News Fukushima LEAK

[GFED]

Fucking crap. I love sushi now I'm avoiding it.

[crockett]

Originally Posted by GFED

Fucking crap. I love sushi now I'm avoiding it.

It's bad, but honestly what can anyone do about it? They haven't even been able to get into the worst reactor because there is so much radiation it destroys the equipment.. I mean honestly wtf do they do?

Sure they can tell you about it but it doesn't change anything. Honestly as bad as it is, I sort of wonder if controlled leakage is not the only solution. The core of these reactors turned molten and burned through their encasement. How deep that shit's gone is anyone guess...

It's just like Chernobyl, they just finished the new sarcophagus but it's life expectancy is only 100 years.. Then what?

We have the abilities to create this shit but not fix it when it goes wrong. Meanwhile people fight against green/renewable energy if favor of polluting our planet even more..

[INever]

Originally Posted by crockett

It's bad, but honestly what can anyone do about it? They haven't even been able to get into the worst reactor because there is so much radiation it destroys the equipment.. I mean honestly wtf do they do?

Sure they can tell you about it but it doesn't change anything. Honestly as bad as it is, I sort of wonder if controlled leakage is not the only solution. The core of these reactors turned molten and burned through their encasement. How deep that shit's gone is anyone guess...

It's just like Chernobyl, they just finished the new sarcophagus but it's life expectancy is only 100 years.. Then what?

We have the abilities to create this shit but not fix it when it goes wrong. Meanwhile people fight against green/renewable energy if favor of polluting our planet even more..

Yeah let's just be cucks and die.

[2MuchMark]

To be fair, Fukushima was hit with a 1-2 punch that day. Earthquake AND a tsunami.

Then again, these reactors are based on 50 year old technology. There are safer and more modern technologies available now that reactors should be based on.

There's a good article about that at Popsci: Building A Safer, Cleaner Nuclear Reactor | Popular Science

[2MuchMark]

Originally Posted by GFED

Fucking crap. I love sushi now I'm avoiding it.

Here you go!

[Sarn]

[crockett]

Originally Posted by INever

Yeah let's just be cucks and die.

So what are your bright plans to fix it? Gonna tweet about it and make Fukushima great again?

[Jigster715]

Enjoy the radium retards. I hope it sterilizes all of you.

[PR_Glen]

Originally Posted by INever

Yeah let's just be cucks and die.

where do these nicks keep coming from anyway? no posts ever then out of nowhere alt-right jibberish

[INever]

I've been here longer than you.

Just look to the left if you're not on your phone.

[INever]

Originally Posted by crockett

It's bad, but honestly what can anyone do about it? They haven't even been able to get into the worst reactor because there is so much radiation it destroys the equipment.. I mean honestly wtf do they do?

Sure they can tell you about it but it doesn't change anything. Honestly as bad as it is, I sort of wonder if controlled leakage is not the only solution. The core of these reactors turned molten and burned through their encasement. How deep that shit's gone is anyone guess...

It's just like Chernobyl, they just finished the new sarcophagus but it's life expectancy is only 100 years.. Then what?

We have the abilities to create this shit but not fix it when it goes wrong. Meanwhile people fight against green/renewable energy if favor of polluting our planet even more..

A day or two after this happened USgov invaded Lybia.

Instead of the world figuring out what to do, it's war war war.

Solution?

I'm not an engineer but it's obvious the rulers not only don't care about us, but they're idiots. Or aliens.

[scarlettcontent]

Isn't nuclear an old energy now? With all the advancements with our technology and ability to create renewable energy I can't believe people (other than those with investment portfolios) consider building bigger and "safer" reactors, when clearly there is no such thing as completely safe. The fact that renewable energy is cheaper and well renewable there is less profit in it, that's the bottom line.

[freecartoonporn]

we are fucked already, one more earthquake and kaboom.
i guess we need superman to throw those radioactive water tanks and rods on another planet.

[john1975]

Head for da hillz...and hide yo hoez.

Oops nevermind, the radiation will hit higher elevations first.

Just hide....Somewhere.

get ur ass to Mars.

Oops nevermind ....Aliens already occupy it.

Just go somewhere.

[john1975]

Even before Fuk-u-shima....Millions of tons of garbage was being dumped in our oceans yearly....And STILL is. The worst part is? Still nobody gives a shit. Commercial shippers tryn to cut costs, by dumping their garage overboard...Knowing nobody will see... Militaries of all countries do the same.. just hide it in the ocean no problem ...Could also b contributing to ocean level rises...Just all the garage itself. Millions of tons a year !!!!! Without any oversight. Who complaining about this ? Nobody.....Fuk the fish and ocean life...Humans more important .

[Relic]

Originally Posted by PR_Glen

where do these nicks keep coming from anyway? no posts ever then out of nowhere alt-right jibberish

Still crying cuck?

[crockett]

Originally Posted by INever

A day or two after this happened USgov invaded Lybia.

Instead of the world figuring out what to do, it's war war war.

Solution?

I'm not an engineer but it's obvious the rulers not only don't care about us, but they're idiots. Or aliens.

You are blaming the US for Fukushima? I mean really... First off Japan refused any assistance at first and is the entire world supposed to stop doing things because something bad happened somewhere?

Not saying I agree with attacking Lybia, but if we hadnt, what difference would it of made at Fukushima?

[INever]

It's a GE reactor, bruh.

[2MuchMark]

Originally Posted by scarlettcontent

Isn't nuclear an old energy now? With all the advancements with our technology and ability to create renewable energy I can't believe people (other than those with investment portfolios) consider building bigger and "safer" reactors, when clearly there is no such thing as completely safe. The fact that renewable energy is cheaper and well renewable there is less profit in it, that's the bottom line.

Great post. I thought I was the greenest person on GFY - nice to see I'm not alone.

That said though, Nuclear can be safe. There are modern technologies for nuclear available now. Fukushima and others are 30 years old... some are close to 50 years old.

When it comes to electricity: We should all get our energy from Solar, wind, or hydro first. Then Nuclear. Coal and natural gas should be way down on the list.

[crockett]

Originally Posted by INever

It's a GE reactor, bruh.

It doesn't matter.. It was 37 years old. The US didn't own it, GE didn't own it. Do you expect the US to invade Japan and force our services on them if they claim they can handle it?

[Sarn]

Originally Posted by 2MuchMark

Great post. I thought I was the greenest person on GFY - nice to see I'm not alone.

That said though, Nuclear can be safe. There are modern technologies for nuclear available now. Fukushima and others are 30 years old... some are close to 50 years old.

When it comes to electricity: We should all get our energy from Solar, wind, or hydro first. Then Nuclear. Coal and natural gas should be way down on the list.

Trump already work on that

Rex Tillerson, ExxonMobil and the separation of oil and state

?Exxon are very systematic and meticulous, and that worked out very well for them at Sakhalin,? says Thane Gustafson of IHS Markit, the consultancy. ?Their relationship with Rosneft has on the whole been very good.?
https://www.ft.com/content/2acabb7a-...c-be108f1c1dce



http://www.sakhalin-1.com/Sakhalin/Russia-English/Upstream/default.aspx

Sakhalin here)

[jsmih]

Originally Posted by scarlettcontent

Isn't nuclear an old energy now? With all the advancements with our technology and ability to create renewable energy I can't believe people (other than those with investment portfolios) consider building bigger and "safer" reactors, when clearly there is no such thing as completely safe. The fact that renewable energy is cheaper and well renewable there is less profit in it, that's the bottom line.

Please tell me exactly how you get a 1000 MW per hour all night from a solar plant after dark, or continuous 24-7 power from wind? The best solar can do is hook up a giant system of storage tanks filled with hazardous molten chemicals to power a small steam plant for a few hours after sunset.

If you look at societal impact, ALL electrical production has risks. Nuclear has it's radiation risk, solar panels use dangerous materials in their semiconductors, wind is noisy and endangers birds, hydro has dam failures, coal (even clean coal) is filthy and emits more radiation than a nuclear plant.

[GFED]

[JFK]

Originally Posted by 2MuchMark

Here you go!

[jbvryant]

Oh well Fuk u shima indeed