Come on don't be hard on the Guy!


Question though? Where's the sex? and where's the education?

And what the fuck! Where is the damm hardcore fucking! what the hell man?

I don't really know the guy but I can read.

I looked at his site and I found it very interesting.

I saw no porn or anything that is obscene. I think it would be a good site for parents to use as a template for teaching their kids about sex.

I learned some stuff and there are lots of links to articles written by doctors on there.

I don?t have time o read through all the posts in this thread as itis the longest thread I have ever seen so it must be interesting.

I only know what I can see. I don't but much value in the bad things people say on this board because generally that is all they do.

is the movie out yet?

The movie should star Woody Allen as the star and directed by Roman Polanski.

Eric:

This sick PEDO ass had HARDCORE CHILD PORN on his supposed "website" including anal sex pics etc. I have copies of his entire site at various stages of "change". Other relevant people already had this and PEDO DAD is on their list for action.

He also had a load of images he thieved off others and has no rights to use. There is also the question of "Mr Beacock's" background ... another story I will hear in full sometime soon from folks with a file on him.

This warped, attention seeking, opinionated, sicko is a waste of time.

does the 1000th poster on this thread get a prize?

Ya..you "win" a dinner with SexEducation.

wow, that is not nice. I still enjoyed the article on the Gspot though.. That info will come in handy..

I know hitmen normally knock off people, but do you think there'd be one who would be prepared to do away with this thread ?

Keep your garbage posts in this thread and respect the topic threads of others.

I will respond to these posts - but I have some coding to do and do not spend all my time on GFY.

PEDO:

PEDO .. Your opionion of posts is the last thing in the world I give a shit about. As for "respect" - you ain't got one clue :1orglaugh

You either screwed up like a "non webmaster" again and posted your reply in the wrong thread... or you trying to use GFY to spam your "sex education website"?

There is *nothing* "garbage" about my post - it states that your are a CHILD PORNOGRAPHER and THIEF - this is a fact which you cannot deny without lying your ass off.

Let me know if you need legal help in suing me - otherwise do it - it would be a pleasure!!! Sure as hell I would if someone accused me of the above!

You are nothing... just a total scumbag. Now :321GFY

Yes - I would need legal help in suing if I wished to.

Let me open your eyes to the world though.

Maybe in the United States 2257 forbids having the graphics of a minor on the same site as graphics of an adult engaged in sexual activity.

AND maybe in the United States on a generic domain like "SexEducation.com" 2257 forbids the showing of a Mother Breast feeding ...

AND maybe in the United States on a generic domain like "SexEducation.com" it is against the law to show a real video of a male infant being circumcised ...

AND maybe in the United States it is against the law to show a Canadian Version of Time magazine with a Mother & Daughter dying of AIDS ...

However, in many communities of the world - that is exactly what is expected of my job as the Webmaster of a website where no sexual topic is barred and one remains anonymous.

Since inception - SexEducation has been a global magazine of sexual intercourse.

The United States is not the only community in the world.
In fact - it is one of the smaller global communities I wish to reach.

The earth has 6.3 Billion people of which 280 Million live in the United States.


This thread has taught me something ...
and it's not what you may think ...
stay tuned ...
change will occur that is for certain.

You are mental.

this thread is soooo boring after like page 4

How can you people call this guy a PEDO and convicted child molestor when nothing is proof?

I have seen one post where someone says something like that, then another one where some one says "It is fact" when in reality the poster was just making a statment.

AND

http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showth...4&pagenumber=3

If you wish to bash me or my domain - you do it here.
Leave the other threads alone and respect the topics and the poster which started those threads.

Sobegirl:-

If you can't be assed to read the threads, can't blame you cause there are lots of em, don't bother defending this weirdo.

Read this... he eventually admitted to having at least one underage pic on his site:-

Happy now. It depends WHEN you checked out his site. It's called delete mate, which is what he admitted to doing - deleting all the graphics. There are at least 5 people here who saw more than that one graphic.... I think he's only recently deleted his banner which also contained 'underage' images. The stolen content was another issue....

The issue of "fair use" is a scale and not black and white, and the US constitution clearly guarantees freedom of speech.

I am not necessarily bound by 2257 which appears to prevent me from displaying a Mother breast feeding, the real circumcision of a male infant (80% who watch it don't do it), or a Canadian Version of a Time Magazine cover depicting a Mother & Daughter with AIDS on a website that also has sexually explicit adult graphics.
Why? Because I can just move the server to another country.
I choose to obey 2257 - and will cross every "t" and dot every "i" in order to comply with 2257 and new VISA regulations.

With regards to "fair use" - that issue is still outstanding.

The above quote appears to imply these are my words - however they are not.

I will respond to this thread but not today.
All of the original "text" of the website is as it was.
Nothing changed - nor did I run.

You may not be mature enough to handle real graphics on a "SexEducation.com" website - but it appears High Schools all across North America regularily show and use them.

And you may not be mature enough to handle real graphics on a "SexEducation.com" website - but it appears in HIgh Schools all across Europe they also use them.

So I would have suggested you use one of the MANY content control features of my website - which was the ability to disable all graphics & video.

However - it's not the graphics that angers most in this thread - it's the text.

Specifically the advocation of ...

NO AROUSED GENITALS OR REPRODUCTIVE BODILY FLUIDS ON ANY DIRECTLY ACCESSED DOMAIN NAME.

Fuck off idiot. We don't want you here.

Yawn... How fucking tedious, why don't you look here, the front page of his site has been archived:

http://web.archive.org/web/*/sexeducation.com

As far as I can see he's consistently posted his anti-CP status, over four years. Although he does talk about kids getting access to his site with supervision, and his email address is nauseating.

Still while we're talking history we can use the same internet archive service we can take a look at the sponsor currently being advertised to me at the top of this page - Clubseventeen.com

Content text from 98:
"club seventeen free preview teen teens young girls teenager teenagers lolita 17 amateurs amateur schoolgirls naked chicks"

Excerpt - content text from 2000:
"... teeners from Holland, teen fuck, lolita sex, lolita pics, lolita links..."

Have fun...

I second that...for like the 10th time.

[QUOTE]Originally posted by nike
Yawn... How fucking tedious, why don't you look here, the front page of his site has been archived:

http://web.archive.org/web/*/sexeducation.com

As far as I can see he's consistently posted his anti-CP status, over four years.

... that is correct ... however each attempt at trying to help the problem was slammed by Google.com and other search engines. Their algrorithms (as I know now) ... smashed traffic ...
yet I continued to try to the best of my ability ...

So now you have admitted that minors would need DIRECT SUPERVISION to view content on SexEducation.com. As a result of this thread now I say ABSOLUTELY NO ACCESS - parent have to print and hand content to their teens. What a victory you have achieved ...

I have tried various banner exchanges most during that time in internet history were repeatedly abused by adult webmaster, probably the same that continue to show aroused genitals and reproductive bodily fluids on their homepages ...
So in the split second the page was cached ... I have become responsible for a banner exchanges advertisement ...
YAWWWNNNNN ... you've lost it.

Well I can not find EITHER of what you are referrering to because you purposely did not link to what you are saying it seems exists ....
but that would be typical of yourself ...

you link to
http://web.archive.org/web/*/sexeducation.com
instead of
http://web.archive.org/web/*/sexeducation.com

however I did review some of the cached pages ...

and on the link ... which I point out you could have provided directly ....
[LINK]http://web.archive.org/web/19990508030512/http://www.sexeducation.com/[/LINK]
is the quote ...
and an FGM Verbatin Account Passage ...

Therefore the "content text" as you outline using only the paragraphs above would be ...

"lying fight girls personally mothers sisters & wife" so what?


however ...
we can really make up stuff if we include the other text on the page

SO NOW WE HAVE ... "content text" that would include ...
"teens, condom, teen, puberty, home, oral sex, anal sex" ...

and your point would be?

Otherwise - try again.
If you dig deep enough you find stuff on everyone.
Go ahead dig.

It's your hole.
I am the real thing.


I will once again state : "any questions with regards to my morals can be answered with - I did NOT turn SexEducation.com into a WhiteHouse.com type porno site. And continued to acquire and protect what I feel are most important generic domains."

In fact - it was only recently that SexEducation.ca stopped pointing to a porn site.

I have made mistakes - we all make mistakes - all we can do is the best we can - and continue.

You could have the guts to point to the exact URL though.
It's kinda slight handed ... and sneaky ..
but as I have been learning ...
[aaah never mind it's just fluff & fodder]

[email protected]

sexeducation:

PEDO DAD.. Since you bumped this dead thread again in an attention to get *some* attention:

(a) You again offer "nothing" - just a waste of time.

(b) Your "mistakes" include CHILD PORN and THIEVING images.

You just don't matter!

Now :321GFY

I don't bump this thread.
I reply to issues relating to myself or SexEducation.com.

If you post crap in other threads that disrespect the topic starter I copy your crap and post the reply here - in the proper thread. If you contribute to the topic in disagreement with me fine - I am okay with that. Pure insults - will get handled here.

Otherwise - I will defend myself and I will post significant changes to SexEducation.com here. This consequences of this thread are not resolved.

You have a choice to read them or not.
Remember there is a link for ignore ... : )

sexeducation:

Yes you do bump the thread... it is that way you are - ie you "need" attention.

Have you ever considered after all the posts, this board already knows you for what you are?

There is nothing to say - the thread is dead - :321GFY

Then stop posting ...
and you will only get some major announcements to the SexEducation.com website ... (ONE MAJOR PENDING - just have to type it up ) ...
continue to post - and I will continue to reply ...
It's that simple.

Fuck off you fucking idiot. We don't want you here.

sexeducation:

[quote]
you will only get some major announcements to the SexEducation.com website ...
[/quote

PEDO ASSHOLE..

It is obvious you do not get the message - NOBODY CARES about your updates to your alledged "website" - it does not matter, understand?

And no.. I doubt I'll be posting again here - since you are an obvious attention seeking CHILD PORNOGRAPHER and THIEF.

Now... :321GFY

SexEducation.com is not going anywhere - whether I am in control of it or someone else.

A significant portion of the demographics of GFY - are exactly who I want to reach.

And I am not talking about the "old school" - "big timers" ...

Get used to it.

sexeducation:
NA!!! :1orglaugh That quote is "something"!! You brain just dropped into a lower gear.

If you think *any* "big timers" have any interest in you, - you are sadly mistaken. :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

And where's my Xbox or DVD everyone keeps talking about ??
Wazzup wit dis?

sexeducation:

PEDO DAD ... you need one?? Yes, just keep bumping and see what happens

Now..:321GFY

Ya of course I do ...
I don't have an Xbox or DVD for real.
I write this on a PII 233 for crying out loud.

Do you want to buy sexquestion.com?

re-read nike's post. he is making a point about the possible hyprocisy of *others*.

[steps back carefully...]

[...approaches cautiously ... : ) ]
You could be right.
That's the thing about "email" and "posts" sometimes they're very hard to interpret what exactly is being said.

I can see where you are coming from though.
IE: he seems to be stating the "facts" of both sides of the fence.

What swayed my response - to the more defensive position - was he ended with "content text" which appears to be derogatory AND the partial link instead of a direct link to what he was quoting.

A statement like - "it's easy to see the hypocrisy" would have been more invitational to engage discussion.

What is not shown by the WayBackEngine.com links is the sequence of pages to enter the website in the beginning days.

Back then when Explorer 3.0 was being upgraded to 4.0 and Netscape was the leading browser on my site - you had to answer a series of questions to enter.
Are you sensitive to nude graphics?
What month were you born in?
What year were you born in?
What is the legal age of majority where you live? ++
Answering improperly booted you out, flagged your IP for the day and cross referenced your answers to previous answers in the membership database.

It's a very difficult domain to find the "balance" of appropriateness for. General audience websites have a problem with the nudity - and - the old school of XXX have an issue with the fact that Parents show some of the articles to their teens (minors).

IMO - it's the new generation of webmasters that will make SexEducation.com successful (at least to support itself). One of the most difficult things for an "adult" to do is to admit that their thinking has been wrong.

Dr. Jocelyn Elders was fired as the Surgeon General (World's Top Doctor) by Bill Clinton for just suggesting that masturbation be discussed in schools. Just suggesting that it be discussed.


Here is a recent read about her ...
http://www.ou.edu/student/ucurrent/a...s/Jocelyn.html ...
or just search "Dr. Jocelyn Elders" in any SE for more info.

Nike is right in that "content text" is exactly the point.
I don't say it the way she does though. Here in this thread I would just say - "masturbation is sex."

On the website the "content text" is this ...
This is a more politically correct way of saying the same thing and lets the person make up their own mind.

Nike's "content text".
He is right. It is very very important.

Dad@

Mmmm... Should have been more clear, I mean 'content' text as in the meta (hidden terms of search engines) on the page. I was amused / bored by the rabid hypocrisy of a lot of adult webmasters.

I used the archive to check your front page over the years - seemed clear that you were against CP from the start.

I then used the archive to check a current major sponsor of GFY, Clubseventeens was banner running at the top of the page, they're meta text from similar periods clearly was designed to attract CP traffic - Lolita was the most used term, second only to teen.

(We can argue about how people should interpret the term Lolita, but in my opinion in the years 98-2000 it was definitely a term associated with underage models, to be honest now I think it is a much more broad term - which is why Visas rules are so fucking half-assed.)

I don't particularly support or dislike you, as I say I find your e-mail address repellant, but also I am not some freak who thinks kids should not learn about major human areas until some arbitrary age decided by a country I am not a citizen of.

They say "curiosity killed the cat"...and I think the "cat" died half way through this thread...BUT, he accomplished his objective.
Remember what Pud (Phillip) from the Fucked Company said on this board..."Bad PR is Good PR"
Let is rest.
:2 cents:

Boring to you - but they did shut down SexEducation.com for awhile.

What I learned from GFY and even from this ACACIA thing is "risk management" ...

Stick to the primary issues - and to me that's sexual equality.
It's from the lack of that that most peversions stem from.

Quote:

I used the archive to check your front page over the years - seemed clear that you were against CP from the start.

Of course like any father would be (well I guess most eh).

Quote:

I then used the archive to check a current major sponsor of GFY, Clubseventeens was banner running at the top of the page, they're meta text from similar periods clearly was designed to attract CP traffic - Lolita was the most used term, second only to teen.

I have often wondered if I had pushed the limits more (I did sometimes) in the old days more - if it would have made more money or less - which would come in handy today.

My attitude is - the key to the information age is information.
I just didn't realize how hard it was to find "real" sexual information. It's not so easy from the "biased" or "flowery" or other books...

The book that influenced me the most was ...
"Ever since Adam and Eve - The evolution of human sexuality."
By Malcom Potts and Roger Short
Cambridge University Press

Quote:

(We can argue about how people should interpret the term Lolita, but in my opinion in the years 98-2000 it was definitely a term associated with underage models, to be honest now I think it is a much more broad term - which is why Visas rules are so fucking half-assed.)

Not really in agreement with that.

Quote:

I don't particularly support or dislike you, as I say I find your e-mail address repellant, but also I am not some freak who thinks kids should not learn about major human areas until some arbitrary age decided by a country I am not a citizen of.

After 20,000 members and many years as you know ... it is only recently in this newsgroup that the handle "Dad@" has become an issue. And I wasn't going to change it ... but as a result of your post - I am rethinking - my rethinking... again ... it's only in this community they find it "repellant" ... :)

It's just that it has been MY email address for years ...
And it clearly shows I am NOT a Doctor - which I think is very important.

My attitude was - develop a "brand" - a "writer" that could replace me - actually. There are many Fathers that know their "stuff".

Anyways thanx for the clarification.
I did

As a "force" in the "adult industry" I am annoucing that GoFuckYourSelf.com will have a position in the "How To Sex" tour of the quickly forming "static" entrance into the SexEducation.com website.

GoFuckYourSelf.com has proven it is a place of breaking news and research and from many of the highly intellectual threads contained within - a place that "academics" need to be aware of.

GoFuckYourSelf.com also contains a good "cross section" of those involved in the industry from the "big players" to the "small players" and will be posted along side YNotMasters.com.

GoFuckYourSelf.com is a highly recommended source of "real time" research.

GoFuckYourSelf.com operated by Adult.com - is a must know internet address for those doing sexual research.

Dad@