Worst President in History???? - GoFuckYourself.com

Loryn · 04-09-2004, 04:19 PM

Worst president in history?

The following appeared in the Durham, NC local paper as a letter to the editor. This will put things in perspective:

Liberals claim President Bush shouldn't have started this war. They complain about his prosecution of it. One liberal recently claimed Bush was the worst president in U.S. history. Let's clear up one point:

We didn't start the war on terror. Try to remember, it was started by terrorists BEFORE 9/11. Let's look at the "worst" president and
mismanagement claims.

FDR led us into World War II. Germany never attacked us: Japan did.

From 1941-1945, 450,000 lives were lost, an average of 112,500 per year.

Truman finished that war and started one in Korea, North Korea
never attacked us. From 1950-1953, 55,000 lives were lost, an average of 18,333 per year.

John F. Kennedy started the Vietnam conflict in 1962. Vietnam never attacked us.

Johnson turned Vietnam into a quagmire. From 1965-1975, 58,000
lives were lost, an average of 5,800 per year.

Clinton went to war in Bosnia without UN or French consent, Bosnia never attacked us. He was offered Osama bin Laden's head on a platter three times by Sudan and did nothing. Osama has attacked us on multiple occasions.

In the two years since terrorists attacked us, President Bush has
liberated two countries, crushed the Taliban, crippled al-Qaida, put nuclear inspectors in Lybia, Iran and North Korea without firing a shot, and captured a terrorist who slaughtered 300,000 of his own people.

We lost 600 soldiers, an average of 30 a year. Bush did all this
abroad while not allowing another terrorist attack at home. Worst
president in history? Come on!

The Democrats are complaining about how long the war is taking,
but...

It took less time to take Iraq than it took Janet Reno to take the
Branch Davidian compound. That was a 51 day operation.

We've been looking for evidence of chemical weapons in Iraq for
less time than it took Hillary Clinton to find the Rose Law Firm billing records.

It took less time for the 3rd Infantry Division and the Marines to
destroy the Medina Republican Guard than it took Teddy Kennedy to call the police after his Oldsmobile sank at Chappaquiddick.

It took less time to take Iraq than it took to count the votes in
Florida!!!!

Our military is GREAT!

So nana nana boo boo stick your head in doo doo!!

Thong Sniper · 04-09-2004, 04:21 PM

George W or Ronald Regan.

can't think of a good think either one ever did.

FDR wasn't bad. he was relected 4 times. got us out of the great depression and helped kill a bunch of nazis.

DrOmango · 04-09-2004, 04:22 PM

yada yada

im still gonna vote for kerry

Lucy · 04-09-2004, 04:24 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by DrOmango
yada yada

im still gonna vote for kerry

me too, vote for Kerry

Loryn · 04-09-2004, 04:24 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Thong Sniper
George W or Ronald Regan.

can't think of a good think either one ever did.

FDR wasn't bad. he was relected 4 times. got us out of the great depression and helped kill a bunch of nazis.

Well maybe you should think alittle harder. Do a little research on what ole Ronnie did when he was President. Look for topics with Russia!!!!

Loryn · 04-09-2004, 04:25 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by DrOmango
yada yada

im still gonna vote for kerry

That wasn't the point. But you can waist your vote if you like!!!

bret · 04-09-2004, 04:26 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Loryn-Adult.com
Worst president in history?

The following appeared in the Durham, NC local paper as a letter to the editor. This will put things in perspective:

Liberals claim President Bush shouldn't have started this war. They complain about his prosecution of it. One liberal recently claimed Bush was the worst president in U.S. history. Let's clear up one point:

We didn't start the war on terror. Try to remember, it was started by terrorists BEFORE 9/11. Let's look at the "worst" president and
mismanagement claims.

FDR led us into World War II. Germany never attacked us: Japan did.

From 1941-1945, 450,000 lives were lost, an average of 112,500 per year.

Truman finished that war and started one in Korea, North Korea
never attacked us. From 1950-1953, 55,000 lives were lost, an average of 18,333 per year.

John F. Kennedy started the Vietnam conflict in 1962. Vietnam never attacked us.

Johnson turned Vietnam into a quagmire. From 1965-1975, 58,000
lives were lost, an average of 5,800 per year.

Clinton went to war in Bosnia without UN or French consent, Bosnia never attacked us. He was offered Osama bin Laden's head on a platter three times by Sudan and did nothing. Osama has attacked us on multiple occasions.

In the two years since terrorists attacked us, President Bush has
liberated two countries, crushed the Taliban, crippled al-Qaida, put nuclear inspectors in Lybia, Iran and North Korea without firing a shot, and captured a terrorist who slaughtered 300,000 of his own people.

We lost 600 soldiers, an average of 30 a year. Bush did all this
abroad while not allowing another terrorist attack at home. Worst
president in history? Come on!

The Democrats are complaining about how long the war is taking,
but...

It took less time to take Iraq than it took Janet Reno to take the
Branch Davidian compound. That was a 51 day operation.

We've been looking for evidence of chemical weapons in Iraq for
less time than it took Hillary Clinton to find the Rose Law Firm billing records.

It took less time for the 3rd Infantry Division and the Marines to
destroy the Medina Republican Guard than it took Teddy Kennedy to call the police after his Oldsmobile sank at Chappaquiddick.

It took less time to take Iraq than it took to count the votes in
Florida!!!!

Our military is GREAT!

So nana nana boo boo stick your head in doo doo!!

Is a June wedding good for you?

Loryn · 04-09-2004, 04:28 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by bret

Is a June wedding good for you?

Oh, to be a June Bride!!

usecondoms · 04-09-2004, 04:29 PM

Kerry the same man who lobbied for the "Big Dig" in his state, then watched a 10 billion dollar cost overrun. Which is no hosing tax payers. The same man going to raise taxes, not a smart choice in my book.

bret · 04-09-2004, 04:31 PM

you got it. hoax said he wants be the best man

Loryn · 04-09-2004, 04:34 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by bret
you got it. hoax said he wants be the best man

Oh hell yes, can he come on the Honeymoon too??

hilly · 04-09-2004, 04:34 PM

Just start something with the Russians
I wouldn't advise it

bluedevil · 04-09-2004, 04:35 PM

Kerry All The Way!!!

But if Hitler were running against Bush, I dunno, it would be a tough one for me, honestly....

crockett · 04-09-2004, 04:36 PM

Loran you seem to forget a few minor details here.. in ww1, 2 and veitnam we depened on foot soldiers as the main battle force. Today we depend on cruise missles attack choppers, fighter jets and armor.. Foot soliders are only used as support for these. If we had guys just walking around all over Iraq, like they did in ww2 and vietnam the death toll would be much much higher. It's not George Bush's fault we have a more advanced military, it's his benifit. This benifit dosn't make him a better pres, just makes him a bit more lucky.

You also seem to be linking Iraq to terrorism.. Where exactly do you find this link with Iraq and terrorism? Sure sadam was a evil bad guy, but let's not forget he was our Evil bad guy untill he decided to cut the pupet strings and do his own thing.

Just like Saudi is A ok with us even though everyone knows the terrorist get support from them, and work within their borders. I will agree saudi is cleaning up it's act because they are under pressure but let's not forget where our good buddy Bin Ladden came from.

If we were really in a war on terror as you put and BUsh claims every other day.. Why arn't we fighting terrorists insted of playing regime change?

bret · 04-09-2004, 04:36 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Loryn-Adult.com

Oh hell yes, can he come on the Honeymoon too??

what, you though i was going to make you carry the bags or something??

stevent37 · 04-09-2004, 04:37 PM

why is it if you dont like a republican they immediatly start screaming liberal at you? Please, its getting old, Im not a liberal and Bush sucks.

I dont think compaing Iraq to a world war is a very inteligent analogy do you? Big difference.

And that article failed to mention one other dubious distinction Bush has, He is the first president of the United States to have two DUI's. Funny isnt it that the pres of the most powerful country in the world cant even legally drive a car n the State of NY. Bet he doesnt talk about that when he is stumping thru the Bible belt.

dav555add · 04-09-2004, 04:40 PM

The worst President in American history would have to be Jimmy Carter, closely followed by Papa Bush.....

Rictor · 04-09-2004, 04:40 PM

VAST RIGHT WING CONSPIRACY.

dav555add · 04-09-2004, 04:41 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by bluedevil
Kerry All The Way!!!

But if Hitler were running against Bush, I dunno, it would be a tough one for me, honestly....

Dude, what the fuck with your sig?????

bret · 04-09-2004, 04:42 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by stevent37
why is it if you dont like a republican they immediatly start screaming liberal at you? Please, its getting old, Im not a liberal and Bush sucks.

I dont think compaing Iraq to a world war is a very inteligent analogy do you? Big difference.

you are right. thanks for proving her point.

Quote:

Originally posted by stevent37
And that article failed to mention one other dubious distinction Bush has, He is the first president of the United States to have two DUI's. Funny isnt it that the pres of the most powerful country in the world cant even legally drive a car n the State of NY. Bet he doesnt talk about that when he is stumping thru the Bible belt.

yeah, and i bet clinton's dad can beat up dubya's. but who the fuck cares? i love it when people bring up shit like that... "Oh yeah, well this one time, he colored out side the lines! IMPEACH HIM!"

Loryn · 04-09-2004, 04:42 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by hilly
Just start something with the Russians
I wouldn't advise it

Who said anything about starting something with Russians? That is all over with thanks to Ronald Regan.

Loryn · 04-09-2004, 04:46 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by bret

what, you though i was going to make you carry the bags or something??

Can he do more than carry our luggage??
Maybe talk dirty to us as we consummate the marriage.

Sly_RJ · 04-09-2004, 04:48 PM

I wouldn't mind starting something with the Russians. They have beautiful women.

Fenris · 04-09-2004, 04:49 PM

>It took less time to take Iraq than it took Janet Reno to take the
>Branch Davidian compound. That was a 51 day operation.

Uhmm - i dont wanna burst a bubble but this operation is not finished - over one year now and they are still fights.
Please dont believe everything that you see on TV - put down your spliff and use your brain .

To be a patriot is fine, to be a brainwashed flagwaving idiot possibly not.

bye Fenris

Roger · 04-09-2004, 04:51 PM

wow, you're not very smart are you?

bret · 04-09-2004, 04:53 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Fenris
>It took less time to take Iraq than it took Janet Reno to take the
>Branch Davidian compound. That was a 51 day operation.

Uhmm - i dont wanna burst a bubble but this operation is not finished - over one year now and they are still fights.
Please dont believe everything that you see on TV - put down your spliff and use your brain .

To be a patriot is fine, to be a brainwashed flagwaving idiot possibly not.

bye Fenris

Uhmm - i dont wanna burst a bubble but, she said "take iraq" (IE the time elapsed to remove the old regime by force) not secure the country, everyone knew securing the country was going to take time.

bret · 04-09-2004, 04:54 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Loryn-Adult.com

Can he do more than carry our luggage??
Maybe talk dirty to us as we consummate the marriage.

hell, if he brings along his better half they can join in... as long as their is no male-to-male contact, and i get something out of the deal, it's all gravy.

StuartD · 04-09-2004, 04:55 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Loryn-Adult.com

Liberals claim President Bush shouldn't have started this war.

...

We didn't start the war on terror.

Hold on a second.... the "war on terror" and the "invasion of Iraq" are two different things.

You may have gotten confused with the spelling so here's a tip...

osama... saddam... osama... saddam.. kinda simliar, but they're two different people.

Loryn · 04-09-2004, 04:55 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Fenris
>It took less time to take Iraq than it took Janet Reno to take the
>Branch Davidian compound. That was a 51 day operation.

Uhmm - i dont wanna burst a bubble but this operation is not finished - over one year now and they are still fights.
Please dont believe everything that you see on TV - put down your spliff and use your brain .

To be a patriot is fine, to be a brainwashed flagwaving idiot possibly not.

bye Fenris

I think for myself fuck you very much!!!

Funny how I start a thread about Bush not being the worst President in our history and you come at me with brainwashed flag waving idiot. hmmm? Who's programmed in this situation??

spanky part 2 · 04-09-2004, 04:59 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Loryn-Adult.com
Worst president in history?

The following appeared in the Durham, NC local paper as a letter to the editor. This will put things in perspective:

Liberals claim President Bush shouldn't have started this war. They complain about his prosecution of it. One liberal recently claimed Bush was the worst president in U.S. history. Let's clear up one point:

We didn't start the war on terror. Try to remember, it was started by terrorists BEFORE 9/11. Let's look at the "worst" president and
mismanagement claims.

FDR led us into World War II. Germany never attacked us: Japan did.

From 1941-1945, 450,000 lives were lost, an average of 112,500 per year.

Truman finished that war and started one in Korea, North Korea
never attacked us. From 1950-1953, 55,000 lives were lost, an average of 18,333 per year.

John F. Kennedy started the Vietnam conflict in 1962. Vietnam never attacked us.

Johnson turned Vietnam into a quagmire. From 1965-1975, 58,000
lives were lost, an average of 5,800 per year.

Clinton went to war in Bosnia without UN or French consent, Bosnia never attacked us. He was offered Osama bin Laden's head on a platter three times by Sudan and did nothing. Osama has attacked us on multiple occasions.

In the two years since terrorists attacked us, President Bush has
liberated two countries, crushed the Taliban, crippled al-Qaida, put nuclear inspectors in Lybia, Iran and North Korea without firing a shot, and captured a terrorist who slaughtered 300,000 of his own people.

We lost 600 soldiers, an average of 30 a year. Bush did all this
abroad while not allowing another terrorist attack at home. Worst
president in history? Come on!

The Democrats are complaining about how long the war is taking,
but...

It took less time to take Iraq than it took Janet Reno to take the
Branch Davidian compound. That was a 51 day operation.

We've been looking for evidence of chemical weapons in Iraq for
less time than it took Hillary Clinton to find the Rose Law Firm billing records.

It took less time for the 3rd Infantry Division and the Marines to
destroy the Medina Republican Guard than it took Teddy Kennedy to call the police after his Oldsmobile sank at Chappaquiddick.

It took less time to take Iraq than it took to count the votes in
Florida!!!!

Our military is GREAT!

So nana nana boo boo stick your head in doo doo!!

The only difference is all the wars you talk about , our allies were attacked and we came to their aid.
This is the first war we have ever gone into where we weren't attacked and neither were our allies.

Bush blows plain and simple. Lets change the laws and bring ol' Bill Clinton back.

stevent37 · 04-09-2004, 05:01 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by bret

yeah, and i bet clinton's dad can beat up dubya's. but who the fuck cares? i love it when people bring up shit like that... "Oh yeah, well this one time, he colored out side the lines! IMPEACH HIM!"

Amazing I said the same thing when republicans were whinning about who clinton was fucking. Must be some kind of bizare double standard ?

But You keep goosestepping son. and do vote for Goerge W, just dont be surprised when the thought polce show up at your door a year from now to lock you up for peddling porn.

You see, you might like him, But I can gaurantee he hates you and everything you do to make a living.

Roger · 04-09-2004, 05:02 PM

Let's face it. Only a coward would've felt threatened by Saddam.

Loryn · 04-09-2004, 05:03 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by MaskedMan

Hold on a second.... the "war on terror" and the "invasion of Iraq" are two different things.

You may have gotten confused with the spelling so here's a tip...

osama... saddam... osama... saddam.. kinda simliar, but they're two different people.

Saddam has been a threat for a long time and everyone knows it. Even these fools new it:

http://flashbunny.org/content/misled.html

But they won't own up to those words now.

Sly_RJ · 04-09-2004, 05:04 PM

Ahaha I love how Loryn can stir up so much shit. Pure entertainment!

Loryn · 04-09-2004, 05:06 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Roger
Let's face it. Only a coward would've felt threatened by Saddam.

Okay then everyone in the in Clinton's administration were cowards too. They all said he was a threat!!!

Loryn · 04-09-2004, 05:06 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Sly_RJ
Ahaha I love how Loryn can stir up so much shit. Pure entertainment!

Thank you Sly. I enjoy it myself!!

bret · 04-09-2004, 05:07 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by stevent37

Amazing I said the same thing when republicans were whinning about who clinton was fucking. Must be some kind of bizare double standard ?

But You keep goosestepping son. and do vote for Goerge W, just dont be surprised when the thought polce show up at your door a year from now to lock you up for peddling porn.

You see, you might like him, But I can gaurantee he hates you and everything you do to make a living.

it's not a double standard. bush spends his time in the oval office running the country. if he was issued a DUI asleep at the wheel on the south lawn, then yeah, i am right there with you. clinton had too much time on his hands, he was like a rich arab's son pissing away his father's oil money at the club... sooner or later you are going to catch him with his pants down and the shit ain't gonna be pretty.

and to be honest with you, i could give to shits if bush likes me as a person, he isn't running for student hahahaha president. he pushes for legislation that puts money back in my pocket, and he isn't affraid to kick this shit out of some people in an effort to make our country a safer place.

Loryn · 04-09-2004, 05:08 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by bret

hell, if he brings along his better half they can join in... as long as their is no male-to-male contact, and i get something out of the deal, it's all gravy.

YEE HAW this is going to be the best party ever!!

Roger · 04-09-2004, 05:09 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Loryn-Adult.com
Okay then everyone in the in Clinton's administration were cowards too. They all said he was a threat!!!

Obviously they didn't feel threatened enough. Grow up lady.

dav555add · 04-09-2004, 05:10 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Loryn-Adult.com

Okay then everyone in the in Clinton's administration were cowards too. They all said he was a threat!!!

Don't mind Roger, he is a True Americana Hater

bret · 04-09-2004, 05:10 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Loryn-Adult.com

YEE HAW this is going to be the best party ever!!

hmmm. maybe we should spend a few moments learning some intimate details about each other...

a/s/l ?

Corleone · 04-09-2004, 05:11 PM

vote4kerry

"It took less time to take Iraq than it took to count the votes in
Florida!!!!"

you dont read the news? its still war... and ppl will die the next years ..

47 marines killed last week

Sly_RJ · 04-09-2004, 05:11 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Roger

Obviously they didn't feel threatened enough. Grow up lady.

Either that or they didn't have the balls to do anything about it...

Loryn · 04-09-2004, 05:12 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Roger

Obviously they didn't feel threatened enough. Grow up lady.

Exactly that is why Sept 11th happened. They didn't feel Osama or any of those idiots over there were a threat.

Loryn · 04-09-2004, 05:13 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Corleone
vote4kerry

"It took less time to take Iraq than it took to count the votes in
Florida!!!!"

you dont read the news? its still war... and ppl will die the next years ..

47 marines killed last week

Roger · 04-09-2004, 05:14 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Sly_RJ
Either that or they didn't have the balls to do anything about it...

About Saddam? Please, the guy wasn't even a threat to Qatar. At least the Clinton admin stopped a genocide, something which no other administration since WWII have done.

Ice · 04-09-2004, 05:14 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Loryn-Adult.com

Corleone · 04-09-2004, 05:15 PM

please forward it to : [email protected]

its this days ... and everytime i check the news theres a new picture with another dead soldier...

btw iraq never attacked the us..

DR_PHIL · 04-09-2004, 05:15 PM

wow a few Rush sheep with a career in porn..let us know how it goes when you freedom is violated and you end up posing in Good housekeeping Mag

Roger · 04-09-2004, 05:15 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Loryn-Adult.com
Exactly that is why Sept 11th happened. They didn't feel Osama or any of those idiots over there were a threat.

Sept. 11th happened because you have idiots in power who ignored the warnings. Bush was president at the time, not Clinton.

04-09-2004, 04:19 PM	#1
Loryn Super Connector Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Las Vegas Posts: 12,853	Worst President in History???? Worst president in history? The following appeared in the Durham, NC local paper as a letter to the editor. This will put things in perspective: Liberals claim President Bush shouldn't have started this war. They complain about his prosecution of it. One liberal recently claimed Bush was the worst president in U.S. history. Let's clear up one point: We didn't start the war on terror. Try to remember, it was started by terrorists BEFORE 9/11. Let's look at the "worst" president and mismanagement claims. FDR led us into World War II. Germany never attacked us: Japan did. From 1941-1945, 450,000 lives were lost, an average of 112,500 per year. Truman finished that war and started one in Korea, North Korea never attacked us. From 1950-1953, 55,000 lives were lost, an average of 18,333 per year. John F. Kennedy started the Vietnam conflict in 1962. Vietnam never attacked us. Johnson turned Vietnam into a quagmire. From 1965-1975, 58,000 lives were lost, an average of 5,800 per year. Clinton went to war in Bosnia without UN or French consent, Bosnia never attacked us. He was offered Osama bin Laden's head on a platter three times by Sudan and did nothing. Osama has attacked us on multiple occasions. In the two years since terrorists attacked us, President Bush has liberated two countries, crushed the Taliban, crippled al-Qaida, put nuclear inspectors in Lybia, Iran and North Korea without firing a shot, and captured a terrorist who slaughtered 300,000 of his own people. We lost 600 soldiers, an average of 30 a year. Bush did all this abroad while not allowing another terrorist attack at home. Worst president in history? Come on! The Democrats are complaining about how long the war is taking, but... It took less time to take Iraq than it took Janet Reno to take the Branch Davidian compound. That was a 51 day operation. We've been looking for evidence of chemical weapons in Iraq for less time than it took Hillary Clinton to find the Rose Law Firm billing records. It took less time for the 3rd Infantry Division and the Marines to destroy the Medina Republican Guard than it took Teddy Kennedy to call the police after his Oldsmobile sank at Chappaquiddick. It took less time to take Iraq than it took to count the votes in Florida!!!! Our military is GREAT! So nana nana boo boo stick your head in doo doo!! __________________ ~ loryn@loryntaylor . com ~ RIP TD

04-09-2004, 04:21 PM	#2
Thong Sniper Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 1,319	George W or Ronald Regan. can't think of a good think either one ever did. FDR wasn't bad. he was relected 4 times. got us out of the great depression and helped kill a bunch of nazis. __________________ <vb>signature</vb>

04-09-2004, 04:29 PM	#9
usecondoms Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Modesto Posts: 125	Kerry the same man who lobbied for the "Big Dig" in his state, then watched a 10 billion dollar cost overrun. Which is no hosing tax payers. The same man going to raise taxes, not a smart choice in my book. __________________ Im starting to question this whole college thing, nobody told me that i actually have to go to class and do the homework...

04-09-2004, 04:35 PM	#13
bluedevil Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: USA Posts: 2,093	Kerry All The Way!!! But if Hitler were running against Bush, I dunno, it would be a tough one for me, honestly.... __________________ My top money maker

04-09-2004, 04:36 PM	#14
crockett in a van by the river Industry Role: Join Date: May 2003 Posts: 76,806	Loran you seem to forget a few minor details here.. in ww1, 2 and veitnam we depened on foot soldiers as the main battle force. Today we depend on cruise missles attack choppers, fighter jets and armor.. Foot soliders are only used as support for these. If we had guys just walking around all over Iraq, like they did in ww2 and vietnam the death toll would be much much higher. It's not George Bush's fault we have a more advanced military, it's his benifit. This benifit dosn't make him a better pres, just makes him a bit more lucky. You also seem to be linking Iraq to terrorism.. Where exactly do you find this link with Iraq and terrorism? Sure sadam was a evil bad guy, but let's not forget he was our Evil bad guy untill he decided to cut the pupet strings and do his own thing. Just like Saudi is A ok with us even though everyone knows the terrorist get support from them, and work within their borders. I will agree saudi is cleaning up it's act because they are under pressure but let's not forget where our good buddy Bin Ladden came from. If we were really in a war on terror as you put and BUsh claims every other day.. Why arn't we fighting terrorists insted of playing regime change? __________________ In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.

04-09-2004, 04:22 PM	#3
DrOmango Registered User Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Austin, TX Posts: 56	yada yada im still gonna vote for kerry

04-09-2004, 04:31 PM	#10
bret Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: detroit Posts: 766	you got it. hoax said he wants be the best man

04-09-2004, 04:34 PM	#12
hilly Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 867	Just start something with the Russians I wouldn't advise it

04-09-2004, 04:37 PM	#16
stevent37 Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: USA Posts: 266	why is it if you dont like a republican they immediatly start screaming liberal at you? Please, its getting old, Im not a liberal and Bush sucks. I dont think compaing Iraq to a world war is a very inteligent analogy do you? Big difference. And that article failed to mention one other dubious distinction Bush has, He is the first president of the United States to have two DUI's. Funny isnt it that the pres of the most powerful country in the world cant even legally drive a car n the State of NY. Bet he doesnt talk about that when he is stumping thru the Bible belt.

04-09-2004, 04:40 PM	#17
dav555add Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2001 Posts: 3,427	The worst President in American history would have to be Jimmy Carter, closely followed by Papa Bush..... __________________ ...

04-09-2004, 04:40 PM	#18
Rictor Old Timer Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Indianapolis Posts: 12,208	VAST RIGHT WING CONSPIRACY.

04-09-2004, 04:48 PM	#23
Sly_RJ Live Hard - Die Hard Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Ready to leave... Posts: 17,042	I wouldn't mind starting something with the Russians. They have beautiful women. __________________ PHAT SERVERS - Quality dedicated hosting at a quality price! sly AT phatservers DOT com - 147479144

04-09-2004, 04:49 PM	#24
Fenris Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 124	>It took less time to take Iraq than it took Janet Reno to take the >Branch Davidian compound. That was a 51 day operation. Uhmm - i dont wanna burst a bubble but this operation is not finished - over one year now and they are still fights. Please dont believe everything that you see on TV - put down your spliff and use your brain . To be a patriot is fine, to be a brainwashed flagwaving idiot possibly not. bye Fenris

04-09-2004, 04:51 PM	#25
Roger Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: MetroCity Posts: 3,181	wow, you're not very smart are you?

04-09-2004, 05:02 PM	#32
Roger Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: MetroCity Posts: 3,181	Let's face it. Only a coward would've felt threatened by Saddam.

04-09-2004, 05:04 PM	#34
Sly_RJ Live Hard - Die Hard Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Ready to leave... Posts: 17,042	Ahaha I love how Loryn can stir up so much shit. Pure entertainment! __________________ PHAT SERVERS - Quality dedicated hosting at a quality price! sly AT phatservers DOT com - 147479144

04-09-2004, 05:11 PM	#42
Corleone C.R.E.A.M Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2003 Posts: 15,262	vote4kerry "It took less time to take Iraq than it took to count the votes in Florida!!!!" you dont read the news? its still war... and ppl will die the next years .. 47 marines killed last week

04-09-2004, 05:15 PM	#48
Corleone C.R.E.A.M Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2003 Posts: 15,262	please forward it to : [email protected] its this days ... and everytime i check the news theres a new picture with another dead soldier... btw iraq never attacked the us..

04-09-2004, 05:15 PM	#49
DR_PHIL Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Never visits the same thread twice Posts: 4,099	wow a few Rush sheep with a career in porn..let us know how it goes when you freedom is violated and you end up posing in Good housekeeping Mag