Strange experiences with Richards Realm - GoFuckYourself.com

eppoclappo · 10-30-2005, 06:49 AM

Over the past days I got a high number of refused galleries from Richards Realm. In general I understand when I get a denial, but over the past days it's not clear to me. Do they once again have a new reviewer that is much too anal about things?

Some examples:

"Poor quality full-size images." while there's nothing real fuzzy in the pics
(yeah, they are video screen caps and no mega sharp high quality glamour stills, but isn't that what at least half of the Internet porn is made of?):
http://www.pornpicz.com/tgps/051030a/index.html
http://www.pornpicz.com/tgps/051030b/index.html

Can someone please clear this up for me?

E.J.

bigdog · 10-30-2005, 07:09 AM

if i remember richard will also refuse galleries that don't have enough nudity, just go to play by his rules

E.Kant · 10-30-2005, 07:23 AM

Qulity of the full sized image is not good as you said by yourself, because
It is screen caps which normally get denied.

grumpy · 10-30-2005, 07:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eppoclappo

Over the past days I got a high number of refused galleries from Richards Realm. In general I understand when I get a denial, but over the past days it's not clear to me. Do they once again have a new reviewer that is much too anal about things?

Some examples:

"Poor quality full-size images." while there's nothing real fuzzy in the pics
(yeah, they are video screen caps and no mega sharp high quality glamour stills, but isn't that what at least half of the Internet porn is made of?):
http://www.pornpicz.com/tgps/051030a/index.html
http://www.pornpicz.com/tgps/051030b/index.html

Can someone please clear this up for me?

E.J.

the answer is in your remark

Quote:

Originally Posted by eppoclappo

yeah, they are video screen caps and no mega sharp high quality glamour stills

eppoclappo · 10-30-2005, 08:46 AM

The strange thing is: sometimes they are accepted, sometimes not at all. And then I am talking about the same series of pics.

And if I ask David from RR to clear things up for me, he has no clue why the reviewer refused the pics and post them anyway...

There isn't real 100% uniformity.
I guess the reviewer didn't get laid this weekend that causes him to be very very strict on what is accepted these past 2 or 3 days...

johndoebob · 10-30-2005, 08:57 AM

Richards Realm is generally refusing a lot nowdays, beside you pay.

Quote:

yeah, they are video screen caps and no mega sharp high quality glamour stills, but isn't that what at least half of the Internet porn is made of?

If there isn't a real fresh gallery shortage it's very unlikely that a TGP owner will list screenshot galleries.

10-30-2005, 06:49 AM	#1
eppoclappo Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Down south in liberal Holland where chicks are hot, eager and willing to expose. Posts: 259	Strange experiences with Richards Realm Over the past days I got a high number of refused galleries from Richards Realm. In general I understand when I get a denial, but over the past days it's not clear to me. Do they once again have a new reviewer that is much too anal about things? Some examples: "Poor quality full-size images." while there's nothing real fuzzy in the pics (yeah, they are video screen caps and no mega sharp high quality glamour stills, but isn't that what at least half of the Internet porn is made of?): http://www.pornpicz.com/tgps/051030a/index.html http://www.pornpicz.com/tgps/051030b/index.html Can someone please clear this up for me? E.J.

10-30-2005, 07:23 AM	#3
E.Kant Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Philosophy Center Posts: 1,577	Qulity of the full sized image is not good as you said by yourself, because It is screen caps which normally get denied. __________________ FILL your TUBE SITE with thousands of videos within a few days! Content delivery with Tags, Description, Pornstar Name, and niche! For example: Start your Asian Porn Tube with 10,000 videos in only 10 days! Contact me: ICQ 461 531 88

10-30-2005, 07:09 AM	#2
bigdog Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2001 Posts: 6,964	if i remember richard will also refuse galleries that don't have enough nudity, just go to play by his rules

10-30-2005, 08:46 AM	#5
eppoclappo Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Down south in liberal Holland where chicks are hot, eager and willing to expose. Posts: 259	The strange thing is: sometimes they are accepted, sometimes not at all. And then I am talking about the same series of pics. And if I ask David from RR to clear things up for me, he has no clue why the reviewer refused the pics and post them anyway... There isn't real 100% uniformity. I guess the reviewer didn't get laid this weekend that causes him to be very very strict on what is accepted these past 2 or 3 days...