N. Korea next to hear U.S. war drum : Invading North Korea and toppling its regime. - Page 2 - GoFuckYourself.com

ScriptBall · 08-09-2003, 08:10 AM

Sometimes one cannot talk peace, other people who live different lifestyles don't understand our freedoms and rights and they are continuously loathing us for them. Their hatred builds then and then its completely inevitable to avoid either terrorist or military actions. They don't understand us as much as we don't understand them and their ways of life. the political values of these different governments are extremely different.

Communism beliefs tends to trend towards "if we cannot have complete control over every aspect of our people lives, then how will they obey us, and also, If we keep everyone on an equal level there will be no Envy between citizens aside from the rich are all rich and the very poor are all very poor." Religion also plays factor in these situations a lot.

Our political beliefs re so different that war is almost unavoidable unfortunate to say...

michugo · 08-09-2003, 09:52 AM

Isn't it funny that only thing NK want to give up its nuke plan is a nonaggression treaty between US and NK which US don't accept now. Isn't it obvious that US want to attack NK for some other reaon? I believe that US will attack NK even though NK drop its nuke plan all of sudden in order for US to take a control of Asia in general. NK is just next to China. If you believe that the only country US cannot threat with their force is China, what you want to do? There are so many reasons other than humane ones the current US leaders want to attack NK, I think. For your reference, I am a Korean and I live in S. Korea.

ADL Colin · 08-09-2003, 10:18 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by KRL

I still think it will be short and sweet.

Agree with you. NK's military is very outdated. A lot of T-72 and even older model series Soviet era tanks.

I'm betting on no war though nor do I want one.

directfiesta · 08-09-2003, 10:28 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by KRL

I just read we used MK77 bombs on the Iraqi Republican Guards. They sure kept that quiet.

For those that don't know MK77's are the US's only still active Napalm bombs. Each one delivers 750 lbs of a fiery mixture of benzene, gasoline and polystyrene. You're burned alive in essence and can't get the gel off you. Ultra nasty way to go and super demoralizing because the other troops see guys running around frantically completely on fire screaming til they drop.

That's so admirable of a mighty country: burn demoralized and underarmed ghost of an army...
They were those that was an "iminent threat " to the US.

America must be proud!

theking · 08-09-2003, 10:42 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by directfiesta

That's so admirable of a mighty country: burn demoralized and underarmed ghost of an army...
They were those that was an "iminent threat " to the US.

America must be proud!

"admirable"...seen to many "war" movies haven't you?

maxjohan · 08-09-2003, 11:00 AM

warning for NK..they going to give 110% in a war..

TheJimmy · 08-09-2003, 11:00 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Colin

...Principled actions in world politics?....

...Costs and benefits...

One would have to be certified to treat Afghanistan and China the same....

ok you got me...

the first issue up there is agreeably laughable... 'principled actions in world politics' is a eutopian dream...

and in the end it does boil down to costs/benefits...

and yes, Afganistan and China are not the same nor should be treated the same in many regards....

...however we must admit to being big hypocritical pussies to some extent if we are to force this premptive strike policy on little weak countries that we can defeat with relative ease...which includes like almost everyone...

Russia is too disorganized atm therefore China is really the only remaining threat/superpower with significant numbers and tools that would and could wear us out a bit...

they should be handled different but it's just an admission of 'we only beat down little fucks that we can get away with beating down..."

that is the point I'm getting at....

do I think it's wrong? ok, that's another discussion....

Question:

...if Hitler's Nazi Germany was as big as China would it be ok to not 'push the issue' with them because they were too large & powerful???

directfiesta · 08-09-2003, 11:02 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by theking

"admirable"...seen to many "war" movies haven't you?

Not as many as you...

English is NOT my mothertongue, so this type of error can slip in... but the general meaning remains very clear.

AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE · 08-09-2003, 11:06 AM

I think we should have waxed North Korea first then hit Saddam...

It seemed only logical, but the Oil men got greedy...

Or

Maybe they realised we need to take out Iraq first to get oil then move to Korea with our equipment fueled by Iraqi Oil...

CHina wont give a shit, they need a better trade partner and N Korea aint putting out good trade with China anyways.

Either way mark my words.

Americans will die in Korea II. USA will be going to Korea next. The scenerio of 30-60 days to take out Joung is prolly on an over estimate it is more likely to be less time.

Fuck North Korea. They need a hefty dose of liberation

directfiesta · 08-09-2003, 11:08 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by AlienQ

Fuck North Korea. They need a hefty dose of liberation

Hitler was saying the same of Europe ....

AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE · 08-09-2003, 11:09 AM

Hitler got nothing on Bush.

Bush is worse cuz he is stupid.

theking · 08-09-2003, 11:11 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by TheJimmy

ok you got me...

the first issue up there is agreeably laughable... 'principled actions in world politics' is a eutopian dream...

and in the end it does boil down to costs/benefits...

and yes, Afganistan and China are not the same nor should be treated the same in many regards....

...however we must admit to being big hypocritical pussies to some extent if we are to force this premptive strike policy on little weak countries that we can defeat with relative ease...which includes like almost everyone...

Russia is too disorganized atm therefore China is really the only remaining threat/superpower with significant numbers and tools that would and could wear us out a bit...

they should be handled different but it's just an admission of 'we only beat down little fucks that we can get away with beating down..."

that is the point I'm getting at....

do I think it's wrong? ok, that's another discussion....

Question:

...if Hitler's Nazi Germany was as big as China would it be ok to not 'push the issue' with them because they were too large & powerful???

Military engagements are mission oriented...can the mission be accomplished and at what cost. Adjectives are not a part of the equation...or debate.

loverboy · 08-09-2003, 11:12 AM

does US still have enough fire power to make it to war?

SpaceAce · 08-09-2003, 11:12 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by AlienQ
Hitler got nothing on Bush.

Bush is worse cuz he is stupid.

That statement shows that, no matter how stupid Bush is, there's always at least one person out there who is even less intelligent.

SpaceAce

TheJimmy · 08-09-2003, 11:14 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by theking

Military engagements are mission oriented...can the mission be accomplished and at what cost. Adjectives are not a part of the equation...or debate.

thanks for the schooling ;-)

PS: who runs the military? that dog doesn't bark unless it's owner lets it off the leash...the owner is the one dealing with 'adjectives'

yes?

AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE · 08-09-2003, 11:19 AM

"does US still have enough fire power to make it to war?"

Of course, The US war machine has not even broke a sweat yet.

Will they break a sweat in N. Korea.

No.

"no matter how stupid Bush is, there's always at least one person out there who is even less intelligent."

Thats absolutly true, your living proof.

jimmyf · 08-09-2003, 11:32 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Veterans Day

The crack up is half you jerk-offs dont like Bush AND STILL DONT VOTE

Give you odds it's more than 1/2.

AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE · 08-09-2003, 11:33 AM

Oh shit, I am gonna be voting Republican!

Its Arnold time

theking · 08-09-2003, 12:05 PM

OK...lets go a little deeper.

Quote:

Originally posted by TheJimmy

...however we must admit to being big hypocritical pussies to some extent if we are to force this premptive strike policy on little weak countries that we can defeat with relative ease...which includes like almost everyone...

Lets say that country A presents a percived problem...then the mission oriented decision making comes into play...can the problem be successfully corrected by military force...at what cost/benefit? The cost/benefit factor may be considered to be not viable. Country B presents a percieved problem and the same mission oriented decision making comes into play and in this case it is decided that the problem can be corrected by military force and the cost/benefit factor is considered to be viable. Bottomline...viable or not viable.

Quote:

Russia is too disorganized atm therefore China is really the only remaining threat/superpower with significant numbers and tools that would and could wear us out a bit...

China is not currently a threat to the US and currently cannot project its military into our hemisphere other than via nukes and their leadership is not into committing suicide. China is not a superpower and is probably 40-50 years away from being a superpower...if it has that goal.

Quote:

they should be handled different but it's just an admission of 'we only beat down little fucks that we can get away with beating down..."

that is the point I'm getting at....

do I think it's wrong? ok, that's another discussion....

Question:

...if Hitler's Nazi Germany was as big as China would it be ok to not 'push the issue' with them because they were too large & powerful???

Once again the answer to all of the questions posed...viable or not viable.

Enchantress · 08-09-2003, 12:06 PM

I think everyone is missing the big picture here, WHO IS GOING TO PAY FOR A WAR WITH NORTH KOREA. We are looking at a 450 billion dollar deficit for this year. We are spending an estimated 3.9 billion dollars a MONTH in iraq with no end in sight, and an additional 900 million per month in afghanistan. Wars don't pay for themselves.

Enchantress

ADL Colin · 08-09-2003, 12:43 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by directfiesta

That's so admirable of a mighty country: burn demoralized and underarmed ghost of an army...
They were those that was an "iminent threat " to the US.

America must be proud!

It only looks easy. How many people were predicting multiple thousands of US deaths in bloody urban combat? It's not easy to project power. It's not easy fight wars half way around the globe on foreign soil. The predictions of horrific urban combat were very popular both on this board and in the press.

Just a few decades ago, the US was having a horrible go at it in Vietnam. The Russians couldn't defeat the Afghans a short while ago and that wasn't even far from home.

TheJimmy · 08-09-2003, 12:50 PM

beating up a little kid = only fighting fights we know we can win....

viable? sure

cost/benefit .... sure if we want their bag of candy enough....

TheJimmy · 08-09-2003, 12:52 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Colin

It only looks easy. ...

that is Soooooooo true, it's amazing how many little details of even deploying a small (under 100 people) reconnaissance squadron can be...let alone conduct a full multi-force & coalition operation

ADL Colin · 08-09-2003, 12:55 PM

Where WAS the predicted urban combat anyway? Lack of will of the Iraqi people?

SpaceAce · 08-09-2003, 12:57 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by AlienQ
"no matter how stupid Bush is, there's always at least one person out there who is even less intelligent."

Thats absolutly true, your living proof.

I think you mean "That's", "absolutely" and "you're".

SpaceAce

eatapeach · 08-09-2003, 01:00 PM

Quote:

"We believe the use of air power in such a war would be swifter and more devastating than it was in Iraq," the article said. "We judge that the U.S. and South Korea could defeat North Korea decisively in 30 to 60 days with such a strategy."

these guys are so full of shit.

in iraq the US air force had been continually bombing iraqi air defenses since 1991.

north korea has high quality anti-aircraft weapons in such quantity that they export them to other countries.

when the war first started there was a site called iraqwar.ru that was run by russian intelligence agencies on how a war would be fought if the US attacked russia.

one of the points they made was that the US air superiorority in iraq was the most important factor in the war, but in a forested and mountainous country the US would not have the same capability as in the desert.

north korea's geography is not iraq's.

theking · 08-09-2003, 01:19 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by eatapeach

these guys are so full of shit.

in iraq the US air force had been continually bombing iraqi air defenses since 1991.

Only along the border of the "no fly zone".

Quote:

north korea has high quality anti-aircraft weapons in such quantity that they export them to other countries.

There has never been, and there currently is not, an anti-aircraft system that can deter airpower.

Quote:

when the war first started there was a site called iraqwar.ru that was run by russian intelligence agencies on how a war would be fought if the US attacked russia.

one of the points they made was that the US air superiorority in iraq was the most important factor in the war, but in a forested and mountainous country the US would not have the same capability as in the desert.

north korea's geography is not iraq's.

Your point is not really applicable...Air Power will seal their strategic fate...Naval Forces makes invasion accessible for boots on the ground virtually at any point along the Penisula and outdated military hardware (that is not replaceable)..makes the outcome inevitable and 60 days is probably the outside limit.

eatapeach · 08-09-2003, 01:44 PM

Quote:

makes the outcome inevitable and 60 days is probably the outside limit.

i think you're talking out your ass, just like the people quoted in that article.

just where are these "boots on the ground" gonna come from when half the military is in afghanistan or iraq?

i don't think it matters anyway. this is just a bunch of lameasses in washington trying to deflect criticism from the current events in afghanistan and iraq.

the US is no more going to invade north korea than i am.

Kapitan Ivanov · 08-09-2003, 01:46 PM

I've got my money on Putin.

Kapitan Ivanov · 08-09-2003, 01:49 PM

North Korea won't be attacked by USA. The reason is simple. The North Koreans would completely pummel the USA. that country has spent decades building it's military and in fact, their military is so large and advanced that it's the cause of their famines and so on. If they don't use this army, they've completly screwed their country.

If they use it, they will damn sure win.

ADL Colin · 08-09-2003, 02:51 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Kapitan Ivanov
North Korea won't be attacked by USA. The reason is simple. The North Koreans would completely pummel the USA. that country has spent decades building it's military and in fact, their military is so large and advanced that it's the cause of their famines and so on. If they don't use this army, they've completly screwed their country.

If they use it, they will damn sure win.

Haha. "large and advanced"? 70's era Soviet tanks and old MiGs are all the rage. ;-)

Kapitan Ivanov · 08-09-2003, 02:53 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Colin

Haha. "large and advanced"? 70's era Soviet tanks and old MiGs are all the rage. ;-)

You know this for a fact, do you? Does US intelligence know ANYTHING of what's going on behind the iron panties of North Korea? I don't think so...

TheJimmy · 08-09-2003, 02:57 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Kapitan Ivanov
...The North Koreans would completely pummel the USA. that country has spent decades building it's military and in fact, their military is so large and advanced that it's the cause of their famines and so on. If they don't use this army, they've completly screwed their country.

If they use it, they will damn sure win.

I will respectfully disagree with you on this one ;)

I agree they will cause a lot of blood loss, but inevitably they will be squashed....unless China jumped in...that would mix shit up a bit...

KRL · 08-09-2003, 03:14 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Enchantress
I think everyone is missing the big picture here, WHO IS GOING TO PAY FOR A WAR WITH NORTH KOREA. We are looking at a 450 billion dollar deficit for this year. We are spending an estimated 3.9 billion dollars a MONTH in iraq with no end in sight, and an additional 900 million per month in afghanistan. Wars don't pay for themselves.

Enchantress

We just print more money like we always have.

KRL · 08-09-2003, 03:15 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Kapitan Ivanov
North Korea won't be attacked by USA. The reason is simple. The North Koreans would completely pummel the USA. that country has spent decades building it's military and in fact, their military is so large and advanced that it's the cause of their famines and so on. If they don't use this army, they've completly screwed their country.

If they use it, they will damn sure win.

OK, sure. Remember we have over 10,000 nukes to their couple if they even have that.

If things get out of hand we always have the nuclear card in our back pocket to play, and play Georgie Boy will I'm sure if it came down to that decision.

directfiesta · 08-09-2003, 04:18 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by KRL

OK, sure. Remember we have over 10,000 nukes to their couple if they even have that.

If things get out of hand we always have the nuclear card in our back pocket to play, and play Georgie Boy will I'm sure if it came down to that decision.

You are sadly right... and even documented:

Quote:

The US is starting a nuclear fight that will be hard to stop

The hawks are gunning for a showdown with North Korea and Iran

Simon Tisdall
Saturday August 9, 2003
The Guardian

http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/st...015278,00.html

Quote:

Since 9/11 and Bush's "axis of evil" speech, matters have just gone from bad to worse.

Quote:

The strange, treacherous ways of American diplomacy are also complicating that other nuclear stand-off, with Iran. A September deadline now looms, by which time Tehran is told it must accept "challenge" inspections of its nuclear facilities. If not, the US may seek UN sanctions and step up unilateral pressure; military options are not entirely ruled out. Following Washington's line, and egged on by Israel, Tony Blair is turning the screw, too, threatening to block an EU trade deal and highlighting human rights issues.

Sounds familiar... mmmmmmm.... Iraq?

Would you trust dealing with the US ...

pauliewalnutz · 08-09-2003, 04:28 PM

EXCELLENT ITS ABOUT TIME!

AFTER THEM WE GO TO IRAN UNLESS THE COUNTRY DOES IT THEMSELVES FIRST

NUKE EM

SHOOT EM

SHOOT EM ONCE MORE

LEAVE EM TO DIE!

boobmaster · 08-09-2003, 04:40 PM

Quote:

iginally posted by pauliewalnutz
EXCELLENT ITS ABOUT TIME!

AFTER THEM WE GO TO IRAN UNLESS THE COUNTRY DOES IT THEMSELVES FIRST

NUKE EM
SHOOT EM
SHOOT EM ONCE MORE
LEAVE EM TO DIE!

... and then the French and then the Germans and then .. Canada and Mexico ..

You're a MORON!

ADL Colin · 08-09-2003, 07:29 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Kapitan Ivanov

You know this for a fact, do you? Does US intelligence know ANYTHING of what's going on behind the iron panties of North Korea? I don't think so...

NK's military hardware is ancient. Sure they spend 15% of their GDP on military. That's only about $4billion per year or so though. The US spends 70x that. I mean, come on, General Motors makes more money than the entire country of North Korea - about 8x as much.

No one is even close.
http://www.aneki.com/military.html

The US spends almost as much on it's military as the total Russian Federation GDP.

NoCarrier · 07-03-2006, 11:16 AM

Bump for boneprone.

mrkris · 07-03-2006, 11:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by basschick

i am going to display my ignorance here.

do we have nukes? i thought we did. if we do, why can we tell other countries not to? if we don't, excuse me for being grossly uninformed...

i just don't understand this aggression - if you discover your next door neighbor owns a big gun, and he and you are on bad terms, you aren't allowed to shoot him because he poses a potential threat.

Unsure if anyone answered or not as i haven't finished reading this thread, but if I recall, it is legal to have them if you previously owned them, but illegal to now create and/or purchase.

ProducerCashDave · 07-03-2006, 11:49 AM

I'm sure the United States have been spying on them with satelites and have every strategy planned out theyre just not revealing it, obviously.

mrkris · 07-03-2006, 11:56 AM

I think it's time to call up Starship Troopers

Rui · 07-03-2006, 01:00 PM

From that article:

"Less than four months after the end of the Iraq war, "

Yep I guess thats why we hear about attacks on a daily basis and Bagdad is considered the city with the worst quality of life in the world

pornguy · 07-03-2006, 01:02 PM

If this idiot is going to do this, he had better send in no less than 1million soldiers.

JD · 07-03-2006, 01:06 PM

hooooooray for really old fucking threads

Matiz · 07-03-2006, 01:26 PM

fucking old thread

08-09-2003, 08:10 AM	#51
ScriptBall Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2003 Posts: 376	Sometimes one cannot talk peace, other people who live different lifestyles don't understand our freedoms and rights and they are continuously loathing us for them. Their hatred builds then and then its completely inevitable to avoid either terrorist or military actions. They don't understand us as much as we don't understand them and their ways of life. the political values of these different governments are extremely different. Communism beliefs tends to trend towards "if we cannot have complete control over every aspect of our people lives, then how will they obey us, and also, If we keep everyone on an equal level there will be no Envy between citizens aside from the rich are all rich and the very poor are all very poor." Religion also plays factor in these situations a lot. Our political beliefs re so different that war is almost unavoidable unfortunate to say... __________________ <table border=0><tr valign=middle> <td><a href=http://www.scriptball.com><img src=http://www.scriptball.com/img/sb_ban_01.jpg border=0></a></td> <td> <font face=arial size=1> <a href=http://www.scriptball.com>Taking the repetitivness out of your job and adding speed to your work. Custom Software in virtually any Unix language, that will save you time and make you money. Take a look! </a> </font> </td> </tr></table>

08-09-2003, 11:00 AM	#56
maxjohan Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Sweden Posts: 7,219	warning for NK..they going to give 110% in a war.. __________________ I went from 100 to 313,000 satoshis in 2 days! Lots of daily freerolls...

08-09-2003, 11:06 AM	#59
AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE best designer on GFY Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: IALIEN.COM - High Definition Video and Photographic Productions -ICQ 78943384 Posts: 30,307	I think we should have waxed North Korea first then hit Saddam... It seemed only logical, but the Oil men got greedy... Or Maybe they realised we need to take out Iraq first to get oil then move to Korea with our equipment fueled by Iraqi Oil... CHina wont give a shit, they need a better trade partner and N Korea aint putting out good trade with China anyways. Either way mark my words. Americans will die in Korea II. USA will be going to Korea next. The scenerio of 30-60 days to take out Joung is prolly on an over estimate it is more likely to be less time. Fuck North Korea. They need a hefty dose of liberation __________________ NAKED HOSTING FTW!11 I'm On The INSANE PLAN $9.95/mo! \| The Alien Blog Adult News Worth Reading Updated Daily \| Content For Sale! 641 PICS 216 MINUTES OF VIDEO $350.00 \|ICQ: 78943384 \| Last edited by AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE; 08-09-2003 at 11:09 AM..

08-09-2003, 11:09 AM	#61
AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE best designer on GFY Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: IALIEN.COM - High Definition Video and Photographic Productions -ICQ 78943384 Posts: 30,307	Hitler got nothing on Bush. Bush is worse cuz he is stupid. __________________ NAKED HOSTING FTW!11 I'm On The INSANE PLAN $9.95/mo! \| The Alien Blog Adult News Worth Reading Updated Daily \| Content For Sale! 641 PICS 216 MINUTES OF VIDEO $350.00 \|ICQ: 78943384 \|

08-09-2003, 11:19 AM	#66
AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE best designer on GFY Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: IALIEN.COM - High Definition Video and Photographic Productions -ICQ 78943384 Posts: 30,307	"does US still have enough fire power to make it to war?" Of course, The US war machine has not even broke a sweat yet. Will they break a sweat in N. Korea. No. "no matter how stupid Bush is, there's always at least one person out there who is even less intelligent." Thats absolutly true, your living proof. __________________ NAKED HOSTING FTW!11 I'm On The INSANE PLAN $9.95/mo! \| The Alien Blog Adult News Worth Reading Updated Daily \| Content For Sale! 641 PICS 216 MINUTES OF VIDEO $350.00 \|ICQ: 78943384 \|

08-09-2003, 09:52 AM	#52
michugo Registered User Join Date: Aug 2003 Posts: 32	Isn't it funny that only thing NK want to give up its nuke plan is a nonaggression treaty between US and NK which US don't accept now. Isn't it obvious that US want to attack NK for some other reaon? I believe that US will attack NK even though NK drop its nuke plan all of sudden in order for US to take a control of Asia in general. NK is just next to China. If you believe that the only country US cannot threat with their force is China, what you want to do? There are so many reasons other than humane ones the current US leaders want to attack NK, I think. For your reference, I am a Korean and I live in S. Korea.

08-09-2003, 11:12 AM	#63
loverboy When it rains, it pours Industry Role: Join Date: May 2003 Posts: 20,609	does US still have enough fire power to make it to war?

08-09-2003, 11:33 AM	#68
AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE best designer on GFY Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: IALIEN.COM - High Definition Video and Photographic Productions -ICQ 78943384 Posts: 30,307	Oh shit, I am gonna be voting Republican! Its Arnold time __________________ NAKED HOSTING FTW!11 I'm On The INSANE PLAN $9.95/mo! \| The Alien Blog Adult News Worth Reading Updated Daily \| Content For Sale! 641 PICS 216 MINUTES OF VIDEO $350.00 \|ICQ: 78943384 \|

08-09-2003, 12:06 PM	#70
Enchantress Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: Wa. U.S.A Posts: 121	I think everyone is missing the big picture here, WHO IS GOING TO PAY FOR A WAR WITH NORTH KOREA. We are looking at a 450 billion dollar deficit for this year. We are spending an estimated 3.9 billion dollars a MONTH in iraq with no end in sight, and an additional 900 million per month in afghanistan. Wars don't pay for themselves. Enchantress

08-09-2003, 12:50 PM	#72
TheJimmy ICQ- five seven 0 2 5 5 0 Join Date: Jan 2001 Posts: 10,747	beating up a little kid = only fighting fights we know we can win.... viable? sure cost/benefit .... sure if we want their bag of candy enough.... __________________ Investor with 5m - 15m USD to invest. Do you have a site or network of sites earning 50k - 200k a month income? Email your contact and preliminary data to: domain.cashventures (at) gmail.com....Please...no tire kickers...serious offers and inquiries only.

08-09-2003, 12:55 PM	#74
ADL Colin Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: Tube Titans, USA Posts: 11,929	Where WAS the predicted urban combat anyway? Lack of will of the Iraqi people? __________________ Adult Date Link - $50 PPS starting NOW! -- good and JUICY! skype = "adultdatelink"

08-09-2003, 01:46 PM	#79
Kapitan Ivanov Confirmed User Join Date: May 2003 Location: Thank you for posting! You will now be taken to your post. If the administrator has selected to moderate all posts in this forum, you will be taken back to the forum and your post will be displayed presently. If you opted to post a poll, you will now Posts: 1,000	I've got my money on Putin. __________________ Ivanov:Never posting again. (666)

08-09-2003, 01:49 PM	#80
Kapitan Ivanov Confirmed User Join Date: May 2003 Location: Thank you for posting! You will now be taken to your post. If the administrator has selected to moderate all posts in this forum, you will be taken back to the forum and your post will be displayed presently. If you opted to post a poll, you will now Posts: 1,000	North Korea won't be attacked by USA. The reason is simple. The North Koreans would completely pummel the USA. that country has spent decades building it's military and in fact, their military is so large and advanced that it's the cause of their famines and so on. If they don't use this army, they've completly screwed their country. If they use it, they will damn sure win. __________________ Ivanov:Never posting again. (666)

08-09-2003, 04:28 PM	#87
pauliewalnutz Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Hell Posts: 486	EXCELLENT ITS ABOUT TIME! AFTER THEM WE GO TO IRAN UNLESS THE COUNTRY DOES IT THEMSELVES FIRST NUKE EM SHOOT EM SHOOT EM ONCE MORE LEAVE EM TO DIE! __________________ <a href="http://netverifier.com/getpaid.asp?siteid=10018799"><img src="http://www.skyweb.net/~kgosselin/banners/newbanner.gif" border="0"></a><br><font color=white size=2> We provide the content to keep your members sticking around!<BR></font> <font color=white size=3>$45.00 per sale!</font>

07-03-2006, 11:16 AM	#90
NoCarrier We need more free porn Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Montreal Posts: 16,356	Bump for boneprone. __________________

07-03-2006, 11:49 AM	#92
ProducerCashDave Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: In Your Brain Posts: 3,983	I'm sure the United States have been spying on them with satelites and have every strategy planned out theyre just not revealing it, obviously. __________________ 15 Exclusive Sites By Top Brand Name Studios! $25 PPS \| 50% Revshare \| 5% Webmaster Referral David K. \| Account Manager \| www.ProducerCash.com ICQ: 480757149 \| david AT producercash DOT com TOLL FREE: 877-549-1112

07-03-2006, 11:56 AM	#93
mrkris Confirmed User Join Date: May 2005 Posts: 2,737	I think it's time to call up Starship Troopers __________________ PHP-MySQL-Rails \| ICQ: 342500546

07-03-2006, 01:00 PM	#94
Rui web Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: On icq: 85-483-060 Posts: 9,533	From that article: "Less than four months after the end of the Iraq war, " Yep I guess thats why we hear about attacks on a daily basis and Bagdad is considered the city with the worst quality of life in the world

07-03-2006, 01:02 PM	#95
pornguy Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Homeless Posts: 62,911	If this idiot is going to do this, he had better send in no less than 1million soldiers. __________________ PornGuy skype me pornguy_epic AmateurDough The Hottes Shemales online! TChicks.com \| Angeles Cid \| Mariana Cordoba \| MAILERS WELCOME!

07-03-2006, 01:06 PM	#96
JD Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2003 Posts: 22,651	hooooooray for really old fucking threads

07-03-2006, 01:26 PM	#97
Matiz Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: ICQ:342419601 Posts: 1,740	fucking old thread __________________ ...