Too Much Media (NATS) announcement regarding verified joins and instant payouts - Page 5 - GoFuckYourself.com

DarkJedi · 12-05-2006, 03:59 AM

200 stole.. err, unverified signups.

Brujah · 12-05-2006, 04:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Konda

Why do people blame NATS for a 'shave function' that FlashCash always had?

FC wanted to use NATS, and NATS told them 'if you want to use our software, you need to show all numbers, including the ones that you don't payout your affilites for'.

If you don't like this you need to complain to FC, not to NATS...

Not all questions should be considered blame. Some good questions in here are just that.. questions. If someone knows the answer, then it's nice to hear it.

Tuga · 12-05-2006, 05:12 AM

PBucksJohn is repeating the same thing over and over again, and some stupid fucks still dont get it.

Go fuck yourself and start shit on the FC foruns! Idiots.

SlamDesigns · 12-05-2006, 05:42 AM

Ok, read it all...again and again...and still don't 100% understand. I will say this though, if a program is using a feature that allows them to basically steal money from you...I would suggest an industry wide boycott of that sponsor. That's just some shady shit there, my friends.

Jace · 12-05-2006, 05:50 AM

ok, I have read this thread over and over again and I totally understand everything but one thing, when a signup is declared "unverified", does that mean the customer didn't pay any money? and if he did pay money why didn't the affiliate get the payout?

basically, who gets the money from an unverified sale?

darksoul · 12-05-2006, 05:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jace

ok, I have read this thread over and over again and I totally understand everything but one thing, when a signup is declared "unverified", does that mean the customer didn't pay any money? and if he did pay money why didn't the affiliate get the payout?

basically, who gets the money from an unverified sale?

Its been said.
Even if the customer pays and its marked as unverified
the sponsor will keep the money unless by some miracle it goes into verified mode.

Legal shaving.

Jace · 12-05-2006, 05:57 AM

I have a solution (even though the can of worms has already been opened)...just remove that "unverified signups" column...totally make it go away

problem solved

darksoul · 12-05-2006, 05:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jace

I have a solution (even though the can of worms has already been opened)...just remove that "unverified signups" column...totally make it go away

problem solved

not really
its already out there, turning it off now wont make the problem go away

Jace · 12-05-2006, 06:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by darksoul

not really
its already out there, turning it off now wont make the problem go away

that column should have never even been put there, that was a really stupid move on the part of flashcash, if it had never been there no one would have ever known

I know the flashcash guys, and they are good people, I can't see them taking advantage of this.....but still, that column shouod have never been there

darksoul · 12-05-2006, 06:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jace

that column should have never even been put there, that was a really stupid move on the part of flashcash, if it had never been there no one would have ever known

I know the flashcash guys, and they are good people, I can't see them taking advantage of this.....but still, that column shouod have never been there

well, thats moot right now. They did it and here they are.
I'm sure they're top notch guys however the percents I see some people
have with unverified signups makes you wonder.

Jace · 12-05-2006, 06:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by darksoul

well, thats moot right now. They did it and here they are.
I'm sure they're top notch guys however the percents I see some people
have with unverified signups makes you wonder.

i have no clue if they are "top notch", and no, they have never bought me a drink....LOL....but yes, I agree, the amount of unverified signups is alarming

darksoul · 12-05-2006, 06:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jace

i have no clue if they are "top notch",
they have never bought me a drink

makes sense

BVF · 12-05-2006, 06:13 AM

Quick, somebody post some old pics of Halcyon and Tassy to distract the angry sheep with all the pink and fruityness! HURRY!!

tASSy · 12-05-2006, 06:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BVF

Quick, somebody post some old pics of Halcyon and Tassy to distract the angry sheep with all the pink and fruityness! HURRY!!

maybe just halcyon pics... seeing as how he's really the beefcake of FLASHCA$H now!

BlackCrayon · 12-05-2006, 06:40 AM

i don't have time to read the whole thread but if people are losing out on sign ups because of this 'instant payout' crap which obviously caters to mostly small webmasters who need money instantly to pay bills then that is just sad. if you can't wait 2 weeks to get paid, get out of the biz. you suck.

thedoc says processors don't scrub for shit. why do some program admns see so many declines in their stats in ccbill for example then? i always thought that webmasters should be able to see declines as well as approved sales, not sure that this is exactly what that is though. this seems like a scrub beyond the declines/approves and to cause everyone to suffer through it because some poor webmasters need the money right away, well sucks.

Snake Doctor · 12-05-2006, 11:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DarkJedi

Fuck you, you fat fuck.

I have talked "privately" to program owners MANY times.
They were not able to help me.

I'm losing money here and I should give a fuck whether someone looks bad or
not? Perhaps if they weren't involved in this bullshit they wouldn't look so bad, eh?

It's hilarious how all the program owners jump in and defend NATS while affiliates try to get any questions answered.

I don't know what my weight has to do with you being an attention whore, but I guess since you don't have anything real to respond with you have to go with an insult an 8 year old would use.

You've talked privately to other program owners?
Who gives a flying fuck, that has nothing to do with this situation.

You'll either talk to flashcash and work it out, or you won't and you can send your traffic elsewhere.
All you're doing here is trying to make flashcash and nats look bad. You won't get shit resolved in a GFY thread and you know it.

You're just a pathetic attention whore who likes to make program owners look bad.

RBC · 12-05-2006, 12:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PBucksJohn

25% is way off from the norm. The norm is far far far lower. Again, if someone has a question that is answerable, I have no problem doing so. "Why is it 25% for me?" I can't, they would have to speak with FlashCash about that.

THIS IS THE ANSWER!
Thank you for you gentle hint John.

RawAlex · 12-05-2006, 12:49 PM

Hopefully John will make it back to this thread to answer some of the level headed and clear questions that have been posted.

director · 10-28-2008, 02:57 PM

We had installed the new Nats 4 The other day and it has been full of problems every since..will not allow us to change or add processors..... giving us code errors all over the place and must have ..tried to contact support on ICQ and with tickets about 30 times and they are just fucking plain useless...

So much hype about this bull shit program..... it not worth the fucking money they are charging,, just another piece of shit program with useless support

Bro Media - BANNED FOR LIFE · 10-28-2008, 03:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by director

We had installed the new Nats 4 The other day and it has been full of problems every since..will not allow us to change or add processors..... giving us code errors all over the place and must have ..tried to contact support on ICQ and with tickets about 30 times and they are just fucking plain useless...

So much hype about this bull shit program..... it not worth the fucking money they are charging,, just another piece of shit program with useless support

LOL

You fail at internetting, NATS is far from being worthless piece of shit, maybe you shouldn't suck so bad at installing it.

FlexxAeon · 10-28-2008, 03:12 PM

cue the pic of doc & marty....

jcsike · 09-24-2009, 05:19 PM

took me 20 min to find this thread, classic

NetHorse · 09-24-2009, 05:54 PM

Well since this thread was bumped, I have a slightly OT question....

Can program owners shave sales using NATS?

12-05-2006, 05:12 AM	#203
Tuga Confirmed User Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Portugal Posts: 7,678	PBucksJohn is repeating the same thing over and over again, and some stupid fucks still dont get it. Go fuck yourself and start shit on the FC foruns! Idiots. __________________ Go Fuck Yourself! ICQ 101411627

12-05-2006, 06:13 AM	#213
BVF Black Vagina Finder Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: The Midwest Posts: 13,975	Quick, somebody post some old pics of Halcyon and Tassy to distract the angry sheep with all the pink and fruityness! HURRY!! __________________ Black Pussy Click On Mr Cosby..CCbill, 60/40, 136 FHG's....The Cos Loves Black Ghetto Pussy!!

12-05-2006, 06:40 AM	#215
BlackCrayon Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Ottawa Posts: 19,631	i don't have time to read the whole thread but if people are losing out on sign ups because of this 'instant payout' crap which obviously caters to mostly small webmasters who need money instantly to pay bills then that is just sad. if you can't wait 2 weeks to get paid, get out of the biz. you suck. thedoc says processors don't scrub for shit. why do some program admns see so many declines in their stats in ccbill for example then? i always thought that webmasters should be able to see declines as well as approved sales, not sure that this is exactly what that is though. this seems like a scrub beyond the declines/approves and to cause everyone to suffer through it because some poor webmasters need the money right away, well sucks. __________________ you don't know you're wearing a leash if you sit by the peg all day..

10-28-2008, 02:57 PM	#219
director Registered User Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: canada, Ontario, Toronto Posts: 26	WHat a fucking waste of money We had installed the new Nats 4 The other day and it has been full of problems every since..will not allow us to change or add processors..... giving us code errors all over the place and must have ..tried to contact support on ICQ and with tickets about 30 times and they are just fucking plain useless... So much hype about this bull shit program..... it not worth the fucking money they are charging,, just another piece of shit program with useless support

10-28-2008, 03:12 PM	#221
FlexxAeon Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: May 2003 Posts: 3,765	cue the pic of doc & marty.... __________________ flexx [dot] aeon [at] gmail

12-05-2006, 03:59 AM	#201
DarkJedi No Refunds Issued. Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: GFY Posts: 28,300	200 stole.. err, unverified signups.

12-05-2006, 05:42 AM	#204
SlamDesigns Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 2,339	Ok, read it all...again and again...and still don't 100% understand. I will say this though, if a program is using a feature that allows them to basically steal money from you...I would suggest an industry wide boycott of that sponsor. That's just some shady shit there, my friends.

12-05-2006, 05:50 AM	#205
Jace FBOP Class Of 2013 Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: bumfuck, ky Posts: 35,562	ok, I have read this thread over and over again and I totally understand everything but one thing, when a signup is declared "unverified", does that mean the customer didn't pay any money? and if he did pay money why didn't the affiliate get the payout? basically, who gets the money from an unverified sale?

12-05-2006, 05:57 AM	#207
Jace FBOP Class Of 2013 Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: bumfuck, ky Posts: 35,562	I have a solution (even though the can of worms has already been opened)...just remove that "unverified signups" column...totally make it go away problem solved

12-05-2006, 12:49 PM	#218
RawAlex So Fucking Banned Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: In a house. Posts: 9,465	Hopefully John will make it back to this thread to answer some of the level headed and clear questions that have been posted.

09-24-2009, 05:19 PM	#222
jcsike Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2006 Posts: 689	took me 20 min to find this thread, classic __________________

09-24-2009, 05:54 PM	#223
NetHorse Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Chicago Posts: 3,526	Well since this thread was bumped, I have a slightly OT question.... Can program owners shave sales using NATS? __________________ ┌∩┐(◣_◢)┌∩┐ ICQ # 427013273