I debunked Albert Einstein while eating ice cream - Page 8 - GoFuckYourself.com

12clicks · 09-22-2011, 02:01 PM

A timely bump

baddog · 09-22-2011, 02:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks

A timely bump

I really want to know how the ice cream figured into the equation. But well done.

baddog · 09-22-2011, 02:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BOSS1

This might be the most idiotic reasoning I read in a while

I suggest taking some physics courses at uni....

Thanks for making me feel more educated!

I am tempted to read this entire thread when I have a decent Internet connection, but in the meantime, do you have a rebuttal argument?

Mutt · 09-22-2011, 02:12 PM

might be a sign of my intellectual laziness but the only thing that piqued my interest in 8 pages of blah blah blah was "Ben & Jerry's "coffee heathbar crunch" icecream"

ilnjscb · 09-22-2011, 02:20 PM

Einstein was an overhyped idiot. If light has no mass, and travels as a wave, it cannot have an upper limit when traveling through a vacuum.

shade001 · 09-22-2011, 02:23 PM

Congrats on showing how uber fucking stupid the rest of the forum is for incoherently trying to act like they know dick about relativity.

Thumbs up.

tranza · 09-22-2011, 02:25 PM

Damn, you're way more dumb than I thought!!

12clicks · 09-22-2011, 03:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tranza

Damn, you're way more dumb than I thought!!

It must suck to have YOUR intelligence and spend 10 years at the bottom rung of the industry

12clicks · 09-22-2011, 03:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog

I really want to know how the ice cream figured into the equation. But well done.

It sets a relaxing environment for my intellectual gymnastics.

cykoe6 · 09-22-2011, 05:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mutt

might be a sign of my intellectual laziness but the only thing that piqued my interest in 8 pages of blah blah blah was "Ben & Jerry's "coffee heathbar crunch" icecream"

Yea those were the only words I really understood in this thread.

Contempt · 09-22-2011, 06:01 PM

Einstein was a fraud

redshift · 09-22-2011, 06:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks

I've always known Einstein was wrong about time travel but I never felt I had the time to properly debunk it.
So tonight, I'm eating Ben & Jerry's "coffee heathbar crunch" icecream and a simple answer to the problem presented itself

The theory is that if you could travel at faster than the speed of light, you could travel through time. Here is why its wrong:

Time has no relationship to people. Time passes regardless of what a person does.
if something happends in another galaxy and it takes a year to see it because the light is traveling from so far away, by the time we see it, its already a year old (standard stuff)
But if we travel at faster than the speed of light towards that galaxy, we will get closer to seeing the galaxy in realtime. we will NOT be turning back the clock.
The proof of this is our ability to travel faster than the speed of sound.
If a sound takes 10 seconds to reach our ear because the action creating it was so far away, we hear an action that happened 10 seconds ago. Not unlike seeing something from the other galaxy that happened already.
Now, if we travel at the speed of sound towards the action that made the sound, we DO hear the sound sooner but we do not travel back in time.
Swap speed of sound with speed of light and you see why Albert Einstein is wrong.

You really don't understand what you are talking about.

SL|M! · 09-22-2011, 06:59 PM

12clicks · 09-22-2011, 08:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by redshift

You really don't understand what you are talking about.

Yeah, I keep hearing that from guys unable to explain themselves.

BestXXXPorn · 09-22-2011, 08:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks

Yeah, I keep hearing that from guys unable to explain themselves.

I can explain...

Sound has no mass... it's just a vibration of the air.

When you're talking about traveling faster than the speed of light, you're talking about a physical object moving through space... faster than light. All comparisons are off at that point.

Let's keep in mind the recent discovery of something traveling faster than light was a neutrino... a sub atomic particle that can pass through walls regardless of size...

papill0n · 09-22-2011, 10:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks

A timely bump

yeah what with it being international fucking idiot day and all

moeloubani · 09-22-2011, 10:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks

Yeah, I keep hearing that from guys unable to explain themselves.

Here is an explanation:

The speed of sound can change, while the speed of light can never change. If you're driving in a car and you yell at someone in front of you, the sound waves are traveling at the speed your car is + the speed of sound. So relative to someone standing on the road as you go by, that sound is travelling at faster than the speed of sound.

The same doesn't apply to light, so when you're in a car and you turn on the lights, the light is still going the speed of light and not the speed of light + the speed of your car.

If I'm traveling towards sound, that sound is going to reach me going faster than it normally would be at rest. But if I'm travelling towards light, the light is reaching me at the same speed as it would if I were at rest.

So if I wanted to jump in a spaceship and travel towards a planet at faster than the speed of light, I'm going to arrive at the planet and see things that happened before I even left, since I'm travelling at faster than the speed of light.

Time travel happens more going the other way, future travel, where the closer to the speed of light you go the more time changes and five minutes for you might be hundreds of years for someone at rest relative to you.

grumpy · 09-23-2011, 03:12 AM

how do i make myself look stupid, any suggestions???

Diomed · 09-23-2011, 04:12 AM

It will end like this,

yes we can travel past the speed of light.

Time is a force of nature, and like other forces of nature it can be manipulated. It can be slowed down, distorted, maximized, manipulated for whatever purpose needed.

We will be able to "pivot" between time, but it wont be time travel as described in the movies.. more like practical skewing.

12clicks · 09-23-2011, 08:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BestXXXPorn

I can explain...

Sound has no mass... it's just a vibration of the air.

When you're talking about traveling faster than the speed of light, you're talking about a physical object moving through space... faster than light. All comparisons are off at that point.

Let's keep in mind the recent discovery of something traveling faster than light was a neutrino... a sub atomic particle that can pass through walls regardless of size...

no where did you mention time.
time is the key factor in the explanation or lack there of.

12clicks · 09-23-2011, 08:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by moeloubani

If I'm traveling towards sound, that sound is going to reach me going faster than it normally would be at rest. But if I'm travelling towards light, the light is reaching me at the same speed as it would if I were at rest.

incorrect. any time two objects head towards each other, they are closing the space between them faster than if only one of them is in motion, whether it be a light particle or a car.

Quote:

Originally Posted by moeloubani

So if I wanted to jump in a spaceship and travel towards a planet at faster than the speed of light, I'm going to arrive at the planet and see things that happened before I even left, since I'm travelling at faster than the speed of light.

again, incorrect. you will merely see things that you hadn't yet SEEN on earth, not things that hadn't happened yet. you can not see a thing before it happened.

Quote:

Originally Posted by moeloubani

Time travel happens more going the other way, future travel, where the closer to the speed of light you go the more time changes and five minutes for you might be hundreds of years for someone at rest relative to you.

regardless of how fast you go, you will age at the same rate. this is the fallacy of the time travel theory.

12clicks · 09-23-2011, 08:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by grumpy

how do i make myself look stupid, any suggestions???

by thinking this will be a career for you?

PR_Glen · 09-23-2011, 08:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ilnjscb

Einstein was an overhyped idiot. If light has no mass, and travels as a wave, it cannot have an upper limit when traveling through a vacuum.

I think he is over quoted personally. He was recognized for his theories regarding physics and relativity not as a philosopher, despite his attempts.

But calling him an idiot is just foolish, if he is an idiot then we are fuckin' seaweed...

xholly · 09-23-2011, 08:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks

incorrect. any time two objects head towards each other, they are closing the space between them faster than if only one of them is in motion, whether it be a light particle or a car.

yes, as sound changes pitch when in motion, light changes colour to be either red for moving away or blue for moving towards the observer. By measuring the red shift or blue shift you can determine an objects speed.

Quote:

regardless of how fast you go, you will age at the same rate. this is the fallacy of the time travel theory.

take a flight in a spaceship at 99.99% speed of light for 5 or so years and when you come back everyone you know WILL be dead or very old. I don't think youve debunked einstein just yet.

same reason they adjust the clocks on the gps satellites every day, because the clocks literally run at different speeds when closer to a strong gravity source or when travelling at near the speed of light.

12clicks · 09-23-2011, 10:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xholly

yes, as sound changes pitch when in motion, light changes colour to be either red for moving away or blue for moving towards the observer. By measuring the red shift or blue shift you can determine an objects speed.

irrelevant to what you quoted.

Quote:

Originally Posted by xholly

take a flight in a spaceship at 99.99% speed of light for 5 or so years and when you come back everyone you know WILL be dead or very old. I don't think youve debunked einstein just yet.

no, you'll all be 5 years older, you'll have been covering a lot of distance. nothing more.

Quote:

Originally Posted by xholly

same reason they adjust the clocks on the gps satellites every day, because the clocks literally run at different speeds when closer to a strong gravity source or when travelling at near the speed of light.

since GPS satellites don't travel at the speed of light, I assume you're arguing that gravity effects the ability to properly count time.

If time travel had anything to do with the speed of light, the guys at CERN couldn't have tracked the particles that travelled faster than the speed of light because they would have arrived before anyone knew they were sent.

Lint · 09-23-2011, 10:39 AM

http://johncostella.webs.com/neutrino-blunder.pdf

Lint · 09-23-2011, 10:43 AM

http://www7.economist.com/blogs/babb...1/09/neutrinos

"The odds, it must be admitted, are that a mistake has been made somewhere in the long chain of timing measurements required to compare the moment when neutrinos are created at CERN by smashing a beam of protons into a target, and their detection in Gran Sasso, though OPERA's researchers have done their best to account for all possible instrumental quirks. What makes the result slightly less than incredible is that an experiment in America, called MINOS, detected a similar anomaly in 2007. MINOS's researchers dismissed that result as a mismeasurement."

moeloubani · 09-23-2011, 10:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks

incorrect. any time two objects head towards each other, they are closing the space between them faster than if only one of them is in motion, whether it be a light particle or a car.

again, incorrect. you will merely see things that you hadn't yet SEEN on earth, not things that hadn't happened yet. you can not see a thing before it happened.

regardless of how fast you go, you will age at the same rate. this is the fallacy of the time travel theory.

Any two objects headed towards each other would be closing the space between them faster except for light. Light is a constant speed.

If the sun exploded then we on Earth wouldn't see it happen for 8 minutes or so after someone who is on the sun would see it happen. But for that 8 minutes we would keep circling the sun normally because even the force of gravity can only travel at the speed of light. So for all intents and purposes, the sun hasn't exploded for us until the light reaches us because only then do we get any affects of it.

And finally if you go fast you will age at the same rate relative to yourself. But if you measure the rate that you age or that time passes compared to someone at rest relative to you, time for you will pass much slower than time for them.

I don't know if you're just being 12clicks the troll here or if you're serious, seems to me you're trolling. Nobody can not know so much when they are sitting in front of a computer, right?

Jack Sparrow · 09-23-2011, 11:02 AM

Damn. I see the most ridiculous arguments and statements on time, light, speed and more flying around in one thread.

12clicks: even 1 of the basics of time you are getting wrong. Seriously wrong.

Sukiho · 09-23-2011, 11:07 AM

its all relative, thats why its called relativity, what are you measuring the speed of light relative to? what time are you measuring your time against?

ilnjscb · 09-23-2011, 11:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PR_Glen

I think he is over quoted personally. He was recognized for his theories regarding physics and relativity not as a philosopher, despite his attempts.

But calling him an idiot is just foolish, if he is an idiot then we are fuckin' seaweed...

You're right, that was too strong. The theories are blatantly incorrect in many ways, and Einstein worship has kept science from moving forward in some ways. Emotionally abusive, yes, overhyped, yes, an undeserving icon, yes, but an idiot, no. I get torqued at overhyped people.

ilnjscb · 09-23-2011, 11:26 AM

"So if the neutrinos are pulling this fast one on Einstein, how can it happen?

Parke said there could be a cosmic shortcut through another dimension ? physics theory is full of unseen dimensions ? that allows the neutrinos to beat the speed of light."

http://online.wsj.com/article/AP58b5...951b36b35.html

From a post 8-21-2011

"This theory of photonic mass is incorrect. Theories of photons are 100 years old and mostly centered around shaky postulates such as relativity.

An object cannot have no mass but have energy. A photon is a result particle with a form that exists outside the currently observable universe.

That is also why the universe did not "appear" from nothing. There are other, currently unobserved frames with physical laws that may not correspond to the frame in which we live."

Being a smart guy +10
Being unable to monetize -50
Score: -40 (Dumbass)

12clicks · 09-23-2011, 11:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by moeloubani

Any two objects headed towards each other would be closing the space between them faster except for light. Light is a constant speed.

the car's speed is not constant and we're not talking about light heading away into space, we're talking about the closing speed of light. if the thing its closing on is moving, the speed of closure changes, the speed of light does not.

12clicks · 09-23-2011, 11:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jack Sparrow

Damn. I see the most ridiculous arguments and statements on time, light, speed and more flying around in one thread.

12clicks: even 1 of the basics of time you are getting wrong. Seriously wrong.

odd then that with the passage of time, my argument becomes more correct.

Jack Sparrow · 09-23-2011, 01:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks

odd then that with the passage of time, my argument becomes more correct.

Not really no.
Or i must be seriously misreading some of your posts.

No offense btw. You know me.

moeloubani · 09-23-2011, 01:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks

the car's speed is not constant and we're not talking about light heading away into space, we're talking about the closing speed of light. if the thing its closing on is moving, the speed of closure changes, the speed of light does not.

Even if you are racing head on into a beam of light, the speed that the light is reaching you is the speed of light, not the speed of light + the speed of you travelling towards it. If you were racing towards me in a car going 100km/h and as you passed I threw a ball up with no horizontal speed, the ball would hit you as if it were traveling at 100km/h. Now if I stood ahead and threw the ball at you at 50km/h, when it hit you it would be going(relative to me, who is at rest) 50km/h + 100km/h. But it doesn't work that way with light, the speed of light remains a constant. So the fact that you're traveling towards the light doesn't mean that the light is hitting you any faster, the speed of light relative to anything remains the same.

grumpy · 09-23-2011, 01:25 PM

lol, why does every serious thread ends in a pissing contest. Must love GFY

BestXXXPorn · 09-23-2011, 01:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks

no, you'll all be 5 years older, you'll have been covering a lot of distance. nothing more.

This is 100% untrue... Time slows as you approach the speed of light. It's where the whole theory/myth of time travel comes from because if time stops at the speed of light, what happens when you travel faster than the speed of light?

This has been proven. If you take two atomic clocks and put one at the base of the empire state building and one at the top then time passes more slowly for the clock at the top than the clock at the base. And that's accounting for time dilation due to mass as well as relative speed.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_dilation

There have been many, many experiments done to prove time dilation and the effects of gravity and relative speed.

seeandsee · 09-23-2011, 02:06 PM

.speed of light --->X

.faster of light ---->X
at this point you are not in future, you are just faster than light, i really dont know why is so hard to understand it, its like you see airplane take off, then you go to other country with faster airplane and wait for it, and here it is, you was faster, lulz

papill0n · 09-23-2011, 02:07 PM

arguing science with 12clicks

Matt 26z · 09-23-2011, 04:47 PM

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravita..._time_dilation

---
Gravitational time dilation is the effect of time passing at different rates in regions of different gravitational potential; the lower the gravitational potential, the more slowly time passes. Albert Einstein originally predicted this effect in his theory of relativity and it has since been confirmed by tests of general relativity.

This has been demonstrated by noting that atomic clocks at differing altitudes (and thus different gravitational potential) will eventually show different times. The effects detected in such experiments are extremely small, with differences being measured in nanoseconds.
---

So in theory if you could enter into a state of true zero gravity, time will stand still for you while Earth time continues forward.

Titan · 09-23-2011, 08:36 PM

You can't travel back in time. It would be like setting your house on fire then putting it back together from ash. Time is simply how fast all objects move. Gravity is like universal friction slowing down all movement. When you travel fast your acceleration increases mass and thus gravity increasing the universal friction you would experience. Effectively time dilation. Travelling faster than the speed of light supposedly is impossible but just because you break the laws of physics doesn't mean you can now magically get to travel back in time. It's comic book logic.

Shey · 09-23-2011, 08:44 PM

Can we just stick to peddling porn? Y'all are giving me a brain freeze, a "Ben & Jerry's "coffee heathbar crunch" brain freeze

xholly · 09-23-2011, 09:24 PM

ice cream theory failed peer review

Varius · 09-24-2011, 02:00 AM

The concept of time is man-made and as such it is flawed and can be interrupted many different ways - thus neither you, or Einstein, or any other GFYer here is right or wrong

Your example also isn't even an example of "popular" time travel. A more fun example would be arguing for or against a concept like, if you could "travel back in time", could you hang out with a long-dead historical figure?

The key to unlocking everything = vibration.

Jack Sparrow · 09-24-2011, 02:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Titan

You can't travel back in time. It would be like setting your house on fire then putting it back together from ash. Time is simply how fast all objects move. Gravity is like universal friction slowing down all movement. When you travel fast your acceleration increases mass and thus gravity increasing the universal friction you would experience. Effectively time dilation. Travelling faster than the speed of light supposedly is impossible but just because you break the laws of physics doesn't mean you can now magically get to travel back in time. It's comic book logic.

Wrong.

Lets say these particles arent faster then light but travelled through another dimension, thus taking shortcuts. They would in fact be going back in time.

Einsteins theory can still hold. But can be different if there are more dimensions.

mineistaken · 10-28-2015, 04:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks

The theory is that if you could travel at faster than the speed of light, you could travel through time. Here is why its wrong:

Well this is obvious to anybody, my question is this: did Einstein actually say that? That if you travel faster than speed pf light you travel in time?
That would be ridiculous

12clicks · 10-28-2015, 07:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mineistaken

Well this is obvious to anybody,

I suggest you read the whole thread then as it doesn't seem that obvious

Relic · 11-19-2016, 02:20 AM

Nothing to say

hjnet · 11-19-2016, 04:08 AM

I'd not like to read the whole thread, so I hope he's just trolling?

09-22-2011, 02:01 PM	#351
12clicks Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: God's right hand Posts: 19,780	A timely bump __________________ I'm not a dinosaur, I'm a crocodile. I've seen dinosaurs come and go and I'm left unimpressed.

09-22-2011, 02:12 PM	#354
Mutt Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 34,431	might be a sign of my intellectual laziness but the only thing that piqued my interest in 8 pages of blah blah blah was "Ben & Jerry's "coffee heathbar crunch" icecream" __________________ I moved my sites to Vacares Hosting. I've saved money, my hair is thicker, lost some weight too! Thanks Sly!

09-22-2011, 02:25 PM	#357
tranza ICQ: 197-556-237 Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: BRASIL !!! Posts: 57,559	Damn, you're way more dumb than I thought!! __________________ I'm just a newbie.

09-22-2011, 06:59 PM	#363
SL\|M! Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: The BP4L Bunker Posts: 1,480	Last edited by SL\|M!; 09-22-2011 at 07:04 PM..

09-23-2011, 03:12 AM	#368
grumpy Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Holland Posts: 9,870	how do i make myself look stupid, any suggestions??? __________________ Don't let greediness blur your vision \| You gotta let some shit slide icq - 441-456-888

09-22-2011, 02:20 PM	#355
ilnjscb Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2009 Posts: 8,788	Einstein was an overhyped idiot. If light has no mass, and travels as a wave, it cannot have an upper limit when traveling through a vacuum.

09-22-2011, 02:23 PM	#356
shade001 Confirmed User Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 396	Congrats on showing how uber fucking stupid the rest of the forum is for incoherently trying to act like they know dick about relativity. Thumbs up.

09-22-2011, 06:01 PM	#361
Contempt So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2011 Posts: 99	Einstein was a fraud

09-23-2011, 04:12 AM	#369
Diomed Converting like it's 1999 Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: The South Posts: 6,165	It will end like this, yes we can travel past the speed of light. Time is a force of nature, and like other forces of nature it can be manipulated. It can be slowed down, distorted, maximized, manipulated for whatever purpose needed. We will be able to "pivot" between time, but it wont be time travel as described in the movies.. more like practical skewing. __________________ 10 years of experience in: CHAT SALES - PAID TRAFFIC - CONVERSION - CREATIVES - CONSULTATION

09-23-2011, 10:39 AM	#376
Lint Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2010 Posts: 254	http://johncostella.webs.com/neutrino-blunder.pdf

09-23-2011, 10:43 AM	#377
Lint Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2010 Posts: 254	http://www7.economist.com/blogs/babb...1/09/neutrinos "The odds, it must be admitted, are that a mistake has been made somewhere in the long chain of timing measurements required to compare the moment when neutrinos are created at CERN by smashing a beam of protons into a target, and their detection in Gran Sasso, though OPERA's researchers have done their best to account for all possible instrumental quirks. What makes the result slightly less than incredible is that an experiment in America, called MINOS, detected a similar anomaly in 2007. MINOS's researchers dismissed that result as a mismeasurement."

09-23-2011, 11:02 AM	#379
Jack Sparrow Almost goners.. Industry Role: Join Date: May 2008 Location: Netherlands Posts: 11,420	Damn. I see the most ridiculous arguments and statements on time, light, speed and more flying around in one thread. 12clicks: even 1 of the basics of time you are getting wrong. Seriously wrong.

09-23-2011, 11:07 AM	#380
Sukiho Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: SE Asia Posts: 111	its all relative, thats why its called relativity, what are you measuring the speed of light relative to? what time are you measuring your time against?

09-23-2011, 11:26 AM	#382
ilnjscb Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2009 Posts: 8,788	"So if the neutrinos are pulling this fast one on Einstein, how can it happen? Parke said there could be a cosmic shortcut through another dimension ? physics theory is full of unseen dimensions ? that allows the neutrinos to beat the speed of light." http://online.wsj.com/article/AP58b5...951b36b35.html From a post 8-21-2011 "This theory of photonic mass is incorrect. Theories of photons are 100 years old and mostly centered around shaky postulates such as relativity. An object cannot have no mass but have energy. A photon is a result particle with a form that exists outside the currently observable universe. That is also why the universe did not "appear" from nothing. There are other, currently unobserved frames with physical laws that may not correspond to the frame in which we live." Being a smart guy +10 Being unable to monetize -50 Score: -40 (Dumbass)

09-23-2011, 01:25 PM	#387
grumpy Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Holland Posts: 9,870	lol, why does every serious thread ends in a pissing contest. Must love GFY __________________ Don't let greediness blur your vision \| You gotta let some shit slide icq - 441-456-888

09-23-2011, 02:06 PM	#389
seeandsee Check SIG! Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Europe (Skype: gojkoas) Posts: 50,945	.speed of light --->X .faster of light ---->X at this point you are not in future, you are just faster than light, i really dont know why is so hard to understand it, its like you see airplane take off, then you go to other country with faster airplane and wait for it, and here it is, you was faster, lulz __________________ BUY MY SIG - 50$/Year Contact here

09-23-2011, 02:07 PM	#390
papill0n Unregistered Abuser Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2007 Posts: 15,547	arguing science with 12clicks

09-23-2011, 04:47 PM	#391
Matt 26z So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: ¤ª"˜¨๑۩۞۩๑¨˜"ª¤ Posts: 18,481	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravita..._time_dilation --- Gravitational time dilation is the effect of time passing at different rates in regions of different gravitational potential; the lower the gravitational potential, the more slowly time passes. Albert Einstein originally predicted this effect in his theory of relativity and it has since been confirmed by tests of general relativity. This has been demonstrated by noting that atomic clocks at differing altitudes (and thus different gravitational potential) will eventually show different times. The effects detected in such experiments are extremely small, with differences being measured in nanoseconds. --- So in theory if you could enter into a state of true zero gravity, time will stand still for you while Earth time continues forward. Last edited by Matt 26z; 09-23-2011 at 04:54 PM..

09-23-2011, 08:36 PM	#392
Titan Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: teencash.com Posts: 994	You can't travel back in time. It would be like setting your house on fire then putting it back together from ash. Time is simply how fast all objects move. Gravity is like universal friction slowing down all movement. When you travel fast your acceleration increases mass and thus gravity increasing the universal friction you would experience. Effectively time dilation. Travelling faster than the speed of light supposedly is impossible but just because you break the laws of physics doesn't mean you can now magically get to travel back in time. It's comic book logic. __________________ TEEN CASH - EXCLUSIVE TEEN NICHE REALITY SITES Check out our Newest Site: Teen Porno Pass - Free Hosted Galleries, Flash Galleries, Tube Content, & Great Support Sample Galleries: Movie Gallery 1 Flash Gallery 1 Pic Gallery 1

09-23-2011, 08:44 PM	#393
Shey Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2005 Posts: 1,654	Can we just stick to peddling porn? Y'all are giving me a brain freeze, a "Ben & Jerry's "coffee heathbar crunch" brain freeze __________________ Regards, Shey <at> datePROFITS.com\| ICQ: 279858568 \| Skype: sheysworld \| Y!M: sheyla702 datePROFITS: Every Niche of ExGF Dating Sites!

09-23-2011, 09:24 PM	#394
xholly Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2009 Posts: 817	ice cream theory failed peer review

09-24-2011, 02:00 AM	#395
Varius Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: New York, NY Posts: 6,890	The concept of time is man-made and as such it is flawed and can be interrupted many different ways - thus neither you, or Einstein, or any other GFYer here is right or wrong Your example also isn't even an example of "popular" time travel. A more fun example would be arguing for or against a concept like, if you could "travel back in time", could you hang out with a long-dead historical figure? The key to unlocking everything = vibration. __________________ Skype variuscr - Email varius AT gmail

11-19-2016, 02:20 AM	#399
Relic So Fucking Banned Join Date: Aug 2002 Posts: 10,300	Nothing to say

11-19-2016, 04:08 AM	#400
hjnet Confirmed User Join Date: May 2002 Location: European Union Posts: 3,815	I'd not like to read the whole thread, so I hope he's just trolling?