YA - WAY TO GO PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH ...
Any links to this new law handy?
BINGO - ....
NEXT STEP ....

"NO AROUSED GENITALS OR REPRODUCTIVE BODILY FLUIDS ON ANY DIRECTLY ACCESSED DOMAIN NAME"

YEHAAA .... mega ... I did not know about this new law.
MEGA KEWL ...

Answer it then ...
yes or no? with a reason...

You are a psychopath who has no place "teaching" children. You're immoral and conniving. You are now also benieth my notice. I hope you go to jail soon, or get hit by a bus, or mauled by wild animals or something. Nobody in the world has earned it more.

Oh -- you are wrong ...
I never ask a question that I don't already have the answer to.
I have an answer - and the proof - to it.
But no-one else has answered it.

I have to scoot for 30 minutes ...maybe 45 ...but I will be back...

CHEERS - PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH ..
yaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!

Well if you never ask a question you don't already have the answer to, then that makes you a moron. I normally want to better myself by asking questions I don't know the anwsers to otherwise you just go round in circles.... kinda like this thread...

BTW - It depends on the laws of your country dipshit..... You still think you know it all don't you ?

PLEASE BAN THE SexED ASSWIT!

sexeducation:

OK.. why don't you simply say that you have NO QUALIFICATION?


True.. there are "no images of children having sex on my websites" - NOW!

BUT THERE *WERE* IMAGES OF ADULTS INVOLVED IN ANAL SEX WITH CHILDREN and related sick imaging on your "website".

How do I know? Because I have copies of your complete website before it was pulled. It may come as a surprise to you that others have been looking at your website for many months and already have copies of your "content" plus a considerable amount of further related information. There is NO QUESTION that this is CHILD PORN.

You have SERIOUSLY GOT TO BE JOKING!!!
OR, you just don't get any of the threads that have been posted here. Try reading the follow twice:

What is "acceptable" to me is totally irrelevant, - I have nothing to do with your "website" and have no qualification - the same as you, - to engage in giving "opinions" in this area.

SexEducation.com is a totally messed up domain currently the subject of several avenues of inquiry by several law enforcement agencies. These people are in no hurry to speak to you - it's called "research" - there are avenues still partially investigated, and, to use a quote, "Mr 'Beacock' is not going anywhere...".

Under these circumstances there is little doubt that you would need to raise considerable amounts of cash to pay *anyone* to take control of your "websites". They are not even worth the $10 registration fee. They are totally contaminated.

Why do you repeat this question parrot fashion? This is not any legal term and is not any guideline for any websites. "Opinions" don't matter since juries and judges will determine guidelines, together with exisiting laws and precedents. YOU NEED LEGAL ADVICE and you admit you have not been provided with this.

Therefore, your "opinion" on this phrase above and the opinions of others is not relevant. This is not a "legal discussion board" - that's what lawyers are for.

FINALLY, - YOU HAVE NO QUALIFICATION TO OFFER ANY "OPINONS" EITHER WITHIN THE ADULT INDUSTRY OR RELATED TO SEX EDUCATION. YOU HAVE ALREADY MESSED UP TIME AND TIME AGAIN - IN FACT YOU ARE A LIABILITY.

Now... :321GFY

Webby is my goddess.

LadyMischief:

Well... maybe a "God" by some unsuspecting person! :1orglaugh

But mainly "idiot", "halfwit", "communist", "liberal" and a string of other terms which were pulled to suit the situation! :winkwink:

Because no adult webmaster has ever provided a reason to why - "NO AROUSED GENITALS OR REPRODUCTIVE FLUIDS SHOULD BE SHOWN ON ANY DIRECTLY ACCESSED DOMAIN NAME" ... including yourself ...

EVER!

That would be interesting news ...
Take this "hamburger flipping" Father to court ...
after I admitted I had made mistakes ...that would be the best "news media" event I could imagine ...
bring it on ...bring it on ...

So GFY now all of a sudden limits what can be discussed here ?


That's not what common sense says.
I defend the rights of women and children - tell that to the judge.

"No aroused genitals or reproductive bodily fluids on any directly accessed domain name."

John E. Beacock
[email protected]
1-403-619-2739

SexEducation certainly is fucked in the head. I'm tempted to write a very long post to try to help him understand that, but instead I just take quiet pleasure in knowing that he won't be around forever. One day he will just stop posting and no one will miss him. ASACP.org, the FBI, Calgary Police Services and the RCMP have all been told about this guy. He thinks he is safe because he has furiously been removing the child porn from his site. But I don't think he understands the concept of a web cache and that the evidence is still there and is well-documented I am sure. He will get his due.

Once a child pornographer always a child pornographer SexEducation. You can never be one of us (a legitimate adult website owner) as hard as you try. You are starting to sound desperate in your posts - trying to legitimize yourself. It's getting sad and embarassing for you really.

sexeducation:

No webmaster needs to enter any "discussion" on "reproductive fluids" for the reason "THIS IS NOT ANY LEGAL TERM AND IS NOT A GUIDELINE FOR ANY WEBSITES".

I am thinking you are some aborted bodily fluid.


[quote]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Opinions" don't matter since juries and judges will determine guidelines, together with exisiting laws and precedents. YOU NEED LEGAL ADVICE and you admit you have not been provided with this.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

That would be interesting news ...
[quote]


You find this "news"??? You clearly don't even know this has been the method of operation of courts for some centuries now.

Mistakes?? What mistakes would these be????

Tell that to the investigation team and the courts - they don't seem to acknowledge some inability or ignorance to comprehend the law. It is either an offense or not. The "mistakes" routine is down to your defence lawyer to use in mitigation of your plea and possibly reducing your sentence.

If you are asking that the opinions on GFY are of legal value, I'll let you into a well kept secret - they ain't.

That's an odd comment from a PEDO, - but not unusal.
I am sure any judge will disappear underneath the bench unconcious when you reveal that stunner.
Is that why you are a CHILD PORNOGRAPHER AND THEIF - to "defend the rights of women and children"???

Now... once again... :321GFY

Keep deflecting the issue ...
OR ...
answer the question ..

Should aroused genitals or reproductive fluids be immediately shown on any directly accessed domain name?"

What is the answer?

sexeducation:


OK... NOW IT IS WELL OVERDUE THAT YOU FUCK OFF YOU STUPID PEDO!

:321GFY

Still "fluff and fodder" ... ANSWER THE QUESTION... !!!

Should aroused genitals or reproductive bodily fluids be shown on any directly accessed domain name?

Will anyone - within the adult industry answer this one question?

sexeducation:

The answer is no. Do you understand "No"?????

:321GFY

I think, if you took the time to learn English, that the question you really want to pose is.. "Should aroused genitals or reproductive bodily fluids be shown on any freely accessible web site ?"

Domain names are irrelevant to this question because one might draw the conclusion, from the poor phrasing of your question, the you wouldn't mind that such things were shown on a web site merely accessible with an IP address.

It seems to me, after watching the pages of this thread grow in number daily, that you are just an attention seeking mis-fit who enjoys throwing stones. Unfortunately for you, as the old saying goes, those who live in glass houses should not throw stones.

The answer to your question, the question to which you obviously crave a response, is all around you. It is blindingly obvious that almost anyone in this industry who runs an adult website does believe that it is acceptable to show "aroused genitals", aka stiff cocks, and "reproductive bodily fluids", aka cum, on freely accesible web sites.

The question you may pose is why ? I think, this is only a matter of opinion, that the reason why this is acceptable is that the Internet is not a place for unsupervised children. It is a network operating in the adult world, as such care must be taken when exposing children to it. Although, I qualify my opinion by stating that it is not acceptible practice to mislead children into accessing such web sites. Adult and General Viewing sites can co-exist on the same network if each site only seeks to draw it's own specific audience.

In your case it is not acceptable to promote SWOIT sites your site if you claim your website as a site for sex education, which implies general viewing.

This is where your argument crumples into a heap. You express a desire to campaign for what you percieve to be sexual liberation and education , yet at the same time you promote the very sites you seek to oppose.

I would go on, expand my thoughts in more depth, however from my reading in recent days it appears that the keystrokes would be lost on you.

I am just passing by on my way to a good nites sleep. roflmao... this is the best that the best can come up with?

sexeducation:

PEDO... First you have not offered any valid comment above, but ignored the lot. Much the same as you have ignored all posts.

Take your sorry ass and stick your head up it and piss off out of here and stay away from children and stop publishing child porn and thieving image content!

Now... :321GFY

:321GFY

No - wrong. Your question could turn into an arguement of "free speech" and such ...
My question does not.
It deals with ONE PAGE - the directly accessed domain name - and the rights of the child to reasonable access to the information age. And we all know the answer to the question - and that it does not occur currently - and that it should occur.

Quote:

Domain names are irrelevant to this question because one might draw the conclusion, from the poor phrasing of your question, the you wouldn't mind that such things were shown on a web site merely accessible with an IP address.

Domain names are "the question".

Quote:

It seems to me, after watching the pages of this thread grow in number daily, that you are just an attention seeking mis-fit who enjoys throwing stones. Unfortunately for you, as the old saying goes, those who live in glass houses should not throw stones.

fluff and fodder

Quote:

The answer to your question, the question to which you obviously crave a response, is all around you. It is blindingly obvious that almost anyone in this industry who runs an adult website does believe that it is acceptable to show "aroused genitals", aka stiff cocks, and "reproductive bodily fluids", aka cum, on freely accesible web sites.

The question is not about the right to publish adult content on any page. The question is about ONE PAGE - just one page - the directly accessed domain name. A page that web browsers could check - a page that content filtering software could check. One page - not subpages - not subdirectories - ONE PAGE - the directly accessed domain name.

Quote:

The question you may pose is why ? I think, this is only a matter of opinion, that the reason why this is acceptable is that the Internet is not a place for unsupervised children. It is a network operating in the adult world, as such care must be taken when exposing children to it. Although, I qualify my opinion by stating that it is not acceptible practice to mislead children into accessing such web sites. Adult and General Viewing sites can co-exist on the same network if each site only seeks to draw it's own specific audience.

I believe that both can exist on the same network - and should - as well. But there must be some overlap of consensus. Let's start with ONE PAGE - the directly accessed domain name. When driving down the information superhighway - all children traveling that road - shouldn't have to keep the eyes shut. It is not an unreasonable restriction to freedom of the press to require ONE PAGE be rated and/or not contain reproductive bodily fluids or aroused genitals.

Quote:

In your case it is not acceptable to promote SWOIT sites your site if you claim your website as a site for sex education, which implies general viewing.

Trust me ... I understand the difficulties of appropriateness regarding a domain name that has BOTH "sex" and "education" contained generically in it.
My directly accessed domain name contains a meta tag with the highest content rating possible by ICRA.ORG. It's graphics will once again - gradually increase in "adultness". The website allows graphics to be turned off, articles to be blocked, videos to be blocked, advertising to be blocked and more. SexEducation.com contains the worlds most advanced content controls ABOVE AND BEYOND anything that I am aware of legally. AND I did not do that because of any website shut down - I did that out of respect for the internet/public.

Quote:

This is where your argument crumples into a heap. You express a desire to campaign for what you percieve to be sexual liberation and education , yet at the same time you promote the very sites you seek to oppose.

Wrong. Adult websites (pornography) have a right to exist and do provide a valuable source of information in the information age. In the history of the world, there has never been this much sexual content available to the public - and it is providing valuable information for sexual research.

AND - pornography provides entertainment for adults.

However, the adult industry has failed to return value to the industry to which it has raped.

Pornography is not representative of how people have partner sex. It is just FANTASY masturbation material.

AND - when you take a look at the historical examples of societies that begin to get television (broadband internet really) - and the "what we see is what we want" demand for consumer products caused by television in an emerging nation - we have the direct evidence of the long term affects of this freely available pornography.

So lets start - ALL OF US - with one page - where we all can agree - JUST ONE PAGE - the directly accessed domain name.
Can we do the right thing on one page?
I say yes...
I say - we have to.

Quote:

I would go on, expand my thoughts in more depth, however from my reading in recent days it appears that the keystrokes would be lost on you.

LOL ...

Okay - I will go back as requested ...
And find this post of yours.

I agree with you Webby.
The answer is "no".
And if you do your own informal poll - or formal poll - you too will find that most people think like we do.

IE: A person who is not yet reproductively capable should not be immediately shown aroused genitals or reproductive bodily fluids when they go to a directly accessed domain name.

It's just common sense really.

And one more thing ...

When taking my son and our dog (name="freedom" thought you might find that interesting) for a walk last nite....

He said - "Dad - I am very proud of you. I can not think of anyone that has the strength - to do what you are. I am very proud that you are my Father."

And that's all the attention that I require.

UPDATE:
I beefed up the wording on the homepage ...

"adult only community"

"intended for adults only"

and included NUMEROUS content filtering software links I previously had ...

and included instructions on how to completely block the website...

He just answered the question I've seen you ask like 300 times now, and you give this line of bullshit? Try LISTENING for once instead of opening your psychopathic yap. Read what he said and attempt, with your 5 remaining braincells, to compute.

Thanks for the try, Oz :)

Unfortunately you still don't seem to understand that it's not the job of the adult webmaster community to teach children about sex, or to police everyone's children while they are on the internet. And if you actually look, MOST adult sites have a warning page on their "directly accessed domain names", you have click a button before they even see the tour. Of course, not being an adult webmaster, being completely useless as you are, you haven't bothered to check. IN fact the vast majority of the websites that I know of all subscribe to netnanny type services, and if a REPONSIBLE parent is allowing their child access to the internet, they should have this software installed ANYWAYS, these sites are ALREADY blocked. It is NOT OUR JOB TO POLICE THEIR CHILDREN! It's NOT OUR JOB TO PRESUME WE HAVE A RIGHT TO EDUCATE THEIR CHILDREN. Our websites are MEANT TO BE FANTASY MASTURBATION MATERIAL! That's what people PAY for you fucking idiot! Our job is NOT to teach adults or children or ANYONE how to have sex.. it's to provide them with a fantasy. Next you're going to say that it's the job of a movie producer of a ganster flick to give the story a moral about gun control or some bullshit.. It's essentially the same thing. You don't seem to get it, and I'm pretty sure you aren't going to pay any attention to this post. You seem to ignore any posts that don't directly suit your needs.

Take yourself somewhere else, because you have NO place in this community. You should remove all swoit advertising from your site, you should give the domain name to QUALIFIED sexual education instructors, and you should go flush your head down a toilet about 50 times...


THAT would be the best thing for EVERYONE involved.

Still waiting. I am trying to give you what you want...an answer to your stupid aroused genital bullshit.

I gave you an answer..you couldn't read between the lines. I will further explain why it is bullshit what you write, but if you respond to my post about your "most advanced" website cookie crap.

It's not just about cookies.
And the controls which I should be working on now but I am taking the time to respond to your questions are currently broken.

They are broken because I was creating a "community" for a particular supplier that cancelled. The supplier requested anonymity and that will be honored.


Anyways ...
It's a combination of things that will be reactivated hopefully this weekend if I stay out of GFY.

#1: The website uses self expiring URLS so if a Parent goes into the site and a child uses the computer later - the pages will not be accessable again. There is only one way into the website and that is from the homepage.


#2: If the cookies were set - then deleted or tampered with - then the Parent was warned when they logged in again.

#3: The starter Table of Contents was customizable and articles could be blocked. You did/do that by dragging the left window frame to the right and clicking on the delete link.

#4: Graphics could be turned off/on.

#5: Background graphics could be turned off/on.

#6: Popups could be turned off/on.

#7: Advertising could be turned off/on.

#8: Content from the Archives could be added to the starter Table of Contents (TOC).

#9: External links to other websites could be added to the Archives which could be added to the Parents TOC.

#10: Invidividual videos linked in the articles could be blocked.

#11: The website was rated with ICRA.org to have the most extreme content rating possible so JUST entering a password into 95% + of web browsers completely disabled the website.
side note: at one time I tried to code my website controls to work with RASCi / ICRA.org controls so that if "explicit" nudity was blocked but not "partial" nudity or if slang/curse words were blocked then those specific pages were blocked - AND - not others. I found it too complicated and web browser buggy/specific

#12: Changing controls and changing them back informed the member by email if they decided.

#13: At one time if anyone logged in - you were emailed.

#14: Links to explanations of background images could be disabled.




And there is probably more I am just not thinking about right now.

I've tried lots - and - done lots.

The ENTIRE website as it was previously minus the graphics
is now back online (minus all graphics).

This discussion thread has now been terminated.

If you wish to make a comment on the website
send your Email to [email protected] using the
subject "SE_Editor".

Emails not using that subject will be ignored.
Emails not consisting of pure text (no html) will be ignored.

Your email is guaranteed to be posted if you use the subject "SE_POST" and you include the TITLE of the article being discussed.

Racial slurs or unfounded slander is not permitted.

A condensed version of this thread will be posted in the days ahead.

John E. Beacock
[email protected]
1-403-619-2739

Who are you to say when a thread has been terminated ?

sexeducation:

PEDO.. TAKE YOU CRAP AND STICK IT UP YOUR ASS!

YOU ARE ONE PATHETIC "DAD"

NOW :321GFY

Okay ...
It's been a week ...
Still no police knocking at my door ...

But I am VERY excited that the new format of SexEducation.com the most difficult domain name to fit "globally" ... [fingers crossed] is solved...

Have a look - your comments are appreciated.

John E. Beacock
[email protected]

PS: LadyMischief - I'm starting to understand your anger.
The problem I think was - I have become "desensitized" ... to controversial issues ....

Still looks like the same piece of shit to me. If you're so adament about working for "this cause"...why not hire some people who know something about web design and development? Your site looks like it came from a Geocities page 6 years ago.

Also...you mention discussion about a million times. Not one place on your site do a see any place to have a discussion.

Yes ... "the discussion" part your are correct about ...
hopefully .. this attention .. will have someone with the resources I don't have to solve that ...

I like the design of my website - it has higher then above "closing" ratios - that's what counts ...

I can not "hire" anyone - I am a "hamburger flipper" ...for real ...

LOL, stop lying...every time someone comments on your site you turn it into a flaming row

OMG, when is this thread going to end? Don't you really wanna start a new one so that way maybe i will understand what is going on.:helpme

Incorrect ... almost every issue raised by this board has been addressed ...

except one which I have not made my mind up about yet ...
the handle "Dad@" ... I am reconsidering ...

I may argue for a bit ...
but every single issue ... every single time ... ever raised with SexEducation.com has been addressed ...after vigorous discussion ...