I debunked Albert Einstein while eating ice cream - Page 7 - GoFuckYourself.com

chowda · 01-19-2006, 09:49 AM

300 i didnt bump this

$5 submissions · 01-19-2006, 03:03 PM

Any seen 12clicks around? Haven't seen much of him here lately.

jjjay · 01-19-2006, 03:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by $5 submissions

Any seen 12clicks around? Haven't seen much of him here lately.

i heard he went broke. mojo finally got fed up of carrying him

BOSS1 · 01-19-2006, 04:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks

I've always known Einstein was wrong about time travel but I never felt I had the time to properly debunk it.
So tonight, I'm eating Ben & Jerry's "coffee heathbar crunch" icecream and a simple answer to the problem presented itself

The theory is that if you could travel at faster than the speed of light, you could travel through time. Here is why its wrong:

Time has no relationship to people. Time passes regardless of what a person does.
if something happends in another galaxy and it takes a year to see it because the light is traveling from so far away, by the time we see it, its already a year old (standard stuff)
But if we travel at faster than the speed of light towards that galaxy, we will get closer to seeing the galaxy in realtime. we will NOT be turning back the clock.
The proof of this is our ability to travel faster than the speed of sound.
If a sound takes 10 seconds to reach our ear because the action creating it was so far away, we hear an action that happened 10 seconds ago. Not unlike seeing something from the other galaxy that happened already.
Now, if we travel at the speed of sound towards the action that made the sound, we DO hear the sound sooner but we do not travel back in time.
Swap speed of sound with speed of light and you see why Albert Einstein is wrong.

This might be the most idiotic reasoning I read in a while

I suggest taking some physics courses at uni....

Thanks for making me feel more educated!

12clicks · 01-19-2006, 06:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BOSS1

This might be the most idiotic reasoning I read in a while

I suggest taking some physics courses at uni....

Thanks for making me feel more educated!

oh, how children love to chirp.
I'll bet you don't even like ice cream

12clicks · 06-23-2006, 03:21 PM

and now I've laid out my entire adult plans over a bowl of chunky monkey.

what I really want to know is what happened to my help thread with the hundreds of questions.

FuqALot · 06-23-2006, 04:19 PM

porn webmasters debating einstein theories.
one of the better threads here.

MrJackMeHoff · 06-23-2006, 04:38 PM

I didnt read shit here but, its already been proven to be true so forget it.

12clicks · 06-24-2006, 10:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrJackMeHoff

I didnt read shit here but, its already been proven to be true so forget it.

check again, Einstein.

http://www.physicsmyths.org.uk/timedilation.htm

MaddCaz · 06-24-2006, 10:19 PM

the answers....by porn!

detoxed · 06-24-2006, 10:24 PM

I just cannot believe this is still going

Dagwolf · 06-24-2006, 11:04 PM

This thread is proof of time travel. ;D heh

Cory W · 04-14-2007, 11:37 AM

12clicks and Lene Hau are now one in the same.
http://www.news.harvard.edu/gazette/...08/99-hau.html

Odie · 04-14-2007, 11:55 AM

I love reading your rants Ron!! lol It def always makes me think!

BOSS1 · 04-14-2007, 09:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks

oh, how children love to chirp.
I'll bet you don't even like ice cream

I am lactose intolertant

GigoloMason · 04-14-2007, 09:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks

oh, how children love to chirp.
I'll bet you don't even like ice cream

I can only picture one place on earth that doesn't like ice cream and it's called COMMUNIST CHINA. fucking commies.

12clicks · 04-15-2007, 07:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BOSS1

I am lactose intolertant

and they say my people skills are lacking.

Goodings Media · 04-15-2007, 10:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks

I've always known Einstein was wrong about time travel but I never felt I had the time to properly debunk it.
So tonight, I'm eating Ben & Jerry's "coffee heathbar crunch" icecream and a simple answer to the problem presented itself

The theory is that if you could travel at faster than the speed of light, you could travel through time. Here is why its wrong:

Time has no relationship to people. Time passes regardless of what a person does.
if something happends in another galaxy and it takes a year to see it because the light is traveling from so far away, by the time we see it, its already a year old (standard stuff)
But if we travel at faster than the speed of light towards that galaxy, we will get closer to seeing the galaxy in realtime. we will NOT be turning back the clock.
The proof of this is our ability to travel faster than the speed of sound.
If a sound takes 10 seconds to reach our ear because the action creating it was so far away, we hear an action that happened 10 seconds ago. Not unlike seeing something from the other galaxy that happened already.
Now, if we travel at the speed of sound towards the action that made the sound, we DO hear the sound sooner but we do not travel back in time.
Swap speed of sound with speed of light and you see why Albert Einstein is wrong.

Im not gonna read all of this thread but this post made me laugh... lol

Now I hope none of it pollutes my brain, my Cosmology and Relativistic Space Science exam is 5th June (1st year finals)

12clicks · 04-15-2007, 11:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Goodings Media

Im not gonna read all of this thread but this post made me laugh... lol

Now I hope none of it pollutes my brain, my Cosmology and Relativistic Space Science exam is 5th June (1st year finals)

I suggest you stay away from the icecream until after the test.

and what do Cosmetics have to do with Relativistic Space Science?

GigoloMason · 04-15-2007, 11:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks

check again, Einstein.

http://www.physicsmyths.org.uk/timedilation.htm

Just in case you're actually interested ;)

Stanford Confirms it with particle accelerators.
http://www2.slac.stanford.edu/vvc/th...elativity.html

In particle accelerators, particles are moving very close to the speed of light where the length and time effects are large. This has allowed us to clearly verify that length contraction and time dilation do occur.

GPS Satellites operation also confirms it:
http://www.physicscentral.com/writers/2000/will.html

But at 38 microseconds per day, the relativistic offset in the rates of the satellite clocks is so large that, if left uncompensated, it would cause navigational errors that accumulate faster than 10 km per day! GPS accounts for relativity by electronically adjusting the rates of the satellite clocks, and by building mathematical corrections into the computer chips which solve for the user's location. Without the proper application of relativity, GPS would fail in its navigational functions within about 2 minutes.

Hafele and Keating Experiment with atomic clocks on airplanes:
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu...iv/airtim.html

These results provide an unambiguous empirical resolution of the famous clock "paradox" with macroscopic clocks."

BOSS1 · 04-15-2007, 11:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks

and they say my people skills are lacking.

are you saying mine are worse

?

Goodings Media · 04-15-2007, 11:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks

I suggest you stay away from the icecream until after the test.

and what do Cosmetics have to do with Relativistic Space Science?

haha

You been on the ice cream too?

3 exams, this one been the last. Need to 50% and above them all or I fail the year. No pressure.

CDSmith · 04-15-2007, 11:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lane

- nothing can travel at or faster than lightspeed.

Light can.

So if light particles can do it (travel at the speed of light), why is it such a stretch to comprehend that other forms of matter might be able to do it as well?

i have the uncanny abilty to hear in the dark. Thus I am not so quick to toss around the word "impossible" :D

J. Falcon · 04-15-2007, 11:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ironhorse

Don't quit your dayjob.

Goodings Media · 04-15-2007, 11:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CDSmith

Light can.

So if light particles can do it (travel at the speed of light), why is it such a stretch to comprehend that other forms of matter might be able to do it as well?

i have the uncanny abilty to hear in the dark. Thus I am not so quick to toss around the word "impossible" :D

Whats the fact that sound travels through vibrations in a medium, got to do with anything other than electromagnetic radiation travelling at light speeds?

At speeds approaching c best to stop thinking of light as particles

GigoloMason · 04-15-2007, 11:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CDSmith

Light can.

So if light particles can do it (travel at the speed of light), why is it such a stretch to comprehend that other forms of matter might be able to do it as well?

Because of relativistic mass increase.

Quote:

At speeds approaching c best to stop thinking of light as particles

That about sums it up.

CDSmith · 04-15-2007, 11:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Goodings Media

Whats the fact that sound travels through vibrations in a medium, got to do with anything other than electromagnetic radiation travelling at light speeds?

it has to do with 1) the fact that some people so lack a sense of humor they completely miss that aspect of it,
and 2) the illustration (through humor mind you) of doing the seemingly impossible. I often find that those who are quick to say "that's impossible" are simply too close-minded to see that just because we as 21st century humans can't do it, doesn't necessarily mean something is impossible. It just means that it is impossible at present.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Goodings Media

At speeds approaching c best to stop thinking of light as particles

But why? Light IS particles.

CDSmith · 04-15-2007, 11:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GigoloMason

Because of relativistic mass increase.

Blabber jabber.

Once Dr. Daystrom invents the first warp drive you eggheads will eat your words.

12clicks · 04-15-2007, 11:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Goodings Media

At speeds approaching c best to stop thinking of light as particles

why is that, because the theories don't hold up under such circumstances or because light particles stop existing at such speeds?

Goodings Media · 04-15-2007, 12:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks

why is that, because the theories don't hold up under such circumstances or because light particles stop existing at such speeds?

Because there isn;t a unified theory of light yet that holds true under all situations. Einstein would have got it, if he'd not been so obsessed with the goddam graviton......

12clicks · 04-15-2007, 12:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Goodings Media

Because there isn;t a unified theory of light yet that holds true under all situations.

or put another way the theories don't hold up under such circumstances

onlinecasino · 07-30-2007, 05:29 PM

oh it's possible alright, i've done some RESEARCH, i know several peoples who done it trough a device by aliens, never tryed myself but i will do it one day..

MrChips · 07-30-2007, 05:48 PM

I heard that the length of a second is based around our current galactic speed away from the point of origin of the big bang.

It is primarily this speed which gives us our current time dialation which we are familiar with.

If we were on a galaxy which was much further away from the point of origin of the big bang - then we would by definition be moving faster, and therefore incur a dialation whereby our seconds would last slightly longer.

(Using seconds to make it simple.)

12clicks · 07-30-2007, 07:55 PM

now what numb skull bumped this?
this is settled fact.
Who exactly are any of you to suggest I'm wrong?

MrChips · 07-30-2007, 07:57 PM

BTW - this means if you get on a rocket - and head back towards the point of origin of the big bang - your seconds will last a shorter period of time and you will age faster (as effectively you are moving slower than you were on the galaxy).

If you stop your rocket at the point of the origin of the big bang - then your seconds will elapse in an instant - you will no longer exist.

This I feel fits in with a unified theory of at the very least space, speed and time.

CDSmith · 07-30-2007, 08:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrChips

BTW - this means if you get on a rocket - and head back towards the point of origin of the big bang - your seconds will last a shorter period of time and you will age faster (as effectively you are moving slower than you were on the galaxy).

If you stop your rocket at the point of the origin of the big bang - then your seconds will elapse in an instant - you will no longer exist.

This I feel fits in with a unified theory of at the very least space, speed and time.

I disagree. I believe that time is linear no matter where in the universe you are. However, as you near the point of the big bang origin your head will implode.

I need a test subject.

High Plains Drifter · 07-30-2007, 08:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GigoloMason

http://www.physicscentral.com/writers/2000/will.html

But at 38 microseconds per day, the relativistic offset in the rates of the satellite clocks is so large that, if left uncompensated, it would cause navigational errors that accumulate faster than 10 km per day! GPS accounts for relativity by electronically adjusting the rates of the satellite clocks, and by building mathematical corrections into the computer chips which solve for the user's location. Without the proper application of relativity, GPS would fail in its navigational functions within about 2 minutes.
[/i]

Interesting article.

Squishy · 07-30-2007, 09:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CDSmith

Blabber jabber.

Once Dr. Daystrom invents the first warp drive you eggheads will eat your words.

Zefram Cochrane, not Daystrom...Daystrom was a computer guy.

AbulletAway · 07-30-2007, 09:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bdjuf

black holes are just too crazy.
some theories say that when you go in a blackhole, you get teleported to another blackhole in the universe (theory of star trek, wich I never watch btw)

Umm no. Not even close. Star Trek delt in the concept of warp speed. The idea of being able to actually warp space. For example, point A and B are 3 light years apart. You warp the space between them so it's say maybe a few thousand miles depending upon the amount of warp you are applying.

The closest thing to what you're talking about our worm holes. (That would be Stargate, I always watch that right after Star Trek by the way.)

CDSmith · 07-30-2007, 09:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Squishy

Zefram Cochrane, not Daystrom...Daystrom was a computer guy.

Sorry, was high on ice cream at the time. :D

AbulletAway · 07-30-2007, 10:00 PM

I can't believe I read the whole thing and I still don't know how much the ice cream cost.

xclusive · 07-30-2007, 10:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AbulletAway

Umm no. Not even close. Star Trek delt in the concept of warp speed. The idea of being able to actually warp space. For example, point A and B are 3 light years apart. You warp the space between them so it's say maybe a few thousand miles depending upon the amount of warp you are applying.

The closest thing to what you're talking about our worm holes. (That would be Stargate, I always watch that right after Star Trek by the way.)

What a fucking nerd

mikesouth · 07-31-2007, 12:03 AM

all you did was disprove something einstein never implied

the limitation to traveling at the speed of light is mass

ie the closer you get to it the more your mass untill your mass becomes infinate at C

MrChips · 07-31-2007, 08:50 AM

I may be wrong - but didnt Einstein say that nothing could ACCELERATE to the speed of light because infinate energy was required (and theres the equivalence between mass and energy of course). I dont think he thought nothing could travel at the speed of light - as of course light does.

Im thinking that just because you cant get to the speed of light doesnt mean you cant move at the speed of light if you are already in motion. Chicken and egg probably.

I know one thing - the answer is out there somewhere.

Dododo be dododo be .....

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikesouth

all you did was disprove something einstein never implied

the limitation to traveling at the speed of light is mass

ie the closer you get to it the more your mass untill your mass becomes infinate at C

MrChips · 07-31-2007, 08:55 AM

Black holes - when you approach a Black hole feet first the tidal gravitational forces vary so greatly from 1mm to the next (IE your foot is therefore under MASSIVELY MORE gravity than your knee) - that your body becomes stretched like a piece of chewing gum as it approaches the singularity.

Effectively each atom which once formed you and your spacesuit would be stretched out in a big line - with the atoms from your shoes spaced further apart than those which came from your head.

All in a split second as you accelerated towards oblivion.

All this shit about black holes leading to another is rubbish - trust me - go near a black hole and you are fucked - BIG TIME.

12clicks · 01-09-2008, 09:59 AM

classic bumpage at Colin's request.

CDSmith · 01-09-2008, 10:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrChips

Black holes - when you approach a Black hole feet first

I've approached a black hole several times, but never feet first.

I'll have to try it.

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrChips

go near a black hole and you are fucked - BIG TIME.

On that we can agree. Each and every time I approached it I did get fucked, not only big time but royally.

:D

GigoloMason · 01-09-2008, 10:22 AM

This thread is so full of fail it makes me giggle.

ADL Colin · 01-09-2008, 11:43 AM

Back In Black

ADL Colin · 01-09-2008, 11:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SykkBoy2

Am I the only one who'd love to see 12clicks all coked up and off his tree?

It would be just like this thread. With visuals.

01-19-2006, 09:49 AM	#301
chowda Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Gooch city Posts: 9,527	300 i didnt bump this __________________ Someone finds you... 2007 PS: Nationalnet is the best host I've ever had. And i tried alot of them.

01-19-2006, 03:03 PM	#302
$5 submissions I help you SUCCEED Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: The Pearl of the Orient Seas Posts: 32,195	Any seen 12clicks around? Haven't seen much of him here lately. __________________ Need a NON-ADULT income stream? We build your YOUTUBE CHANNEL for only $20 per video! For Hire: $3/hour or $400 per month Marketing Specialist Virtual Assistants

06-23-2006, 03:21 PM	#306
12clicks Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: God's right hand Posts: 19,780	and now I've laid out my entire adult plans over a bowl of chunky monkey. what I really want to know is what happened to my help thread with the hundreds of questions. __________________ I'm not a dinosaur, I'm a crocodile. I've seen dinosaurs come and go and I'm left unimpressed.

06-23-2006, 04:38 PM	#308
MrJackMeHoff Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: LOLLIPOP ISLAND =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Posts: 4,569	I didnt read shit here but, its already been proven to be true so forget it. __________________

06-24-2006, 10:19 PM	#310
MaddCaz Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Illinois Posts: 9,483	the answers....by porn! __________________ BigCocks.com - MatureWomen.com - Tranny.com - DrunkGirls.com - TeenGirls.com - MonsterCock.com and many more... Click here to see them all!

06-23-2006, 04:19 PM	#307
FuqALot Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: Malibu Posts: 3,817	porn webmasters debating einstein theories. one of the better threads here.

06-24-2006, 10:24 PM	#311
detoxed vip member Join Date: Jan 2003 Posts: 17,798	I just cannot believe this is still going

06-24-2006, 11:04 PM	#312
Dagwolf President of Canada Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Leaving Hell, Entering Limbo Posts: 23,141	This thread is proof of time travel. ;D heh __________________ Sleep well, and dream of large women.

04-14-2007, 11:37 AM	#313
Cory W Deeply shallow Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Hollywood, Ca. Posts: 9,133	12clicks and Lene Hau are now one in the same. http://www.news.harvard.edu/gazette/...08/99-hau.html __________________ ICQ: 292310358 Offering writing and content services (mainstream). Marketing for L3 Payments

04-14-2007, 11:55 AM	#314
Odie Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: The WATER BABY! Posts: 7,040	I love reading your rants Ron!! lol It def always makes me think! __________________ Odie [email protected] Are you Mobile???? MMACanada ICQ # 166208354 See Who I Am At AdultWhosWho.com!

07-30-2007, 05:29 PM	#332
onlinecasino Confirmed User Join Date: Nov 2004 Posts: 452	oh it's possible alright, i've done some RESEARCH, i know several peoples who done it trough a device by aliens, never tryed myself but i will do it one day..

07-30-2007, 05:48 PM	#333
MrChips Confirmed User Join Date: May 2005 Posts: 1,504	I heard that the length of a second is based around our current galactic speed away from the point of origin of the big bang. It is primarily this speed which gives us our current time dialation which we are familiar with. If we were on a galaxy which was much further away from the point of origin of the big bang - then we would by definition be moving faster, and therefore incur a dialation whereby our seconds would last slightly longer. (Using seconds to make it simple.)

07-30-2007, 07:55 PM	#334
12clicks Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: God's right hand Posts: 19,780	now what numb skull bumped this? this is settled fact. Who exactly are any of you to suggest I'm wrong? __________________ I'm not a dinosaur, I'm a crocodile. I've seen dinosaurs come and go and I'm left unimpressed.

07-30-2007, 07:57 PM	#335
MrChips Confirmed User Join Date: May 2005 Posts: 1,504	BTW - this means if you get on a rocket - and head back towards the point of origin of the big bang - your seconds will last a shorter period of time and you will age faster (as effectively you are moving slower than you were on the galaxy). If you stop your rocket at the point of the origin of the big bang - then your seconds will elapse in an instant - you will no longer exist. This I feel fits in with a unified theory of at the very least space, speed and time.

07-30-2007, 10:00 PM	#341
AbulletAway Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Hesperia, CA Posts: 760	I can't believe I read the whole thing and I still don't know how much the ice cream cost. __________________ 11 MODEL SITES \| NOW WITH PPS Sign up now or your dog will die.

07-31-2007, 12:03 AM	#343
mikesouth Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: My High Horse Posts: 6,346	all you did was disprove something einstein never implied the limitation to traveling at the speed of light is mass ie the closer you get to it the more your mass untill your mass becomes infinate at C __________________ Mike South It's No wonder I took up drugs and alcohol, it's the only way I could dumb myself down enough to cope with the morons in this biz.

07-31-2007, 08:55 AM	#345
MrChips Confirmed User Join Date: May 2005 Posts: 1,504	Black holes - when you approach a Black hole feet first the tidal gravitational forces vary so greatly from 1mm to the next (IE your foot is therefore under MASSIVELY MORE gravity than your knee) - that your body becomes stretched like a piece of chewing gum as it approaches the singularity. Effectively each atom which once formed you and your spacesuit would be stretched out in a big line - with the atoms from your shoes spaced further apart than those which came from your head. All in a split second as you accelerated towards oblivion. All this shit about black holes leading to another is rubbish - trust me - go near a black hole and you are fucked - BIG TIME.

01-09-2008, 09:59 AM	#346
12clicks Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: God's right hand Posts: 19,780	classic bumpage at Colin's request. __________________ I'm not a dinosaur, I'm a crocodile. I've seen dinosaurs come and go and I'm left unimpressed.

01-09-2008, 10:22 AM	#348
GigoloMason Confirmed User Join Date: May 2005 Posts: 742	This thread is so full of fail it makes me giggle. __________________

01-09-2008, 11:43 AM	#349
ADL Colin Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: Tube Titans, USA Posts: 11,929	Back In Black __________________ Adult Date Link - $50 PPS starting NOW! -- good and JUICY! skype = "adultdatelink"