News North Korea claims it has loaded H-bomb onto ICBM - GoFuckYourself.com

SilentKnight · 09-02-2017, 06:24 PM

Seems the escalation continues...

SEOUL, Korea, Republic Of -- North Korean leader Kim Jong Un inspected a new, "super explosive" hydrogen bomb meant to be loaded into an intercontinental ballistic missile, Pyongyang's state media said Sunday, a claim to technological mastery that some outside experts will doubt but that raises the possibility of an imminent nuclear bomb test.

Full story

Spunky · 09-02-2017, 06:27 PM

They need a couple h bombs to wake them up

Rochard · 09-02-2017, 06:33 PM

Thanks Trump

Rochard · 09-02-2017, 06:34 PM

All kidding aside, didn't our leader promise us North Korea would never have ICBMs?

I guess this is more fail for the red hats.

EonBlue · 09-02-2017, 06:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard

All kidding aside, didn't our leader promise us North Korea would never have ICBMs?

I guess this is more fail for the red hats.

Presidents, from both "sides", have been letting this shit slide for the past 30+ years and yet you somehow now find it convenient to blame it on the guy who has been in power for 9 months?

I'm no fan of Trump but it seems a little convenient for you to trot out this argument now that the "chickens have come home to roost" after 30 or so years of failed policy in regards to North Korea.

Trump is a lot of things but he is not the reason that NK now has nukes and/or ICBM's. That all falls on his predecessors.

.

SilentKnight · 09-02-2017, 10:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EonBlue

Presidents, from both "sides", have been letting this shit slide for the past 30+ years and yet you somehow now find it convenient to blame it on the guy who has been in power for 9 months?

I'm no fan of Trump but it seems a little convenient for you to trot out this argument now that the "chickens have come home to roost" after 30 or so years of failed policy in regards to North Korea.

Trump is a lot of things but he is not the reason that NK now has nukes and/or ICBM's. That all falls on his predecessors.

.

As you say, several administrations have dropped the North Korean football over the past few decades - but I feel Trump may be the latest impetus for NK to be foolish enough to let one fly soon.

I'm losing confidence that cooler heads will prevail this time.

mikeet · 09-02-2017, 10:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spunky

They need a couple h bombs to wake them up

haha sounds a bit extreme but i guess id have to agree

mikeet · 09-02-2017, 10:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard

All kidding aside, didn't our leader promise us North Korea would never have ICBMs?

I guess this is more fail for the red hats.

It's hard to say man but with the way things are now you never know!

pimpmaster9000 · 09-03-2017, 03:07 AM

I like how some people pretend that n.korea is not supposed to have nukes and should just bend over every time the USA decides to invade

motherfuckers, you are delusional LOL what the fuck did you think was going to happen?

meanwhile, serial invader USA is stocking the fuck up on all sorts of weapons and the small countries are supposed to fight fair?

klinton · 09-03-2017, 03:21 AM

1,2,3,4, lets march together comrade !!!

Quote:

Originally Posted by crucifissio

motherfuckers, you are delusional LOL what the fuck did you think was going to happen?

SilentKnight · 09-03-2017, 08:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crucifissio

meanwhile, serial invader USA is stocking the fuck up on all sorts of weapons and the small countries are supposed to fight fair?

Fighting fair?

Worked well for Japan in WWII, didn't it.

Pearl Harbour only cost them Hiroshima and Nagasaki...and 67 other cities they carpet-bombed into rubble.

Sarn · 09-03-2017, 09:53 AM

Joshua G · 09-03-2017, 10:13 AM

love how history repeats itself over & over.

watch madman build up military, good side does nothing.

gee when did this happen before?

if the USA is too chicken shit to strike first, then at least do a trade embargo on china. since they are the enablers.

Barry-xlovecam · 09-03-2017, 10:18 AM

The world didn't end when Hiroshima and Nagasaki were destroyed. The Russians and Chinese would protest the destruction of North Korea for years but they would not attack the USA because if they do-- we all die. Or, will end up surviving and wishing we did not survive when we see the life in that aftermath.

So President *Fire and Fury* has a very hard choice to make. Tactical nuclear weapons and ABM missile defense should be considered. Conventional invasion and conflict is not to be considered.

2MuchMark · 09-03-2017, 10:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joshua G

love how history repeats itself over & over.

watch madman build up military, good side does nothing.

gee when did this happen before?

if the USA is too chicken shit to strike first, then at least do a trade embargo on china. since they are the enablers.

A first-strike against NK would be a complete disaster for all kinds of reasons. It would result in hundreds of tens of thousands of casualties, and hundreds of thousands of refugees that nearby countries could not handle. Even a surgical strike or simple assassination would result in the same thing. If the NK Government fails, millions of people would become displaced as smaller civil wars would break out.

The best possible outcome is to calm UN down.

Donald Trump, in all his deal-making expertise (lol), should invite UN to the US for dinner, complete with security protection and welcome. Make a deal to end the bullshit, open up new trade, etc. Maybe build a couple of fugly Trump Hotels here and there (Illegal yes, but he'll be in jail soon anyway).

UN wants money and respect. Maybe Trump can give him both.

Joshua G · 09-03-2017, 10:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 2MuchMark

Donald Trump, in all his deal-making expertise (lol), should invite UN to the US for dinner, complete with security protection and welcome. Make a deal to end the bullshit, open up new trade, etc. Maybe build a couple of fugly Trump Hotels here and there (Illegal yes, but he'll be in jail soon anyway).

UN wants money and respect. Maybe Trump can give him both.

more talking...wow that's worked so well for 20 years now.

comical dumb lib.

Sarn · 09-03-2017, 11:05 AM

today:

China's Xi To Welcome Putin, Other BRICS Leaders For Summit
https://www.rferl.org/a/brics-brazil.../28713189.html

it was answer as I think - on it

Trump says he ordered strikes on Syria over dessert with Xi

https://www.washingtonpost.com/video...=.e2d374b24a17

baddog · 09-03-2017, 11:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EonBlue

Presidents, from both "sides", have been letting this shit slide for the past 30+ years and yet you somehow now find it convenient to blame it on the guy who has been in power for 9 months?

I'm no fan of Trump but it seems a little convenient for you to trot out this argument now that the "chickens have come home to roost" after 30 or so years of failed policy in regards to North Korea.

Trump is a lot of things but he is not the reason that NK now has nukes and/or ICBM's. That all falls on his predecessors.

.

It you own a cat, dog, or bird, try explaining to them. They will understand as much as Rochead.

pimpmaster9000 · 09-03-2017, 12:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SilentKnight

Fighting fair?

Worked well for Japan in WWII, didn't it.

Pearl Harbour only cost them Hiroshima and Nagasaki...and 67 other cities they carpet-bombed into rubble.

If you take away small countries ability to fight off your invasions conventionally, they will start to fight you unconventionally...this may confuse your invader beliefs, after all you are the USA and you are special...when you guys invade it does not count LOL...but seriously, you guys invest 600bil/year in invasion and you honestly expect others not to nuke the fuck up? Crazy Americans...

SilentKnight · 09-03-2017, 04:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crucifissio

If you take away small countries ability to fight off your invasions conventionally, they will start to fight you unconventionally...this may confuse your invader beliefs, after all you are the USA and you are special...when you guys invade it does not count LOL...but seriously, you guys invest 600bil/year in invasion and you honestly expect others not to nuke the fuck up? Crazy Americans...

Paul Markham · 09-04-2017, 03:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard

All kidding aside, didn't our leader promise us North Korea would never have ICBMs?

I guess this is more fail for the red hats.

It takes longer than 6 months to build a nuclear ballistic missiles program.

What do you think should be done?

Paul Markham · 09-04-2017, 03:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 2MuchMark

A first-strike against NK would be a complete disaster for all kinds of reasons. It would result in hundreds of tens of thousands of casualties, and hundreds of thousands of refugees that nearby countries could not handle. Even a surgical strike or simple assassination would result in the same thing. If the NK Government fails, millions of people would become displaced as smaller civil wars would break out.

The best possible outcome is to calm UN down.

Donald Trump, in all his deal-making expertise (lol), should invite UN to the US for dinner, complete with security protection and welcome. Make a deal to end the bullshit, open up new trade, etc. Maybe build a couple of fugly Trump Hotels here and there (Illegal yes, but he'll be in jail soon anyway).

UN wants money and respect. Maybe Trump can give him both.

Trump is doing all he can, threatening trade restrictions on countries supporting NK is a great move. What will China do, go to war???

NK is a problem and it will not be resolved with the present regime in power. Getting rid of them and allowing businesses into NK will be the best outcome for everyone, including the Chinese.

adultchatpay · 09-04-2017, 04:12 AM

A bad sign for everyone. I hope it won't go into war.

AndyA · 09-04-2017, 04:48 AM

Geez what happened to FIRE AND FURY if they did ONE more thing?

Trump talked endlessly about that 'red line' Obama mistakenly made with Syria and chemical weapons

now he did the same thing.. I hate Trump

AndyA · 09-04-2017, 04:49 AM

Mr America First

the SECOND this Russian probe starts heating up we will be bombing NK TRUST ME

just a punk · 09-04-2017, 04:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sarn

^^^ That's why Russia and South Korea have a mutual visa free regime

bronco67 · 09-04-2017, 06:20 AM

and I could claim I shot a load into Selena Gomez.

Sarn · 09-04-2017, 07:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crucifissio

If you take away small countries ability to fight off your invasions conventionally, they will start to fight you unconventionally...this may confuse your invader beliefs, after all you are the USA and you are special...when you guys invade it does not count LOL...but seriously, you guys invest 600bil/year in invasion and you honestly expect others not to nuke the fuck up? Crazy Americans...

Who says few nuke bomb will save small countries?

Google Expert · 09-04-2017, 08:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard

Thanks Trump

Obama, being a n**ger faggot liberal pussy, let it happen. Now Trump has to take care of the problem.

onwebcam · 09-04-2017, 08:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard

All kidding aside, didn't our leader promise us North Korea would never have ICBMs?

I guess this is more fail for the red hats.

Yes because it only takes a few months to develop.

09-02-2017, 06:24 PM	#1
SilentKnight Megan Fox's fluffer Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: shooting pool in Elysium Posts: 24,818	North Korea claims it has loaded H-bomb onto ICBM Seems the escalation continues... SEOUL, Korea, Republic Of -- North Korean leader Kim Jong Un inspected a new, "super explosive" hydrogen bomb meant to be loaded into an intercontinental ballistic missile, Pyongyang's state media said Sunday, a claim to technological mastery that some outside experts will doubt but that raises the possibility of an imminent nuclear bomb test. Full story

09-02-2017, 06:27 PM	#2
Spunky I need a beer Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: ♠ Toiletville ♠ Posts: 133,919	They need a couple h bombs to wake them up __________________ *Skype : Spunky GFY*

09-02-2017, 06:33 PM	#3
Rochard Jägermeister Test Pilot Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: NORCAL Posts: 72,903	Thanks Trump __________________ “The choice is no longer between right or left. The choice is between normal and crazy.” - Sarah Huckabee Sanders YNOT MAIL \| THE BEST ADULT MAILING SOLUTION

09-02-2017, 06:34 PM	#4
Rochard Jägermeister Test Pilot Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: NORCAL Posts: 72,903	All kidding aside, didn't our leader promise us North Korea would never have ICBMs? I guess this is more fail for the red hats. __________________ “The choice is no longer between right or left. The choice is between normal and crazy.” - Sarah Huckabee Sanders YNOT MAIL \| THE BEST ADULT MAILING SOLUTION

09-03-2017, 03:07 AM	#9
pimpmaster9000 Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2011 Posts: 26,732	I like how some people pretend that n.korea is not supposed to have nukes and should just bend over every time the USA decides to invade motherfuckers, you are delusional LOL what the fuck did you think was going to happen? meanwhile, serial invader USA is stocking the fuck up on all sorts of weapons and the small countries are supposed to fight fair? __________________ Report a suspicious cracker: Click Here

09-03-2017, 09:53 AM	#12
Sarn Say for stagnation Yes!!1 Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2015 Location: Russia Posts: 10,921

09-03-2017, 10:13 AM	#13
Joshua G dumb libs love censorship Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2008 Posts: 8,198	love how history repeats itself over & over. watch madman build up military, good side does nothing. gee when did this happen before? if the USA is too chicken shit to strike first, then at least do a trade embargo on china. since they are the enablers.

09-03-2017, 10:18 AM	#14
Barry-xlovecam It's 42 Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: Global Posts: 18,083	The world didn't end when Hiroshima and Nagasaki were destroyed. The Russians and Chinese would protest the destruction of North Korea for years but they would not attack the USA because if they do-- we all die. Or, will end up surviving and wishing we did not survive when we see the life in that aftermath. So President Fire and Fury has a very hard choice to make. Tactical nuclear weapons and ABM missile defense should be considered. Conventional invasion and conflict is not to be considered.

09-03-2017, 11:05 AM	#17
Sarn Say for stagnation Yes!!1 Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2015 Location: Russia Posts: 10,921	today: China's Xi To Welcome Putin, Other BRICS Leaders For Summit https://www.rferl.org/a/brics-brazil.../28713189.html it was answer as I think - on it Trump says he ordered strikes on Syria over dessert with Xi https://www.washingtonpost.com/video...=.e2d374b24a17

09-04-2017, 04:12 AM	#23
adultchatpay Let's Make Money Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2008 Posts: 8,784	A bad sign for everyone. I hope it won't go into war.

09-04-2017, 04:48 AM	#24
AndyA So Fucking Banned Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: Tampa, Fl. Posts: 1,670	Geez what happened to FIRE AND FURY if they did ONE more thing? Trump talked endlessly about that 'red line' Obama mistakenly made with Syria and chemical weapons now he did the same thing.. I hate Trump

09-04-2017, 04:49 AM	#25
AndyA So Fucking Banned Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: Tampa, Fl. Posts: 1,670	Mr America First the SECOND this Russian probe starts heating up we will be bombing NK TRUST ME

09-04-2017, 06:20 AM	#27
bronco67 Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 29,035	and I could claim I shot a load into Selena Gomez. __________________