Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Post New Thread Reply

Register GFY Rules Calendar
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed.

 
Thread Tools
Old 05-25-2005, 12:49 PM   #1
DVTimes
xxx
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 31,544
At what point is a photograph not a photograph?

At what point is a photograph not a photograph?

In fact when is a model not a model?

This may sound silly, but with great art packages and extremely talented artists, I bet you could create porn artificially. By this I mean create a realistic looking babe, that looks like its been photographed yet, created on a computer.

By doing so, you avoid the need to comply by the 2257 law (I suspect).

Also if you photograph a babe, but then play around with the photograph, at what point is it no longer a photograph, and purely a digital image. I mean at what point would the 2257 law no longer apply?
__________________
The Affiliate Program
DVTimes is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2005, 12:51 PM   #2
Lifer
Confirmed User
 
Lifer's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Working
Posts: 871
The explanation I read said that the image can not be based on a human...

Then it is exempt.
Lifer is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2005, 12:53 PM   #3
DVTimes
xxx
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 31,544
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lifer
The explanation I read said that the image can not be based on a human...

Then it is exempt.
If thats the case, then a cartoon would apply to the 2257 law.
__________________
The Affiliate Program
DVTimes is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2005, 01:00 PM   #4
DVTimes
xxx
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 31,544
bump as i think this is a thought.
__________________
The Affiliate Program
DVTimes is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Post New Thread Reply
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >

Bookmarks



Advertising inquiries - marketing at gfy dot com

Contact Admin - Advertise - GFY Rules - Top

©2000-, AI Media Network Inc



Powered by vBulletin
Copyright © 2000- Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.