Publisher Bucks

So after the past couple of weeks, its becoming clear that I need a better way of managing and organizing my SQL databases, at present, I have each database listed by site name, with a table underneath it like this:

domain
- tablename

But was wondering if there might be a better method, perhaps creating one 'primary' SQL database and then adding a slew of single tables below it:

maindatabase
- recipes
- cars
- pets
- forum
- store
- casino
- etc

Are there any drawbacks or bonuses to using either method over the other or, perhaps, any other methods you might have or currently use to handle database management that may be better still?

baodb

I'd say it really depends on how you consume the data and the structure of your application. While there are surely best or common practices that are good to follow as a default, no one can give you a good answer to your specific use case without knowing what the scope of your application is.

k0nr4d

You should be using a separate db per site for several reasons:
- Table name overlap (you might need a users table on each site)
- Security (sql injection on one site will limit damage to the one site and not all your sites).
- Portability (you can move a single site to another server if you need)
- Corruption (single database getting corrupted can cause complete loss for all your sites)

I can't really think of a reason to use a single db like what you are describing.

__________________
Mechanical Bunny Media
Mechbunny Tube Script | Mechbunny Webcam Aggregator Script | Custom Web Development

fuzebox

You use one single database across multiple unrelated websites?

Klen

Dont think i ever used single database for multi domains/sites. Different site, different database, end of story.

hornyasf

Absolutely 100%

__________________

Publisher Bucks

Okay cool, thanks, I guess I shall keep things how they are then