HIV, condoms and backing up in the car

[Grapesoda]

it's obvious that driving backwards is far more dangerous than on camera sex between tested partners...

hiv transmission since 2005 =5
backing up the car = 15,000 injuries and over 200 backover fatalites per year, 1/3 under 5

just a bit of clarity for today

[NatalieK]

I'd have thought more than 5 people have contracted HIV, how ever, yes, it brings to light that more worrying than disease or shootings, crime or terrorism. The person pulling out of their drive way could be the one that kills you

[Brian8377]

5 people in 11 years? Just believing that tells me you have HIV and will get his by a car in reverse LOL

[Grapesoda]

Originally Posted by GspotProductions

I'd have thought more than 5 people have contracted HIV, how ever, yes, it brings to light that more worrying than disease or shootings, crime or terrorism. The person pulling out of their drive way could be the one that kills you

yes only 5 for one male performer in 2 days, 2004 or 05 I think...

[Mediamix]

But how many people drive a car and how many people fuck in front of a camera..

It's all about the math and ratio.

[just a punk]

Originally Posted by Grapesoda

yes only 5 for one male performer in 2 days, 2004 or 05 I think...

So you compare the documented cases of HIV transmissions among a few dozens of adult performers vs the whole car accident statistics for the 320+ million country, right? ;)

[Grapesoda]

Originally Posted by CyberSEO

So you compare the documented cases of HIV transmissions among a few dozens of adult performers vs the whole car accident statistics for the 320+ million country, right? ;)

at the height of the porn biz I was told 11K scenes a year were shot in LA, do the math yourself and tell me what the odds are, better chance of getting hit by lighting I think

[Rochard]

Driving is by far the most dangerous thing we do on a regular basis. You figure this out when you put your fifteen year old kid behind the wheel for the first time.

[just a punk]

Originally Posted by Grapesoda

at the height of the porn biz I was told 11K scenes a year were shot in LA, do the math yourself and tell me what the odds are, better chance of getting hit by lighting I think

Ok, 11K scenes a year. So even if there were 2 unique performers in every single scene (22K different performers a year), the math would be the following:

1) a chance for 0.33 cases of HIV a year (5 per 22k performers during 15 years) = 0.33/22000*100 = 0.0015%

2) a chance for 200 backover fatalities a year per 320 million US population = 200/320000000*100 = 0.00006%

So a chance to get HIV infection performing in a porn movie is 25 times higher than to become a backover victim in the car accident

Since there are much less than 22K performers were used to film 11K scenes, the real chance to get HIV is much higher...

[just a punk]

Originally Posted by Grapesoda

at the height of the porn biz I was told 11K scenes a year were shot in LA, do the math yourself and tell me what the odds are, better chance of getting hit by lighting I think

Let me show you some even more interesting calculations. As we know, HIV is not very virulent. A chance to get it during a straight sex act is about 0.5% (a half of a percent) and it's about 4% for anal.

What does it mean? it does mean that to infect 5 performers, there must be 1000 of vaginal sex or 125 anal sex scenes filmed where at least one person was infected.

Is it a lot or not? Actually this means that 0.6% of all 165K straight sex scenes that were filmed during 15 years (11K a year) were involving at least one HIV-infected performer. Now it doesn't sound good, right? And note that we have counted the documented cases only. Course the real number of infected performers is much more. I'm talking about all those performers who've got lost (left the industry) after 1-2 scenes, so nobody can check their HIV status and nobody knows if they were infected as performers or elsewhere a year before or a year after. HIV has a damn long seronegative period...

[Grapesoda]

Originally Posted by CyberSEO

Ok, 11K scenes a year. So even if there were 2 unique performers in every single scene (22K different performers a year), the math would be the following:

1) a chance for 0.33 cases of HIV a year (5 per 22k performers during 15 years) = 0.33/22000*100 = 0.0015%

2) a chance for 200 backover fatalities a year per 320 million US population = 200/320000000*100 = 0.00006%

So a chance to get HIV infection performing in a porn movie is 25 times higher than to become a backover victim in the car accident

Since there are much less than 22K performers were used to film 11K scenes, the real chance to get HIV is much higher...

and getting hit by lighting since you are on a roll?

[Grapesoda]

Originally Posted by CyberSEO

Let me show you some even more interesting calculations. As we know, HIV is not very virulent. A chance to get it during a straight sex act is about 0.5% (a half of a percent) and it's about 4% for anal.

What does it mean? it does mean that to infect 5 performers, there must be 1000 of vaginal sex or 125 anal sex scenes filmed where at least one person was infected.

Is it a lot or not? Actually this means that 0.6% of all 165K straight sex scenes that were filmed during 15 years (11K a year) were involving at least one HIV-infected performer. Now it doesn't sound good, right? And note that we have counted the documented cases only. Course the real number of infected performers is much more. I'm talking about all those performers who've got lost (left the industry) after 1-2 scenes, so nobody can check their HIV status and nobody knows if they were infected as performers or elsewhere a year before or a year after...

no not at all, it means that a boy went to brazil, got fucked by tyrannies, can back positive, did not test upon return and infected several models doing DOUBLE ANAL. I PERSONALLY spoke with some of the models and knew them from shooting them, and a model that did anal with the boy, did not get infected while a model that did double anal with with the boy later in the same day got infected! and that is exactly what happened! now do some more math because you are making stuff up to change the stats. because the states are doing double anal with an infected boy is 100% probability from what I see.

[just a punk]

Originally Posted by Grapesoda

and getting hit by lighting since you are on a roll?

I know a person who as hit by lighting. and it was a very rare case because it was not just a regular lightning, it was a ball lightning. That woman has got a serious burn but survive. On the other hand I'm not personally familiar with at least one HIV-positive person. Saw them on TV only