![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
![]() ![]() |
|
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed. |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Damn Right I Kiss Ass!
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Cowtown, USA
Posts: 32,405
|
X-Realm are they legal? CCBILL can you help me out?
I was trolling for new girls and came across www.X-Realm.com.
Here is there site list: http://www.x-realm.com/list/ The girls all look young and non of their bios state their ages. They all are supposedly in high school and looking forward to college... sure... CCBILL does the billing so I am figuring you know if they are indeed over 18? They have this 2257 link in the affiliate area: http://www.x-realm.com/compliance/index.htm But nothing on their websites or galleries. They state: We are 100% non nude and in full compliance with the new 2257 code! But they are NOT 100% nonnude and plenty of the girls have nude tours... They don't answer their contact form either... Anyone from X-Realm or CCBILL want to chime in? |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: scottsdale
Posts: 7,880
|
if you have issues with the any of the models in any of the sites that we process for, or think they violate our aup in any way, send an email to [email protected] with the details, feel free to cc me on it, [email protected]
__________________
If you need a good company for check writing services, then check out checkissuing, and for webhosting, check out Phoenix NAP |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
I can change this!!!!!
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 18,972
|
Honestly.. Does it effect your bottom line?
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 592
|
Here are my stats when I use to use them.
32,621 clicks. 1:16310 3 rebills total profit $49.85 RUN!!!!!! |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Too lazy to set a custom title
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 17,393
|
Quote:
Speaking of their gals, I've never seen FHGs with a single image that includes all of the thumbs, promotional text and graphics. I guess it saves them on bw but I bet surfers find it frustrating. Here's an example http://www.lilsuzy.net/hosted/suzy1/ |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Too lazy to set a custom title
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 17,393
|
bump8char
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 592
|
rowan: yea they count ccbill clicks stupid, eitherway they were on my site like 2-3 months. Ive never had a sponsor perform that bad.
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
So Fucking Banned
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Taipei
Posts: 25,198
|
yea i've always wondered about x-realm, some girls look too young, some are really hot tho, guess i dont care to promote them too much since the webmaster doesnt answer my emails
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Damn Right I Kiss Ass!
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Cowtown, USA
Posts: 32,405
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Too lazy to set a custom title
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 17,393
|
Quote:
32621 gallery loads assume 3% CTR = 978 sponsor clicks (tour load) 2 sales = 1:489 Given that their hosted gals are horrible ;) the CTR could actually be worse and the conversions better... either way it looks pretty good to me, the problem is that you're not sending enough traffic to the gals. |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |