Should Looters who steal from mansions in the path of CA fires be prosecuted? - GoFuckYourself.com

$5 submissions · 11-11-2018, 04:19 PM

On the one hand, looting is against the law

On the other, those homes are about to burn anyway. Why not 'spread the wealth' (I believe that's the proper lefty term of art, I maybe mistaken - perhaps, 'liberating the fruits of capitalist exploitation' may be more appropriate-if a bit dated) by legally allowing looters to steal flat screen TVs, art, sound systems, and other stuff that's covered by insurance anyway?

Besides, looting, like pimping, ain't easy-imagine looting a home that's surrounded by a wildfire.

Where do you stand on this pressing issue?

TheSquealer · 11-11-2018, 04:21 PM

You could use that same "logic" and defend raping or killing anyone that doesn't evacuate the area.

Rochard · 11-11-2018, 04:34 PM

Stealing is stealing, period. They have no idea if that house is going to burn to the ground or if it will still standing the following day.

I've read reports that people are dressing up like fire crews to go in steal. Fuckers.

EddyTheDog · 11-11-2018, 04:43 PM

Hang 'em by the testicles...

bronco67 · 11-11-2018, 07:38 PM

Yes, they should be prosecuted. Just because it was about to be destroyed doesn't mean it isn't theft.

$5 submissions · 11-11-2018, 11:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bronco67

Yes, they should be prosecuted. Just because it was about to be destroyed doesn't mean it isn't theft.

Can an argument be made about social utility?

OneHungLo · 11-12-2018, 12:08 AM

What's your opinion $5?

Spunky · 11-12-2018, 12:22 AM

A baseball bat to the head is the only answer. I hate those bottom feeder scum thieves

Paul Markham · 11-12-2018, 01:42 AM

Yes, prosecute them.

astronaut x · 11-12-2018, 01:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSquealer

You could use that same "logic" and defend raping or killing anyone that doesn't evacuate the area.

No sir you can't.. and no you can't steal peoples shit. What the fuck is wrong you people?

just a punk · 11-12-2018, 02:24 AM

A very strange question. They are marauders so course they must be prosecuted. During WWII, Soviet army and police had a direction to execute them w/o without trial.

Busty2 · 11-12-2018, 06:12 AM

Lock them in the house and if it docent burn to the ground with them in it, then they can take what they want. Take the risk get a reward !

$5 submissions · 11-12-2018, 06:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Busty2

Lock them in the house and if it docent burn to the ground with them in it, then they can take what they want. Take the risk get a reward !

$5 submissions · 11-12-2018, 06:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OneHungLo

What's your opinion $5?

Here's my answer

k0nr4d · 11-12-2018, 08:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard

They have no idea if that house is going to burn to the ground or if it will still standing the following day.

They could just light the house on fire prophylactically

crockett · 11-12-2018, 08:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by astronaut x

No sir you can't.. and no you can't steal peoples shit. What the fuck is wrong you people?

They are mentally ill..

$5 submissions · 11-12-2018, 08:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by k0nr4d

They could just light the house on fire prophylactically

Kinda reminds me of those cheesy James Bond flicks from the early 80s where any wannabe car burglar blows up with Bond's car. Now that's what you call an automotive security system. Sure beats the hell out of a car alarm, right?

imabro · 11-12-2018, 09:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by $5 submissions

On the one hand, looting is against the law

On the other, those homes are about to burn anyway. Why not 'spread the wealth' (I believe that's the proper lefty term of art, I maybe mistaken - perhaps, 'liberating the fruits of capitalist exploitation' may be more appropriate-if a bit dated) by legally allowing looters to steal flat screen TVs, art, sound systems, and other stuff that's covered by insurance anyway?

Besides, looting, like pimping, ain't easy-imagine looting a home that's surrounded by a wildfire.

Where do you stand on this pressing issue?

I hope you're just trolling not really a thief in real life.

Grapesoda · 11-12-2018, 10:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by $5 submissions

On the one hand, looting is against the law

On the other, those homes are about to burn anyway. Why not 'spread the wealth' (I believe that's the proper lefty term of art, I maybe mistaken - perhaps, 'liberating the fruits of capitalist exploitation' may be more appropriate-if a bit dated) by legally allowing looters to steal flat screen TVs, art, sound systems, and other stuff that's covered by insurance anyway?

Besides, looting, like pimping, ain't easy-imagine looting a home that's surrounded by a wildfire.

Where do you stand on this pressing issue?

If you need a want of something is illegal immoral a just and proper to do you should probably just find something else to do

crockett · 11-12-2018, 10:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSquealer

You could use that same "logic" and defend raping or killing anyone that doesn't evacuate the area.

You know how I know you are mentally ill? Because you think you can rationalize that stealing is the same as rape and murder..

nickey1952 · 11-12-2018, 10:20 AM

Don't prosecute them shoot em on the way out and leave them there for the next guy to see.
Stealing is stealing.

King Mark · 11-12-2018, 12:21 PM

Stealing is wrong. Unless the good outweighs the bad. If I'm starving and have no money, nobody being generous... I'm stealing some food. Sorry. Cali wildfire? I'm leaving.

celandina · 11-12-2018, 12:22 PM

Looters should be shot on sight....the end.

TheSquealer · 11-12-2018, 12:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett

You know how I know you are mentally ill? Because you think you can rationalize that stealing is the same as rape and murder..

You guys always have me scratching my head wondering how in the fuck do your peabrains twist things into something obvious and simple into something that wasn't being said.

The point, which any idiot but two should easily understand is that the law is the law, your property is your property and your rights are your rights, regardless of extenuating circumstances. No one gets to pick and choose just because they decided there is an opportunity to violate the law or someones rights.

rowan · 11-12-2018, 12:42 PM

Rationally, it makes sense to preserve value that's going to be destroyed otherwise.

Morally, it's still theft of someone else's property.

RyuLion · 11-12-2018, 01:08 PM

There nothing to argue here, looters are stealing..damn..

Scott McD · 11-12-2018, 03:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by $5 submissions

On the one hand, looting is against the law

On the other, those homes are about to burn anyway. Why not 'spread the wealth' (I believe that's the proper lefty term of art, I maybe mistaken - perhaps, 'liberating the fruits of capitalist exploitation' may be more appropriate-if a bit dated) by legally allowing looters to steal flat screen TVs, art, sound systems, and other stuff that's covered by insurance anyway?

Besides, looting, like pimping, ain't easy-imagine looting a home that's surrounded by a wildfire.

Where do you stand on this pressing issue?

Wow.

My home was flooded for 6 months a few years ago and we had to move out. Yes we had house insurance. Should we have been looted aswell then ??

GFY stupidity never ceases to amaze...

NaughtyRob · 11-12-2018, 11:23 PM

Fuck yes, lock them up.

$5 submissions · 11-12-2018, 11:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scott McD

Wow.

My home was flooded for 6 months a few years ago and we had to move out. Yes we had house insurance. Should we have been looted aswell then ??

GFY stupidity never ceases to amaze...

Obviously, your reading and comprehension skills are on the left side of the bell curve.

This discussion is about MORALITY vs LEGALITY and the SLIDING SCALE (slippery slope?) of JUSTIFICATIONS people come up to excuse SHIT they would not want done to them.

Based on the responses, there are a few glimmers of SITUATIONAL MORALITY / RETRIBUTIVE JUSTICE and others here...

As I have mentioned earlier, my view on this is summed up in one phrase: CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE

What is the Categorical Imperative?
Assume the ACTION YOU TAKE will be taken by EVERYONE ELSE, would you still take that action???

The problem with "It's going to burn anyway" is that it is just another REHASH of the problematic morality of "If I Don't do it, someone else will..."

11-11-2018, 04:19 PM	#1
$5 submissions I help you SUCCEED Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: The Pearl of the Orient Seas Posts: 32,195	Should Looters who steal from mansions in the path of CA fires be prosecuted? On the one hand, looting is against the law On the other, those homes are about to burn anyway. Why not 'spread the wealth' (I believe that's the proper lefty term of art, I maybe mistaken - perhaps, 'liberating the fruits of capitalist exploitation' may be more appropriate-if a bit dated) by legally allowing looters to steal flat screen TVs, art, sound systems, and other stuff that's covered by insurance anyway? Besides, looting, like pimping, ain't easy-imagine looting a home that's surrounded by a wildfire. Where do you stand on this pressing issue? __________________ Need a NON-ADULT income stream? We build your YOUTUBE CHANNEL for only $20 per video! For Hire: $3/hour or $400 per month Marketing Specialist Virtual Assistants

11-11-2018, 04:21 PM	#2
TheSquealer BANNED Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: In Your Head Posts: 25,083	You could use that same "logic" and defend raping or killing anyone that doesn't evacuate the area. __________________ . Yes, fewer illegal immigrants working equates to more job opportunities for American citizens. Rochard

11-11-2018, 04:34 PM	#3
Rochard Jägermeister Test Pilot Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: NORCAL Posts: 72,922	Stealing is stealing, period. They have no idea if that house is going to burn to the ground or if it will still standing the following day. I've read reports that people are dressing up like fire crews to go in steal. Fuckers. __________________ “The choice is no longer between right or left. The choice is between normal and crazy.” - Sarah Huckabee Sanders YNOT MAIL \| THE BEST ADULT MAILING SOLUTION

11-11-2018, 04:43 PM	#4
EddyTheDog Just Doing My Own Thing Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2011 Location: London, Spain, New Zealand, GFY - Not Croydon... Posts: 25,038	Hang 'em by the testicles... __________________ - Chaturbate Script - https://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-b...er-issues.html - Now supports White Labels

11-11-2018, 07:38 PM	#5
bronco67 Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 29,035	Yes, they should be prosecuted. Just because it was about to be destroyed doesn't mean it isn't theft. __________________

11-12-2018, 12:08 AM	#7
OneHungLo So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: May 2001 Location: Your mom's front hole Posts: 40,910	What's your opinion $5?

11-12-2018, 12:22 AM	#8
Spunky I need a beer Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: ♠ Toiletville ♠ Posts: 133,919	A baseball bat to the head is the only answer. I hate those bottom feeder scum thieves __________________ *Skype : Spunky GFY*

11-12-2018, 01:42 AM	#9
Paul Markham Too old to care Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2001 Location: On the sofa, watching TV or doing my jigsaws. Posts: 52,943	Yes, prosecute them. __________________ Blowout deal. 880 videos, 2,400 image sets, plus many RAW videos. $500. PM me for a deal. Skype Paulmarkham70

11-12-2018, 02:24 AM	#11
just a punk So fuckin' bored Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2003 Posts: 32,381	A very strange question. They are marauders so course they must be prosecuted. During WWII, Soviet army and police had a direction to execute them w/o without trial. __________________ Obey the Cowgod

11-12-2018, 06:12 AM	#12
Busty2 Member since 1999 Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Off the Amalfi coast Posts: 7,202	Lock them in the house and if it docent burn to the ground with them in it, then they can take what they want. Take the risk get a reward !

11-12-2018, 10:20 AM	#21
nickey1952 Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: los angeles Posts: 669	Don't prosecute them shoot em on the way out and leave them there for the next guy to see. Stealing is stealing. __________________ LoveHerBoobs.com

11-12-2018, 12:21 PM	#22
King Mark So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2016 Posts: 27,033	Stealing is wrong. Unless the good outweighs the bad. If I'm starving and have no money, nobody being generous... I'm stealing some food. Sorry. Cali wildfire? I'm leaving.

11-12-2018, 12:22 PM	#23
celandina Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2006 Posts: 11,357	Looters should be shot on sight....the end.

11-12-2018, 12:42 PM	#25
rowan Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Australia Posts: 17,393	Rationally, it makes sense to preserve value that's going to be destroyed otherwise. Morally, it's still theft of someone else's property.

11-12-2018, 01:08 PM	#26
RyuLion ClubDomCash.com Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: San Diego Posts: 32,176	There nothing to argue here, looters are stealing..damn.. __________________ Adult Biz Consultant A tech head since 1995

11-12-2018, 11:23 PM	#28
NaughtyRob Two fresh affiliate progs Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Inside teen pussy Posts: 29,602	Fuck yes, lock them up. __________________ [email protected] Skype: 17026955414 Vacares Web Hosting - Protect Your Ass with Included Daily Backups