Panorama: Paxman on Trump v Hillary. - GoFuckYourself.com

Paul Markham · 10-17-2016, 11:40 PM

I urge all Americans to watch it. The bullshit starts early from the Establishment side claiming Trump's control of the media has kept him in the race. Accusing Americans supporting Trump to be stupid.

BBC Panorama?s Jeremy Paxman On Trump V Clinton Previewed On Today Programme

Paxman is one you would expect to be on Clinton's side. It will give Americans a view from the outside.

Paul Markham · 10-18-2016, 12:54 AM

Paxman presents the Establishment's view of the situation in politics. The program is mostly anti-Trump refusing to look at the real reasons Trump is in the race. The rigged Republican race, then the rigged Democratic race, now the rigged Presidential race.

While the people in the US who form the lower 60% get poorer. Become more detached from politics yet with enough of them voting for the people who are making Washington dysfunctional. He points out the Democrats are becoming more left wing, while Republicans move further to the right. Without addressing why people vote to continue the problems.

This was happening in Europe with the EU. More and more people are voting for politicians in County elections and EU elections who are determined to bring down the EU. How many American politicians want to change the US political system of the Electoral College? This allows a candidate with fewer votes to become President.

Quote:

In 2000, George W. Bush was declared the winner of the general election and became the 43rd president, but he didn?t win the popular vote either. Al Gore holds that distinction, garnering about 540,000 more votes than Bush. However, Bush won the electoral vote, 271 to 266.

Unless Americans and Europeans start voting for the people who are dedicated to stopping the drain of jobs and money out of the West. The drain will continue. Clinton will carry it on. Given a decent Republican Candidate with some or Trump's message, she would have conceded by now.

Joshua G · 10-18-2016, 01:05 AM

the electoral college was divised when the smallest of the 13 colonies rejected a new US constitution on the grounds of under-representation of small states vs states with big populations.

without an electoral college, all candidates would simply campaign in the biggest cities, & thats it. urban liberal city politicians & their priorities would dominate over farm states & small populations.

at least the electoral college makes smaller states matter to the election.

as far as polls, they were WILDLY wrong about brexit. they under-represented the exit voter, exactly like the US media is fudging US polls on hilary. hilary is not up by 11 points! nobody shows up at her rallies. one poll has her down 3!

& the one where she is down 3, called 2012 spot on. all liberals discount LATimes, even though LAtimes is...liberal.

liberals see only what they want to see. hilary is going down. they refuse to see it under the blizzard of liberal bullshit they live on.

Paul Markham · 10-18-2016, 11:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joshua G

the electoral college was divised when the smallest of the 13 colonies rejected a new US constitution on the grounds of under-representation of small states vs states with big populations.

without an electoral college, all candidates would simply campaign in the biggest cities, & thats it. urban liberal city politicians & their priorities would dominate over farm states & small populations.

at least the electoral college makes smaller states matter to the election.

as far as polls, they were WILDLY wrong about brexit. they under-represented the exit voter, exactly like the US media is fudging US polls on hilary. hilary is not up by 11 points! nobody shows up at her rallies. one poll has her down 3!

& the one where she is down 3, called 2012 spot on. all liberals discount LATimes, even though LAtimes is...liberal.

liberals see only what they want to see. hilary is going down. they refuse to see it under the blizzard of liberal bullshit they live on.

I see the point for the Electoral colleges back then. But one candidate just grabbing victory in one State and getting all the Electoral College Votes. Defeats the original purpose. Because it makes campaigning in California far more important than campaigning in Ohio.

NewNick · 10-19-2016, 02:23 AM

Informative video.

However your critique OP was horseshit.

Like most of the drivel you spout.

just a punk · 10-19-2016, 03:11 AM

Am I the only one who read it as "Paxum on Trump v Hillary"?

SirDubin · 10-19-2016, 03:17 AM

Hahahahahaha that shit is funny

NatalieK · 10-19-2016, 10:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberSEO

Am I the only one who read it as "Paxum on Trump v Hillary"?

I watch & know Paxman, still did I read it as Paxum

10-17-2016, 11:40 PM	#1
Paul Markham Too old to care Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2001 Location: On the sofa, watching TV or doing my jigsaws. Posts: 52,943	Panorama: Paxman on Trump v Hillary. I urge all Americans to watch it. The bullshit starts early from the Establishment side claiming Trump's control of the media has kept him in the race. Accusing Americans supporting Trump to be stupid. BBC Panorama?s Jeremy Paxman On Trump V Clinton Previewed On Today Programme Paxman is one you would expect to be on Clinton's side. It will give Americans a view from the outside. __________________ Blowout deal. 880 videos, 2,400 image sets, plus many RAW videos. $500. PM me for a deal. Skype Paulmarkham70

10-19-2016, 02:23 AM	#5
NewNick Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 7,033	Informative video. However your critique OP was horseshit. Like most of the drivel you spout. __________________ "Americas Hitler" JD Vance. “There isn’t really an upside to Trump.” Tucker Carlson. “a convicted felon rapist is now your president” OneHungLow, gfy.com

10-19-2016, 03:11 AM	#6
just a punk So fuckin' bored Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2003 Posts: 32,381	Am I the only one who read it as "Paxum on Trump v Hillary"? __________________ Obey the Cowgod

10-19-2016, 03:17 AM	#7
SirDubin Registered User Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2014 Location: Romania, Buzau, Posta Calnau Posts: 71	Hahahahahaha that shit is funny __________________ ### TEC [trustExchanger.Com] ###

10-18-2016, 01:05 AM	#3
Joshua G dumb libs love censorship Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2008 Posts: 8,198	the electoral college was divised when the smallest of the 13 colonies rejected a new US constitution on the grounds of under-representation of small states vs states with big populations. without an electoral college, all candidates would simply campaign in the biggest cities, & thats it. urban liberal city politicians & their priorities would dominate over farm states & small populations. at least the electoral college makes smaller states matter to the election. as far as polls, they were WILDLY wrong about brexit. they under-represented the exit voter, exactly like the US media is fudging US polls on hilary. hilary is not up by 11 points! nobody shows up at her rallies. one poll has her down 3! & the one where she is down 3, called 2012 spot on. all liberals discount LATimes, even though LAtimes is...liberal. liberals see only what they want to see. hilary is going down. they refuse to see it under the blizzard of liberal bullshit they live on.