Mueller's indictment is a total sham - GoFuckYourself.com

onwebcam · 07-15-2018, 07:23 AM

In less than 48 hours Mueller's indictment is being shredded to pieces. Very extensive research in the following article..

Mueller’s Latest Indictment Ignores Evidence In The Public Domain

Evidence was found over 500 days ago relating to the Guccifer 2.0 persona that showed they had deliberately manipulated files to have Russian metadata. We know the process used to construct the documents was not due to accidental mistakes during the creation process.
The original template document that Guccifer 2.0 used has been identified. It is also the source of the presence of Warren Flood’s name, and can be found attached to one of Podesta’s emails (it has RSIDs matching with Guccifer 2.0’s first couple of documents).
The Trump opposition research, which CrowdStrike claimed was targeted at the DNC, apparently in late April 2016, isn’t what Guccifer 2.0 actually presented to reporters. It also didn’t come from the DNC, but was an attached file on one of John Podesta’s emails – not the DNC’s. This specific copy appears to have been edited by Tony Carrk shortly before it was sent to Podesta. The fact that Guccifer 2.0’s initial releases were Podesta email attachments was even conceded by a former DNC official.
It appears that Guccifer 2.0 fabricated evidence on June 15, 2016, that coincidentally dovetailed with multiple claims made by CrowdStrike executives that had been published the previous day.
Guccifer 2.0 went to considerable effort to make sure Russian error messages appeared in copies of files given to the press.
Evidence – which Guccifer 2.0 couldn’t manipulate due to being logged by third parties – suggests he was operating in the US.
Additional evidence, which Guccifer 2.0 would have been unlikely to realize “he” was leaving, indicated that the persona was archiving files in US timezones before release, with email headers giving him away early on.
Virtually everything that has been claimed to indicate Guccifer 2.0 was Russian was based on something he chose to do.
Considering that Guccifer 2.0 had access to Podesta’s emails, yet never leaked anything truly damaging to the Clinton campaign even though he would have had access to it, is highly suspicious. In fact, Guccifer 2.0 never referenced any of the scandals that would later explode when the DNC emails and Podesta email collections were published by WikiLeaks.

https://disobedientmedia.com/2018/07...public-domain/

There's more to come...

beerptrol · 07-15-2018, 07:24 AM

Another bullshit thread started by an alt right nutjob.
The only Total Sham is the Russian loving conman in the white house

RedFred · 07-15-2018, 07:30 AM

Onwebcam works feverishly to give aid and comfort to the enemy.

dyna mo · 07-15-2018, 07:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam

There's more to come...

so we should add this to the list of all the shit you always claim is coming.

change your nic to waitforit

onwebcam · 07-15-2018, 07:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo

so we should add this to the list of all the shit you always claim is coming.

change your nic to waitforit

Nope it's research that's already been done I just have to have the time to post it... Such as actblues.com domain name was originally linked to Podesta. It's only registration is to a company with the same name as a company based out of London.... (London once again)

Actblue.com the actual site got caught trying to collect money for the DCCC itself but later had to change their collections to "technical services" so it's very likely the DCCC switched the domain name on their site themselves so they could continue the illegal donations...

So basically what you have unfolding is Mueller getting caught doing cover up work with his "indictments"

overdose · 07-15-2018, 08:01 AM

one of my exgfs was a Mueller... she was definitely a psycho biatch

8pt-buck · 07-15-2018, 08:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam

In less than 48 hours Mueller's indictment is being shredded to pieces.

One good thing came out of is was the investigation displayed no Republicans were involved in illegal Russian activities.

Funny how the stupid Democrats love the Mueller investigation when they prayed Trump would be involved (and wasn't) but conveniently forget Donna Brazile giving crooked Hillary debate questions prior to the debate. Rigging the primary's / voter fraud etc, ect and she still lost.

Onwebcam, keep in mind all the Liberals have is crying and degrading our President. Think of the last time the Democratic Party has won one influential political election.
They're losers not withstanding their continued hate will be a shoe-in for Trumps reelection in 2020.

onwebcam · 07-15-2018, 08:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam

Nope it's research that's already been done I just have to have the time to post it... Such as actblues.com domain name was originally linked to Podesta. It's only registration is to a company with the same name as a company based out of London.... (London once again)

Actblue.com the actual site got caught trying to collect money for the DCCC itself but later had to change their collections to "technical services" so it's very likely the DCCC switched the domain name on their site themselves so they could continue the illegal donations...

So basically what you have unfolding is Mueller getting caught doing cover up work with his "indictments"

Actblues.com was originally identified by George Webb.. He's a wealthy life long Democrat / Bernie supporter who after realizing Hillary rigged the primary decided he would find out how... He has since went down all sorts of rabbit holes.. He was the thorn in Washington's side when it came to the Awan's..

Supposedly Bernie Sanders received all of the funds from actblue.com.... I guess we now know how he got paid off and bought his new lake house...

2MuchMark · 07-15-2018, 08:37 AM

Total Sham! Nothing to see here! Manchurian Candidate Trump forever!

onwebcam · 07-15-2018, 08:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 2MuchMark

Total Sham! Nothing to see here! Manchurian Candidate Trump forever!

A Manchurian candidate would be someone with a made up past.. hmmm I wonder who that sounds like?

onwebcam · 07-15-2018, 09:34 AM

"Mueller indictment would look ridiculous today if our report was unredacted"

Nunes: Indictment of Russians leaves out targeting of GOP | On Air Videos | Fox News

crockett · 07-15-2018, 09:38 AM

onwebcam is a total sham.. No one could possible be as wrong as he is about literally everything and still keep posting.

Has onwebcm ever got anything right? Ever?

beerptrol · 07-15-2018, 09:38 AM

Alt right nutjobs at it again. keep sucking that dick!

Bladewire · 07-15-2018, 09:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett

onwebcam is a total sham.. No one could possible be as wrong as he is about literally everything and still keep posting.

Has onwebcm ever got anything right? Ever?

His job isn't to be right.

His job is to lie & mislead people with Russian propoganda using fake nics to make it look like it's not just one Putin ass licker here.

Hell.. the open honest Russian nics on here are less Putin cock suckers than this bitch Onwebcam aka mineistaken aka wehateporn aka 8pt-buck aka dyna mo aka Acepimp aka Boozer

onwebcam · 07-15-2018, 09:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett

onwebcam is a total sham.. No one could possible be as wrong as he is about literally everything and still keep posting.

Has onwebcm ever got anything right? Ever?

Trump is President.... Hillary is not... Is that good enough or do you need more?

Bladewire · 07-15-2018, 10:04 AM

↑↑↑ Alt-right hate fake nic Russian troll

crockett · 07-15-2018, 10:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam

Trump is President.... Hillary is not... Is that good enough or do you need more?

That was a 50/50 chance.. and the reality is more people voted for Hillary. You and Matt claimed Trump would get overwhelming support from the people.. Trump didn't.. He lost by what 3 or 4 million votes..

He only won by a rigged electoral vote system and you never predicted that. You predicted he'd win by voter turn out..

You make ridiculous claims every day and by dumb luck it even rains in the desert..

baddog · 07-15-2018, 10:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam

Trump is President.... Hillary is not... Is that good enough or do you need more?

. Touche'

dyna mo · 07-15-2018, 10:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo

so we should add this to the list of all the shit you always claim is coming.

change your nic to waitforit

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire

Hell.. the open honest Russian nics on here are less Putin cock suckers than this bitch Onwebcam aka mineistaken aka wehateporn aka 8pt-buck aka dyna mo aka Acepimp aka Boozer

just one of the big problems with putting people on ignore.

onwebcam · 07-15-2018, 10:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett

That was a 50/50 chance.. and the reality is more people voted for Hillary. You and Matt claimed Trump would get overwhelming support from the people.. Trump didn't.. He lost by what 3 or 4 million votes..

He only won by a rigged electoral vote system and you never predicted that. You predicted he'd win by voter turn out..

You make ridiculous claims every day and by dumb luck it even rains in the desert..

Only a complete fucking moron could take this indictment seriously but I do realize who I'm replying to.

Simple question: Why did Mueller make no mention that hackers targeted Republicans/RNC as well in the indictment?
Simple answer: Because it was entirely a political move.

Acepimp · 07-15-2018, 10:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 2MuchMark

Total Sham! Nothing to see here! Manchurian Candidate Trump forever!

Mark, you may want to take a minute and read this recent article:

America really did have a Manchurian Candidate in the White House

beerptrol · 07-15-2018, 10:40 AM

Originally Posted by onwebcam View Post
Trump is President.... Hillary is not... Is that good enough or do you need more?

Doesn't stop the Liar in Chief from bringing up her and Obama's name and blaming them when he wants to deflect

crockett · 07-15-2018, 10:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam

Only a complete fucking moron could take this indictment seriously but I do realize who I'm replying to.

Simple question: Why did Mueller make no mention that hackers targeted Republicans/RNC as well in the indictment?
Simple answer: Because it was entirely a political move.

He did mention the RNC hack in the indictment moron... You dumb right wing lunatics think because you say something it makes it true...

onwebcam · 07-15-2018, 11:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett

That was a 50/50 chance.. and the reality is more people voted for Hillary. You and Matt claimed Trump would get overwhelming support from the people.. Trump didn't.. He lost by what 3 or 4 million votes..

He only won by a rigged electoral vote system and you never predicted that. You predicted he'd win by voter turn out..

You make ridiculous claims every day and by dumb luck it even rains in the desert..

Also at the time if you remember correctly it wasn't 50/50. If one were following your sources it was more like 90/10 right up until election night

onwebcam · 07-15-2018, 11:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett

He did mention the RNC hack in the indictment moron... You dumb right wing lunatics think because you say something it makes it true...

Nope. Zero results if you search the document for "rnc" or "gop"
"republican" is mentioned twice. On page 14 and page 23.. Neither of which mentioning them being hacked.

crockett · 07-15-2018, 02:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam

Nope. Zero results if you search the document for "rnc" or "gop"
"republican" is mentioned twice. On page 14 and page 23.. Neither of which mentioning them being hacked.

So you thi k that indictment of people who hacked the DNC, RNC and several states election systems is all politically motivated. You are dumber than Trump..

At least when Trump says it, we know he's just lying to fool idiots like you. You on the other hand actually believe it...

onwebcam · 07-15-2018, 02:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett

So you thi k that indictment of people who hacked the DNC, RNC and several states election systems is all politically motivated. You are dumber than Trump..

At least when Trump says it, we know he's just lying to fool idiots like you. You on tje other hand actually believe it...

Everyone knows the RNC was hit as well except evidently Mueller and his team.. What would you call that? Forgetfulness?

Young · 07-15-2018, 03:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Acepimp

Mark, you may want to take a minute and read this recent article:

America really did have a Manchurian Candidate in the White House

Your right wing leaning half assed shit rag of a paper is a source?

07-15-2018, 07:23 AM	#1
onwebcam Fake Nick 1.0 Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Rent free, your head Posts: 27,652	Mueller's indictment is a total sham In less than 48 hours Mueller's indictment is being shredded to pieces. Very extensive research in the following article.. Mueller’s Latest Indictment Ignores Evidence In The Public Domain Evidence was found over 500 days ago relating to the Guccifer 2.0 persona that showed they had deliberately manipulated files to have Russian metadata. We know the process used to construct the documents was not due to accidental mistakes during the creation process. The original template document that Guccifer 2.0 used has been identified. It is also the source of the presence of Warren Flood’s name, and can be found attached to one of Podesta’s emails (it has RSIDs matching with Guccifer 2.0’s first couple of documents). The Trump opposition research, which CrowdStrike claimed was targeted at the DNC, apparently in late April 2016, isn’t what Guccifer 2.0 actually presented to reporters. It also didn’t come from the DNC, but was an attached file on one of John Podesta’s emails – not the DNC’s. This specific copy appears to have been edited by Tony Carrk shortly before it was sent to Podesta. The fact that Guccifer 2.0’s initial releases were Podesta email attachments was even conceded by a former DNC official. It appears that Guccifer 2.0 fabricated evidence on June 15, 2016, that coincidentally dovetailed with multiple claims made by CrowdStrike executives that had been published the previous day. Guccifer 2.0 went to considerable effort to make sure Russian error messages appeared in copies of files given to the press. Evidence – which Guccifer 2.0 couldn’t manipulate due to being logged by third parties – suggests he was operating in the US. Additional evidence, which Guccifer 2.0 would have been unlikely to realize “he” was leaving, indicated that the persona was archiving files in US timezones before release, with email headers giving him away early on. Virtually everything that has been claimed to indicate Guccifer 2.0 was Russian was based on something he chose to do. Considering that Guccifer 2.0 had access to Podesta’s emails, yet never leaked anything truly damaging to the Clinton campaign even though he would have had access to it, is highly suspicious. In fact, Guccifer 2.0 never referenced any of the scandals that would later explode when the DNC emails and Podesta email collections were published by WikiLeaks. https://disobedientmedia.com/2018/07...public-domain/ There's more to come... __________________ PLEASE WAIT WHILE BIDEN ADMIN UNINSTALLS ITSELF..... ██████████████████▒ 99.5% complete.

07-15-2018, 07:24 AM	#2
beerptrol Confirmed Asshole Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Half way between sobriety and fubar. Posts: 12,722	Another bullshit thread started by an alt right nutjob. The only Total Sham is the Russian loving conman in the white house __________________ “If we are to have another contest in the near future of our national existence, I predict that the dividing line will not be Mason and Dixon's but between patriotism and intelligence on the one side, and superstition, ambition and ignorance on the other.” -- Ulysses S. Grant

07-15-2018, 08:37 AM	#9
2MuchMark Videochat Solutions Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Canada Posts: 48,529	Total Sham! Nothing to see here! Manchurian Candidate Trump forever! __________________ VideoChat Solutions \| Custom Software \| IT Support https://www.2much.net \| https://www.lcntech.com

07-15-2018, 09:34 AM	#11
onwebcam Fake Nick 1.0 Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Rent free, your head Posts: 27,652	"Mueller indictment would look ridiculous today if our report was unredacted" Nunes: Indictment of Russians leaves out targeting of GOP \| On Air Videos \| Fox News __________________ PLEASE WAIT WHILE BIDEN ADMIN UNINSTALLS ITSELF..... ██████████████████▒ 99.5% complete.

07-15-2018, 09:38 AM	#12
crockett in a van by the river Industry Role: Join Date: May 2003 Posts: 76,806	onwebcam is a total sham.. No one could possible be as wrong as he is about literally everything and still keep posting. Has onwebcm ever got anything right? Ever? __________________ In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.

07-15-2018, 07:30 AM	#3
RedFred Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2016 Posts: 9,782	Onwebcam works feverishly to give aid and comfort to the enemy.

07-15-2018, 08:01 AM	#6
overdose So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2012 Posts: 358	one of my exgfs was a Mueller... she was definitely a psycho biatch

07-15-2018, 10:04 AM	#16
Bladewire StraightBro Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Monarch Beach, CA USA Posts: 56,232	↑↑↑ Alt-right hate fake nic Russian troll __________________ Skype: CallTomNow

07-15-2018, 10:40 AM	#22
beerptrol Confirmed Asshole Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Half way between sobriety and fubar. Posts: 12,722	Originally Posted by onwebcam View Post Trump is President.... Hillary is not... Is that good enough or do you need more? Doesn't stop the Liar in Chief from bringing up her and Obama's name and blaming them when he wants to deflect __________________ “If we are to have another contest in the near future of our national existence, I predict that the dividing line will not be Mason and Dixon's but between patriotism and intelligence on the one side, and superstition, ambition and ignorance on the other.” -- Ulysses S. Grant