasn't already been posted on places like the Google Webmaster blog, SEO Roundtable, Search Engine Land etc.

So you make iot easier for the ones who don't know that. Or none of this is of any value.

Quote:

One of my mainstream companies (my largest) does SEO for corporate clients, however nobody can guarantee rankings - anyone who does is not being honest. The best you can do for people is ensure they have the best chance at ranking - on page/site SEO is the place to begin.

I would have thought guys of a certain size would employ their own people to do it.

Quote:

I'm not in the pay site business anymore. Sharing my observations on how sites are leaving opportunities on the table does nothing to depreciate or take away from my business.

Not everyone here is in the paysite business.

Quote:

The sharing society was happening long before porn got online and has grown exponentially over the years. People were sharing technical knowledge at computer clubs in the 1970s, people were sharing software they had written too.

No we didn't. we were brighter that to give away business knowledge. If it was worth anything. Also the sharing was one to one. Not 5 to 500 or even 5,000.

Quote:

A walled garden isn't everything you think it is, perhaps you should leave the walled garden and explore the universe ?

I left the walled garden years ago. what I didn't was to give my map away.

I understand the intrepid will know all this. The danger is keeping novices going long enough so they learn and become major competitors. Best to let newbies flounder than help them learn, grow and become competitors for those top spots.

Before piracy and Tubes, the biggest effect on people's income was the other people trying to do exactly the same. 1,000s fighting for a TGP spot, fighting to get sites up and all fighting to get 100 views to make a sale. Then 10,000 views to make a living. With the only filter being knowledge, giving it away is business suicide.

Even telling people where the information is, is more than I would do. I never told anyone to go out and find brand new girls, because magazines would buy someone else's work instead of mine.

30SalesPlus · 05-19-2016, 01:28 PM

Google tries to give people what they want and when it comes to porn they want the tubes.

AdultKing · 05-19-2016, 04:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham

So you make iot easier for the ones who don't know that. Or none of this is of any value.

As this thread demonstrates, when people find deficiencies in what they do they'll often just not act on it.

Some have pointed at tubes not having user friendly URLs seemingly as justification for pay sites or affiliate not having them.

Very few people commenting in this thread even understand what schema is, or see any benefit in it.

What people do is up to them, however I started this thread to discuss where blatant opportunity is being squandered. I suspect this thread won't change that.

Barry-xlovecam · 09-11-2017, 07:57 AM

I found this thread by searching site:gfy.com structured data

this is the only thread returned :P

Opinions are like assholes -- there is no shortage here

However is anyone having any notable success with

<script type='application/ld+json'>
{
"@context": "http://www.schema.org",

...

</script>

05-18-2016, 05:11 AM	#51
CurrentlySober Too lazy to wipe my ass Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: A Public Bathroom Posts: 38,488	Fiddy reasons the Tubes do so well in search... & i like poo... __________________ My AI Handywork... My Dream Gal... XXX 👁️ 👍️ 💩

05-19-2016, 12:53 PM	#54
freecartoonporn Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2012 Location: NC Posts: 7,683	youtubew uses ugly urls, pornhub uses ugly urls., yet both are top sites. many big site using ugly urls., it doesnt matter , if user likes the site, google can sense it and favors the site./ one more thing i learned hard way, is dont give google a fucking sitemap., keep pages interlinked, and let the google bot find internal pages . it will take time, but its worth it, uploading sitemap, makes us look desperate and google does not like it. maybe after 4-5 months of launch , but not right away __________________ SSD Cloud Server, VPS Server, Simple Cloud Hosting \| DigitalOcean

05-19-2016, 01:28 PM	#56
30SalesPlus Confirmed User Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 212	Google tries to give people what they want and when it comes to porn they want the tubes. __________________

05-19-2016, 10:51 AM	#52
Why MFBA Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: PNW Posts: 7,230	is this post from 2008? this is all really old, basic SEO knowledge. and non-seo friendly URLs rank just fine as long as they arent changing... google is smart enough to know any route can change at any time.

09-11-2017, 07:57 AM	#58
Barry-xlovecam It's 42 Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: Global Posts: 18,083	I found this thread by searching site:gfy.com structured data this is the only thread returned :P Opinions are like assholes -- there is no shortage here However is anyone having any notable success with <script type='application/ld+json'> { "@context": "http://www.schema.org", ... </script>