Mueller Gets Indictment -- Heads Will Roll -- Guess the Defendant!

[Barry-xlovecam]

https://news.google.com/news/story/d...n&gl=US&ned=us

I vote for Michael Flynn; and that Flynn rolls over, cops a plea and more people are indicted.

The White House had "no comment."

[BaldBastard]

This shits about to get real, Magna side distraction needed, Hillary blow up of this week did'nt do as well as expected.

[2MuchMark]

It has to be Manafort. They told him to prepare for it... they raided his house...

I suspect The Kush will be next.

[Barry-xlovecam]

Maybe, the KKK will burn Hillary in effigy on a cross this weekend ....

[BaldBastard]

Originally Posted by 2MuchMark

It has to be Manafort. They told him to prepare for it... they raided his house...
I suspect The Kush will be next.

Even we who follow the news, across various countries and platforms reading both sides.. wouldn't have any idea who's going to go down.

We can only guess!
and that's for only one reason
they're all guilty, as fuck...

Pick a number who's next...

[Google Expert]

Hey Barry, why did you get shit-canned as an affiliate rep from xlovecam.com ?

[Barry-xlovecam]

Monday is warrant day ...

[Google Expert]

TRIGGERED ^

[Rochard]

We should have an investigation. Into Hillary. Again. She must be corrupt.

[beerptrol]

My guess would be someone close to Manafort or Flynn in order to get them to cooperate

[RedFred]

[mineistaken]

Crookedteer circle jerk train!

[RedFred]

Originally Posted by Google Expert

Hey Barry, why did you get shit-canned as an affiliate rep from xlovecam.com ?

[crockett]

Flynn and Manafort are the obvious but there were others as well and I'm sure Kushner is on the list.

Notice Kushner has all but disappeared from the action as of late..

[crockett]

Just remember MAGA on impeachment day!

[crockett]

Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam

Maybe, the KKK will burn Hillary in effigy on a cross this weekend ....

No they are having white lives matter rallies..

[Rochard]

Originally Posted by crockett

Flynn and Manafort are the obvious but there were others as well and I'm sure Kushner is on the list.

Notice Kushner has all but disappeared from the action as of late..

All of these people are guilty as sin. Take any average person and put them under an intense microscope of the FBI for six months and chances are you will find that they've broken a law somewhere along the line. I'm not talking about murder, but instead something with their taxes, or some business law you and I never heard of.

These people are all filthy rich, and the more money they have the more risk there is. If "Joe" cheats on his taxes to the tune of $12k he gets a fine and a slap on the wrist. If Jared Kushner cheats on his taxes, it's to the tune of tens of millions of dollars.

What's about to happen is going to make Trump look even worse than he currently is. He is, by far, the most unpopular president ever. If everyone around him ends up getting charged and goes to trial, it will make Trump look even worse.

I'm not concerned with people cheating on their taxes, etc.... I hate Trump and it's amusing and frankly I'm fine with anything that makes Trump look bad and weakens his administration, but what I really concerned about is what the Russian government did with our elections. It's painfully obvious that the Russian government influenced our election in dozens of ways, and most likely dozens of ways we do not know even know yet. The President of the United States isn't remotely interested in having an investigation into this which is fucking mind blowing.

Just the fact that Trump isn't ordering an investigation into this tells me he was part of it.

[The Truth Hurts]

CNN knows who it is* ... but they?re not spilling the beans ... i wonder why.

probably gonna be a lot of dissapointed people when the person is revealed.

(*assuming they didn't fabricate the story)

[Acepimp]

Before you jokers get too excited about Manafort's indictment, keep in mind that he was actually working for.... that's right the Podesta Group, the shady lobbying firm run by crooked dems.

Source Tells Tucker Carlson: Manafort Worked for Podesta Group Before Trump!

It's a RUSE, to cover up their own crimes. Most of you guys will fall for it

[Barry-xlovecam]

Every so called self proclaimed 'expert' is full of shit.

[Barry-xlovecam]

Let the heads roll where they may -- drain the swamp -- right?

[Barry-xlovecam]

I really don't want Trump impeached -- a President Mike Dence will be a nightmare.

Just hobble Trump with legal woes for years and dump his ass in 2020.

New political party PLEASE! the D and R are both imbeciles at the moment.

[Acepimp]

This is the part where they tell Manafort "Admit that Trump was working with Putin and we'll let you off the hook."

They want him to lie. It won't work, and they will all be investigated for their shady Russia deals

[BaldBastard]

Originally Posted by Acepimp

Before you jokers get too excited about Manafort's indictment, keep in mind that he was actually working for.... that's right the Podesta Group, the shady lobbying firm run by crooked dems.

Source Tells Tucker Carlson: Manafort Worked for Podesta Group Before Trump!

It's a RUSE, to cover up their own crimes. Most of you guys will fall for it

Whys that article start with "Sources say", then in the middle claims "was indeed", then finally ends up again with .. "according to this anonymous source".

You understand you write it like that so your not legally liable, its called fake news looks like its straight off a template.

Is English not your first language or just easily manipulated to anyone's agenda?

[Acepimp]

Originally Posted by MrBaldBastard

Whys that article start with "Sources say", then in the middle claims "was indeed", then finally ends up again with .. "according to this anonymous source".

You understand you write it like that so your not legally liable, its called fake news looks like its straight off a template.

Is English not your first language or just easily manipulated to anyone's agenda?

You mean like what the mainstream media does every day with "anonymous sources"?

[BaldBastard]

Originally Posted by Acepimp

You mean like what the mainstream media does every day with "anonymous sources"?

Well in many ways yes, except this time.. Jokes on you.

[RedFred]

Originally Posted by Acepimp

This is the part where they tell Manafort "Admit that Trump was working with Putin and we'll let you off the hook."

They want him to lie. It won't work, and they will all be investigated for their shady Russia deals

Sending a truckload of straws your way to improve your odds at grasping one of them.

[kane]

I would guess it would be Flynn or Manafort, but I won't be shocked if it is one or more lesser-known people. Often investigations start by casting a wide net and slowly gather evidence and information to go after the big guys. They may have some small time people in mind here that they think have info that can help them bring down the big guys.

[Acepimp]

Originally Posted by RedFred

Sending a truckload of straws your way to improve your odds at grasping one of them.

Wait, so there's no shady Russia uranium deal involving HillBillary, Mueller, Comey, & the Podesta brothers? Taking bribes from foreign governments is a crime.

It seems it's you who needs the straws, buddy

[onwebcam]

Originally Posted by MrBaldBastard

Whys that article start with "Sources say", then in the middle claims "was indeed", then finally ends up again with .. "according to this anonymous source".

You understand you write it like that so your not legally liable, its called fake news looks like its straight off a template.

Is English not your first language or just easily manipulated to anyone's agenda?

It doesn't matter who their sources were because it is fact. Why do you think both Manafort and Molesta Group were both scrambling to file disclosures?

[Helix]

I'll wait for Monday but until then i'm enjoying watching the show.

[kane]

Originally Posted by Acepimp

You mean like what the mainstream media does every day with "anonymous sources"?

Just to make sure I am clear.

Anonymous sources when the story is one you don't like = bad and fake news.

Anonymous sources when the story is one you do like = good and likely real.

Am I correct?

[GAMEFINEST]

Shits about to hit the fan

[Rochard]

Originally Posted by Acepimp

Before you jokers get too excited about Manafort's indictment, keep in mind that he was actually working for.... that's right the Podesta Group, the shady lobbying firm run by crooked dems.

Source Tells Tucker Carlson: Manafort Worked for Podesta Group Before Drumpf!

It's a RUSE, to cover up their own crimes. Most of you guys will fall for it

No. I don't believe Manafort worked for the Podesta Group. A single reporter on the Fox propaganda channel does not mean it's fact. A serious news source citing a "confidential source" is remotely trustworthy, but anything on Fox news, well, isn't trustworthy at all.

Did you read the article at all? Did it say what Manafort's title was? Odd. If he worked for the Podesta Group in any way, shape or form, he would have a title. And business cards.

Seems to me like this article is trying to put distance between Manafort and Trump, and trying to make it seem like Manafort had "deep" ties to the Podestra Group.

What the source shared with Tucker Carlson is that the ties of Manafort were shallow with regards to being on the Trump campaign team for a time in comparison to his years of not only working as a lobbyist on behalf of Russia, but also in comparison to his deep connection with the Podesta Group and Hillary Clinton!

Everyone knows Manafort worked directly for Trump's campaign, yet no one seems to know anything about him working for the Podesta Group except for one person who is top secret, and on the Fox propaganda channel.

So if Manafort worked for the Podesta Group, how come he only showed up "once a month" and was "representing Russian business and political interests. According to the article...

In the years following, our source says he saw Manafort in the Podesta Group offices quote, ?all the time,? at least once a month. Manafort was not there to socialize. He was representing Russian business and political interests who sought to influence Capitol Hill, Hillary Clinton?s State Department, and the Obama administration. Our source describes Manafort bringing what he called ?a parade? of Russian oligarchs to the Congress, where they met with members and their staffs, but the central effort to extend Russian influence was focused at the Executive Branch, the Obama administration.

Seems like Manafort was working for the Russians, and trying to buy influence with everyone in Washington. That surely doesn't sound like he worked for the Podesta Group.

The final paragraph reads....

So it seems that Manafort was indeed lobbying hard on behalf of the Russian government for years, and there is every reason to believe that he may have joined Drumpf?s team to get close to him in the event that he should win. When it was discovered that he was the subject of an FBI investigation into his work with the ECMU, Trump fired him, but it was Clinton who was working with Manafort for years, according to this source, to give the Russians undue influence in American government circles, efforts which included cornering the market on U.S. uranium deposits.

We all know he worked for the Russian government for years, but they are clearly trying to tie Manafort into Clinton and the Podesta Group without ANY proof at all.

But you keep trying.

[bronco67]

I can't remember where I read this and I take it with the proverbial grain of salt, but it would be great if true...but in a comments section a person said they are very close with someone in IC (intelligence community) and IC says that "they have Trump" and "he will die in jail".

[Rochard]

Originally Posted by Acepimp

You mean like what the mainstream media does every day with "anonymous sources"?

There is a huge difference here.

When mainstream media uses an anonymous source it means it is a legitimate, and the entire network stands behind it. In this case, it's a single reporter and is not backed up by his network - both of with are heavily biased and more less nothing more than propaganda.

In this case, they are claiming Manafort worked for the Podesta Group for a long period of time and Manafort was "at their office all the time" yet offers up no proof other than a single dinner.

Manafort working for the Podesta Group should be very, VERY easy to verify yet.... No one can find any trace of it.

[Rochard]

Originally Posted by onwebcam

It doesn't matter who their sources were because it is fact. Why do you think both Manafort and Molesta Group were both scrambling to file disclosures?

No, it's not fact. If Manafort worked for the Podesta Group it should be very VERY easy to verify. Yet there seems to be no evidence of this other than one "anonymous source".

All this really has become is deflection. They are trying to get people to believe that Manafort didn't have close ties to Trump and instead want you to believe that Manafort really worked for the Democrats. Bullshit.

If the Podesta brothers are involved in this and have committed a crime, charge them, bring them to trial, and if found guilty lock their asses up.

We impeached Bill Clinton when he lied under oath in front of his wife about getting a blow job yet for some reason Jeff Sessions is still in office after he lied under oath multiple times.

[Rochard]

Originally Posted by Acepimp

Wait, so there's no shady Russia uranium deal involving HillBillary, Mueller, Comey, & the Podesta brothers? Taking bribes from foreign governments is a crime.

It seems it's you who needs the straws, buddy

Taking bribes from a foreign government is in fact a crime. However, there is no proof that happened here. At all.

This was a routine government decision that doesn't even seem to have involved the Secretary of State, nor did any money go directly into her pocket. But let's have an investigation.

This is getting very dangerous. It is now to the point where a routine government decision is being linked to a charity and accusations being made without any proof.

Whatever. We had a dozen investigations into Clinton, which produced no charges. One investigation into Trump - which is just getting started - and we have charges. Go figure.

Jesus fucking Christ already. I hate Clinton as much as the next person, but you have nothing on her at all.

The Senate is having an investigation, and the Republicans are only showing up when former Obama staff members are being interviewed. It's become obvious the Russian government influenced our election, and Republicans are doing NOTHING about it. So much for caring about our country.

[Matt 26z]

I predict the crimes will have taken place under the Obama admin, but the media will focus on Trump.

[onwebcam]

Originally Posted by Rochard

No. I don't believe Manafort worked for the Podesta Group. A single reporter on the Fox propaganda channel does not mean it's fact. A serious news source citing a "confidential source" is remotely trustworthy, but anything on Fox news, well, isn't trustworthy at all.

Did you read the article at all? Did it say what Manafort's title was? Odd. If he worked for the Podesta Group in any way, shape or form, he would have a title. And business cards.

Seems to me like this article is trying to put distance between Manafort and Trump, and trying to make it seem like Manafort had "deep" ties to the Podestra Group.

What the source shared with Tucker Carlson is that the ties of Manafort were shallow with regards to being on the Trump campaign team for a time in comparison to his years of not only working as a lobbyist on behalf of Russia, but also in comparison to his deep connection with the Podesta Group and Hillary Clinton!

Everyone knows Manafort worked directly for Trump's campaign, yet no one seems to know anything about him working for the Podesta Group except for one person who is top secret, and on the Fox propaganda channel.

So if Manafort worked for the Podesta Group, how come he only showed up "once a month" and was "representing Russian business and political interests. According to the article...

In the years following, our source says he saw Manafort in the Podesta Group offices quote, ‘all the time,’ at least once a month. Manafort was not there to socialize. He was representing Russian business and political interests who sought to influence Capitol Hill, Hillary Clinton’s State Department, and the Obama administration. Our source describes Manafort bringing what he called “a parade” of Russian oligarchs to the Congress, where they met with members and their staffs, but the central effort to extend Russian influence was focused at the Executive Branch, the Obama administration.

Seems like Manafort was working for the Russians, and trying to buy influence with everyone in Washington. That surely doesn't sound like he worked for the Podesta Group.

The final paragraph reads....

So it seems that Manafort was indeed lobbying hard on behalf of the Russian government for years, and there is every reason to believe that he may have joined Drumpf’s team to get close to him in the event that he should win. When it was discovered that he was the subject of an FBI investigation into his work with the ECMU, Trump fired him, but it was Clinton who was working with Manafort for years, according to this source, to give the Russians undue influence in American government circles, efforts which included cornering the market on U.S. uranium deposits.

We all know he worked for the Russian government for years, but they are clearly trying to tie Manafort into Clinton and the Podesta Group without ANY proof at all.

But you keep trying.

He didn't work "for" Podesta. He worked "with" Podesta. As in they were working together separately. It's not a rumor or conspiracy theory it's a fact. It's why he a Podesta group had to back file disclosures.

[onwebcam]

Originally Posted by Rochard

Taking bribes from a foreign government is in fact a crime. However, there is no proof that happened here. At all.

This was a routine government decision that doesn't even seem to have involved the Secretary of State, nor did any money go directly into her pocket. But let's have an investigation.

This is getting very dangerous. It is now to the point where a routine government decision is being linked to a charity and accusations being made without any proof.

Whatever. We had a dozen investigations into Clinton, which produced no charges. One investigation into Trump - which is just getting started - and we have charges. Go figure.

Jesus fucking Christ already. I hate Clinton as much as the next person, but you have nothing on her at all.

The Senate is having an investigation, and the Republicans are only showing up when former Obama staff members are being interviewed. It's become obvious the Russian government influenced our election, and Republicans are doing NOTHING about it. So much for caring about our country.

No proof? It's publicly admitted fact 145 million was given to her foundation by the players involved. You can keep acting as if they aren't getting any of that money but you know damn well they did/are. It's as simple as setting up another fake charity and paying themselves out of it. Better yet a trust... You're a goddamn fool to believe otherwise.

[C H R I S]

Flynn for sure - he has already been thrown under the bus.

Manafort close second.

Trumpy is a longshot,

[crockett]

Originally Posted by RedFred

Are we sure she isnt a man? She looks a lot like a man,..

[2MuchMark]

Originally Posted by RedFred

[Barry-xlovecam]

[BaldBastard]

Originally Posted by onwebcam

No proof? It's publicly admitted fact 145 million was given to her foundation by the players involved. You can keep acting as if they aren't getting any of that money but you know damn well they did/are. It's as simple as setting up another fake charity and paying themselves out of it. Better yet a trust... You're a goddamn fool to believe otherwise.

Even if at the end of the day Hillary was proven totally guilty you need to consider where that money went and what was done with it... Fighting disease and poverty around the world.

Where as Trump just builds a family empire and shits in a golden toilet.

you want to know what a doggey charity looks like.. read

https://www.forbes.com/sites/danalex.../#53abbeac6b4a

[crockett]

Originally Posted by Rochard

All of these people are guilty as sin. Take any average person and put them under an intense microscope of the FBI for six months and chances are you will find that they've broken a law somewhere along the line. I'm not talking about murder, but instead something with their taxes, or some business law you and I never heard of.

These people are all filthy rich, and the more money they have the more risk there is. If "Joe" cheats on his taxes to the tune of $12k he gets a fine and a slap on the wrist. If Jared Kushner cheats on his taxes, it's to the tune of tens of millions of dollars.

What's about to happen is going to make Trump look even worse than he currently is. He is, by far, the most unpopular president ever. If everyone around him ends up getting charged and goes to trial, it will make Trump look even worse.

I'm not concerned with people cheating on their taxes, etc.... I hate Trump and it's amusing and frankly I'm fine with anything that makes Trump look bad and weakens his administration, but what I really concerned about is what the Russian government did with our elections. It's painfully obvious that the Russian government influenced our election in dozens of ways, and most likely dozens of ways we do not know even know yet. The President of the United States isn't remotely interested in having an investigation into this which is fucking mind blowing.

Just the fact that Trump isn't ordering an investigation into this tells me he was part of it.

Russia was only able to do what they did because they had a willing audience to believe their nonsense fake news stories. What needs to be looked at is how the right wing became so fucking hate filled and brain washed.

You dont have to look very far, all you have to do is take a drive around the country. When you get to those areas where the radio stops picking up the good stations you notice there is an abundance of right wing talk shows and reglious chatter filling the radio waves.

The relgious stations are busy brain washing them into believing they are the true righious people but only if they repent and obey. The talk show hosts all do nothing but white wash anything their team does whike literally blaming anything and everything on liberals.

I was driving through Tennessee a few days ago and some nutter right wing radio show had some guy on there blaming liberals for ruining his fanasty foodball league. The guy was like it's all my conservative buddies but the liberals ruined it because his buddies wanted extra points for this reason or that..somehow it was liberals fault..

They have been brainwashed for years by this tag team combo to the point they see anyone not a far right goon as themselves as being some evil liberal. Fox news just did the same but brought it to the masses..

You listen to the crack pots on these shows and you could easily picture them as so e radical muslim cleric if they happened to have been born in the middle east.

The simple fact is, Russia couldn't have done what they did, if not for the right wing media brainwashing these fools for years so they become so stupid as to actually believe in thngs lime pizzagate..

The entire right wing in this country has gone bat shit crazy.. Russia is only a minor issue, its the Right wing who is destroying this country from with in.

I mean look at guys like Matt26z and try to figure out how you could ever have a rational discussion with him, and then just know there are thousands just like him in rural America. Brainwashed to hate..

[Barry-xlovecam]

This was Tennessee this weekend:



There has been more hate activity in the USA in the past year then there has been in the last 20 years

WW2 Veterans are turning over in their graves -- seeing garbage like this on the lose in the USA.

My dad fought 2nd wave D-Day to Germany killing these scum along the way.

[onwebcam]

Originally Posted by MrBaldBastard

Even if at the end of the day Hillary was proven totally guilty you need to consider where that money went and what was done with it... Fighting disease and poverty around the world.

Where as Trump just builds a family empire and shits in a golden toilet.

you want to know what a doggey charity looks like.. read

https://www.forbes.com/sites/danalex.../#53abbeac6b4a

The ONLY claim to fame the Clinton foundation has is "negotiating prices." They weren't buying medication... They weren't even buying down the prices. They were just negotiating lower prices.. It costs pretty much nothing to negotiate prices..

[Rochard]

Originally Posted by onwebcam

He didn't work "for" Podesta.

So now he didn't work for Podesta?

Which is it? Was Manafort on the payroll at the Podesta Group or not?