Does Gravity Exist? - Page 2 - GoFuckYourself.com

ilnjscb · 08-11-2018, 07:03 AM

The strength of gravity is directly proportional to the amount of mass of each object. The gravitational force increases as the size of an object increases. On the other hand, the strength of gravity is inversely related to the square of the distance between two objects.

Clearly has a relationship to mass. It also has a relationship to time, gravitational time dilation. We can't really define time, either, though we label it the 4th dimension. If gravity affects mass and space, effectively the third dimension, and time, effectively our way to perceive the 4th dimension, then it is clearly at least represented in 2 dimensions.

MFCT · 09-08-2018, 11:31 PM

Another way to look at gravity:

Imagine space is a liquid. Imagine atomic & sub-atomic particles as drain holes, in which the liquid of infinite space is constantly flowing into forever. The constant draining action creates micro-vortices, but in the 4th dimension (spherical). The higher number of "drain holes" in a given area = higher gravity.

A comparison of this effect to something you're already familiar with: let's say you're at the bottom of a pool and the drain opens up. You're now drawn to the drain. If you get close enough to the drain, you're stuck to it. Hence, gravity. Astonishingly simple, when viewed in this way.

Cyber Fucker · 09-09-2018, 03:10 AM

CaptainHowdy · 09-09-2018, 05:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cyber Fucker

. . .

2MuchMark · 09-09-2018, 01:39 PM

If you turn a bathroom scale upside down and stand on it, the measurement on the dial will be equal to the force of gravity your body exerts on the earth. Mind=blown?

Smack dat · 09-09-2018, 03:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 2MuchMark

If you turn a bathroom scale upside down and stand on it, the measurement on the dial will be equal to the force of gravity your body exerts on the earth. Mind=blown?

Tried. Couldn't see readout. Mind= Not Blown

ilnjscb · 09-09-2018, 03:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Smack dat

Tried. Couldn't see readout. Mind= Not Blown

Because it won't

Idigmygirls · 09-09-2018, 05:09 PM

Are there any actual physicists on this board?

I posted a paper a few years ago in which I postulated what was essentially a theory of quantum gravity.

I've now worked out all of the math, and my first in a series of actual scientific papers is shortly going to be published in a reputable scientific journal. Subsequent papers will show how my new mathematical framework (which I call Geometric Relativistic Transformations, or GRTs) prove that gravity and electromagnetism are actually the same force (actually, both are curved spacetime that can be described by a single force equation).

I'm starting to look for a good animator to produce a video that will explain my entire theory of quantum gravity from start to finish for those that are not inclined to read dense science and math of a journal paper.

For those who are interested, I can give you this part of the equation that should blow your mind for real

My technique generated a new equation for the Lorentz Factor (the number that tells us how spacetime gets warped by objects in relative motion).

By comparing my equation to the traditional equation (of Einstein fame in special relativity), the solution to unification of forces becomes obvious. You see, in the traditional equation, there is a division by zero at the speed of light. By substitution of terms with my new equation, we can get rid of that problem.

Here is the simple math:

Lorentz factor traditional equation is (where "g" is the lorentz factor):

g = 1/(root: (1-v^2/c^2)) that is 1 over the square root of 1-(velocity squared/speed of light squared)

New equation:

g = sec(arsin(B)) where B is the relative velocity. sec = secant and asin = arcsine

I have proven that 1/(root: (1-v^2/c^2)) = g = sec(arsin(B))

This simple equation solves the problems with unification of relativity and quantum mechanics. Obviously I'm super excited

I'll post when my first paper has been published!

MFCT · 09-09-2018, 07:15 PM

Idigmygirls, awesome work. Looking forward to that animation and do let us know about the publication. Plz take your theory to the next level by inventing an anti-gravity device. If you can identify exactly what gravity is down to that level of precision, then you can amplify it, nullify it, or otherwise use it to your advantage. Potentially free energy if you could, for example, put 2000 pounds of gravity on one side of a wheel and negative 2000 pounds on the other.

2MuchMark · 09-09-2018, 07:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Idigmygirls

Are there any actual physicists on this board?

I posted a paper a few years ago in which I postulated what was essentially a theory of quantum gravity.

I've now worked out all of the math, and my first in a series of actual scientific papers is shortly going to be published in a reputable scientific journal. Subsequent papers will show how my new mathematical framework (which I call Geometric Relativistic Transformations, or GRTs) prove that gravity and electromagnetism are actually the same force (actually, both are curved spacetime that can be described by a single force equation).!

Tell me more, but skip the math because I won't understand it.

How is Gravity and Electromagnetism the same? Gravity is the force that acts between any 2 objects with mass. Electromagnetic force is the interaction between charges. Also, gravity can only attract but electromagnetic force can repel as well as attract. So how do you arrive at the idea that they are the same?

jsmih · 09-10-2018, 01:08 PM

They actually now have observatories measuring gravity waves. These were used to detect colliding black holes 1.8 billion light years away. Pretty cool stuff

https://www.ligo.caltech.edu/news/ligo20170927

CaptainHowdy · 09-10-2018, 01:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Idigmygirls

Are there any actual physicists on this board?

I posted a paper a few years ago in which I postulated what was essentially a theory of quantum gravity.

I've now worked out all of the math, and my first in a series of actual scientific papers is shortly going to be published in a reputable scientific journal. Subsequent papers will show how my new mathematical framework (which I call Geometric Relativistic Transformations, or GRTs) prove that gravity and electromagnetism are actually the same force (actually, both are curved spacetime that can be described by a single force equation).

I'm starting to look for a good animator to produce a video that will explain my entire theory of quantum gravity from start to finish for those that are not inclined to read dense science and math of a journal paper.

For those who are interested, I can give you this part of the equation that should blow your mind for real

My technique generated a new equation for the Lorentz Factor (the number that tells us how spacetime gets warped by objects in relative motion).

By comparing my equation to the traditional equation (of Einstein fame in special relativity), the solution to unification of forces becomes obvious. You see, in the traditional equation, there is a division by zero at the speed of light. By substitution of terms with my new equation, we can get rid of that problem.

Here is the simple math:

Lorentz factor traditional equation is (where "g" is the lorentz factor):

g = 1/(root: (1-v^2/c^2)) that is 1 over the square root of 1-(velocity squared/speed of light squared)

New equation:

g = sec(arsin(B)) where B is the relative velocity. sec = secant and asin = arcsine

I have proven that 1/(root: (1-v^2/c^2)) = g = sec(arsin(B))

This simple equation solves the problems with unification of relativity and quantum mechanics. Obviously I'm super excited

I'll post when my first paper has been published!

2MuchMark · 09-10-2018, 01:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jsmih

They actually now have observatories measuring gravity waves. These were used to detect colliding black holes 1.8 billion light years away. Pretty cool stuff

https://www.ligo.caltech.edu/news/ligo20170927

Super-cool. I read about this a couple of months ago. This and CERN LHC are 2 places I would love to visit one day.

ilnjscb · 09-11-2018, 11:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Idigmygirls

Are there any actual physicists on this board?

I posted a paper a few years ago in which I postulated what was essentially a theory of quantum gravity.

I've now worked out all of the math, and my first in a series of actual scientific papers is shortly going to be published in a reputable scientific journal. Subsequent papers will show how my new mathematical framework (which I call Geometric Relativistic Transformations, or GRTs) prove that gravity and electromagnetism are actually the same force (actually, both are curved spacetime that can be described by a single force equation).

I'm starting to look for a good animator to produce a video that will explain my entire theory of quantum gravity from start to finish for those that are not inclined to read dense science and math of a journal paper.

For those who are interested, I can give you this part of the equation that should blow your mind for real

My technique generated a new equation for the Lorentz Factor (the number that tells us how spacetime gets warped by objects in relative motion).

By comparing my equation to the traditional equation (of Einstein fame in special relativity), the solution to unification of forces becomes obvious. You see, in the traditional equation, there is a division by zero at the speed of light. By substitution of terms with my new equation, we can get rid of that problem.

Here is the simple math:

Lorentz factor traditional equation is (where "g" is the lorentz factor):

g = 1/(root: (1-v^2/c^2)) that is 1 over the square root of 1-(velocity squared/speed of light squared)

New equation:

g = sec(arsin(B)) where B is the relative velocity. sec = secant and asin = arcsine

I have proven that 1/(root: (1-v^2/c^2)) = g = sec(arsin(B))

This simple equation solves the problems with unification of relativity and quantum mechanics. Obviously I'm super excited

I'll post when my first paper has been published!

I would say it would be pretty miraculous if you could solve quantum gravity with trigonometry, which you appear to have tried. Since measurements indicate no granularity, I would think you'd need a derivative, at least and probably a double derivative.

09-08-2018, 11:31 PM	#52
MFCT Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2015 Posts: 1,489	Another way to look at gravity: Imagine space is a liquid. Imagine atomic & sub-atomic particles as drain holes, in which the liquid of infinite space is constantly flowing into forever. The constant draining action creates micro-vortices, but in the 4th dimension (spherical). The higher number of "drain holes" in a given area = higher gravity. A comparison of this effect to something you're already familiar with: let's say you're at the bottom of a pool and the drain opens up. You're now drawn to the drain. If you get close enough to the drain, you're stuck to it. Hence, gravity. Astonishingly simple, when viewed in this way. __________________ Keeping you abreast of the teens that get undressed. Girls By Location - Couples By Location - Guys By Location - Trans By Location

09-09-2018, 03:10 AM	#53
Cyber Fucker Hmm Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: On an endless road around the world for rock and roll. Posts: 12,642	__________________

09-09-2018, 01:39 PM	#55
2MuchMark Videochat Solutions Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Canada Posts: 48,529	If you turn a bathroom scale upside down and stand on it, the measurement on the dial will be equal to the force of gravity your body exerts on the earth. Mind=blown? __________________ VideoChat Solutions \| Custom Software \| IT Support https://www.2much.net \| https://www.lcntech.com

09-09-2018, 07:15 PM	#59
MFCT Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2015 Posts: 1,489	Idigmygirls, awesome work. Looking forward to that animation and do let us know about the publication. Plz take your theory to the next level by inventing an anti-gravity device. If you can identify exactly what gravity is down to that level of precision, then you can amplify it, nullify it, or otherwise use it to your advantage. Potentially free energy if you could, for example, put 2000 pounds of gravity on one side of a wheel and negative 2000 pounds on the other. __________________ Keeping you abreast of the teens that get undressed. Girls By Location - Couples By Location - Guys By Location - Trans By Location

08-11-2018, 07:03 AM	#51
ilnjscb Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2009 Posts: 8,785	The strength of gravity is directly proportional to the amount of mass of each object. The gravitational force increases as the size of an object increases. On the other hand, the strength of gravity is inversely related to the square of the distance between two objects. Clearly has a relationship to mass. It also has a relationship to time, gravitational time dilation. We can't really define time, either, though we label it the 4th dimension. If gravity affects mass and space, effectively the third dimension, and time, effectively our way to perceive the 4th dimension, then it is clearly at least represented in 2 dimensions.

09-09-2018, 05:09 PM	#58
Idigmygirls Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Vancouver, BC Posts: 498	Are there any actual physicists on this board? I posted a paper a few years ago in which I postulated what was essentially a theory of quantum gravity. I've now worked out all of the math, and my first in a series of actual scientific papers is shortly going to be published in a reputable scientific journal. Subsequent papers will show how my new mathematical framework (which I call Geometric Relativistic Transformations, or GRTs) prove that gravity and electromagnetism are actually the same force (actually, both are curved spacetime that can be described by a single force equation). I'm starting to look for a good animator to produce a video that will explain my entire theory of quantum gravity from start to finish for those that are not inclined to read dense science and math of a journal paper. For those who are interested, I can give you this part of the equation that should blow your mind for real My technique generated a new equation for the Lorentz Factor (the number that tells us how spacetime gets warped by objects in relative motion). By comparing my equation to the traditional equation (of Einstein fame in special relativity), the solution to unification of forces becomes obvious. You see, in the traditional equation, there is a division by zero at the speed of light. By substitution of terms with my new equation, we can get rid of that problem. Here is the simple math: Lorentz factor traditional equation is (where "g" is the lorentz factor): g = 1/(root: (1-v^2/c^2)) that is 1 over the square root of 1-(velocity squared/speed of light squared) New equation: g = sec(arsin(B)) where B is the relative velocity. sec = secant and asin = arcsine I have proven that 1/(root: (1-v^2/c^2)) = g = sec(arsin(B)) This simple equation solves the problems with unification of relativity and quantum mechanics. Obviously I'm super excited I'll post when my first paper has been published!

09-10-2018, 01:08 PM	#61
jsmih Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2010 Posts: 334	They actually now have observatories measuring gravity waves. These were used to detect colliding black holes 1.8 billion light years away. Pretty cool stuff https://www.ligo.caltech.edu/news/ligo20170927