Lady tells the TRUTH about the black academic achievement gap

[OneHungLo]

Has nothing to do with white people and racism. There are behavioral differences that explain these outcomes! She nails it.

[Bosa]

Originally Posted by OneHungLo

Has nothing to do with white people and racism. There are behavioral differences that explain these outcomes! She nails it.

Onehunglo Stop your Hate and Come to Jesus

Proverbs 6:16-19
Things that the Lord hates, that are an abomination to him:

a lying tongue,
a heart that devises wicked plans,
feet that make haste to run to evil,
a false witness who breathes out lies,
and one who sows discord among brothers.

[Bosa]

How can you White Nationalists, Republicans, REDHATS say you are good Christians.
These are the words from the book of GOD that describes EVIL that fits You and Trumpf TO A TEE!!! YOU NEED TO COME TO JESUS!!!


1.Evil hearts are experts at creating confusion and contention.
They twist the facts, mislead, lie, avoid taking responsibility, deny reality, make up stories, and withhold information.

(Psalms 5:8; 10:7; 58:3; 109:2–5; 140:2; Proverbs 6:13,14; 6:18,19; 12:13; 16:20; 16:27, 28; 30:14; Job 15:35; Jeremiah 18:18; Nehemiah 6:8; Micah 2:1; Matthew 12:34,35; Acts 6:11–13; 2 Peter 3:16)

2. Evil hearts are experts at fooling others with their smooth speech and flattering words.
But if you look at the fruit of their lives or the follow through of their words, you will find no real evidence of godly growth or change. It’s all smoke and mirrors.

(Psalms 50:19; 52:2,3; 57:4; 59:7; 101:7; Proverbs 12:5; 26:23–26; 26:28; Job 20:12; Jeremiah 12:6; Matthew 26:59; Acts 6:11–13; Romans 16:17,18; 2 Corinthians 11:13,14; 2 Timothy 3:2–5; 3:13; Titus 1:10,16).

3. Evil hearts crave and demand control, and their highest authority is their own self-reference.
They reject feedback, real accountability, and make up their own rules to live by. They use Scripture to their own advantage but ignore and reject passages that might require self-correction and repentance.

(Romans 2:8; Psalms 10; 36:1–4; 50:16–22; 54:5,6; 73:6–9; Proverbs 21:24; Jude 1:8–16).

4. Evil hearts play on the sympathies of good-willed people, often trumping the grace card.
They demand mercy but give none themselves. They demand warmth, forgiveness, and intimacy from those they have harmed with no empathy for the pain they have caused and no real intention of making amends or working hard to rebuild broken trust.

(Proverbs 21:10; 1 Peter 2:16; Jude 1:4).

5. Evil hearts have no conscience, no remorse.

They do not struggle against sin or evil—they delight in it—all the while masquerading as someone of noble character.

(Proverbs 2:14–15; 10:23; 12:10; 21:27,29; Isaiah 32:6; Romans 1:30; 2 Corinthians 11:13–15)

[OneHungLo]

Originally Posted by Bosa

Onehunglo Stop your Hate and Come to Jesus

There is no hate here. The truth will set them free.

[Bosa]

If you are working with someone who exhibits these characteristics, it’s important that you confront them head on.

You must name evil for what it is. The longer you try to reason with them or show mercy towards them, the more you, as the Christian counselor, will become a pawn in his or her game

1. Their horrible actions should have no serious or painful consequences.
They believe grace means they are immediately granted immunity from the relational fallout of their serious sin.

As Biblical counselors let’s not collude with the evil one by turning our attention to the victim, requiring her to forgive, to forget, to trust again when there has been no evidence of inner change.

Proverbs says, “Trusting in a treacherous man in time of trouble is like a bad tooth or a foot that slips” (Proverbs. 25:19). It’s foolishness.

2. That if I talk like a gospel-believing Christian I am one, even if my actions don’t line up with my talk
Remember, Satan masquerades as an angel of light (2 Corinthians 11:13–15).

He knows more true doctrine than you or I will ever know, but his heart is wicked. Why? Because although he knows the truth, he does not believe it or live it.

The Bible has some strong words for those whose actions do not match their talk (1 John 3:17,18; Jeremiah 7:8,10; James 1:22, 26).

John the Baptist said it best when he admonished the religious leaders, “Prove by the way you live that you have repented of your sins and turned to God” (Luke 3:8).

If week after week you hear the talk but there is no change in the walk, you have every reason to question someone’s relationship with God.

It’s important because evil usually pretends to be good, and without discernment we can be easily fooled (Hebrews 5:14).


When you confront evil, chances are good that the evil heart will stop counseling with you because the darkness hates the light (John 3:20) and the foolish and evil heart reject correction (Proverbs 9:7,8).

But that outcome is far better than allowing the evil heart to believe you are on his or her side, or that “he’s not that bad” or “that he’s really sorry” or “that he’s changing” when, in fact, he is not.


Daniel says, “[T]he wicked will continue to be wicked” (Daniel 12:10), which begs the question, do you think an evil person can really change?

[Bosa]

Originally Posted by OneHungLo

There is no hate here. The truth will set them free.

Who are you to judge anyone? What good have you done in your life. Lets go thought your life and see your deeds. It's not you place to judge anyone. All you do is spew hate all day everyday you are evil!


Matthew 7:1
“Judge not, that you be not judged.

For with the judgment you pronounce you will be judged, and with the measure you use it will be measured to you.

Why do you see the speck that is in your brother's eye, but do not notice the log that is in your own eye?

Or how can you say to your brother, ‘Let me take the speck out of your eye,’ when there is the log in your own eye? You hypocrite, first take the log out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to take the speck out of your brother's eye. ...

[Bosa]

If you are working with someone who exhibits these characteristics, it’s important that you confront them head on.

You must name evil for what it is. The longer you try to reason with them or show mercy towards them, the more you, as the Christian counselor, will become a pawn in his or her game

[pimpmaster9000]

well they needed military escrort to school during your lifetime so I am guessing the lady selling her book on this show forgot to mention this and is picking an angle to create outrage and interest for her book...

[Paul Markham]

Originally Posted by Bosa

How can you White Nationalists, Republicans, REDHATS say you are good Christians.
These are the words from the book of GOD that describes EVIL that fits You and Trumpf TO A TEE!!! YOU NEED TO COME TO JESUS!!!


1.Evil hearts are experts at creating confusion and contention.
They twist the facts, mislead, lie, avoid taking responsibility, deny reality, make up stories, and withhold information.

(Psalms 5:8; 10:7; 58:3; 109:2–5; 140:2; Proverbs 6:13,14; 6:18,19; 12:13; 16:20; 16:27, 28; 30:14; Job 15:35; Jeremiah 18:18; Nehemiah 6:8; Micah 2:1; Matthew 12:34,35; Acts 6:11–13; 2 Peter 3:16)

2. Evil hearts are experts at fooling others with their smooth speech and flattering words.
But if you look at the fruit of their lives or the follow through of their words, you will find no real evidence of godly growth or change. It’s all smoke and mirrors.

(Psalms 50:19; 52:2,3; 57:4; 59:7; 101:7; Proverbs 12:5; 26:23–26; 26:28; Job 20:12; Jeremiah 12:6; Matthew 26:59; Acts 6:11–13; Romans 16:17,18; 2 Corinthians 11:13,14; 2 Timothy 3:2–5; 3:13; Titus 1:10,16).

3. Evil hearts crave and demand control, and their highest authority is their own self-reference.
They reject feedback, real accountability, and make up their own rules to live by. They use Scripture to their own advantage but ignore and reject passages that might require self-correction and repentance.

(Romans 2:8; Psalms 10; 36:1–4; 50:16–22; 54:5,6; 73:6–9; Proverbs 21:24; Jude 1:8–16).

4. Evil hearts play on the sympathies of good-willed people, often trumping the grace card.
They demand mercy but give none themselves. They demand warmth, forgiveness, and intimacy from those they have harmed with no empathy for the pain they have caused and no real intention of making amends or working hard to rebuild broken trust.

(Proverbs 21:10; 1 Peter 2:16; Jude 1:4).

5. Evil hearts have no conscience, no remorse.

They do not struggle against sin or evil—they delight in it—all the while masquerading as someone of noble character.

(Proverbs 2:14–15; 10:23; 12:10; 21:27,29; Isaiah 32:6; Romans 1:30; 2 Corinthians 11:13–15)

Don't quote from a religion that is based on lies. Look to today and the truth for your evidence.

Jews, Orientals and Indian subcontinent races do exceptionally well in studying, much better than Europeans. They fill jobs such as banking, legal, healthcare and CEOs of many companies. While Africans and Latinos do very badly. This has nothing to do with the colour of their skin. It's down to the parents pushing children and working hard to make sure the children get the best education.

While African and Latino cultures don't do the same. But if they adopt a middle class White, Jewish, Oriental and Indian culture towards educating their children the children will benefit.

[OneHungLo]

Originally Posted by crucifissio

well they needed military escrort to school during your lifetime so I am guessing the lady selling her book on this show forgot to mention this and is picking an angle to create outrage and interest for her book...

You are sooooo full of shit and you know it. lol 60 years ago in one section of the US? That's like 5-6 generations ago for blacks. What does that have to do with kids in school today?

And it's funny that you completely ignored the main message. If skin pigmentation is the factor here, and white supremacy is to explain why blacks' grades are so bad, how do you explain 7 out of the 8 national spelling bee champions are Indian Americans? You can't. Your whole argument falls apart.

What good does it do people if you lie and make them the victim? How will they ever better themselves if you perpetrate this myth of bad grades because someone got escorted to school almost 70 yrs ago?

Can you imagine if people were dumbed down by traumatic experiences? How would any of us be here? Every single ethnic group has been traumatized by another since recorded history.

[King Mark]

^when was yours?

[Sarn]

1. Want to go in school with whites
2. Want black America in 2040
3. In 2040 go to school with all black
4. shiiiit

[Bladewire]

Originally Posted by OneHungLo

Has nothing to do with white people and racism. There are behavioral differences that explain these outcomes! She nails it.

Saying black folks are mentally deficient and therefore inferior is racist. You can't put lipstick on that pig.

[TheSquealer]

Leftists have almost an allergic reaction to facts and reality

I wonder why it is that almost all national spelling bee champions are Indian in this incredibly racist educational system? So strange. It's almost like they parent their children, are active in their education and insist on excellence... where other ethnic groups are much less likely to do so.

Strange how all this supposed "racism" and "white supremacy" is so selective and how almost all ethnic groups have no issues thriving except on small subset of one... who coincidentally blames all their failures on imagined boogeymen, rather than just cracking a book open or parenting (fathering) their kids.

[pimpmaster9000]

Originally Posted by OneHungLo

You are sooooo full of shit and you know it. lol 60 years ago in one section of the US? That's like 5-6 generations ago for blacks. What does that have to do with kids in school today?

And it's funny that you completely ignored the main message. If skin pigmentation is the factor here, and white supremacy is to explain why blacks' grades are so bad, how do you explain 7 out of the 8 national spelling bee champions are Indian Americans? You can't. Your whole argument falls apart.

What good does it do people if you lie and make them the victim? How will they ever better themselves if you perpetrate this myth of bad grades because someone got escorted to school almost 70 yrs ago?

Can you imagine if people were dumbed down by traumatic experiences? How would any of us be here? Every single ethnic group has been traumatized by another since recorded history.

dude they needed military escort to school...MILITARY

can you imagine the situation where the police was not sufficient? I mean this was in no way just a few people when the MILITARY had to step in...the MILITARY

indians suck at sport...their national sport is not doing sport....google it...the entire nation barely does any sport...so they read books all the time and they did not need the military to clear the road to school...

[Paul Markham]

If you take a poor black kid from a backward family and put him with a middle class white family he will do well.

If you take the white kid out of that family and put him with a backward black family, he will do badly.

It's all about the culture and not breeding.

[OneHungLo]

Originally Posted by Paul Markham

If you take a poor black kid from a backward family and put him with a middle class white family he will do well.

If you take the white kid out of that family and put him with a backward black family, he will do badly.

It's all about the culture and not breeding.

Nope. They've studied this and the black still did terrible.

Harvard psychologists took a look at how black children adopted by well off upper-middle class white families at a very young age perform on IQ tests once they grow up in white families with good socioeconomic conditions. Black children adopted by white parents average 89 on IQ tests at age 17 (slightly better than the 85 average for blacks nationally). White children who grew up in the same households and had white biological parents on average scored 109. Even with the same socioeconomic upbringing, the racial IQ gap remains.

The Minnesota Transracial Adoption Study examined the IQ test scores of 130 black or interracial children adopted by advantaged white families. The aim of the study was to determine the contribution of environmental and genetic factors to the poor performance of black children on IQ tests as compared to white children. The studies' general findings were that the IQs of children of a particular race did not differ significantly depending on whether they were raised by their biological parents or by adoptive parents of a different race. The gap between black and white IQ scores remained even if growing up in the same family.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minnes...Adoption_Study

[bronco67]

Originally Posted by OneHungLo

Nope. They've studied this and the black still did terrible.




https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minnes...Adoption_Study

Ok...here's why it's a fact that you're a racist.

Maybe that's a real, legit study and stats on the IQ gap between races. Let's say that's a fact I now know and anyone else who reads it will now know. Science says whites are smarter than blacks. Ok.

Most people would just know the fact and not get some kind of superiority complex about it. You diligently scour the internet to find that material to back up your racist thoughts. "Ooh look, I told you! Whites are smarter than blacks. It says so right here in this Harvard study. How can I be racist if I'm just telling the truth?"

So you're basically absolved and vindicated as a racist because of some info in a study? This is regardless of whether or not the data is valid.

[OneHungLo]

So I’m a racist because I know of this particular Harvard study? So I guess the Harvard psychologists are also racist for conducting them?

[bronco67]

Originally Posted by OneHungLo

So I’m a racist because I know of this particular Harvard study? So I guess the Harvard psychologists are also racist for conducting them?

You're racist for going to find it and posting it. You're so fucking dense I may as well be teaching a dog how to do math.

And the Harvard people aren't doing the study because they want to feel superior.

[King Mark]

How do you feel about this Cornell study tho?

https://www.foxnews.com/story/whites...ks-study-finds

[TheSquealer]

Originally Posted by Dead Eye

How do you feel about this Cornell study tho?

https://www.foxnews.com/story/whites...ks-study-finds

The funniest thing is that you have no clue what you're reading... you're just happy to see the phrase "whites genetically weaker" and celebrate the fact that you think it means something. ... and are oblivious to the fact that it means nothing... and have no clue what the article is even about.

First, none of that is new information. Anyone that knows anything at all about evolutionary biology knows its been a long established fact that Africans have greater genetic diversity, which fades the further away from ground zero that they get. This is how migration patterns are studied.

This is why the genetic trait from equatorial Africa affecting height to wingspan ratio disappears almost entirely in Eastern Europe... and why there's so many Eastern Europeans in pro basketball and that single genetic trait is why blacks are over represented in pro basketball in general.

[King Mark]

Originally Posted by TheSquealer

The funniest thing is that you have no clue what you're reading... you're just happy to see the phrase "whites genetically weaker" and celebrate the fact that you think it means something. ... and are oblivious to the fact that it means nothing... and have no clue what the article is even about.

First, none of that is new information. Anyone that knows anything at all about evolutionary biology knows its been a long established fact that Africans have greater genetic diversity, which fades the further away from ground zero that they get. This is how migration patterns are studied.

This is why the genetic trait from equatorial Africa affecting height to wingspan ratio disappears almost entirely in Eastern Europe... and why there's so many Eastern Europeans in pro basketball and that single genetic trait is why blacks are over represented in pro basketball in general.

^you seem mad

I dont know if it's the way you said it means nothing. Or the way you proved it means a lot in the following paragraph.

You def seem mad tho. (Had to quote you, cause you always edit shit)

[pimpmaster9000]

Originally Posted by OneHungLo

Nope. They've studied this and the black still did terrible.




https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minnes...Adoption_Study

this study was done in 1979, like 20 years after blacks could go to school without military escort and they could ride in the front of the bus...it does not exactly scream legit when you test an oppressed people who needed MILITARY escort to school because of US racism

MILITARY ESCORT


most important contributing factors to IQ:
1) gross domestic product - if the white man is exploiting the living shit out of you, you aint gonna eat well
2) access to education - in you need the ARMY to escort you to school, it is safe to say that you aint gonna do well like the ones who do not need ARMY support



so in short: people with more money, more opportunity and who are not persecuted by racist mother fuckers, do better on IQ tests

conclusion: a white man doing an IQ test on a group of people who probably did not have the right to vote at the time, is comedy supreme

[pimpmaster9000]

number of black families with college degrees when onehunglos "IQ race test" was done = zero

so yeah I am going to do this test with a few super rich white kids against some poor as shit former slaves...yeah I am a great scientist

fuck off

[ghjghj]

Originally Posted by crucifissio

most important contributing factor to IQ:
1) Genetics

[pimpmaster9000]

Originally Posted by ghjghj

not needing military escort to school because of racism also helps

[Paul Markham]

Originally Posted by OneHungLo

Nope. They've studied this and the black still did terrible.




https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minnes...Adoption_Study

Did you read what it says?

The study found that "(a) putative genetic racial differences do not account for a major portion of the IQ performance difference between racial groups, and (b) black and interracial children reared in the culture of the tests and the schools perform as well as other adopted children in similar families."[4]

By examining the cognitive ability and school performance of both black and white children adopted into white families, the study intended to separate genetic factors from rearing conditions as causal influences in the gap. "Trans racial adoption is the human analog of the cross-fostering design, commonly used in animal behavior genetics research.... There is no question that adoption constitutes a massive intervention" (Scarr & Weinberg, 1976, p. 726).

Scarr and Weinberg studied black, white, Asian, indigenous American, and mixed-race black/white children adopted by upper-middle-class white families in Minnesota. The average IQ of the adopting parents was more than one standard deviation above the population mean of 100. The biological children of these parents were also tested. The sample of adopted children was selected by eligible parents contacting the researchers for participating following a newsletter call. The geographical origin of the adopted children was not uniform. All except one white adopted child was adopted in-state. Black and interracial children came from twelve states; Asian and indigenous American children came from Minnesota as well as from Korea, Vietnam, Canada and Ecuador.

As Scarr & Weinberg (1976) note, transracial adoption studies only control for family environment, not social environment. For example, children who are socially identified as black may still be subject to racial discrimination despite being raised by white parents. Yet, it was previously known that adoption into upper-middle class white families has a positive influence on the IQ and school performance of white children.

However I do believe genetics play a large part in sport. African long distance runners, Afro Caribbean do well in most sports. Because of inbred genetics and environment.

Still not decided on IQ levels of races as a contributory factor. Asians do better than Afro Caribbean, Jews do better than them and so on.

[TheSquealer]

Originally Posted by Paul Markham

Did you read what it says?

However I do believe genetics play a large part in sport. African long distance runners, Afro Caribbean do well in most sports. Because of inbred genetics and environment.

All sports have genetic components which play a role in success. With most sports, its usually 1 or 2 specific genetic traits. This is particularly true with traditional olympic sports.

There is nothing to "believe" as its all quite well studied and well documented.

Kenyans are disproportionately represented long distance running success because
1) they live 1 mile above sea level
2) they have the genetic traits for high vo2 max/high trainability
3) they grow up in areas where distance running is the primary mode of transportation
4) those successful in distance running have unique physiological makeup - 15% longer legs on average + 15% less muscle mass in legs on average (costing less energy to swing a longer pendulum)

.. all of these factors leading to greater running economy (which is what distance running is about)

Jamaicans are disproportionately represented in sprinting because they those who compete are genetically from one specific tribe in west africa where;
1) they are uniquely large and have a sprinters physiological makeup (narrow hips, shorter legs, more muscle mass etc)
2) carry the genetic trait for sickle cell
3) the above leading to a disproportionate amount of type 2b muscle fibers in their bodies as there muscles rely primarily on the body's anaerobic energy system
4) those succeeding in sprinting, having a disproportionate amount of type 2b muscle fibers in their legs/quads

all of these factors leading to an improved ability to apply more force to the ground, more efficiently and more times (which is what sprinting is)

high jumpers have to have the right achilles tendon length/thickness which dictates how much energy can be stored and released...

a major league baseball player cannot be a successful hitter without having a certain range of macular cones on the retina which dictate the quality of the image they see of both the release point of the baseball when its thrown and the rotational patterns of the stitches, enabling their brain to make a better quality educated guess as to the type and location of pitch so that they can initiate a swing earlier and more accurately.

a successful rowing team all have a disproportionate density of type2 b muscle fibers in their upper bodies/back

a successful basketball player has a height to wingspan ratio which is usually something like 1:1.15 to 1:1.25 (success in basketball is not about height per se)

a world class female gymnast has to be short (all are within certain physiological parameters).... cause,... basic physics

Successful body builders usually carry more than one copy of a mutated myostatin gene (which exists to limit muscle growth/mass - as a means to preserve energy)

None of these things have anything at all to do with "inbreeding".

All Olympic sports and most sports in general, and even positions in sports have dominant body types and genetic traits which lead to greater success in that specific sport or position.

Furthermore, successful athletes are statistically more likely to marry successful athletes and create athlete babies by passing on these genetic traits.