Direct Proof Trump's campaign was working with wikileaks

[crockett]

Twitter messages have been released which show Trump Jr, working directly with wikileaks via private messages on twitter..


https://www.theatlantic.com/amp/article/545738/


More fucking lies from Trump and his son...Trump claimed they didn't work with wikileaks or other Russians, yet time and time again we see he's a fucking crook & a liar..

This also shows how one sided and biased wikileaks is. Wikileaks = Russian propaganda..

[onwebcam]

Originally Posted by crockett

Twitter messages have been released which show Trump Jr, working directly with wikileaks via private messages on twitter..


https://www.theatlantic.com/amp/article/545738/


More fucking lies from Trump and his son...Trump claimed they didn't work with wikileaks or other Russians, yet time and time again we see he's a fucking crook & a liar..

"They are part of a long—and largely one-sided—correspondence between WikiLeaks and the president’s son"

"Though Trump Jr. mostly ignored the frequent messages from WikiLeaks, he at times appears to have acted on its requests. "

It takes 2 to tango. Them sending him info isn't really "working together" and wikileaks isn't Russian.

[crockett]

Originally Posted by onwebcam

"They are part of a long—and largely one-sided—correspondence between WikiLeaks and the president’s son"

"Though Trump Jr. mostly ignored the frequent messages from WikiLeaks, he at times appears to have acted on its requests. "

It takes 2 to tango. Them sending him info isn't "working together" and wikileaks isn't Russian.

Trump Jr did some of the things they requested, but they provided him with a private email address which we do not have any correspondence from that source as of yet. We have yet to see how much more of this stuff went on via that email..

This shows Trump 100% lied about working with wikileaks because there is now proof his son acting on behalf of the campaign did just that. This also removes any question at all of how biased wikileaks is and they can not be trusted as anything other than Russian propaganda..

wikileaks/RT same propaganda network just different website..

give it up putinbot.. you guys have been exposed.

[Sarn]

[wehateporn]

WikiLeaks have been fighting evil

[crockett]

Originally Posted by wehateporn

I get paid 700 rubles a month to post this shit

Can you even buy a bottle of vodka with 700 rubles?

[wehateporn]

Originally Posted by crockett

Can you even buy a bottle of vodka with 700 rubles?

WikiLeaks don't pay in rubles

[bronco67]

In what fantasy world did Julian Assange think he would be the Australian Ambassador?

[Rochard]

[Rochard]

[nico-t]

i remember when so called 'liberals' used to support wikileaks. Until the media told them wikileaks is evil.

Wikileaks is a breath of fresh air, a much needed medium to provide insight in how we the people are getting fucked by the establishment.

Citizens should be hungry for any inside information of the rotten system to learn how things really work. Yet some citizens started to condemn wikileaks all of a sudden, as ordered by their TV sets, because establishment puppet Clinton started appearing in the leaked emails.

You cannot come up with this. It's like a rape victim condemning the judge for sending the rapist to jail. Hypnotized sheep.

[Rochard]

Let me see if I understand this correctly.... Trump Jr was communicating with Wikileaks, the company that helped with the hacking of the DNC, and Wikileaks was passing Trump Jr. hacked access to an anti Trump PAC website.

LOL.

But... the emails....

[Rochard]

Originally Posted by nico-t

i remember when so called 'liberals' used to support wikileaks. Until the media told them wikileaks is evil.

Wikileaks is a breath of fresh air, a much needed medium to provide insight in how we the people are getting fucked by the establishment.

Citizens should be hungry for any inside information of the rotten system to learn how things really work. Yet some citizens started to condemn wikileaks all of a sudden, as ordered by their TV sets, because establishment puppet Clinton started appearing in the leaked emails.

You cannot come up with this. It's like a rape victim condemning the judge for sending the rapist to jail. Hypnotized sheep.

I never supported it from day one... No matter how you spin it they were involved in hacking and exposing secret / classified information. They exposed how our military was targeting terrorists.

I'm stunned the United States has allowed Wikileaks to continue to exist.

[nico-t]

Originally Posted by Rochard

I never supported it from day one... No matter how you spin it they were involved in hacking and exposing secret / classified information. They exposed how our military was targeting terrorists.

I'm stunned the United States has allowed Wikileaks to continue to exist.

Do you think Snowden is a traitor?

[Rochard]

Originally Posted by nico-t

Do you think Snowden is a traitor?

Yes. I am stunned Snowden is still alive.

Snowden betrayed the United States government.

[RedFred]

Gee, all foreigners defending this shit.

[slapass]

I always wondered how Snowden ended up in Russia. I guess now we know.

[Rochard]

Originally Posted by slapass

I always wondered how Snowden ended up in Russia. I guess now we know.

Was there any doubt?

I've always believed that Wikipedia started with the best of intentions. If you worked for a company, and you knew the company was doing something bad, immoral, or illegal, Wikileaks gave you a platform to expose the company and it's wrong doing without having to risk your job. It was a legal grey area.

Somewhere along the lines the moved into espionage, mostly targeted against the United States.

Snowden is a traitor. He was involved in treason. Period.

Eventually we will have a president with balls who will take Wikipedia down - completely. It will stared with strangling them financially, then mysterious deaths of Wikileaks staff members, eventually will lead to their servers being removed off line... Somewhere along the line Julian Assange will be targeted and killed. What you say? Julian Assange is in an embassy in London? And? It wouldn't be the first time the CIA has targeted an embassy in a foreign country.

Snowden is a dead man walking too.

[onwebcam]

Originally Posted by Rochard

Let me see if I understand this correctly....

[crockett]

Originally Posted by nico-t

i remember when so called 'liberals' used to support wikileaks. Until the media told them wikileaks is evil.

Wikileaks is a breath of fresh air, a much needed medium to provide insight in how we the people are getting fucked by the establishment.

Citizens should be hungry for any inside information of the rotten system to learn how things really work. Yet some citizens started to condemn wikileaks all of a sudden, as ordered by their TV sets, because establishment puppet Clinton started appearing in the leaked emails.

You cannot come up with this. It's like a rape victim condemning the judge for sending the rapist to jail. Hypnotized sheep.

I supported wikileaks when it first started. It seemed to have noble intentions at that point. Perhaps it was always a scam or perhaps Assange got turned by the Russians but at a certain point it became very clear wikileaks had become a extremely biased organization. Something it didn't seem to be in the beginning but maybe it always was or maybe they got turned and used as a propaganda outlet.

My guess is it was always biased with a Russian connection because even in the beginning, wikileaks never posted dirt on Russia when the dirt was out there just like it was for the US.

Snowden IMO is a patriot and did what needed to be done. IMO he paid the highest punishment for his actions aside from death. IMO he's played the cards the best he could after he leaked but I suspect the reason he ended up in Russia was because he was convinced by Assange to go there and Assange was already on Russia's payroll at that point.

[crockett]

Trump tweeted about Podesta emails 15 mins after wikileaks asked Trump Jr to do so...


Trump tweeted about Podesta emails 15 minutes after WikiLeaks asked Trump Jr. to: report | TheHill

Direct collusion with wikileaks who was handling hacked stolen emails. Trump Jr will be indited over this.. It's direct involvement of criminal conspiracy. Not to mention it's treason because he acted on behalf of a foreign agent for the intention of fucking with our election process..

There is so many laws broken here, violation of election laws, potential hacking charges if he was dumb enough to try to log into that website.. The list can go on and on.. Don Jr is fucked...

Trump Jr now goes down along with Kushner.. I was wondering what was gonna take Jr down in all this and now we see what it is...

[imabro]

Originally Posted by onwebcam

I almost choked when I read that.

[crockett]

Looks like the 12hr day in Moscow is over for onewebcam and wehateporn.. perhaps they will be back in the morning or maybe go for some overtime pay...

[Acepimp]

Yet another useless political post from Crockette.

1. Messaging on Twitter is not a crime.
2. Nothing was hacked or stolen. These were leaks (Seth Rich)
3. Trump Jr didn't ask for anything in the messages.

Conclusion: Crockette is parroting the fake media hysteria.... again

[2MuchMark]

Originally Posted by onwebcam

It takes 2 to tango. Them sending him info isn't really "working together" and wikileaks isn't Russian.

Try not to defend this stuff anymore dude... this is really serious stuff.

CNN Just broke the story. At least watch the short video. Donald Trump Jr. releases exchanges with WikiLeaks - CNNPolitics

[crockett]

Originally Posted by Acepimp

Yet another useless political post from Crockette.

1. Messaging on Twitter is not a crime.
2. Nothing was hacked or stolen. These were leaks (Seth Rich)
3. Trump Jr didn't ask for anything in the messages.

Conclusion: Crockette is parroting the fake media hysteria.... again

Ahh look the B team is here... denial, denial, denial.. wait for talking points from Moscow!

[Rochard]

Originally Posted by crockett

Snowden IMO is a patriot and did what needed to be done. IMO he paid the highest punishment for his actions aside from death. IMO he's played the cards the best he could after he leaked but I suspect the reason he ended up in Russia was because he was convinced by Assange to go there and Assange was already on Russia's payroll at that point.

Snowden is a traitor. He exposed how our intelligence community collects information against it's enemies. He weakened our nation.

[Rochard]

Originally Posted by Acepimp

Messaging on Twitter is not a crime.

When you discussing the release of illegally hacked information by a foreign government which assisted their campaign, yes, it is a crime. The Trump Campaign now received direct help from Wikileaks, if not Russia itself.

Drip. Drip. Drip.

[onwebcam]

Originally Posted by 2MuchMark

Try not to defend this stuff anymore dude... this is really serious stuff.

CNN Just broke the story. At least watch the short video. Donald Trump Jr. releases exchanges with WikiLeaks - CNNPolitics

Release on, I hope the left keeps on keeping on with this nonsense and pushes Trump to expose all the corrupt fucks in Washington.

It doesn't matter what wikileaks sent Trump. He has the fucking keys to all intel.

[crockett]

Originally Posted by Rochard

Snowden is a traitor. He exposed how our intelligence community collects information against it's enemies. He weakened our nation.

He also exposed that the NSA was spying on us.. Bush jr weakened our nation by secrectly allowing it to begin in the 1st place. With out Snowdon doing what he did, we might not have known the level the NSA had gone under the Bush admin with spying on Americans.

[Matt 26z]

Originally Posted by Rochard

Snowden is a traitor. He exposed how our intelligence community collects information against it's enemies. He weakened our nation.

Snowden is both a traitor and a hero.

I don't think anyone has a problem with the US spy agencies looking at what bad seeds across the world are doing, but they overstepped their bounds by spying on every American.

For decades the US government has photographed the outside of every piece of mail sent. They can look your name up and see everything you ever sent or received. They can not, however, indiscriminately open your mail and record your written communications. Whether they didn't do that because it was against the law or because it would have been physically impossible is open for debate. One thing is certain; once the digital age hit they began saving everything you ever sent or received. They have every email you sent in the year 1995. They have recordings of your Yahoo webcam chats from fifteen years ago. They have the text you entered into Facebook comments, but then deleted before hitting submit.

[Acepimp]

Originally Posted by crockett

Ahh look the B team is here... denial, denial, denial.. wait for talking points from Moscow!

I post simple facts, you scream Russian agent. Hysterical victim of fake news.

Originally Posted by Rochard

When you discussing the release of illegally hacked information by a foreign government which assisted their campaign, yes, it is a crime. The Trump Campaign now received direct help from Wikileaks, if not Russia itself.

Drip. Drip. Drip.

Rochard, it's a good thing none of that happened. The DNC has provided ZERO evidence of hacking. They refused to let the FBI examine the server, then said it must've been Russians. Seth Rich had access to the server. Looking at the data, it's been shown that the data was copied at a high rate of speed, indicating direct access with a flash drive, not a transfer over the internet.

Also, you claim "The Trump Campaign now received direct help from Wikileaks" -- Please indicate the message that shows any "help from wikileaks." You and Crockette are imagining things because you want SO badly to believe the Russia collusion delusion. It's clearly bogus when one looks at the facts. Why did the dems refuse to let any agencies examine the server? I think you got duped, sorry guys.

[Barry-xlovecam]

Will my count get to 500?

[Rochard]

Originally Posted by Acepimp

I post simple facts, you scream Russian agent. Hysterical victim of fake news.



Rochard, it's a good thing none of that happened. The DNC has provided ZERO evidence of hacking. They refused to let the FBI examine the server, then said it must've been Russians. Seth Rich had access to the server. Looking at the data, it's been shown that the data was copied at a high rate of speed, indicating direct access with a flash drive, not a transfer over the internet.

Also, you claim "The Trump Campaign now received direct help from Wikileaks" -- Please indicate the message that shows any "help from wikileaks." You and Crockette are imagining things because you want SO badly to believe the Russia collusion delusion. It's clearly bogus when one looks at the facts. Why did the dems refuse to let any agencies examine the server? I think you got duped, sorry guys.

The US intelligence community told us it was the Russians. This is not even open to discussion.

https://www.apnews.com/dea73efc01594839957c3c9a6c962b8a

We know exactly who did it. We know exactly how they got in.

How did the Trump Campaign get help from Wikileaks? We now have communication between Wikileaks and the Trump campaign coordinating with Wikileaks (Which seems to be controlled by the Russian government) on the release of hacked information by Russia.

Every week there is more information being released about this. They deny, deny, deny, and every week there is yet more "secret" communication with Russia.

Why wouldn't they go public with this information the moment they knew they were under investigation? Did they think we wouldn't find it?

Next up - Carter Page, Jeff Sessions, Jared, and Trump Jr.

[RedFred]

Originally Posted by Matt 26z

Snowden is both a traitor and a hero.

I don't think anyone has a problem with the US spy agencies looking at what bad seeds across the world are doing, but they overstepped their bounds by spying on every American.

For decades the US government has photographed the outside of every piece of mail sent. They can look your name up and see everything you ever sent or received. They can not, however, indiscriminately open your mail and record your written communications. Whether they didn't do that because it was against the law or because it would have been physically impossible is open for debate. One thing is certain; once the digital age hit they began saving everything you ever sent or received. They have every email you sent in the year 1995. They have recordings of your Yahoo webcam chats from fifteen years ago. They have the text you entered into Facebook comments, but then deleted before hitting submit.

Yep, they photographed 500 million pieces of mail every day for decades. Looking past the physical logistics I guess no postal worker has ever came clean about this because Hillary would have had them killed, right?

[Acepimp]

Originally Posted by Rochard

The US intelligence community told us it was the Russians. This is not even open to discussion.

https://www.apnews.com/dea73efc01594839957c3c9a6c962b8a

We know exactly who did it. We know exactly how they got in.

How did the Trump Campaign get help from Wikileaks? We now have communication between Wikileaks and the Trump campaign coordinating with Wikileaks (Which seems to be controlled by the Russian government) on the release of hacked information by Russia.

^^ The above AP article is full of opinions presented as facts. No, the 17 agencies didn't conclude that Russians hacked anything. The New York Times had to retract that story. The full details are right here:

Even New York Times correction is incorrect

From the article:

Tucked into the bottom of a story titled ?Trump?s Deflections and Denials on Russia Frustrate Even His Allies,? published on June 25, the Times added:

Correction: June 29, 2017
A White House Memo article on Monday about President Trump?s deflections and denials about Russia referred incorrectly to the source of an intelligence assessment that said Russia orchestrated hacking attacks during last year?s presidential election. The assessment was made by four intelligence agencies ? the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the Central Intelligence Agency, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the National Security Agency. The assessment was not approved by all 17 organizations in the American intelligence community.

But even that correction is inaccurate.

The assessment was not ?made by four intelligence agencies.? The four agencies approved the assessment. But the assessment itself was not done by the four agencies. It was done by a highly irregular committee.

That fact was disclosed by former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper during a Senate Judiciary subcommittee hearing on May 8, when he acknowledged the assessment was not conducted by his office, the FBI, the CIA and the NSA, but by a panel.

Clapper told senators the assessment was actually made by two dozen or so ?seasoned experts? who were ?handpicked? from the contributing agencies.

And how did those four agencies verify the accuracy of the panel?s assessment and ultimately give it their stamp of approval?

Clapper merely stated, ?I?m not aware of anyone who dissented or ? or disagreed when it came out.?

^^ THAT'S NOT HOW IT WORKS, Nice try, Obama

[Rochard]

Originally Posted by Acepimp

^^ The above AP article is full of opinions presented as facts. No, the 17 agencies didn't conclude that Russians hacked anything. The New York Times had to retract that story. The full details are right here:

Even New York Times correction is incorrect

From the article:

Tucked into the bottom of a story titled ?Trump?s Deflections and Denials on Russia Frustrate Even His Allies,? published on June 25, the Times added:

Correction: June 29, 2017
A White House Memo article on Monday about President Trump?s deflections and denials about Russia referred incorrectly to the source of an intelligence assessment that said Russia orchestrated hacking attacks during last year?s presidential election. The assessment was made by four intelligence agencies ? the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the Central Intelligence Agency, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the National Security Agency. The assessment was not approved by all 17 organizations in the American intelligence community.

But even that correction is inaccurate.

The assessment was not ?made by four intelligence agencies.? The four agencies approved the assessment. But the assessment itself was not done by the four agencies. It was done by a highly irregular committee.

That fact was disclosed by former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper during a Senate Judiciary subcommittee hearing on May 8, when he acknowledged the assessment was not conducted by his office, the FBI, the CIA and the NSA, but by a panel.

Clapper told senators the assessment was actually made by two dozen or so ?seasoned experts? who were ?handpicked? from the contributing agencies.

And how did those four agencies verify the accuracy of the panel?s assessment and ultimately give it their stamp of approval?

Clapper merely stated, ?I?m not aware of anyone who dissented or ? or disagreed when it came out.?

^^ THAT'S NOT HOW IT WORKS, Nice try, Obama

1) Did you really just use WND - A Free Press for a Free People to back up your stupidity?

2) The retraction you posted still claims four of the primary intelligence agencies confirmed that Russia is behind the hacking.

[onwebcam]

Originally Posted by Rochard

1) Did you really just use WND - A Free Press for a Free People to back up your stupidity?

2) The retraction you posted still claims four of the primary intelligence agencies confirmed that Russia is behind the hacking.

The only evidence they have of Russia doing the hacking is from a DNC hired company. And that evidence has been fully debunked because it's not possible to transfer as much data that was copied over the web in the time that it was. It was done locally, copied to a flash drive..

One of the people who could have done it is dead. Another is in jail.

A New Report Raises Big Questions About Last Year’s DNC Hack
Former NSA experts say it wasn’t a hack at all, but a leak—an inside job by someone with access to the DNC’s system.

https://www.thenation.com/article/a-...ears-dnc-hack/

[Acepimp]

Originally Posted by Rochard

1) Did you really just use WND - A Free Press for a Free People to back up your stupidity?

2) The retraction you posted still claims four of the primary intelligence agencies confirmed that Russia is behind the hacking.

You're bashing WND... for quoting testimony from Clapper? You're deflecting. Facts are facts. Obama's hand-picked panel of his cronies can't be trusted to be unbiased. They have provided no evidence of anything.

Time to fire Mueller and move on with his prosecution along with HRC, Comey, Lynch, & Holder & a few others

[The Porn Nerd]

Holy shit this thread is funny!

[Rochard]

Originally Posted by Acepimp

You're bashing WND... for quoting testimony from Clapper? You're deflecting. Facts are facts. Obama's hand-picked panel of his cronies can't be trusted to be unbiased. They have provided no evidence of anything.

Time to fire Mueller and move on with his prosecution along with HRC, Comey, Lynch, & Holder & a few others

I don't trust ANYTHING that website says. I do no trust a website unless I know it is a real source. Anyone can run a wordpress news site.

[Rochard]

Originally Posted by onwebcam

The only evidence they have of Russia doing the hacking is from a DNC hired company. And that evidence has been fully debunked because it's not possible to transfer as much data that was copied over the web in the time that it was. It was done locally, copied to a flash drive..

One of the people who could have done it is dead. Another is in jail.

A New Report Raises Big Questions About Last Year?s DNC Hack
Former NSA experts say it wasn?t a hack at all, but a leak?an inside job by someone with access to the DNC?s system.

https://www.thenation.com/article/a-...ears-dnc-hack/

Fox News seems to disagree with you.

Report: DOJ weighs charging Russian officials in DNC computer hack | Fox News

[Rochard]

In other news Jeff Sessions - the man who lied under oath about three secret meetings with the Russian ambassador - wants to open up another investigation into Hillary....

LOL.

We should have an investigation.

[onwebcam]

Originally Posted by Rochard

Fox News seems to disagree with you.

Report: DOJ weighs charging Russian officials in DNC computer hack | Fox News

If they have this so called evidence then why the wait? The article says "reportedly" and then goes on to state "DOJ declined to comment" meaning it didn't come from the DOJ and the only commenting about the matter was from the DNC.

They have "reportedly" had evidence for over a year.

[Sarn]

After American intelligence agencies failed to detect and stop Al Qaeda?s 9/11 attack, sixteen years ago, Congress more than doubled their budgets and gave them unprecedented secret authorities. As the intelligence beat reporter for the Washington Post at the time, I watched these agencies grow in size, as dozens of new buildings appeared around the Washington region to house a ballooning workforce of over a million people with top-secret security clearances.

The National Security Agency obtained permission to collect and store the private Internet correspondence and cell-phone data of millions of Americans. The F.B.I. was granted the power to obtain citizens? banking, library, and phone records without court approval. The C.I.A. opened secret prisons abroad where they tortured terrorist suspects. Local police departments began employing military-grade weapons, armored vehicles, and cell-phone-tracking devices.
https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-...igence-failure

Need more money for big brother, more fear, more cut of freedom, more control, total control - because Russia coming Russia coming)))



Totalitarianism is a political system in which the state recognizes no limits to its authority and strives to regulate every aspect of public and private life wherever feasible. A distinctive feature of totalitarian governments is an "elaborate ideology, a set of ideas that gives meaning and direction to the whole society".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Totalitarianism

[nico-t]

Originally Posted by Rochard

Yes. I am stunned Snowden is still alive.

Thanks for making my point.

Wow.

[2MuchMark]

Originally Posted by Acepimp

1. Messaging on Twitter is not a crime.

Then why did Trump Jr. Lie about it?

And why are you OK With him lying about it?

[beerptrol]

Originally Posted by 2MuchMark

And why are you OK With him lying about it?

They have the same morals and ethics, plus they serve the same master

[Rochard]

Originally Posted by onwebcam

If they have this so called evidence then why the wait? The article says "reportedly" and then goes on to state "DOJ declined to comment" meaning it didn't come from the DOJ and the only commenting about the matter was from the DNC.

They have "reportedly" had evidence for over a year.

You tell me. You explain to me why we have evidence from every area that Russia interfered with our election yet the current administration isn't remotely interested in investigating.

[Rochard]

I am not a crook!