![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
![]() ![]() |
|
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed. |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: New Orleans, Louisiana. / Newcastle, England.
Posts: 1,117
|
![]() So I'm currently putting together a bunch of stand-alone sites but, they're all located in an individual sub directory of a single domain name.
Should I be generating a sitemap for each of these sites as if they were stand alone or, just do one sitemap for the main domain name? Anyone have any feedback or thoughts on this that are cemented in experience? Much appreciated ![]()
__________________
NOTHING TO SEE HERE |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Midwest
Posts: 3,802
|
Why would you put together a bunch of "sites" in sub directories on the same domain name? Landing pages makes sense, but sites... that does not compute.
Either way, if you want to go down this route (a route that is pretty ill-advisable, imo), just one sitemap per domain. If you were using sub-domains instead of directories, then per sub-domain is fine. |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: New Orleans, Louisiana. / Newcastle, England.
Posts: 1,117
|
Quote:
__________________
NOTHING TO SEE HERE |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Apr 2019
Posts: 657
|
Think you can beat these guys? https://www.tripod.lycos.com/
__________________
__________________ |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Midwest
Posts: 3,802
|
I haven't really done something that doesn't make any sense since about 2006 as far as websites go. As for "free sites", that's literally my business.
![]() I don't put anything that isn't connected to the main site (ie., a forum or blog) in a sub-directory. Like I said, a landing page makes sense, but a wholly different "site" is quite frankly stupid. Buy a domain. They're cheap. Either way, doing different sitemaps for the same top-level domain on a sub-directory is a great way to make Google think this is as stupid as I do. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
making it rain
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: seattle
Posts: 22,004
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 952
|
I used to build out doorways on a mass scale if I remember correctly Google tools will reject the subdomains in the xml file when you submit it for indexing. Sub domain should have own xml but things might be different now try it out.
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
|||||||
|
|||||||
Bookmarks |
Tags |
sitemap, domain, sites, main, stand, experience, cemented, appreciated, thumbsup, feedback, generating, stand-alone, bunch, putting, question, located, xml, individual, directory, single |