Time Travel is Possible....scientific proof!!! - Page 2 - GoFuckYourself.com

ModelPerfect · 04-12-2005, 04:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chodadog

That's actually a pretty interesting thought. Assuming you had telescope powerful enough to look that far, and could travel a lightyear in a single hour, or day, or week, then you could watch history as it unfolds and see exactly what happened.

Limited only by a lack of technology. Nice theory. I like it. But isn't this just the theory of relativity?

Why do you need a powerful telescope? The naked eye will suffice. What do you think we're doing when we look up at the stars? We're seeing the light that was emitted from the past...we're not seeing the current state of the stars. If the star was 10 light years away, then the light emitted took, by definition, 10 years to get here. So we're seeing the star as it was 10 years ago; as far as we know, it might be implodded by now... The thing is we're used to watching the past and relating that with the present, but that's not really the case.

A powerful telescope wouldn't allow you to see further in the past, unless it was moved further away faster than the speed of light, as noted before, or aimed at a reflection of the original light (hint!). Purely from our point of view, the telescope would only allow you to see closer towards the object's present.

blackmonsters · 04-12-2005, 05:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chodadog

Nice theory. I like it. But isn't this just the theory of relativity?

Well, I'm not exactly ready to equate my theories with those of Einstein, but I'm sure there are some similar concepts.
It would be pretty hard for me to come up with any plausible theories without at least touching some of Einstein's.

Interesting thing though: I had taken a few IQ test in the past for some jobs and even though they were not allowed to give out scores, I was told on each occasion that I had the highest score they'd ever seen.
I never put much weight on that, I mean who knows if the other applicants were just weak or not. But I recently took another IQ test out of curiosity and got to see my score this time. I shit in my pants when I was told what Einstien's IQ score was. All I will say about it is that Einstien would have enjoyed talking to me.

quantum-x · 04-12-2005, 06:15 AM

I couldn't be fucked debunking you, we all know it's bs

quantum-x · 04-12-2005, 06:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackmonsters

Well, I'm not exactly ready to equate my theories with those of Einstein, but I'm sure there are some similar concepts.
It would be pretty hard for me to come up with any plausible theories without at least touching some of Einstein's.

Interesting thing though: I had taken a few IQ test in the past for some jobs and even though they were not allowed to give out scores, I was told on each occasion that I had the highest score they'd ever seen.
I never put much weight on that, I mean who knows if the other applicants were just weak or not. But I recently took another IQ test out of curiosity and got to see my score this time. I shit in my pants when I was told what Einstien's IQ score was. All I will say about it is that Einstien would have enjoyed talking to me.

word, yet you hang out on gfy because?

quant · 04-12-2005, 08:00 AM

Interesting thread. I basically agree that time travel is only possible in an astral sense. There are some misconceptions...

First, particles can travel faster than the speed of light. On Earth, light does not travel at 186,000 miles per second. In water, it travels even slower. So it's possible to accelerate a particle faster than the speed of light in a medium where light travels considerably slower than c. When this happens, a magnificant blue or green glowing light emerges and is equivalent to a visible shock wave. It's quite intense -

Time is really the difference between chaos and harmony. It may sound like a simplistic definition, but consider that scientists view time as entropy, or as energy being disorganized through heat. This means they view the world as constantly progressing towards chaos (2nd law of thermodynamics). I highly disagree with this, as the purpose of anyone's life is to create more stability, and that purpose is shared by the universe. Plus you can see this in particle accelerators. Particle physics is actually a legitimate hoax created by physicists who dreamt up explanations of why a pion turns into a muon and then an electron. A glimpse of an omega, a tauon, a muon or such particle is simply a flash back in time.

As for the mind, it technically operates at reverse time or negative entropy. It exists in a constant state of macroscopic quantum coherence. There is no speed of thought, because one thought can be slow while 1000 thoughts in the same quantum wave function is both 1 and infinite at the same time. It is the idea of silience of the mind, focus, or left-right brain synchronization. Electric current is very slow, normally it barely moves at all.

For the acceleration comment, you must first eliminate acceleration (and thus friction) to be able to physically exceed the speed of c in a vacuum. Eliminating acceleration is a key to opening Pandora's box.

Finally, the big bang theory is not inoperable in quantum physics. People think of quantum physics as some mystical phenomenon that is only recent. It's not. Understanding of quantum mechanics is what proved the Big Bang. Furthermore, the speed of light is not a limit, rather it is a divider. Most importantly, everything I am saying is supported by religion/spirituality.

Prior to the Big Bang, there was no time and All That Is existed as 1. Creation was the act of sharing the infinite light with itself. In order to do so, part of the infinite had to condense into form, to create a vessel to receive light. This is when the Godhead condensed, which is literally a roadmap back to the source. At the beginning, the universe was full of dense, chaotic energy, which as it spread out became more coherent and stable. This was the beginning of time. Their is no end of time, only infinite time.

This is when we have reached an ultimate balance between form and source, a state of universal superconducting fields (where the Godhead leads us). In this reality, electrons may exist at a more evolved state with a cosmic bosonic nature. It would be mind induced molecular manufacturing on an intense and interactive level. A Kundalini awakening of the universe; a realization that we are much more than you or I.

This world would be like a constant shifting of unified quantum wave functions, where thoughts are the construct of perception and physical reality. Heaven isn't in the stars, it's in our mind and on Earth.

quant · 04-12-2005, 08:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KRL

I think the mind is more powerful than any of us realize. I think it is capable of things we can't even comprehend. I don't think our mind is really in our mind per se. I think its more of a termination point for a connection from some other dimension, spiritual plane or higher frequency energy we don't see but that is surrounding our physical self.

I've noted on many of my posts how I've been studying metaphysics for decades. By doing so, my own abilities have gotten to the point where sometimes it gets a bit unbelievable. We all have preminitions, but mine go beyond that. I have experiences now where I sense and see future events happening in extreme detail.

So is this a form of time travel or just an advanced state of intuition? I don't really know. It could be either. But how can we see the future if it hasn't happened yet? The only answer can be that Einstein's theories of time and space are exactly right. The past, the future and the now are all actually an eternal now where there really is no time and there really is no space in the way we think of it traditionally.

If this is true than we have the ability to alter the past, the present and the future and we can travel to the past or future, because we aren't really going there we are already there.

If you look into a deep space telescope you are looking at what was billions of years ago, not what is now. However, what was billions of years ago could be us looking at ourselves and now we are 5 billion years forward while simultaneously see 5 billion years back thus creating the eternal void moment that is without time or space.

This is why my beliefs are strong that death is merely a transformation of our energy force not an end to it. You can not destroy something in a state without time and without space because the physics of this do not allow for anything but a perpetual past, present and future in simultaneous harmony with each other.

I guess I should be fair and say that KRL has some very good points. I can also understand his rationalization of the Big Bang, as it is impossible to capture any one moment. However, that FIRST moment -- 'the beginning' is what is allowing us the ability to eventually capture one moment infinitely (or infinite moments one at a time).

Yes, our mind is like a dumb terminal in a sense. It is the connection to the hyperluminal world (or termination point of). We can ignore it (and believe death is death) or embrace it (and discover life is eternal).

You are right about the past and future, along with every possible event already existing. When you are consciously thinking you are either in the past or the future, but never in the infinite moment that is the past or future (which few have experienced). A somewhat cheap analogy would be a multiplex theater and the ability to get up and watch/experience other movies anytime. Although it's hard to quantify the personal experience of a past moment, so changing it wouldn't alter the person's zero-point personality. Meaning that superficial events that happened to us may never be erased, but our ultimate energy state will exist without them and because of them.

Finally, great explanation of the 'eternal void moment'. When we are looking up in the sky, we are actually looking into a reflective mirror of sorts. What has happened above, is happening inside us. There is no outerspace independent of what is inside our mind. It's impossible to be millions of miles away from something that is inside us.

arnette · 04-12-2005, 08:33 AM

there are some seriously dumb people in this thread.

time travel is possible in einsteins universe!

nojob · 04-12-2005, 08:37 AM

nice read. But is it true, who knows?

Pretty_Lara · 04-12-2005, 08:51 AM

hehe listen to relict radiation and you understand theory of traveling in time

Nismo · 04-12-2005, 08:57 AM

after reading this thread, i have realized that I need to go back to November 22, 1955 and take the Sports Almanac from Griff Tannen to prevent dangerous changed to the real 1985.

chodadog · 04-12-2005, 09:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ModelPerfect

Why do you need a powerful telescope? The naked eye will suffice. What do you think we're doing when we look up at the stars? We're seeing the light that was emitted from the past...we're not seeing the current state of the stars. If the star was 10 light years away, then the light emitted took, by definition, 10 years to get here. So we're seeing the star as it was 10 years ago; as far as we know, it might be implodded by now... The thing is we're used to watching the past and relating that with the present, but that's not really the case.

A powerful telescope wouldn't allow you to see further in the past, unless it was moved further away faster than the speed of light, as noted before, or aimed at a reflection of the original light (hint!). Purely from our point of view, the telescope would only allow you to see closer towards the object's present.

I didn't explain myself clearly. You'd need a telescope to see things clearly. I mean sure, we can look at a star and see it and what we're seeing is X number of years old. But being 2 lightyears away from earth, you wouldn't be able to see earth. You'd see the sun for sure. But let's just assume you could even see the planet, you certainly wouldn't be able to see it with any great detail. Imagine being able to look at dinosaurs. To actually see them. That's why you'd need the uber-scope. Hope that clears things up.

Blackmonsters; i just mean that it sounds like what you've done is just taken Einstein's existing theory of relativity and applied it to another situation. Pretty cleverly done too, if you ask me.

HpicAnn · 04-12-2005, 09:24 AM

too long for me to read!!

blackmonsters · 04-12-2005, 09:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HpicAnn

too long for me to read!!

Yeah...like you actually got something else to fuckin' do....Nugga PLEASE!!!

Homer · 04-12-2005, 09:42 AM

haha that's funny

blackmonsters · 04-12-2005, 09:52 AM

For those who need something to do:

Download the script in my sig and make some money.

The script is far more solid than any of my theories and it's free.

The GetThumbs script automates the process of making customized thumbs for all your hosted galleries, builds your site, ranks thumbs by popularity so the best thumbs go to the top and get clicked more and updates your site with new thumbs on a schedule you control.

Once it's set up you only keep adding gallery urls and click go.
You can paste 200 galleries into the script at once and minutes later build a site with those thumbs linked to the galleries.

COOL....try it.

PS: It does not skim any traffic; this is mostly a beta test to improve the pay version; but you can still let me refer you some new sponsors and or place a link to the getthumbs site if you like to.

project_naughty · 04-12-2005, 09:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackmonsters

I will prove here that time travel is absolutely possible.

1. First I will define what I mean by "Time Travel".

* Time travel : The ability to "view" a specific place and time in space other than the space and time in which you reside. (of course, if someone recorded the event on a camcorder then just push play..hehehehe)

-- View : One need not be there physically; but merely visually; so forget about Buck Rogers and getting into a gun fight with Jessy James kind of shit.

2. The device to view(travel) into the past was invented 1000's of years ago by north Africans specificly the Moors. It is called the telescope.
(please don't give me shit about some european inventing it because that's like saying Columbus discovered America when 5 million Indians and Mexicans were already fucking here...so just skip that shit)

3. Viewing(traveling) the future is done with a process I have defined as Rapid Image Logic(RIL).

4. I only need prove time travel for times less than one year to prove it is possible.

5. The fastest possible speed is "the speed of thought".

6. "Total Recall"

-------- Explanation ------

A powerful telescope pointed at a object in space that is one light year away is viewing the state of that object as it appeared one year ago. The viewer has "traveled" to one year in the past of that object. To view further into the object's past requires moving the telescope further from the object; say two light years away. (yep that is a problem)

Ah...so yes, there is a problem with viewing the past on earth because we need to place the telescope away from earth. But remember how I defined it as viewing a specific place and time in space and not specifically earth.

So we can absolutely view(travel) into the past of an object in space.

-- Faster than the speed of light:
Others have said achieving speeds faster than light is needed for time travel...True for viewing the past on earth. If I want to view the state of earth 500 years ago today then I need to place the telescope 500 light years away from earth...kinda hard to do that before lunch unless I can launch a telescope at 500 times the speed of light.

---LASER---
How can I see 500 year old light??????

laser is an acronym for :Light Amplification by the Stimulated Emission of Radiation. (I went to the same college as the inventor Charles Hard Townes)

The light source from the planet will be amplified thru a powerful laser so that actual images can be viewed.

--- The Future ----
* Can only be viewed with RIL (Rapid Image Logic)

RIL is my own defined process where a place and time is selected and all possible images of this time and space are exaughsted. These images must be logicaly processed to remove the impossible and or illogical. The remaining Image from the elimination process, will not perfectly, but will accurately view the future.

Of course this would require an image processing computer that is faster than anything on earth at this time.

-- Speed of thought (SOT):
RIL will only be achomplished on a machine that can process images at the speed of thought. SOT is the fastest speed to ever exist.

Proof : I can think that I am on planet Pluto before a beam of light can get there.

--- Dreams --
Composed of complex images and characters involved in sophisticated behavior and events.

Dose off for 2 secs and create what seems like a 10 min movie.
Proof that the brain can function at excellerated speeds durring sleep!!!

***** FINAL SOLUTION *******

1. If RIL can work for the furture it will also work for the past(no more telescope).
2. So RIL is the full solution for time travel.
3. SOT can only be achieved by the brain so the brain is the time travel machine.
4. The brain must excellerate to perform RIL; so the state of time travel will be sleep as in the movie "Total Recall"

** Da Bomb **
Time travel will be a mental state that will absolutely be drug induced ("much like this post"...Just thought I'd get that joke out of the way before the morons chimed in)

*** FUN ****
You can actually have a gun fight with Jessy James since the bullet he puts in your ass will only exist in your dream.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The telescope was in fact invented in Europe, not by the Moors as you state.

Pleasurepays · 04-12-2005, 10:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackmonsters

Well, I'm not exactly ready to equate my theories with those of Einstein, but I'm sure there are some similar concepts.
It would be pretty hard for me to come up with any plausible theories without at least touching some of Einstein's.

and of course there is the fact that you are talking about abstract ideas... and they were talking in mathematics... so unless you brush up on your addition and subtraction, you will never touch on anything that matters...

either post the math ... or start a cult.

Rinaldo · 04-12-2005, 11:02 AM

thanks for the interesting read

AphEX · 04-12-2005, 11:25 AM

I watched a great movie the other day about time travel, its called "primer"
you guys should check it out

ADL Colin · 04-12-2005, 11:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackmonsters

What????? No critics!!!!!

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackmonsters

Time travel will be a mental state that will absolutely be drug induced

So is this thread

Dagwolf · 04-12-2005, 11:43 AM

They sky will be blue in the future.
I see blue.
Therefore, I see the future.

C'mon, man, you can do better than this!

ADL Colin · 04-12-2005, 11:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackmonsters

All I will say about it is that Einstien would have enjoyed talking to me.

Einstein received many letters from quacks. He did enjoy them.

brand0n · 04-12-2005, 11:47 AM

im from the year 3024

i came back to this point to tell you all this method will not work

idiot

ADL Colin · 04-12-2005, 11:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KRL

The only answer can be that Einstein's theories of time and space are exactly right.

Nope. Einstein's formulation of General Relativity does not include quantum mechanics therefor the results breaks down at the quantum level.

Nismo · 04-12-2005, 12:05 PM

I am back from the future. I've successfully stolen the Grays Sports Alamanac from Griff Tannen. All is well and 1985 is back to normal.

Susan F · 04-12-2005, 12:09 PM

This has been one of the most interesting threads in a while...

KRL · 04-12-2005, 12:14 PM

http://www.kfcplainfield.com/sound/timetunnel.wav The Time Tunnel Theme Song

blackmonsters · 04-12-2005, 02:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Susan F

This has been one of the most interesting threads in a while...

Cool...here's another one that I think you should read:
http://gofuckyourself.com/showthread.php?t=454185

quantum-x · 04-12-2005, 03:05 PM

..wait.. wait.. I'm getting something..
Oh yeah, no maths or physics in your theories.

false alarm.

blackmonsters · 04-12-2005, 04:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by quantum-x

..wait.. wait.. I'm getting something..
Oh yeah, no maths or physics in your theories.

false alarm.

(RIL+SOT/2)/MPOR=AAC...

RIL : Rapid Image Processing SOT: Speed Of Thought
MPOR: Manditory Point Of Repetition
AAC: Attracts Asshole Critics who can produce no evidence to the contray either with ot without the quaifications they state is required of my evidence.

This is your brain

This is your brain after my theory:food-smil

ATKTrevor · 04-12-2005, 04:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by quantum-x

..wait.. wait.. I'm getting something..
Oh yeah, no maths or physics in your theories.

false alarm.

It just works Napoleon, you don't even know.

HitMePlse · 04-12-2005, 04:58 PM

Don't most people call this Deja Vu?

Pleasurepays · 04-12-2005, 05:37 PM

bobvegas · 04-12-2005, 06:04 PM

Say hi to Captain Kirk for me........

quantum-x · 04-14-2005, 06:04 AM

You give no theory.
I will listen to you when you publish your studies, with accompanying pages of equations and mathematical functions.

Until then you can string things together and call them 'proof' as much as you want.

ADL Colin · 04-14-2005, 06:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by quantum-x

Until then you can string things together and call them 'proof' as much as you want.

Pun intended?

Froey Twe · 04-14-2005, 06:51 AM

again this guy is smoking crack! lol

EROTEEK · 04-14-2005, 07:26 AM

STP, STOP, I just figured something, it's all wrong, OMG, it's all WRONG !!!

Demonstration:
The coefficients of the power series solutions of certain non-linear
differential equations are generated by convolutions of the preceeding
coefficients. One example is the differential equation

x x'' + a (x')^2 = b (1)

Among the solutions of this equation (with appropriate choices of a,b)
are exp(t), sin(t), cos(t), (A+Bt)^n, A+Bt+Ct^2, and sqrt(A+Bt+Ct^2).
This last function represents the separation between any two objects
in unaccelerated motion. Other solutions include the cycloid relation
for (non-rotating) gravitational free-fall, and the radial distance
of a mass from a central point about which it revolves with constant
angular velocity and radial freedom.

The power series solution of equation (1) can be written

x(t) = c[0] + c[1] t + c[2] t^2 + c[3] t^3 + ...

where the coefficients c[i] satisfy the convolutions

n / b if n = 2
SUM A(k,n-k) c[k] c[n-k] = (
k=0 \ 0 if n > 2

with
A(k,j) = (a-1) j (k-j) + k(k-1)/2

Any choice of c[0], c[1], c[2], and c[3], with c[1]c[2] not zero,
determines the values of a,b and therefore all the remaining
coefficients. There are many interesting things about these sequences
of c[k] values. Focusing on just the sequences with |c[k]| = 1,
k=0,1,2,3, there are obviously 16 possible choices, but only 8 up to
a simple sign change. These 8 can be arranged as four groups of 2:

k I II III IV
--- -------- ---------- --------- ---------
0 1 1 -1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 -1 1 1 1 -1 1 -1
2 1 1 1 -1 -1 -1 1 1
3 -1 1 1 1 -1 1 1 -1
4 1/2 1/2 3/2 -3/2 0 0 1 1
5 1/2 -1/2 5/2 5/2 4/5 -4/5 1 -1
6 -3/2 -3/2 9/2 -9/2 2/5 2/5 1 1
7 3/2 -3/2 19/2 19/2 -2/5 2/5 1 -1
8 3/8 3/8 133/8 -133/8 -1/2 -1/2 1 1
9 -29/8 29/8 267/8 267/8 1/30 -1/30 1 -1
etc

Yhe coefficients in each group differ only in sign. The coefficients
in groups I and II diverge, and those in group IV are all units. Only
the group III sequences converge. Interestingly, these coefficients
are given very closely by

c[k-1] = 2 exp(ku) sin(kw)

for k>2, where
u = -0.145370157...

/ 1.877672951... for III(a)
w = (
\ 1.263919649... for III(b)

Notice that the two possible values of w sum to 3.1415926...

The integer numerators and denominators of these c[k] sequences also
have many interesting properties. For example, primes p congruent to
+1 (mod 4) first appear in the denominator at c[p], whereas primes
congruent to -1 (mod 4) first appear at c[p^2]. The sequence of
numerators is much less regular

1 -1 -1 1 0 -4 2 2 -1 -1 59 -9 -1 233 8 -934 49 .. etc

Incidentally, the value of b in the ubiquitous equation (1) is
essentially just a constant of integration, and the underlying
relation is the derivitive

x x'' + q x' x'' = 0

where q=3 for unaccelerated separations and q=2 for (non-rotating)
gravitational separations. Isolating q and differentiating again
leads to the basic relation, free of arbitrary constants,

x x' x'' x'''' - x x' (x'')^2 - x (x'')^2 x''' + (x')^2 x'' x''' = 0

Dividing by x x' x'' x''' gives the nice form

x'''' x''' x'' x'
------ - ----- - ---- + ----- = 0
x''' x'' x' x

see what i mean???

quantum-x · 04-14-2005, 07:38 AM

I just plugged that into my Transmeta Hyper Accelerator, and wow! I'm posting from the future.

:D

Head · 04-14-2005, 07:46 AM

Fassinating Captain!

Platinumpimp · 04-14-2005, 07:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackmonsters

Dude; you are hoping for the TV version of time travel.
TV is produced to entertain the masses of ignorant fucks in this world.
I don't own a fucking TV!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Get more sophisticated about what time travel would be.
Nobody will ever go back in time and physically kick Hitler in his ass.
Stuff like that is for entertainment only.

My time travel feels just as real as being for real.
Viewing into the future and the past is time travel, and wanting to physically interact with the future/past is fantasy.

See, if you could really go back into the past and interact and this could affect the future then chances are that in the future you would not exist any more since any change in history will alter it's entire paradigm.

So going back into the past would be a bad idea.
So just view into the future and see the armored car drop the bag with 3 billion dollars(inflation, ya know) at the the street corner and then go to that corner and just wait for the future and interact when they drop that money.

Then I ask to myself, but why can't you interact with the past or future if someone creates a device that can process sound at the speed of light?

Serge Litehead · 04-14-2005, 08:03 AM

if time exists then you must be already traveling from one point of time to another.
if you say time doesn't exists and that you're always in state of "now" then time traveling isn't an option because "now" expands through the life span.
take for instance one of the oldest human languages, sanskrit, it doesnt have past nor future tense. pleople speaking sanskrit believed there is only one continues tense which is "now".

keyboard warrior · 04-14-2005, 08:38 AM

I have been to the future.

My Name is John Tittor!

Monk · 04-14-2005, 08:55 AM

I dream.... therefore I am!

04-12-2005, 06:15 AM	#53
quantum-x Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: ICQ: 251425 Fr/Au/Ca Posts: 6,863	I couldn't be fucked debunking you, we all know it's bs __________________ PrettyInCash.com - BoozedGFs.com - TeenGFs.com - JizzGFs.com- MilfUploads.com -

04-12-2005, 08:51 AM	#59
Pretty_Lara Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Barbados Posts: 755	hehe listen to relict radiation and you understand theory of traveling in time __________________ dedicate servers $60 USA, Europe, UK, VPS / VDS XEN $6 + 1 class support administration FREE

04-12-2005, 08:57 AM	#60
Nismo Confirmed User Join Date: May 2002 Location: FLORIDA Posts: 4,977	after reading this thread, i have realized that I need to go back to November 22, 1955 and take the Sports Almanac from Griff Tannen to prevent dangerous changed to the real 1985. __________________ i buy massive xxx dating traffic.

04-12-2005, 09:24 AM	#62
HpicAnn Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2005 Posts: 4,319	too long for me to read!! __________________ GiVe YoU a BiG......... tImE Best Converting Webmaster Programs! All Niches Covered! [email protected] IcQ: 226461222

04-12-2005, 09:42 AM	#64
Homer Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 6,780	haha that's funny __________________

04-12-2005, 08:00 AM	#55
quant Registered User Join Date: Mar 2005 Posts: 53	Interesting thread. I basically agree that time travel is only possible in an astral sense. There are some misconceptions... First, particles can travel faster than the speed of light. On Earth, light does not travel at 186,000 miles per second. In water, it travels even slower. So it's possible to accelerate a particle faster than the speed of light in a medium where light travels considerably slower than c. When this happens, a magnificant blue or green glowing light emerges and is equivalent to a visible shock wave. It's quite intense - Time is really the difference between chaos and harmony. It may sound like a simplistic definition, but consider that scientists view time as entropy, or as energy being disorganized through heat. This means they view the world as constantly progressing towards chaos (2nd law of thermodynamics). I highly disagree with this, as the purpose of anyone's life is to create more stability, and that purpose is shared by the universe. Plus you can see this in particle accelerators. Particle physics is actually a legitimate hoax created by physicists who dreamt up explanations of why a pion turns into a muon and then an electron. A glimpse of an omega, a tauon, a muon or such particle is simply a flash back in time. As for the mind, it technically operates at reverse time or negative entropy. It exists in a constant state of macroscopic quantum coherence. There is no speed of thought, because one thought can be slow while 1000 thoughts in the same quantum wave function is both 1 and infinite at the same time. It is the idea of silience of the mind, focus, or left-right brain synchronization. Electric current is very slow, normally it barely moves at all. For the acceleration comment, you must first eliminate acceleration (and thus friction) to be able to physically exceed the speed of c in a vacuum. Eliminating acceleration is a key to opening Pandora's box. Finally, the big bang theory is not inoperable in quantum physics. People think of quantum physics as some mystical phenomenon that is only recent. It's not. Understanding of quantum mechanics is what proved the Big Bang. Furthermore, the speed of light is not a limit, rather it is a divider. Most importantly, everything I am saying is supported by religion/spirituality. Prior to the Big Bang, there was no time and All That Is existed as 1. Creation was the act of sharing the infinite light with itself. In order to do so, part of the infinite had to condense into form, to create a vessel to receive light. This is when the Godhead condensed, which is literally a roadmap back to the source. At the beginning, the universe was full of dense, chaotic energy, which as it spread out became more coherent and stable. This was the beginning of time. Their is no end of time, only infinite time. This is when we have reached an ultimate balance between form and source, a state of universal superconducting fields (where the Godhead leads us). In this reality, electrons may exist at a more evolved state with a cosmic bosonic nature. It would be mind induced molecular manufacturing on an intense and interactive level. A Kundalini awakening of the universe; a realization that we are much more than you or I. This world would be like a constant shifting of unified quantum wave functions, where thoughts are the construct of perception and physical reality. Heaven isn't in the stars, it's in our mind and on Earth.

04-12-2005, 08:33 AM	#57
arnette Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 283	there are some seriously dumb people in this thread. time travel is possible in einsteins universe!

04-12-2005, 08:37 AM	#58
nojob The Original NoJob Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Jerzzey Posts: 3,682	nice read. But is it true, who knows?

04-12-2005, 09:52 AM	#65
blackmonsters Making PHP work Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: 🌎🌅🌈🌇 Posts: 20,390	For those who need something to do: Download the script in my sig and make some money. The script is far more solid than any of my theories and it's free. The GetThumbs script automates the process of making customized thumbs for all your hosted galleries, builds your site, ranks thumbs by popularity so the best thumbs go to the top and get clicked more and updates your site with new thumbs on a schedule you control. Once it's set up you only keep adding gallery urls and click go. You can paste 200 galleries into the script at once and minutes later build a site with those thumbs linked to the galleries. COOL....try it. PS: It does not skim any traffic; this is mostly a beta test to improve the pay version; but you can still let me refer you some new sponsors and or place a link to the getthumbs site if you like to. __________________ Make Money with Porn

04-12-2005, 11:02 AM	#68
Rinaldo Confirmed User Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: South Florida Posts: 5,086	thanks for the interesting read

04-12-2005, 11:25 AM	#69
AphEX Confirmed User Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Montreal Posts: 2,901	I watched a great movie the other day about time travel, its called "primer" you guys should check it out __________________ IndieBucks \| StandAhead \| BoyCrushCash \| Phoenixxx \| EmoProfits \| BritishBucks \| HunkMoney \| LatinoBucks

04-12-2005, 11:43 AM	#71
Dagwolf President of Canada Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Leaving Hell, Entering Limbo Posts: 23,141	They sky will be blue in the future. I see blue. Therefore, I see the future. C'mon, man, you can do better than this! __________________ Sleep well, and dream of large women.

04-12-2005, 11:47 AM	#73
brand0n been very busy Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: the queen city Posts: 26,983	im from the year 3024 i came back to this point to tell you all this method will not work idiot

04-12-2005, 12:05 PM	#75
Nismo Confirmed User Join Date: May 2002 Location: FLORIDA Posts: 4,977	I am back from the future. I've successfully stolen the Grays Sports Alamanac from Griff Tannen. All is well and 1985 is back to normal. __________________ i buy massive xxx dating traffic.

04-12-2005, 12:09 PM	#76
Susan F Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Costa Rica Posts: 397	This has been one of the most interesting threads in a while... __________________ Susan F http://affiliates.IwantU.com Our members get laid, our affiliates get paid

04-12-2005, 12:14 PM	#77
KRL Entrepreneur Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: USA Posts: 31,429	http://www.kfcplainfield.com/sound/timetunnel.wav The Time Tunnel Theme Song __________________ If you would like to develop your domains, you can lease inexpensive foreign labor from the leaders in the field at iWebmasters.com TO LOWER YOUR COSTS AND INCREASE YOUR PRODUCTION! * * * * * * * * * * * * Domains Adult News KRL's Newsletter Biz Tips Just Listed Domains

04-12-2005, 03:05 PM	#79
quantum-x Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: ICQ: 251425 Fr/Au/Ca Posts: 6,863	..wait.. wait.. I'm getting something.. Oh yeah, no maths or physics in your theories. false alarm. __________________ PrettyInCash.com - BoozedGFs.com - TeenGFs.com - JizzGFs.com- MilfUploads.com -

04-12-2005, 04:58 PM	#82
HitMePlse Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: So Cal Posts: 143	Don't most people call this Deja Vu?

04-12-2005, 05:37 PM	#83
Pleasurepays BANNED - SUPPORTING TUBES Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: I live in a pile of boogers Posts: 11,913

04-12-2005, 06:04 PM	#84
bobvegas Registered User Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Las Vegas Posts: 71	Say hi to Captain Kirk for me........ __________________ BobBucks 100% Original Teen Sites. Email Us: Bob<at>BobBucks.com The Pinkies.com \| ClubEmber.com \| TeenPartyGirl.com

04-14-2005, 06:04 AM	#85
quantum-x Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: ICQ: 251425 Fr/Au/Ca Posts: 6,863	You give no theory. I will listen to you when you publish your studies, with accompanying pages of equations and mathematical functions. Until then you can string things together and call them 'proof' as much as you want. __________________ PrettyInCash.com - BoozedGFs.com - TeenGFs.com - JizzGFs.com- MilfUploads.com -

04-14-2005, 06:51 AM	#87
Froey Twe Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2003 Posts: 1,297	again this guy is smoking crack! lol

04-14-2005, 07:26 AM	#88
EROTEEK Confirmed User Join Date: May 2004 Location: Transylvania...no kidding Posts: 419	STP, STOP, I just figured something, it's all wrong, OMG, it's all WRONG !!! Demonstration: The coefficients of the power series solutions of certain non-linear differential equations are generated by convolutions of the preceeding coefficients. One example is the differential equation x x'' + a (x')^2 = b (1) Among the solutions of this equation (with appropriate choices of a,b) are exp(t), sin(t), cos(t), (A+Bt)^n, A+Bt+Ct^2, and sqrt(A+Bt+Ct^2). This last function represents the separation between any two objects in unaccelerated motion. Other solutions include the cycloid relation for (non-rotating) gravitational free-fall, and the radial distance of a mass from a central point about which it revolves with constant angular velocity and radial freedom. The power series solution of equation (1) can be written x(t) = c[0] + c[1] t + c[2] t^2 + c[3] t^3 + ... where the coefficients c[i] satisfy the convolutions n / b if n = 2 SUM A(k,n-k) c[k] c[n-k] = ( k=0 \ 0 if n > 2 with A(k,j) = (a-1) j (k-j) + k(k-1)/2 Any choice of c[0], c[1], c[2], and c[3], with c[1]c[2] not zero, determines the values of a,b and therefore all the remaining coefficients. There are many interesting things about these sequences of c[k] values. Focusing on just the sequences with \|c[k]\| = 1, k=0,1,2,3, there are obviously 16 possible choices, but only 8 up to a simple sign change. These 8 can be arranged as four groups of 2: k I II III IV --- -------- ---------- --------- --------- 0 1 1 -1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 -1 1 1 1 -1 1 -1 2 1 1 1 -1 -1 -1 1 1 3 -1 1 1 1 -1 1 1 -1 4 1/2 1/2 3/2 -3/2 0 0 1 1 5 1/2 -1/2 5/2 5/2 4/5 -4/5 1 -1 6 -3/2 -3/2 9/2 -9/2 2/5 2/5 1 1 7 3/2 -3/2 19/2 19/2 -2/5 2/5 1 -1 8 3/8 3/8 133/8 -133/8 -1/2 -1/2 1 1 9 -29/8 29/8 267/8 267/8 1/30 -1/30 1 -1 etc Yhe coefficients in each group differ only in sign. The coefficients in groups I and II diverge, and those in group IV are all units. Only the group III sequences converge. Interestingly, these coefficients are given very closely by c[k-1] = 2 exp(ku) sin(kw) for k>2, where u = -0.145370157... / 1.877672951... for III(a) w = ( \ 1.263919649... for III(b) Notice that the two possible values of w sum to 3.1415926... The integer numerators and denominators of these c[k] sequences also have many interesting properties. For example, primes p congruent to +1 (mod 4) first appear in the denominator at c[p], whereas primes congruent to -1 (mod 4) first appear at c[p^2]. The sequence of numerators is much less regular 1 -1 -1 1 0 -4 2 2 -1 -1 59 -9 -1 233 8 -934 49 .. etc Incidentally, the value of b in the ubiquitous equation (1) is essentially just a constant of integration, and the underlying relation is the derivitive x x'' + q x' x'' = 0 where q=3 for unaccelerated separations and q=2 for (non-rotating) gravitational separations. Isolating q and differentiating again leads to the basic relation, free of arbitrary constants, x x' x'' x'''' - x x' (x'')^2 - x (x'')^2 x''' + (x')^2 x'' x''' = 0 Dividing by x x' x'' x''' gives the nice form x'''' x''' x'' x' ------ - ----- - ---- + ----- = 0 x''' x'' x' x see what i mean??? __________________ EROTEEK STUDIOS Yahoo: Eroteek_Studios ICQ: 346685131 CUSTOM AND EXCLUSIVE CONTENT

04-14-2005, 07:38 AM	#89
quantum-x Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: ICQ: 251425 Fr/Au/Ca Posts: 6,863	I just plugged that into my Transmeta Hyper Accelerator, and wow! I'm posting from the future. :D __________________ PrettyInCash.com - BoozedGFs.com - TeenGFs.com - JizzGFs.com- MilfUploads.com -

04-14-2005, 07:46 AM	#90
Head Confirmed User Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Starship Enterprise Posts: 8,278	Fassinating Captain! __________________

04-14-2005, 08:03 AM	#92
Serge Litehead Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Behind the scenes Posts: 5,190	if time exists then you must be already traveling from one point of time to another. if you say time doesn't exists and that you're always in state of "now" then time traveling isn't an option because "now" expands through the life span. take for instance one of the oldest human languages, sanskrit, it doesnt have past nor future tense. pleople speaking sanskrit believed there is only one continues tense which is "now". __________________ SilverCrocodile.com Adult web design since '05

04-14-2005, 08:38 AM	#93
keyboard warrior Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2004 Posts: 1,435	I have been to the future. My Name is John Tittor! __________________ - nothing here -

04-14-2005, 08:55 AM	#94
Monk Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Canada Posts: 631	I dream.... therefore I am!