Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Post New Thread Reply

Register GFY Rules Calendar Mark Forums Read
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed.

 
Thread Tools
Old 09-16-2020, 04:21 PM   #51
SBJ
So Fucking Fabulous
 
SBJ's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Indiana
Posts: 11,375
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Porn Nerd View Post


If ALL your sales/revenue is 50% from paysites and you are shooting content 1-3 times per week for updates then yes 50% would be a tough margin. But hopefully only a % of your money comes from affiliates.
100% this ^ I've also ran free sites since 2001 and I was one of my top 5 affiliates selling my stuff
SBJ is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2020, 04:34 PM   #52
Grapesoda
So Fucking Banned
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Montana
Posts: 46,238
Thanks
Grapesoda is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2020, 02:04 AM   #53
Paul Markham
Too old to care
 
Paul Markham's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: On the sofa, watching TV or doing my jigsaws.
Posts: 52,943
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Porn Nerd View Post
I love the "who needs affiliates?" argument. LOL Especially coming from people with no skin in the game, like Paul.

Affiliates = traffic. Period. If a webmaster sends a visitor to a site from his site that webmaster wants and expects to get paid. And he should. That 50% for paysite affiliates Paul is bitching about is EXACTLY what I as a Program Owner want! Why? Because it's free money. It's a FREE sale Paul. It's a sale I would otherwise not get. So, to me, it's passive income. Yay affiliates!

Now this does not mean I stop my own "in-house" traffic generation. Of course I make more without affiliates (duh) but see above. It's not an either/or situation. You do/have BOTH. Get affiliates AND you do your own traffic generation, traffic and media buys, link exchanges, etc etc.

Geez Louise. LOL



If ALL your sales/revenue is 50% from paysites and you are shooting content 1-3 times per week for updates then yes 50% would be a tough margin. But hopefully only a % of your money comes from affiliates.
Major points that prove you're wrong.

Affiliates do not have a monopoly on traffic, anyone can find and send it. I'm not advocating doing nothing to get it. Even you tell us that you're having to send a lot of your own traffic.

Then there's the methods affiliates use to get traffic. Using google they could be getting your traffic just because you have to compete with them on Google. Using your samples to submit to other sites, they're using your content to get traffic you could be getting.

Getting 50% for doing no more than using what you supply and can use. Is too high and we've seen too many programs fail because of it. You're picking up those failures soall power to you.

Then there's the money spent on content. You expect content providers to work for a reduced wage, then you only get content providers who have no alternative. I had an alterative that paid much better than what paysites could offer, so I went for it.
Paul Markham is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2020, 02:05 AM   #54
Paul Markham
Too old to care
 
Paul Markham's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: On the sofa, watching TV or doing my jigsaws.
Posts: 52,943
Quote:
Originally Posted by SBJ View Post
100% this ^ I've also ran free sites since 2001 and I was one of my top 5 affiliates selling my stuff
So why not drop the affiliates and employ someone inhouse?

Concentrate on what you do best.
Paul Markham is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2020, 02:06 AM   #55
Paul Markham
Too old to care
 
Paul Markham's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: On the sofa, watching TV or doing my jigsaws.
Posts: 52,943
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grapesoda View Post
I had heard numbers from a client that made 50% seem unprofitable
You only have to do the calculations to know 50% is unsustainable and buy in good content. Unless you're already driving 80-90% of your own traffic.
Paul Markham is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2020, 05:03 AM   #56
AmeliaG
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
AmeliaG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 10,530
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Porn Nerd View Post
I love the "who needs affiliates?" argument. LOL Especially coming from people with no skin in the game, like Paul.

Affiliates = traffic. Period. If a webmaster sends a visitor to a site from his site that webmaster wants and expects to get paid. And he should. That 50% for paysite affiliates Paul is bitching about is EXACTLY what I as a Program Owner want! Why? Because it's free money. It's a FREE sale Paul. It's a sale I would otherwise not get. So, to me, it's passive income. Yay affiliates!

Now this does not mean I stop my own "in-house" traffic generation. Of course I make more without affiliates (duh) but see above. It's not an either/or situation. You do/have BOTH. Get affiliates AND you do your own traffic generation, traffic and media buys, link exchanges, etc etc.

Geez Louise. LOL



If ALL your sales/revenue is 50% from paysites and you are shooting content 1-3 times per week for updates then yes 50% would be a tough margin. But hopefully only a % of your money comes from affiliates.
Well said
__________________
GFY Hall of Famer

AltStar Hall of Famer




Blue Blood's SpookyCash.com

Babe photography portfolio
AmeliaG is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2020, 06:30 AM   #57
ruff
I have a plan B
 
ruff's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Seattle - Miami - St Kitts
Posts: 5,501
I totally agree with what Mr Porn Nerd stated. I make sales for my sponsors because I offer something my traffic wants and comes back for daily. If I didn't, I would have nothing to offer sponsors. A lot of businesses work the same, notably real estate. The listing agent rarely sells the house, it's usually another agent. Same difference. I guarantee you, the sponsor is not going to make the sale I made for them, that's wishful thinking.
__________________
CryptoFeeds
ruff is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Post New Thread Reply
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >

Bookmarks

Tags
payout, low, cams, sales, bother, required, perfect, promote, margin, feel, tight, cam, typically, site, math, 50%, membership, 20%, affiliate, remember, personally, people, percentages, amazon, mba
Thread Tools



Advertising inquiries - marketing at gfy dot com

Contact Admin - Advertise - GFY Rules - Top

©2000-, AI Media Network Inc



Powered by vBulletin
Copyright © 2000- Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.