Money Makers - Galleries Vs. Free Sites - GoFuckYourself.com

Blake Diesel · 11-16-2006, 10:28 AM

For the people who own free sites, and for the people that bang out numerous galleries per day.. Which do you find more efficient to make money.

Obviously the fact that free sites only have the traffic you supply to them so that only gives you that leverage to turn ratios for sales. But when you are pushing a few different galleries a day and submitting 2-3 or 5 a day we are talking loads of traffic. Then you have your galleries loaded on other sites bc some sites don't have submitters. So lets talk about the positives and negatives about making galleries Vs. owning free sites.

Thanks, Blake

Fucksakes · 11-16-2006, 10:33 AM

only thing I could say about either is that a free site is more perm traffic and dependable source of income.. unlike galleries that has 400k of traffic 1 day and 30k if you stop for a few days.

sales wise thou, I would consider them pretty equal.

bufferover · 11-16-2006, 10:35 AM

Free sites do better if you don't have too much cash

Kron · 11-16-2006, 10:37 AM

Yeah, free sites, but gallery can get huge traffic really fast

Kimo · 11-16-2006, 10:42 AM

free sites for se traffic, galleries for tgp traffic

Blake Diesel · 11-16-2006, 10:46 AM

But you have to understand any respectable movie site today is looking to trade 500+. If you are starting out and have no icq's with owners of high volume traffic to set you up real quick you are shit out of luck. Most free sites only want to trade with established sites that have been online for more then a year.

Movie site traffic isnt easy to maintain or obtain. The thing is you can go and buy tons of feeder traffic but it sucks!! Prod level super low so you are wasting funds. With galleries, if you are putting out more then 2 different galleries a day and submitting them to 25-50 sites.. and obviously the hardcore submitters submit to over 200 sites a day.. We are talking serious traffic!! Depending on the quality and niche of content shit will convert.. well it should. i remember 5-7 years ago i was converting bangbros 1:20.. shit was bonkers.

Miguel T · 11-16-2006, 10:47 AM

Freesites converts much better than galls.

Metalsound · 11-16-2006, 11:10 AM

Nice thread !!
Nowadays you have to pay for being a Trusted Submitter in many Tgp`s so my guess is, if you dont have any money start with FreeSites then buy a good autosubmitter, add as many Tgp`s you can, and start sending galleries.
I read somewhere that now only 10-20% traffic is really free on galleries.

Barefootsies · 11-16-2006, 11:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kron

Yeah, free sites, but gallery can get huge traffic really fast

Correct.

Blake Diesel · 11-16-2006, 11:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Metalsound

Nice thread !!
only 10-20% traffic is really free on galleries.

What do you mean its freally free?

But what i was saying is that if your post gets lets say 10k daily.. The galleries can get soooo much more traffic then that. If you paid for a few partner accounts you can have within a week over a million hits per day going to your galleries.

Blake Diesel · 11-16-2006, 11:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barefootsies

Correct.

Yes they can get huge but sooo much invested time.. Staying up 24/7 just to speak to a webmaster that is totally of your time zone to set up a trade. But traffic goes up and down like stocks. If you don't update for 1 day you are already seeing decrease in bookmarks and productivity. And again its hard keeping trades going if you run out of feeder traffic.. Feeder traffic is not showing high prod.. So automatically you can get dropped from a few trades. Its better to have high prod and lower traffic.

The Heron · 11-16-2006, 11:58 AM

The freesites most people are talking about here are ones that you submit to linklists.
Blake, you seem to be thinking more along the lines of freesites like tgps which require you to setup trades and monitor the traffic.

Blake Diesel · 11-16-2006, 12:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Heron

The freesites most people are talking about here are ones that you submit to linklists.
Blake, you seem to be thinking more along the lines of freesites like tgps which require you to setup trades and monitor the traffic.

FoSho my friend. TGP's and MGP's.. I am not into link sites.. toplists.. they are waste of time. Sites with bookmarks and quality prod trades is whats good.

11-16-2006, 10:28 AM	#1
Blake Diesel Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Huntingdon Posts: 134	Money Makers - Galleries Vs. Free Sites For the people who own free sites, and for the people that bang out numerous galleries per day.. Which do you find more efficient to make money. Obviously the fact that free sites only have the traffic you supply to them so that only gives you that leverage to turn ratios for sales. But when you are pushing a few different galleries a day and submitting 2-3 or 5 a day we are talking loads of traffic. Then you have your galleries loaded on other sites bc some sites don't have submitters. So lets talk about the positives and negatives about making galleries Vs. owning free sites. Thanks, Blake

11-16-2006, 10:37 AM	#4
Kron Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 1,668	Yeah, free sites, but gallery can get huge traffic really fast __________________ I dont exchange money!

11-16-2006, 10:42 AM	#5
Kimo ... Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Maryland ICQ:87038677 Posts: 11,542	free sites for se traffic, galleries for tgp traffic __________________ ...

11-16-2006, 10:47 AM	#7
Miguel T ♦ Web Developer ♦ Industry Role: Join Date: May 2005 Location: Full-Stack Developer Posts: 12,468	Freesites converts much better than galls. __________________ Full Stack Webdeveloper: HTML5/CSS3, jQuery, AJAX, ElevatedX, NATS, MechBunny, Wordpress

11-16-2006, 11:10 AM	#8
Metalsound Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Right now . . . Everywhere Posts: 880	Nice thread !! Nowadays you have to pay for being a Trusted Submitter in many Tgp`s so my guess is, if you dont have any money start with FreeSites then buy a good autosubmitter, add as many Tgp`s you can, and start sending galleries. I read somewhere that now only 10-20% traffic is really free on galleries. __________________ There are more important things than money . . . BUT THEY COST TOO MUCH

11-16-2006, 10:33 AM	#2
Fucksakes Shit... Fuck! What the Hell? Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2003 Posts: 7,567	only thing I could say about either is that a free site is more perm traffic and dependable source of income.. unlike galleries that has 400k of traffic 1 day and 30k if you stop for a few days. sales wise thou, I would consider them pretty equal.

11-16-2006, 10:35 AM	#3
bufferover Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2004 Posts: 25,202	Free sites do better if you don't have too much cash

11-16-2006, 10:46 AM	#6
Blake Diesel Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Huntingdon Posts: 134	But you have to understand any respectable movie site today is looking to trade 500+. If you are starting out and have no icq's with owners of high volume traffic to set you up real quick you are shit out of luck. Most free sites only want to trade with established sites that have been online for more then a year. Movie site traffic isnt easy to maintain or obtain. The thing is you can go and buy tons of feeder traffic but it sucks!! Prod level super low so you are wasting funds. With galleries, if you are putting out more then 2 different galleries a day and submitting them to 25-50 sites.. and obviously the hardcore submitters submit to over 200 sites a day.. We are talking serious traffic!! Depending on the quality and niche of content shit will convert.. well it should. i remember 5-7 years ago i was converting bangbros 1:20.. shit was bonkers.

11-16-2006, 11:58 AM	#12
The Heron Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: Michigan Posts: 4,486	The freesites most people are talking about here are ones that you submit to linklists. Blake, you seem to be thinking more along the lines of freesites like tgps which require you to setup trades and monitor the traffic.