if you support hilary but dont read wikileaks, you are sarah palin - GoFuckYourself.com

Joshua G · 11-06-2016, 10:46 AM

It's ignorant to vote for Hillary Clinton without reading WikiLeaks

Quote:

Those voting for Hillary Clinton, defending Clinton and supporting Clinton without reading the information reported by WikiLeaks are intellectually no different than those who criticize climate science without ever having read the science. In short, if you defend Clinton and ignore WikiLeaks, you have something in common with Sarah Palin.

Let that sink in for a moment. Finished processing that? Now process this ? if the journalists responsible for reporting on Watergate were labeled ?Russian sympathizers,? charged by the media as ?attempting to influence an election,? and banned from travel or communication access, how would history judge the event?

This is exactly what has happened to Julian Assange, who has done more for journalism than any of these corporate-owned, brand-named media products have done this election cycle.

Either you support access to information or you have a problem with an informed public. Which side are you on?

hey rochard...denverpost says you are sarah palin, & you do not support an informed public.

you dont even support an informed rochard.

EddyTheDog · 11-06-2016, 10:48 AM

You seem to be getting more desperate every day - Is this some sort of breakdown?..

2MuchMark · 11-06-2016, 10:52 AM

The only person other than Sarah Palin that is Sarah Palin, is you Josh'.

#Hillary2016

SuckOnThis · 11-06-2016, 11:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joshua G

hey rochard...denverpost says you are sarah palin, & you do not support an informed public.

you dont even support an informed rochard.

Hey dumbass, that is a letter to the editor. Just when I thought you couldn't get any dumber.

altmman · 11-06-2016, 11:15 AM

I think it's creepy that WikiLeaks is a bunch of stolen documents from a server that was hacked into and then plastered everywhere.

Thats like someone hacking into into my phone and taking all my dick pics and posting them everywhere. weird.

Also with what I heard so far theres nothing bad. Some snide comments in emails, who cares?

Joshua G · 11-06-2016, 11:17 AM

lookey lookey ad hominem attacks...

that means they are attacking me personally instead of listening to the message.

looks like calling liberals sarah palin hits them in their liberal G spot.

Bladewire · 11-06-2016, 11:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by altmman

I think it's creepy that WikiLeaks is a bunch of stolen documents from a server that was hacked into and then plastered everywhere.

Thats like someone hacking into into my phone and taking all my dick pics and posting them everywhere. weird.

Also with what I heard so far theres nothing bad. Some snide comments in emails, who cares?

A big reason for Assange never to be trusted again.

Assange said on multiple TV interviews that he had nothing against Clinton: he lied each time

Assange said multiple times throughout the election that the next release was HUGE with end game info: he lied each time

Major (Tom) · 11-06-2016, 11:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by altmman

I think it's creepy that WikiLeaks is a bunch of stolen documents from a server that was hacked into and then plastered everywhere.

Thats like someone hacking into into my phone and taking all my dick pics and posting them everywhere. weird.

Also with what I heard so far theres nothing bad. Some snide comments in emails, who cares?

Nothing bad? She revealed the names of undercover opperatives in the middle east who were killed. Shes corrupt beyond reproach. Clearly you have not been following along

Joshua G · 11-06-2016, 11:22 AM

a number of liberal sarah palins have flocked into my thread.

thank you altman for your contribution to the advancement of knowledge.

EddyTheDog · 11-06-2016, 11:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joshua G

lookey lookey ad hominem attacks...

that means they are attacking me personally instead of listening to the message.

looks like calling liberals sarah palin hits them in their liberal G spot.

Give me your details and I will start a GoFundMe page for when Trump loses...

Do they pay for therapy?....

Major (Tom) · 11-06-2016, 11:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire

A big reason for Assange never to be trusted again.

Assange said on multiple TV interviews that he had nothing against Clinton: he lied each time

Assange said multiple times throughout the election that the next release was HUGE with end game info: he lied each time

It is end game info. The mainstream refuses to run it. All the media, npr etc are donors to podesta group. Even pbs is a cuck like mark prince to the current admin and hillary. This stuff is huge. Come on bladewire. Dig in to this stuff. It's un fucking believable.

altmman · 11-06-2016, 11:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DukeSkywalker

Nothing bad? She revealed the names of undercover opperatives in the middle east who were killed.

In private emails that were stolen?
Its her fault she was hacked?

SuckOnThis · 11-06-2016, 11:26 AM

altmman · 11-06-2016, 11:28 AM

And what about Trump's missing emails?

Donald Trumpâ€™s Companies Destroyed Emails in Defiance of Court Orders

Or the Republican's 22 MILLION missing emails made on a private server during wartime?

The George W. Bush White House â€˜Lostâ€™ 22 Million Emails

At least Hillary showed up in court to explain herself. Trump & Republicans dont even go to court, they run out the clock.

They really are sleazy for coming down hard on her when they were much much worse, and know it

Joshua G · 11-06-2016, 11:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by altmman

In private emails that were stolen?
Its her fault she was hacked?

yeah you dumb clown. the classified emails WERE NOT SUPPOSED TO BE ON A PRIVATE SERVER WHERE THEY COULD BE HACKED. she is responsible for handling them...hence the felony crime of "mishandling" classified intelligence...

do you even know she took a sworn oath with the FBI, separate from her job oath, pledging to legally protect classified intelligence? no you dont.

holy shit you libs are dumb!

slapass · 11-06-2016, 11:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DukeSkywalker

Nothing bad? She revealed the names of undercover opperatives in the middle east who were killed. Shes corrupt beyond reproach. Clearly you have not been following along

Do you have a source for that? I can't find it.

I have read the wikileaks stuff. I think it might have made them look better. They are super squeaky clean. Think of someone getting every email you have sent. Nothing even that snide or offensive.

SuckOnThis · 11-06-2016, 11:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joshua G

holy shit you libs are dumb!

Says the guy who thinks a letter to the editor is actual news.

noshit · 11-06-2016, 11:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DukeSkywalker

It is end game info. The mainstream refuses to run it. All the media, npr etc are donors to podesta group. Even pbs is a cuck like mark prince to the current admin and hillary. This stuff is huge. Come on bladewire. Dig in to this stuff. It's un fucking believable.

Low T Altruistic Losers Seldom Dig In. ...It's Much Easier to be an Emotional Based Nellie!

.

Joshua G · 11-06-2016, 11:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SuckOnThis

Says the guy who thinks a letter to the editor is actual news.

you cant form a coherent thought that gets past 2 sentences.

Major (Tom) · 11-06-2016, 11:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by altmman

In private emails that were stolen?
Its her fault she was hacked?

No... pay attention. She sent these names as secretary of state. A classified email to a non classified recipient.

SuckOnThis · 11-06-2016, 11:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joshua G

you cant form a coherent thought that gets past 2 sentences.

Maybe you should find comments in the news section of the Denver Post and create threads about them.

Joshua G · 11-06-2016, 11:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SuckOnThis

Maybe you should find comments in the news section of the Denver Post and create threads about them.

now you cant form a coherent thought that passes 1 sentence...

SuckOnThis · 11-06-2016, 11:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joshua G

now you cant form a coherent thought that passes 1 sentence...

Admit it, you don't know what a letter to the editor is.

Joshua G · 11-06-2016, 12:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SuckOnThis

Admit it, you don't know what a letter to the editor is.

all that matters, is information. not how you get it.

Joshua G · 11-06-2016, 12:14 PM

do you liberals understand the word "information" ?

the first part is inform...something that increases wisdom, knowledge.

the second part is formation...forming info.

information, whether it from a newspaper, or a letter to the paper, the source is irrelevent. just as it does not matter that a criminal hacker got the emails. the information itself, is the key.

hence, the dumb liberal worries about HOW the information is gathered, not the content of the information...suckonthis has not uttered 1 single word on the information of post #1, that a hilary supporter that does not read wikileaks is ignorant. this is a undisputed fact.

dumb lib.

Bladewire · 11-06-2016, 12:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DukeSkywalker

Nothing bad? She revealed the names of undercover opperatives in the middle east who were killed. Shes corrupt beyond reproach. Clearly you have not been following along

That's a lie.

The truth:

"A handful of emails forwarded to Hillary Clinton's personal server while she was secretary of state contained references to undercover CIA officers ? including one who was killed by a suicide attack in Afghanistan, according to U.S. officials who have reviewed them.

But contrary to some published reports, three officials said there was no email on Clinton's server that directly revealed the identity of an undercover intelligence operative. Rather, they said, State Department and other officials attempted to make veiled references to intelligence officers in the emails ? references that were deemed classified when the messages were being reviewed years later for public release."

https://www.google.com/amp/www.nbcne...ndroid-verizon

Joshua G · 11-06-2016, 12:23 PM

when watergate broke, did liberals worry about where woodward/bernstein got their information? no. just the information mattered.

todays dumb lib says wikileaks is not a legitimate source of information. to deflect from the information itself.

that sounds like hypocrisy.

Bladewire · 11-06-2016, 12:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joshua G

all that matters, is information. not how you get it.

You have serious character flaws, this is one of them.

You are a baby being fed by something that wants to make you destructive to your own best interest, and you don't care what's in the food, how it was obtained or who's feeding you as long as you keep eating.

nico-t · 11-06-2016, 12:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SuckOnThis

Hey dumbass, that is a letter to the editor. Just when I thought you couldn't get any dumber.

546 comments, looks like it's quite a popular piece.

But if the message is the harsh truth, just whine about semantics like you libs do

C H R I S · 11-06-2016, 12:46 PM

The most incriminating thing in the wiki leaks emails is a risotto recipe:

7 Awesomely Random Food Tips From the WikiLeaks Dump | Mother Jones

C H R I S · 11-06-2016, 12:47 PM

Double post for Risotto lovers

galleryseek · 11-06-2016, 12:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by C H R I S

The most incriminating thing in the wiki leaks emails is a risotto recipe:

7 Awesomely Random Food Tips From the WikiLeaks Dump | Mother Jones

So you didn't read any of the wikileaks then?

bro..

Joshua G · 11-06-2016, 12:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by C H R I S

The most incriminating thing in the wiki leaks emails is a risotto recipe:

7 Awesomely Random Food Tips From the WikiLeaks Dump | Mother Jones

hello chris. this one time i will help you with this. mother jones is a great source of information. a great place to go when the president is a GOP. opponents are always much better critics than the allies.

in this case, all of the media that has a liberal slant has decided to cover wikileaks by publishing the non-controversial elements of the email dumps. this is a method of mis-informing consumers of the liberal media, who dont yet know its slanted, into thinking nothing harmful is in the wikileaks. i assure you this is not true, & the liberal media is lying & misleading to you.

see, you have to read the wikileaks yourself, in order to be informed. you have to go beyond mother jones, if you want to inform yourself. its like exercise, you dont want to do it, but you are stronger & better for it.

but im certain, based on your comments, that all i wrote was too intelligent & abstract for you to comprehend. so please do reply by name calling, or deflecting, or otherwise changing the subject.

beerptrol · 11-06-2016, 01:05 PM

That must make the OP Trig

11-06-2016, 10:48 AM	#2
EddyTheDog Just Doing My Own Thing Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2011 Location: London, Spain, New Zealand, GFY - Not Croydon... Posts: 25,038	You seem to be getting more desperate every day - Is this some sort of breakdown?.. __________________ - Chaturbate Script - https://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-b...er-issues.html - Now supports White Labels

11-06-2016, 10:52 AM	#3
2MuchMark Videochat Solutions Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Canada Posts: 48,553	The only person other than Sarah Palin that is Sarah Palin, is you Josh'. #Hillary2016 __________________ VideoChat Solutions \| Custom Software \| IT Support https://www.2much.net \| https://www.lcntech.com

11-06-2016, 12:46 PM	#30
C H R I S Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Marina Del Rey Posts: 10,845	The most incriminating thing in the wiki leaks emails is a risotto recipe: 7 Awesomely Random Food Tips From the WikiLeaks Dump \| Mother Jones __________________ C H R I S Retired Porn Veteran BH4L

11-06-2016, 12:47 PM	#31
C H R I S Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Marina Del Rey Posts: 10,845	Double post for Risotto lovers __________________ C H R I S Retired Porn Veteran BH4L

11-06-2016, 01:05 PM	#34
beerptrol Confirmed Asshole Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Half way between sobriety and fubar. Posts: 12,722	That must make the OP Trig __________________ “If we are to have another contest in the near future of our national existence, I predict that the dividing line will not be Mason and Dixon's but between patriotism and intelligence on the one side, and superstition, ambition and ignorance on the other.” -- Ulysses S. Grant

11-06-2016, 11:15 AM	#5
altmman Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2015 Location: usa Posts: 468	I think it's creepy that WikiLeaks is a bunch of stolen documents from a server that was hacked into and then plastered everywhere. Thats like someone hacking into into my phone and taking all my dick pics and posting them everywhere. weird. Also with what I heard so far theres nothing bad. Some snide comments in emails, who cares?

11-06-2016, 11:17 AM	#6
Joshua G dumb libs love censorship Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2008 Posts: 8,198	lookey lookey ad hominem attacks... that means they are attacking me personally instead of listening to the message. looks like calling liberals sarah palin hits them in their liberal G spot.

11-06-2016, 11:22 AM	#9
Joshua G dumb libs love censorship Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2008 Posts: 8,198	a number of liberal sarah palins have flocked into my thread. thank you altman for your contribution to the advancement of knowledge.

11-06-2016, 11:26 AM	#13
SuckOnThis So Fucking Banned Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: In my head Posts: 6,844

11-06-2016, 11:28 AM	#14
altmman Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2015 Location: usa Posts: 468	And what about Trump's missing emails? Donald Trumpâ€™s Companies Destroyed Emails in Defiance of Court Orders Or the Republican's 22 MILLION missing emails made on a private server during wartime? The George W. Bush White House â€˜Lostâ€™ 22 Million Emails At least Hillary showed up in court to explain herself. Trump & Republicans dont even go to court, they run out the clock. They really are sleazy for coming down hard on her when they were much much worse, and know it

11-06-2016, 12:14 PM	#25
Joshua G dumb libs love censorship Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2008 Posts: 8,198	do you liberals understand the word "information" ? the first part is inform...something that increases wisdom, knowledge. the second part is formation...forming info. information, whether it from a newspaper, or a letter to the paper, the source is irrelevent. just as it does not matter that a criminal hacker got the emails. the information itself, is the key. hence, the dumb liberal worries about HOW the information is gathered, not the content of the information...suckonthis has not uttered 1 single word on the information of post #1, that a hilary supporter that does not read wikileaks is ignorant. this is a undisputed fact. dumb lib.

11-06-2016, 12:23 PM	#27
Joshua G dumb libs love censorship Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2008 Posts: 8,198	when watergate broke, did liberals worry about where woodward/bernstein got their information? no. just the information mattered. todays dumb lib says wikileaks is not a legitimate source of information. to deflect from the information itself. that sounds like hypocrisy.