tick tock goes the FBI clock: the big one is almost upon us - Page 2 - GoFuckYourself.com

dyna mo · 07-01-2016, 10:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ilnjscb

Now Lynch says she will take the recommendations of the JD and FBI. I'm out on a limb here, but that says to me she knows there won't be a recommendation for criminal charges on Clinton. Unfortunately, I also think some poor lackey will go down. The flame that burns twice as bright burns half as long.

I say this will make the race very interesting, which is great.

you may be right. it seems more like damage control to me after the press raked her over the coals this week for her chance encounter with bill at the airport.

Joshua G · 07-01-2016, 10:32 AM

Sorry libs. Voters dont turn out for lying felons whose boss lets her break the law.

You dems are so screwed, & your clueless its coming.

ilnjscb · 07-01-2016, 10:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joshua G

Sorry libs. Voters dont turn out for lying felons whose boss lets her break the law.

You dems are so screwed, & your clueless its coming.

It is "you're" my good man, and perhaps "you're" correct, but which felon are you referring to? At present there are none who are nominees for major parties.

The damage from this has been "baked in" as they say; only an actual criminal charge will derail her presidency. I suggest it will be as follows:

1. No charges, no reprimand for anyone +12 poll points for Clinton, electoral wipeout
2. No charges, reprimand for staff +8 points, wipeout
3. Reprimand, reprimand for staff +4 points, wipeout <-my bet
3. Reprimand, charges for staff +0 points, close race
4. Civil charges for Clinton, charges or reprimand for staff, -7 points, possible loss
5. Criminal charges for Clinton, unable to continue as nominee

Joshua G · 07-01-2016, 10:45 AM

Right. Keep believing hilary is up 12. Nazis said the jews caused the war too. Did u also believe that?

& casey anthony was not a felon, a jury said so...right?

ilnjscb · 07-01-2016, 10:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joshua G

Right. Keep believing hilary is up 12. Nazis said the jews caused the war too. Did u also believe that?

& casey anthony was not a felon, a jury said so...right?

JG man that is LITERALLY what makes a felon! You can't believe someone into a felon!

I can believe all day that Casey Anthony was guilty, and I do, but that doesn't make her a felon, and it doesn't mean she should do jail time. I would a million times rather let a criminal go than jail an innocent person.

dyna mo · 07-01-2016, 10:55 AM

word around the web is that airport meeting was a private meeting between lynch and bill on the plane.

"I think she should have said, 'Look, I recognize you have a long record of leadership on fighting crime but this is not the time for us to have that conversation,' " Delaware Democratic Sen. Chris Coons said of Lynch in an interview with CNN. " 'After the election is over, I'd welcome your advice.' "

Lynch bowed to the public pressure caused by her impromptu meeting Friday morning, announcing that she will accept whatever recommendation federal prosecutors make in the email case. Lynch repeatedly acknowledged in an interview with The Post's Jonathan Capehart at the Aspen Ideas Festival in Colorado that her meeting with Bill Clinton had cast a shadow over the investigation. After much prodding from Capehart, she even basically acknowledged the meeting never should have happened in the first place.

"I certainly wouldn't do it again," she said.

Bill Clinton and AG Loretta Lynch meet privately - CNNPolitics.com

Bladewire · 07-01-2016, 11:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ilnjscb

JG man that is LITERALLY what makes a felon! You can't believe someone into a felon!

I can believe all day that Casey Anthony was guilty, and I do, but that doesn't make her a felon, and it doesn't mean she should do jail time. I would a million times rather let a criminal go than jail an innocent person.

Trump supporters literally would rather jail an innocent person and let criminal Trump go free so republicans control the white house.

Rochard · 07-01-2016, 11:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ilnjscb

It is "you're" my good man, and perhaps "you're" correct, but which felon are you referring to? At present there are none who are nominees for major parties.

The damage from this has been "baked in" as they say; only an actual criminal charge will derail her presidency. I suggest it will be as follows:

1. No charges, no reprimand for anyone +12 poll points for Clinton, electoral wipeout
2. No charges, reprimand for staff +8 points, wipeout
3. Reprimand, reprimand for staff +4 points, wipeout <-my bet
3. Reprimand, charges for staff +0 points, close race
4. Civil charges for Clinton, charges or reprimand for staff, -7 points, possible loss
5. Criminal charges for Clinton, unable to continue as nominee

I do not believe that there will be any charges.

The charges that would be brought would be under the Espionage Act, and was meant to prosecute spies. Meaning the laws were created to charge a spy with taking classified information and giving it an agent of another country (Ally or otherwise). In these cases, they look at intent and damages. The intention was for her to do her job, and there was no damages.

One of the charges they are looking at is "mishandling classified information". That's a big vague. You can clearly argue she never mishandled anything - she sent an email and it got sent to the correct person, it was not intercepted, and the information was not received by anyone other than the person it was intended for. There will also be discussions about if the receiving person was allowed to received classified information, but you can argue that until you are blue in the face too - Was the email classified, when was it classified, was the other person allowed to received such classified information, and did the person sending know it was classified, etc.... At a certain point in time it will become impossible for our government to do business because before anyone in the State Department / White House / Congress / CIA / Pentagon sends out any information via email, it will have to be vetted by a dozen different agencies, the CIA, the Justice Department, and then the Justice League. (Yes, I said Justice League!)

One of the "classified" emails was about a birthday wish. It was from a staff member to Clinton which was forwarded to another staff member to handle. It was a reminder to send to send a birthday wish to a President of another country. The information wasn't classified, no one need to "read in" on the information, but for some reason it was classified after the fact for reasons no one understands.

On top of all of this, if the Secretary of State decides that one of her staff members needs to be involved in something that involves classified information, shouldn't the Secretary of State be allowed to do this? Or should the entire State Department drag to a halt every time they have to have a discussion about classified information?

I don't like Hillary. (I obviously like Trump a lot less.) But frankly, this is a waste of time, money, and resources. Even if she is completely guilty and they go all out to press full charges - which are highly unlikely - Clinton will put into a place a legal dream team that make the OJ case look like child's play, delay any potential charges until well after the election, will fight them tooth and nail, and in the end she'll be charged with a handful of misdemeanor and a small fine.

This is like someone loosing their brakes on a hill and having a small accident - and then being handed a traffic ticket for speeding.

dyna mo · 07-01-2016, 11:24 AM

how does someone claim to know what charges would be brought against hillary when the FBI hasn't released 1 single iota of information re: the investigation and what it all covers?

ilnjscb · 07-01-2016, 12:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard

I do not believe that there will be any charges.

The charges that would be brought would be under the Espionage Act, and was meant to prosecute spies. Meaning the laws were created to charge a spy with taking classified information and giving it an agent of another country (Ally or otherwise). In these cases, they look at intent and damages. The intention was for her to do her job, and there was no damages.

One of the charges they are looking at is "mishandling classified information". That's a big vague. You can clearly argue she never mishandled anything - she sent an email and it got sent to the correct person, it was not intercepted, and the information was not received by anyone other than the person it was intended for. There will also be discussions about if the receiving person was allowed to received classified information, but you can argue that until you are blue in the face too - Was the email classified, when was it classified, was the other person allowed to received such classified information, and did the person sending know it was classified, etc.... At a certain point in time it will become impossible for our government to do business because before anyone in the State Department / White House / Congress / CIA / Pentagon sends out any information via email, it will have to be vetted by a dozen different agencies, the CIA, the Justice Department, and then the Justice League. (Yes, I said Justice League!)

One of the "classified" emails was about a birthday wish. It was from a staff member to Clinton which was forwarded to another staff member to handle. It was a reminder to send to send a birthday wish to a President of another country. The information wasn't classified, no one need to "read in" on the information, but for some reason it was classified after the fact for reasons no one understands.

On top of all of this, if the Secretary of State decides that one of her staff members needs to be involved in something that involves classified information, shouldn't the Secretary of State be allowed to do this? Or should the entire State Department drag to a halt every time they have to have a discussion about classified information?

I don't like Hillary. (I obviously like Trump a lot less.) But frankly, this is a waste of time, money, and resources. Even if she is completely guilty and they go all out to press full charges - which are highly unlikely - Clinton will put into a place a legal dream team that make the OJ case look like child's play, delay any potential charges until well after the election, will fight them tooth and nail, and in the end she'll be charged with a handful of misdemeanor and a small fine.

This is like someone loosing their brakes on a hill and having a small accident - and then being handed a traffic ticket for speeding.

That may be but if they file criminal charges she will not win the presidency. Of course she won't do jail time - but that doesn't matter to her. I am pretty astonished at how brazen all this is on Obama's part. I wonder what they are hiding?

Bladewire · 07-01-2016, 03:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ilnjscb

That may be but if they file criminal charges she will not win the presidency. Of course she won't do jail time - but that doesn't matter to her. I am pretty astonished at how brazen all this is on Obama's part. I wonder what they are hiding?

Judicial Watch released their deposition of Patrick Kennedy, State Department under secretary for management yesterday. There is no smoking gun and he said, among other things, that he knew she was using that email address and didn't say their was anything wrong with it but did say that those in the State Department are "encouraged" to use state.gov.

With him backing Clinton, and the FBI requesting back in April that the State Department suspend their investigation into whether any of the emails were classified at the time she sent/received them at the State Department, it's clear she wont be indicted because the State Department hasn't certified if the emails were classified when she sent/received them.

Joshua G · 07-01-2016, 03:40 PM

liberals - get the fuck out of my thread with your stupid.

rochard, you wrote a wall of words, every single word of which says "i still havent read clinton cash & choose to ignore the full picture" stop wasting your energy there are potatoes with more wattage than you.

bladewire, put me back on ignore please. i dont know why you are full of bile against a man who will make america great again, but you havent contributed one iota of fact or enlightenment. so make your own threads full of your nonsense. get it out of here.

you libs so dumb, you cant see the only way you win if she's indicted. then you can get bernie, or biden, & have a shot at the white house, & SCOTUS.

but you fucking dumbasses will be singing happy songs when she is cleared, when in truth her acquittal will only feed the narrative that the system is rigged for the elites, & the donald will bash her over the head, every single day to november with her sleaze.

& you libs will lose everything. the presidency was the last bastion of power for the left. you have no state houses, you have no congress wings, you got no SCOTUS, you got NOTHING, no power left in america. all you got are safe spaces in college, & colbert. oh, & a california over-run by mexico. thats it.

& its all because you voted in the felon over the liberal in the primary.

nico-t · 07-01-2016, 05:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire

Trump supporters literally would rather jail an innocent person and let criminal Trump go free so republicans control the white house.

Good luck voting pure evil establishment in...

I'd rather have a turd in the white house than Hillary. With Hillary the world is 100% sure of 4 more years of war... I cannot fathom the mind of anyone preferring her over anyone or anything... Unbelievable

Paul Markham · 07-01-2016, 11:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DavieVegas

Polls are garbage. Its all old retired people sitting around taking polls. This election is gonna be unreal with the turn out of voters for trump. If everyone voted now, it spells a problem for Hillary imo. DEMOCRATS have a history of being lazy voters. Big % never make it to the polls. Also, take into consideration that the primaries STILL did not have ALL the voters go to the polls. I didnt go. Many are not gonna wait in lines to vote for a primary. When it counts, you will see that # of voters double if not triple by republican voters. They should stop doing polls. They are garbage

Agree about polls being garbage. This one seems to far to be 100% wrong.

Paul Markham · 07-01-2016, 11:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paper_Zak

I don't think she will face indictment. If there was enough evidence to prosecute her, wouldn't they have began proceedings already? Why would a democratic president leaving office shoot is party in the foot on his way out the door by bringing criminal charges to his preferred successor?

Bush is yet to face charges for lying to the world and going into war.

Nixon was given a free pardon for his crimes.

Will the upcoming Chilcot report take Blair to task for lying to Parliament?

Yes Clinton is a bad choice for President. The US had a great choice in Bernie Sanders and still chooses Clinton.

The GOP had an open goal to get the Presidency and couldn't beat Trump. Why did they fail? https://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...sten-mind.html Watch the video and think what is all stage managed and how easy was it to stage manage?

kane · 07-02-2016, 12:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joshua G

Sorry libs. Voters dont turn out for lying felons whose boss lets her break the law.

You dems are so screwed, & your clueless its coming.

You are dead wrong about this. In 2008 Ted Stevens had been indicted - not just investigated, but charged, arrested and indicted and then later went to jail - on felony charges and he still got about 46% of the vote in that election.

Some people will vote for a D or an R no matter who the candidate is or what they may say, do, or believe.

Rochard · 07-02-2016, 01:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ilnjscb

That may be but if they file criminal charges she will not win the presidency. Of course she won't do jail time - but that doesn't matter to her. I am pretty astonished at how brazen all this is on Obama's part. I wonder what they are hiding?

I disagree.

You are saying "If charges are filed, Clinton is done with". Yet Trump is already going to trial in November. And there are hundreds of other lawsuits pending. HUNDREDS.

dyna mo · 07-02-2016, 01:36 PM

Trump's lawsuits are civil, not criminal and many if not most were filed by Trump, none of which are stemming from FBI criminal investigations.

dyna mo · 07-02-2016, 01:37 PM

read earlier that Hills was interviewed by the FBI today.

arock10 · 07-02-2016, 02:02 PM

I feel like we should have another Benghazi investigation first

kane · 07-02-2016, 02:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo

read earlier that Hills was interviewed by the FBI today.

I saw that today. Josh G must have came so hard he passed out and couldn't post about it.

Joshua G · 07-02-2016, 02:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ilnjscb

Now Lynch says she will take the recommendations of the JD and FBI. I'm out on a limb here, but that says to me she knows there won't be a recommendation for criminal charges on Clinton. Unfortunately, I also think some poor lackey will go down. The flame that burns twice as bright burns half as long.

I say this will make the race very interesting, which is great.

upon further reflection, looks more & more like bubbas meet n greet in phoenix was intimidation. everyone is crapping on loretta for the meet, but it was slick willy that made first contact.

hilary. may yet be on her way down the drain. surely loretta cant know there wont be charges before hilz was interviewed, today apparently.

Joshua G · 07-02-2016, 02:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kane

I saw that today. Josh G must have came so hard he passed out and couldn't post about it.

no. the money shot is the day she realizes its game over. shes too arrogant to resign, so she'll either be vanquished by her own party, or by the voters.

libs if i really wanted trump in white house, i would root for her getting cleared. i would rather see a fair fight in the election, not trump win on a gimmee from the felon & the dumb dems that voted for her. sanders is an interesting guy. hilary is a fake phony fraud. Why is she even in the race.

whatever happens, she will not be president of the united states of america.

ilnjscb · 07-02-2016, 02:41 PM

The investigation couldn't have ended without her being interviewed! They are looking at *her* emails!

The question is, what will be done? Some here seem pretty confident one way or the other. I'm not, but I doubt it will disrupt the election.

If I were to hazard a guess, and that is all it is, I'd say this is good for her, because the investigation is nearing its end.

dyna mo · 07-02-2016, 02:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kane

I saw that today. Josh G must have came so hard he passed out and couldn't post about it.

Ahahahahahahahaahahahahaha!

I snickered.

dyna mo · 07-02-2016, 02:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joshua G

upon further reflection, looks more & more like bubbas meet n greet in phoenix was intimidation. everyone is crapping on loretta for the meet, but it was slick willy that made first contact.

hilary. may yet be on her way down the drain. surely loretta cant know there wont be charges before hilz was interviewed, today apparently.

I tend to agree . He was on her plane chitty chatty for 30 minutes. She claims they discussed grand kids and golf, that covers about 3 minutes.

I thought slick willy is supposed to be the politically adroit one? Hills plans to tap him to fix the economy too.

Joshua G · 07-02-2016, 02:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ilnjscb

The investigation couldn't have ended without her being interviewed! They are looking at *her* emails!

The question is, what will be done? Some here seem pretty confident one way or the other. I'm not, but I doubt it will disrupt the election.

If I were to hazard a guess, and that is all it is, I'd say this is good for her, because the investigation is nearing its end.

im pretty sure, that a criminal investigation does not require the prey to participate in the process. for all we know hilary declined to be interviewed but sent out cars just for the PR of her cooperating. i have no idea, if the dirt on her is true, why she would cooperate in an interview. all she could do is perjury, or a lot of 5ths.

but clintons have successfully lied their way through legal proceedings, so theres that.

Joshua G · 07-02-2016, 03:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kane

You are dead wrong about this. In 2008 Ted Stevens had been indicted - not just investigated, but charged, arrested and indicted and then later went to jail - on felony charges and he still got about 46% of the vote in that election.

Some people will vote for a D or an R no matter who the candidate is or what they may say, do, or believe.

good point. explains why a majority of dem voters chose "her" the felon. or...since most people need 12 jurors to say so..."possible" felon. I myself have judged that she engages in felonious behavior & therefore is a felon in my book.

did stevens win?

kane · 07-02-2016, 03:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joshua G

good point. explains why a majority of dem voters chose "her" the felon. or...since most people need 12 jurors to say so..."possible" felon. I myself have judged that she engages in felonious behavior & therefore is a felon in my book.

did stevens win?

Stevens didn't win, but it was actually pretty damn close. Stevens got 46.7% of the vote. His opponent got 47.9%. And Stevens was a Republican. Democrats aren't the only ones who vote for criminals. In this case nearly half the people of Alaska said they would rather have a criminal who was heading for bed than a Democrat.

Joshua G · 07-02-2016, 03:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kane

Stevens didn't win, but it was actually pretty damn close. Stevens got 46.7% of the vote. His opponent got 47.9%. And Stevens was a Republican. Democrats aren't the only ones who vote for criminals. In this case nearly half the people of Alaska said they would rather have a criminal who was heading for bed than a Democrat.

well let me put it this way. if trump never ran, & ted cruz was the nominee, i'd vote hilary, even with an indictment & the VP would have to run the country for half the term.

so i guess im conceding your point. but it would take a satan of a opponent for the majority of people to go with a felon. trump?

SuckOnThis · 07-03-2016, 07:09 AM

I don't want to be a part of Joshy's suicide or anything but....

CNN and MSNBC confirm Hillary Clinton will not face any charges in email inquiry

Joshua G · 07-03-2016, 07:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SuckOnThis

I don't want to be a part of Joshy's suicide or anything but....

CNN and MSNBC confirm Hillary Clinton will not face any charges in email inquiry

Your so dumb u dont see hilary in race = trump next president of united states of america. Your only shot was indictment.

Laughs on you dumbass

SuckOnThis · 07-03-2016, 08:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joshua G

Your so dumb u dont see hilary in race = trump next president of united states of america. Your only shot was indictment.

Laughs on you dumbass

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joshua G

trump will beat hilary in 49 out of 50 states.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joshua G

whats coming out of the FBI will be 5000x worse than the state dept report, which was not good. the FBI one comes with charges.

Whatever you say Miss Cleo.

dyna mo · 07-03-2016, 08:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SuckOnThis

I don't want to be a part of Joshy's suicide or anything but....

CNN and MSNBC confirm Hillary Clinton will not face any charges in email inquiry

that article is completely fabricated, that's a pro-hillary blog.

SuckOnThis · 07-03-2016, 08:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo

that article is completely fabricated, that's a pro-hillary blog.

Jump to 6:50

Even your boy Trump is whining about it on Twitter...

dyna mo · 07-03-2016, 08:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SuckOnThis

Jump to 6:50

Even your boy Trump is whining about it on Twitter...

i listened to the entire interview, i like chuck todd and he's never been one to shy away from asking tough questions, like he did in this interview, but he only mentions hearsay, and hills doesn't answer the question. i did a cursory search for any such articles on cnn and msnbc and nothing came up. i also have a hard time believing that within a couple hours of the FBI interviewing hills that the FBI leaked to the media that she won't face charges. the entire thing seems entirely made up to me.

i'm not surprised Trump fell for it, he's a clown.

Paul Markham · 07-03-2016, 09:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joshua G

Sorry libs. Voters dont turn out for lying felons whose boss lets her break the law.

You dems are so screwed, & your clueless its coming.

Whois a convicted felon?

Trump has broken the law and been convicted, he's also has a currently in court defending himself.

This doesn't abstain Clinton. It does convict the American political system.

With people like you voting, it's easy to see why you're puppets.

SuckOnThis · 07-03-2016, 09:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo

i'm not surprised Trump fell for it, he's a clown.

Stick around while the clown who is sick does the trick of disaster.

Joshua G · 07-03-2016, 10:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo

i'm not surprised Trump fell for it, he's a clown.

suckonthis fell for it too.

the reality distortion coming out of the press is as bad as ive seen my lifetime. never seen a person under investigation so thoroughly defended by the media, the politicians, everyone. meanwhile everyone piles onto the soft spoken entrepreneur who wants to bang his daughter.

kinda sad. would be nice to just get the facts not have to read 3 sources & filter out opinions.

Joshua G · 07-03-2016, 10:24 AM

hey dumb libs -

we are 1 day closer to president trump. your not going to win with a felon that is getting cleared by her crooked boss. voters wont be pleased! & theres not enough dumb people that will be fooled that clinton is trustworthy.

Joshua G · 07-03-2016, 10:27 AM

hilary will have 100x more cash than trump. 1000x more ad-time. she will have the media in her pocket. all thats left of the democrat machine.

& she's STILL gonna lose.

because the best you dumb libs can come up with is comparing civil suits to an FBI investigation into espionage.

comical.

SuckOnThis · 07-03-2016, 11:06 AM

Meanwhile, Trump now has had a bribery complaint filed against him. Looks like he may be having a friendly chat of his own with the FBI.

Bribery Complaint Filed Against Donald Trump and Florida AG Pam Bondi Over Trump U Case

ilnjscb · 07-03-2016, 12:15 PM

The FBI can't have made a determination in that short a time unless they were not targeting her all along. Then the interview was just them being thorough.

As I said, after every tiny event in this saga, right wing press will say, proof she committed high treason, hang the bitch! and left wing will say proof of the vast conspiracy, st. Clinton vindicated!

The middle ground is, showman Trump has what, 16 days, to get his show in order. The convention should be a show of epic proportions, if he wants to have any chance.

Paul Markham · 07-03-2016, 12:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo

Trump's lawsuits are civil, not criminal and many if not most were filed by Trump, none of which are stemming from FBI criminal investigations.

So far he has never had many opportunities to break criminal law. Given his disregard for civil laws, why do you think he will respect laws should a miracle happen and he gets elected?

Paul Markham · 07-03-2016, 12:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joshua G

no. the money shot is the day she realizes its game over. shes too arrogant to resign, so she'll either be vanquished by her own party, or by the voters.

libs if i really wanted trump in white house, i would root for her getting cleared. i would rather see a fair fight in the election, not trump win on a gimmee from the felon & the dumb dems that voted for her. sanders is an interesting guy. hilary is a fake phony fraud. Why is she even in the race.

whatever happens, she will not be president of the united states of america.

You would rather see a fair fight in the election. Do you have the ability to go back in time?

Should criminal charged be filed, which is unlikely. It's not guilty until a jury decides. By then the VP takes over.

Sanders would be a far better choice, he would scare the daylights out of those who buy politicians. Then if Americans break the hold of big Corporations and billionaires by voting against those with big money backing, you might get your country back. Long shot but it's the only way.

dyna mo · 07-03-2016, 01:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham

So far he has never had many opportunities to break criminal law. Given his disregard for civil laws, why do you think he will respect laws should a miracle happen and he gets elected?

i have no idea why you'd assume this, i just posted that Trump's a clown.

Bladewire · 07-03-2016, 01:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SuckOnThis

Jump to 6:50

Even your boy Trump is whining about it on Twitter...

She was never going to be indicted.

The Secretary of State is head of the state department. Clinton emailed Obama from her server email address. Obama knew and communicated with her in that matter, which means her actions were sanctioned by the President of the United States. Another non issue created by Republicans to stress Americans so they can gain power,

Case closed

Paul Markham · 07-04-2016, 01:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo

i have no idea why you'd assume this, i just posted that Trump's a clown.

The question's still valid.

Trump has a long history of flouting civil law when those laws didn't suit his needs. Why anyone wants to give a person like that more power to break even bigger rules. Is the mystery.

The only reasonTrump is in the race is the Republicans can't get Republican voters to vote for anointed Republica candidates. Letting this wild card get ahead in the race. That's shameful for all Republicans.

Any halfway decent candidate could be wiping the floor with Clinton. Pity the Republicans don't have one. Should people get incensed enough for local elections, you might see some changes. But not with Clinton at the healm.

Joshua G · 07-04-2016, 01:15 AM

just a reminder - she still may be indicted, tards.

paul. stop it. your a trumpity trumpster with your euro-politics. then you tells us americans to vote for everything you oppose in europe.

get the fuck outta here, you have no clue on the USA. sitting there whining about a billionaires law suits. EVERY fucking billionaire has people suing him, for anything & everything. comes with being rich.

but trumps civil suits are a problem, you suggest we americans go with a felon. fuck the fuck off, & stick to what you know.

SuckOnThis · 07-05-2016, 08:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joshua G

just a reminder - she still may be indicted, tards.

Wrong again numbnuts.

07-02-2016, 02:02 PM	#70
arock10 Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2006 Posts: 6,218	I feel like we should have another Benghazi investigation first __________________ Sup

07-01-2016, 10:32 AM	#52
Joshua G dumb libs love censorship Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2008 Posts: 8,198	Sorry libs. Voters dont turn out for lying felons whose boss lets her break the law. You dems are so screwed, & your clueless its coming.

07-01-2016, 10:45 AM	#54
Joshua G dumb libs love censorship Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2008 Posts: 8,198	Right. Keep believing hilary is up 12. Nazis said the jews caused the war too. Did u also believe that? & casey anthony was not a felon, a jury said so...right?

07-01-2016, 10:55 AM	#56
dyna mo The People's Post Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: invisible 7-11 Posts: 63,936	word around the web is that airport meeting was a private meeting between lynch and bill on the plane. "I think she should have said, 'Look, I recognize you have a long record of leadership on fighting crime but this is not the time for us to have that conversation,' " Delaware Democratic Sen. Chris Coons said of Lynch in an interview with CNN. " 'After the election is over, I'd welcome your advice.' " Lynch bowed to the public pressure caused by her impromptu meeting Friday morning, announcing that she will accept whatever recommendation federal prosecutors make in the email case. Lynch repeatedly acknowledged in an interview with The Post's Jonathan Capehart at the Aspen Ideas Festival in Colorado that her meeting with Bill Clinton had cast a shadow over the investigation. After much prodding from Capehart, she even basically acknowledged the meeting never should have happened in the first place. "I certainly wouldn't do it again," she said. Bill Clinton and AG Loretta Lynch meet privately - CNNPolitics.com

07-01-2016, 11:24 AM	#59
dyna mo The People's Post Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: invisible 7-11 Posts: 63,936	how does someone claim to know what charges would be brought against hillary when the FBI hasn't released 1 single iota of information re: the investigation and what it all covers?

07-01-2016, 03:40 PM	#62
Joshua G dumb libs love censorship Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2008 Posts: 8,198	liberals - get the fuck out of my thread with your stupid. rochard, you wrote a wall of words, every single word of which says "i still havent read clinton cash & choose to ignore the full picture" stop wasting your energy there are potatoes with more wattage than you. bladewire, put me back on ignore please. i dont know why you are full of bile against a man who will make america great again, but you havent contributed one iota of fact or enlightenment. so make your own threads full of your nonsense. get it out of here. you libs so dumb, you cant see the only way you win if she's indicted. then you can get bernie, or biden, & have a shot at the white house, & SCOTUS. but you fucking dumbasses will be singing happy songs when she is cleared, when in truth her acquittal will only feed the narrative that the system is rigged for the elites, & the donald will bash her over the head, every single day to november with her sleaze. & you libs will lose everything. the presidency was the last bastion of power for the left. you have no state houses, you have no congress wings, you got no SCOTUS, you got NOTHING, no power left in america. all you got are safe spaces in college, & colbert. oh, & a california over-run by mexico. thats it. & its all because you voted in the felon over the liberal in the primary.

07-02-2016, 01:36 PM	#68
dyna mo The People's Post Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: invisible 7-11 Posts: 63,936	Trump's lawsuits are civil, not criminal and many if not most were filed by Trump, none of which are stemming from FBI criminal investigations.

07-02-2016, 01:37 PM	#69
dyna mo The People's Post Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: invisible 7-11 Posts: 63,936	read earlier that Hills was interviewed by the FBI today.

07-02-2016, 02:41 PM	#74
ilnjscb Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2009 Posts: 8,793	The investigation couldn't have ended without her being interviewed! They are looking at her emails! The question is, what will be done? Some here seem pretty confident one way or the other. I'm not, but I doubt it will disrupt the election. If I were to hazard a guess, and that is all it is, I'd say this is good for her, because the investigation is nearing its end.

07-03-2016, 07:09 AM	#81
SuckOnThis So Fucking Banned Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: In my head Posts: 6,844	I don't want to be a part of Joshy's suicide or anything but.... CNN and MSNBC confirm Hillary Clinton will not face any charges in email inquiry

07-03-2016, 10:24 AM	#90
Joshua G dumb libs love censorship Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2008 Posts: 8,198	hey dumb libs - we are 1 day closer to president trump. your not going to win with a felon that is getting cleared by her crooked boss. voters wont be pleased! & theres not enough dumb people that will be fooled that clinton is trustworthy.

07-03-2016, 10:27 AM	#91
Joshua G dumb libs love censorship Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2008 Posts: 8,198	hilary will have 100x more cash than trump. 1000x more ad-time. she will have the media in her pocket. all thats left of the democrat machine. & she's STILL gonna lose. because the best you dumb libs can come up with is comparing civil suits to an FBI investigation into espionage. comical.

07-03-2016, 11:06 AM	#92
SuckOnThis So Fucking Banned Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: In my head Posts: 6,844	Meanwhile, Trump now has had a bribery complaint filed against him. Looks like he may be having a friendly chat of his own with the FBI. Bribery Complaint Filed Against Donald Trump and Florida AG Pam Bondi Over Trump U Case

07-03-2016, 12:15 PM	#93
ilnjscb Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2009 Posts: 8,793	The FBI can't have made a determination in that short a time unless they were not targeting her all along. Then the interview was just them being thorough. As I said, after every tiny event in this saga, right wing press will say, proof she committed high treason, hang the bitch! and left wing will say proof of the vast conspiracy, st. Clinton vindicated! The middle ground is, showman Trump has what, 16 days, to get his show in order. The convention should be a show of epic proportions, if he wants to have any chance.

07-04-2016, 01:15 AM	#99
Joshua G dumb libs love censorship Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2008 Posts: 8,198	just a reminder - she still may be indicted, tards. paul. stop it. your a trumpity trumpster with your euro-politics. then you tells us americans to vote for everything you oppose in europe. get the fuck outta here, you have no clue on the USA. sitting there whining about a billionaires law suits. EVERY fucking billionaire has people suing him, for anything & everything. comes with being rich. but trumps civil suits are a problem, you suggest we americans go with a felon. fuck the fuck off, & stick to what you know.