Has anyone gone up against Mueller, and won?

[2MuchMark]

Answer: Nope!

G'night!

[onwebcam]

Answer is, YES..

4 innocent people were set free and paid millions after Mueller kept them in prison and covered up for his snitch Whitey Bulger who actually committed the murders.

https://www.newsmax.com/politics/ala.../08/id/853235/

Luckily Bulger met his maker within 12 hours after being transfered to general population.

Mueller = Dirty Cop

[King Mark]

Originally Posted by onwebcam

Answer is, YES..

4 innocent people were set free and paid millions after Mueller kept them in prison and covered up for his snitch Whitey Bulger who actually committed the murders.

https://www.newsmax.com/politics/ala.../08/id/853235/

Luckily Bulger met his maker within 12 hours after being transfered to general population.

Mueller = Dirty Cop

https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/20...yoL/story.html

[onwebcam]

Originally Posted by Dead Eye

https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/20...yoL/story.html

Ah yes, head of the criminal division but knew nothing about it.. RIGHT.. Keep buying the bullshit.


"In addition, I pointed out that as a prosecutor and as acting US attorney, Mueller reportedly wrote letters to the parole and pardons board throughout the 1980s opposing clemency for four men with links to the Mafia who were framed for murder by FBI lies. At least that’s what I heard from Mike Albano, a former member of the parole board who had expressed sympathy for the men and was intimidated by FBI agents for doing so. Albano said he saw the letters, but I never did."

https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/20...aFI/story.html

[King Mark]

Y'all be reaching. Hard as hell.

Let the man do his job

[GAMEFINEST]

He is strong as iron

[Rochard]

Seems to be a lot of indictments handed down.

Must be a lot of witches.

[J. Falcon]

Originally Posted by onwebcam

Mueller = Dirty Cop

That's what Fox News wants you to believe.

Mueller is corrupt, but Donnie Moscow is as clean and pure as the driven snow.

[onwebcam]

Originally Posted by J. Falcon

That's what Fox News wants you to believe.

Mueller is corrupt, but Donnie Moscow is as clean and pure as the driven snow.

Which one actually delivered Uranium samples to Moscow while they were trying to acquire US Uranium?

[RedFred]

Originally Posted by onwebcam

Which one actually delivered Uranium samples to Moscow while they were trying to acquire US Uranium?

Who supports and trolls endlessly for a hostile country to take over the US?

[Acepimp]

Originally Posted by J. Falcon

That's what Fox News wants you to believe.

Mueller is corrupt, but Donnie Moscow is as clean and pure as the driven snow.

Besides OnWebcam, you guys are really bad at staying informed.

Mueller hauled before secret FISA court to address FBI abuses in 2002, Congress told

Robert Mueller, the former FBI director and current special prosecutor in the Russia case, once was hauled before the nation’s secret intelligence court to address a large number of instances in which the FBI cheated on sensitive surveillance warrants, according to evidence gathered by congressional investigators.

The episode is taking on new significance as Mueller moves into the final stages of his Russia probe while evidence mounts that the FBI work preceding his appointment as special prosecutor may have involved improprieties in the securing of a FISA warrant to spy on Donald Trump’s campaign in the final weeks of the 2016 campaign.

Trisha Anderson, who recently stepped down as the FBI’s principal deputy general counsel, told House investigators late last year in an interview that early in Mueller’s FBI tenure, nearly two decades ago, the FISC summoned the new director to appear before the judges to address concerns about extensive cheating on FISA warrants.

A declassified FISC order from 2002 gives a glimpse into how serious the omissions were: In one case the FBI failed to tell the court that the person they were seeking a FISA warrant to surveil was, in fact, one of their own informants.

The court expressed concern that “misinformation found its way into the FISA applications and remained uncorrected for more than one year despite procedures to verify the accuracy of FISA pleadings.”

Anderson’s testimony isn’t just for the history books. It has as much relevance today as when the judges first became upset with the FBI.

That’s because we now know the FBI, in 2016, omitted significant information from the application for the FISA warrant that allowed it to spy on Trump campaign adviser Carter Page in hopes of finding evidence of collusion between Russia and the GOP presidential nominee’s campaign.

Thanks to congressional oversight and declassified documents, we now know the FBI failed to tell the court that the primary evidence it used to support its warrant — the so-called Steele dossier — was political opposition research produced on behalf of and paid for by the Democratic Party and Hillary Clinton’s campaign, in hopes of harming Trump’s election chances.

We know the FBI falsely told the court in the first application warrant that it knew of no derogatory information about the dossier author, Christopher Steele, a retired British intelligence operative who worked simultaneously as an FBI source and a Clinton campaign opposition researcher. In fact, a senior Justice Department official named Bruce Ohr warned the FBI that Steele was desperate to stop Trump from becoming president, and other evidence showed Steele had been leaking to the media in violation of FBI rules — all derogatory evidence weighing against Steele’s credibility.

Further, we’ve learned from congressional testimony of other FBI officials that the dossier’s contents had not been corroborated by the FBI when it was used in the FISA application — even though the Woods Procedures mentioned above required that only corroborated evidence be used in support of a warrant request.

And, finally, we know from sources that the FBI had other evidence suggesting the innocence of two Trump campaign aides it targeted — Page and George Papadopoulos — that wasn’t provided to the court.

As such evidence has mounted, some Justice and FBI officials have whispered suggestions that the FBI didn’t have an obligation to disclose such information and, therefore, there were no abuses.

Yet, thanks to Anderson’s recounting of the episode from 16-plus years ago, we now know the FISA judges don’t tolerate omissions of material facts and were angry enough in an earlier time to haul the FBI director into court to make their point. Anderson testified Mueller got to see that lesson up close and personal.

The question now is, do the current FISC judges and Justice Department supervisors — Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and FBI Director Christopher Wray among them — care the same about the integrity of the FISA process?

If they do, the first step (as 2002 showed us) is to acknowledge the wrongdoing and put corrective action into place.

Silence and hiding behind classified information don’t serve the American interest, just the interests of an intelligence bureaucracy that wrongly allowed itself to be used for a political dirty trick.

------------------------------

You people who think the FISA abuse scandal isn't real- are completely clueless.

[RedFred]

[J. Falcon]

Originally Posted by Acepimp

Besides OnWebcam, you guys are really bad at staying informed.

You are the last person who should be accusing anyone of being misinformed. Nobody takes you or your Fox News / Infowars conspiracy bullshit seriously. Maybe stick to posting with one of your other fake nicks because this one has run its course...of credibility, that is

[Acepimp]

^^ LOL! So Fred, you will accept Mueller's findings, no matter what, right?

[King Mark]

See sig...

[Acepimp]

Originally Posted by J. Falcon

You are the last person who should be accusing anyone of being misinformed. Nobody takes you or your Fox News / Infowars conspiracy bullshit seriously. Maybe stick to posting with one of your other fake nicks because this one has run its course...of credibility, that is

Keep ignoring indisputable facts... clueless lib. FISA declass is coming

[RedFred]

Originally Posted by Acepimp

^^ LOL! So Fred, you will accept Mueller's findings, no matter what, right?

STFU, you're a Russian troll pretending to live in America. Your opinion means less than a Sarah Palin tweet.

[Acepimp]

Originally Posted by RedFred

STFU, you're a Russian troll pretending to live in America. Your opinion means less than a Sarah Palin tweet.

^^ All of that is false, and it's a simple question. If you guys have so much "respect" for the "honorable" ex-marine Mueller, then you'll accept his findings. I fully agree. Still waiting to see a single shred of any evidence whatsoever of "collusion" (which isn't even a crime)

[2MuchMark]

Originally Posted by Dead Eye

https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/20...yoL/story.html

WOW....!!! What a fucking scumbag Hannity is.

[RedFred]

Originally Posted by Acepimp

^^ All of that is false, and it's a simple question. If you guys have so much "respect" for the "honorable" ex-marine Mueller, then you'll accept his findings. I fully agree. Still waiting to see a single shred of any evidence whatsoever of "collusion" (which isn't even a crime)

[King Mark]

[J. Falcon]

Originally Posted by Acepimp

^^ All of that is false, and it's a simple question. If you guys have so much "respect" for the "honorable" ex-marine Mueller, then you'll accept his findings. I fully agree. Still waiting to see a single shred of any evidence whatsoever of "collusion" (which isn't even a crime)

Keep repeating the same bullshit and proving you have no idea of what's going on. You're like a parrot for right wing talking points, you repeat what you're clueless about.

[King Mark]

[tfto]

Originally Posted by RedFred

STFU, you're a Russian troll pretending to live in America. Your opinion means less than a Sarah Palin tweet.

Damn. That sounds just like a Bladelier response. What a coincidence.

[King Mark]

[King Mark]

Originally Posted by Acepimp

^^ All of that is false, and it's a simple question. If you guys have so much "respect" for the "honorable" ex-marine Mueller, then you'll accept his findings. I fully agree. Still waiting to see a single shred of any evidence whatsoever of "collusion" (which isn't even a crime)

You're right, collusion isn't a crime. Collusion includes MANY crimes, not just one.

Semantics and going to do your agenda any justice bro.

[RedFred]

Originally Posted by tfto

Damn. That sounds just like a Bladelier response. What a coincidence.

Bladewire isn't the only one who posts truth around here. Bigger coincidence is you're defending a Russian troll.

[tfto]

Originally Posted by RedFred

Bladewire isn't the only one who posts truth around here. Bigger coincidence is you're defending a Russian troll.

I wasn't defending anyone. I was just pointing out how your post style is just like Bladeliers.
What a coincidence.

[King Mark]

[RedFred]

Originally Posted by tfto

I wasn't defending anyone. I was just pointing out how your post style is just like Bladeliers.
What a coincidence.

2+2=4...what a coincidence.

[King Mark]

[Acepimp]

Originally Posted by Dead Eye

You're right, collusion isn't a crime. Collusion includes MANY crimes, not just one.

Semantics and going to do your agenda any justice bro.

LOL! Still haven't seen any evidence. No one has even said how Putin would be able to help Trump rig an election. It was determined no votes were affected. But yeah, let's waste $30 million on unrelated process crimes

[King Mark]

^^^denial...

[escorpio]

Originally Posted by RedFred

When did liberals start supporting the Vietnam war? Back in the 70's it was the draft dodgers that were the brave heroes and the guys that went to war were "baby killers."

[J. Falcon]

Originally Posted by RedFred

2+2=4...what a coincidence.

Like a scene from The Hills Have Eyes.

[Acepimp]

Originally Posted by Dead Eye

^^^denial...

Senate report: No evidence that Russians changed vote tallies in 2016

WASHINGTON — There is no evidence that Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election affected the actual vote count, according to the first installment of the Senate Intelligence Committee's Russia report, released Tuesday.

"The Committee has not seen any evidence that vote tallies were manipulated or that voter registration information was deleted or modified," the report said, confirming a January 2017 assessment by U.S. intelligence agencies.


Shove It, Democrats: Senate Intelligence Committee Finds No Direct Evidence Of Trump-Russia Collusion



Also your meme was lying. "Trump Jr worked with Wikileaks! Trump told Russians to hack!" LOL

[King Mark]

^^^not the Mueller investigation. Deflection.

[Acepimp]

Originally Posted by Dead Eye

^^^not the Mueller investigation. Deflection.

Roger Stone Files Motion to Force Mueller to Prove He Didn’t Leak to CNN

Longtime political operative Roger Stone on Wednesday filed a motion requesting a federal judge force special counsel Robert Mueller to prove he did not tip off CNN about his January 25 arrest.
Stone’s legal team argues CNN showed it a draft copy of the indictment, stamped without a PACER, after their client’s arrest, suggesting the document had been released prematurely. “A person with privileged access to a ‘draft’ of Roger Stone’s Indictment, identical to that which had been filed under seal … had — in violation of the Court’s Order — publicly distributed the Indictment prior to its release from the sealing ordered by the Court,” the filing reads.

Since his arrest, Stone has contended CNN was given notice of his arrest ahead of time.

[King Mark]

^^^more useless deflections

[Acepimp]

Originally Posted by Dead Eye

^^^more useless deflections

Except that if his office is leaking to the media, that's a crime.

[King Mark]

Just like IF Trump is as guilty as his team...?

Or...?

[2MuchMark]

Cry all you want Acepimp and cohorts. The Justice system is cleaning up on this. Everyone nailed so far is behind bars, with more to come. Soon, even Trump himself will be in prison, and the world will dance and make merry.

[Acepimp]

LOL! You people actually believe he conspired with Putin!!

You conspiracy nuts crack me up

[tfto]

Originally Posted by RedFred

2+2=4...what a coincidence.

Holy Shit!. You post exactly like Bladelier. This is beyond a coincidence.

[Bladewire]

Originally Posted by Dead Eye

https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/20...yoL/story.html

Onwebcam is a fake nic run by a russian alt-right hate troll it's his job to lie to support Trump and the GOP's attempted coup of our democracy.

Onwebcam lies here daily. Good catch on finding the real facts Dead Eye

I have all his fake nics blocked so I don't see there posts they are a waste of time These are some of his fake nics tfto - Acepimp - onwebcam - hottoddy - escorpio - ghjghj - Drax - diomed - Hawkeye - TampaToker and a few more.

He's obsessed with hate politics & has no impulse control it's part of his mental disability. You'll notice all his fake nics have no city, state, country, name or business urls in their profiles. He demands they all be "anonymous" unprovable identities because they're all him.

He'll reply with multiple fake nics right after I post this in 3.. 2.. 1...

[Acepimp]

Originally Posted by Bladewire

Onwebcam is a fake nic run by a russian alt-right hate troll it's his job to lie to support Trump and the GOP's attempted coup of our democracy.

Onwebcam lies here daily. Good catch on finding the real facts Dead Eye

These are some of his fake nics tfto - Acepimp - onwebcam - escorpio - ghjghj

[tfto]

Originally Posted by Bladewire

Onwebcam is a fake nic run by a russian alt-right hate troll it's his job to lie to support Trump and the GOP's attempted coup of our democracy.

Onwebcam lies here daily. Good catch on finding the real facts Dead Eye

These are some of his fake nics tfto - Acepimp - onwebcam - escorpio - ghjghj - Drax - diomed - Hawkeye - TampaToker and a few more.

He's obsessed with hate politics

Hey Cockholster. If you are so fuckin sure I am someone's fake nic, why won't you take my $1000 bet?. You fuckin worthless lying piece of shit!. All you do is come here non stop every fuckin day and make shit up. When you get called out, you run and hide like the little fuckin bitch you really are.

What's wrong bitch?. Getting called out wasn't part of the Media Matters training and you don't know how to deal with?.. You fuckin worthless bitch.

And in a few, the lying bitch will reply below with some 'I was right' bullshit with those gay ass arrows.

[tfto]

... And FYI, Little bitch Bladelier. Acepimp and I are logged in at the same time. How do you explain that one bitch?

[RedFred]

Originally Posted by tfto

Holy Shit!. You post exactly like Bladelier. This is beyond a coincidence.

Yes, I post exactly like Bladewire. I do it to confuse the low IQ mouth breathers. I must say it works better than I imagined.

[RedFred]

Originally Posted by tfto

Hey Cockholster. If you are so fuckin sure I am someone's fake nic, why won't you take my $1000 bet?. You fuckin worthless lying piece of shit!. All you do is come here non stop every fuckin day and make shit up. When you get called out, you run and hide like the little fuckin bitch you really are.

What's wrong bitch?. Getting called out wasn't part of the Media Matters training and you don't know how to deal with?.. You fuckin worthless bitch.

And in a few, the lying bitch will reply below with some 'I was right' bullshit with those gay ass arrows.

Wow, you post exactly like Diomed. What a coincidence.