content people, spam me with.... - Page 2 - GoFuckYourself.com

Heather Hamptons · 10-21-2003, 04:57 PM

I sure don't. I have aol/aim and yahoo. My IM name on both of them is HeatherHamptons (pretty simple huh?) lol

LadyMischief · 10-21-2003, 05:01 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Heather Hamptons
ok well let me ask you this...what if the people holding records do not want their address listed on the internet for all to view?

That's something you have to take into consideration when you take on the responsibility... Unfortunately, the law doesn't make allowances for that kind of privacy if you are the custodian

freeadultcontent · 10-21-2003, 05:02 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Heather Hamptons
ok well let me ask you this...what if the people holding records do not want their address listed on the internet for all to view?

You remove them from the site if it is content covered by the 2257 rules.

tootie · 10-21-2003, 05:05 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Heather Hamptons
ok well let me ask you this...what if the people holding records do not want their address listed on the internet for all to view?

Maybe we should lobby the government to change that law. I think it is reasonable to have a P.O. Box listed, but put in the law that if a request is made by a government agency for legitimate purposes to see your documents and you don't respond in a resonable amount of time then they could subpoena your real address from the Post Office. I know the government doesn't exactly like adult webmasters, but certainly something could be done. Is an amateur model going to have to be harmed by someone who found her address on the 2257 page of her site before anything is done?

AaronM · 10-21-2003, 05:08 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Heather Hamptons
ok well let me ask you this...what if the people holding records do not want their address listed on the internet for all to view?

Tough shit. They are in the wrong business.

Harsh but true.

tootie · 10-21-2003, 05:18 PM

I think content providers having to display their business addresses is one thing. It's not nearly as likely that someone would start to stalk the photographer or broker of a model than it is to think that an amateur model who has her home address on her website might be stalked by an obsessed fanatic. Individual models who pose nude being forced to display their home addresses like that is just plain wrong.

That, by the way, is the only hurdle forcing me to buy exclusive sets instead of shooting them myself. Good news for the photographers, bad news for me. LOL

LadyMischief · 10-21-2003, 05:20 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by tootie
I think content providers having to display their business addresses is one thing. It's not nearly as likely that someone would start to stalk the photographer or broker of a model than it is to think that an amateur model who has her home address on her website might be stalked by an obsessed fanatic. Individual models who pose nude being forced to display their home addresses like that is just plain wrong.

It's wrong but neccessary.. We display ours in our custodial information. Fortunately our address is obscure, however, it's still the law, however unfair.

AaronM · 10-21-2003, 05:37 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by tootie
I think content providers having to display their business addresses is one thing. It's not nearly as likely that someone would start to stalk the photographer or broker of a model than it is to think that an amateur model who has her home address on her website might be stalked by an obsessed fanatic. Individual models who pose nude being forced to display their home addresses like that is just plain wrong.

That, by the way, is the only hurdle forcing me to buy exclusive sets instead of shooting them myself. Good news for the photographers, bad news for me. LOL

This topic has been beat to death and ALL angles and opinions have been covered. None of what has been said has made any impact on the law. If you feel strongly enough about it, stop bitching and do something to make a difference.

10-21-2003, 04:57 PM	#51
Heather Hamptons Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Virginia Posts: 2,306	I sure don't. I have aol/aim and yahoo. My IM name on both of them is HeatherHamptons (pretty simple huh?) lol __________________ SIG TOO BIG! Maximum 120x60 button and no more than 3 text lines of DEFAULT SIZE and COLOR. Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, then you may use a 624x80 instead of a 120x60.

10-21-2003, 05:18 PM	#56
tootie Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Planet Earp Posts: 6,041	I think content providers having to display their business addresses is one thing. It's not nearly as likely that someone would start to stalk the photographer or broker of a model than it is to think that an amateur model who has her home address on her website might be stalked by an obsessed fanatic. Individual models who pose nude being forced to display their home addresses like that is just plain wrong. That, by the way, is the only hurdle forcing me to buy exclusive sets instead of shooting them myself. Good news for the photographers, bad news for me. LOL __________________