British Film Censor Seeks to Classify Websites - GoFuckYourself.com

DVTimes · 06-21-2006, 03:17 AM

British Film Censor Seeks to Classify Websites

http://xbiz.com/news_piece.php?id=15571

LONDON ? In its annual report, the British Board of Film Classification has suggested using its content rating system for the Internet. The board is seeking to implement a voluntary classification system ? similar to the one it uses for films ? that would warn surfers of adult content.

?We regularly see and deal with material, whether so-called ?extreme reality,? abusive pornography, or simply content that is unsuitable for the age group to whom it is addressed, where our intervention is clearly necessary,? the board wrote in its report.

Sue Clark, spokeswoman for the board, explained that people should be able to make informed choices about their web viewing, and that the board doesn?t seek to censor any content, just inform surfers. ?Regulation, in this case, doesn?t mean banning or cutting,? Clark said. ?It is about providing information.?

Logistically, there seems to be many flaws in the proposed ratings system critics say. Even if websites are properly labeled, what software or device would keep minors from accessing sites or content that is deemed inappropriate for their consumption?

?No one should assume that such material would be confined to established platforms such as film and DVD,? the report states. ?Whether in a regulatory or an advisory capacity, we believe we have unique expertise and experience to offer.?

The film board?s proposal raises many interesting questions, according to The Guardian. With the Internet being a global community, how do you enforce standards across nations? Are sites not hosted in the U.K. still subject to the ratings panel? While movie ratings might keep children from attending adult films, how would content ratings apply to web surfing in the privacy of one?s home?

?It sounds like the most stupid intervention since the registration of fax machines and photocopiers in communist China,? Privacy International?s Simon Davies, who campaigns for freedom of expression, told The Times of London.

Cypherpunk · 06-21-2006, 04:22 AM

this is just too funny, how the hell do they think they are going to do it?

Sarah_Jayne · 06-21-2006, 04:55 AM

I heard an interview with the woman who proposed it. She kept saying they weren't a gov't body and had no influence over gov't policy. There is no way is is going to happen. Strikes of the video nasties scare.

Mr.Fiction · 06-21-2006, 06:07 AM

Why not support the voluntary rating systems and filters that already exist instead?

Sarah_Jayne · 06-21-2006, 07:40 AM

because that wouldn't be creating a job for them and therefore requiring more funding

directfiesta · 06-21-2006, 07:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sarah_webinc

because that wouldn't be creating a job for them and therefore requiring more funding

paper pushers rule ....

We have boards here for films/dvd's ( all films, including majors).

In Quebec alone, about 250-300 new releases are submitted every month for classification ... They are all viewed, inventoried ( label, cast, director, stars) and if suitable classified.... They have 18 people on staff to view all day porn, paid by the Government ( tax payers ) ...

Manowar · 06-21-2006, 08:39 AM

that would be bad

DVTimes · 06-22-2006, 03:08 AM

Bump Bump Bump

06-21-2006, 03:17 AM	#1
DVTimes xxx Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: UK Posts: 31,544	British Film Censor Seeks to Classify Websites British Film Censor Seeks to Classify Websites http://xbiz.com/news_piece.php?id=15571 LONDON ? In its annual report, the British Board of Film Classification has suggested using its content rating system for the Internet. The board is seeking to implement a voluntary classification system ? similar to the one it uses for films ? that would warn surfers of adult content. ?We regularly see and deal with material, whether so-called ?extreme reality,? abusive pornography, or simply content that is unsuitable for the age group to whom it is addressed, where our intervention is clearly necessary,? the board wrote in its report. Sue Clark, spokeswoman for the board, explained that people should be able to make informed choices about their web viewing, and that the board doesn?t seek to censor any content, just inform surfers. ?Regulation, in this case, doesn?t mean banning or cutting,? Clark said. ?It is about providing information.? Logistically, there seems to be many flaws in the proposed ratings system critics say. Even if websites are properly labeled, what software or device would keep minors from accessing sites or content that is deemed inappropriate for their consumption? ?No one should assume that such material would be confined to established platforms such as film and DVD,? the report states. ?Whether in a regulatory or an advisory capacity, we believe we have unique expertise and experience to offer.? The film board?s proposal raises many interesting questions, according to The Guardian. With the Internet being a global community, how do you enforce standards across nations? Are sites not hosted in the U.K. still subject to the ratings panel? While movie ratings might keep children from attending adult films, how would content ratings apply to web surfing in the privacy of one?s home? ?It sounds like the most stupid intervention since the registration of fax machines and photocopiers in communist China,? Privacy International?s Simon Davies, who campaigns for freedom of expression, told The Times of London. __________________ The Affiliate Program

06-21-2006, 04:22 AM	#2
Cypherpunk Confirmed User Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: UK Posts: 812	this is just too funny, how the hell do they think they are going to do it? __________________ ICQ 83965113 Skype: devilishproductions

06-21-2006, 06:07 AM	#4
Mr.Fiction Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Free Speech Land Posts: 9,484	Why not support the voluntary rating systems and filters that already exist instead? __________________ Don't be lazy, protect free speech: ACLU \| Free Speech Coalition \| EFF \| IMPA

06-22-2006, 03:08 AM	#8
DVTimes xxx Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: UK Posts: 31,544	Bump Bump Bump __________________ The Affiliate Program

06-21-2006, 04:55 AM	#3
Sarah_Jayne Now with more Jayne Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Los Angeles Posts: 40,077	I heard an interview with the woman who proposed it. She kept saying they weren't a gov't body and had no influence over gov't policy. There is no way is is going to happen. Strikes of the video nasties scare.

06-21-2006, 07:40 AM	#5
Sarah_Jayne Now with more Jayne Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Los Angeles Posts: 40,077	because that wouldn't be creating a job for them and therefore requiring more funding

06-21-2006, 08:39 AM	#7
Manowar jellyfish Join Date: Dec 2003 Posts: 71,528	that would be bad