![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
![]() ![]() |
|
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed. |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Beer Money Baron
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: brujah / gmail
Posts: 22,157
|
How the DirectNIC, 2257 issue affect TGP Owners
I've noticed the issue regarding the domain registrar asking a TGP to provide model IDs as evidence of age for sponsor hosted content. If I'm mistaken, please clarify it here but this is the way I understand it so far.
How does this affect most TGPs or anyone else using Sponsored hosted content? Will the sponsor need to provide all of it's affiliates with 2257 documentation including IDs for each model now also in order to be able to comply with the registrars inquiry?
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Beer Money Baron
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: brujah / gmail
Posts: 22,157
|
Forgot the link, covering the McCain proposed law.
http://news.com.com/SenatorIllegalim...?tag=nefd.lede
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: FL
Posts: 1,767
|
These laws are really fucking us over left and right. The online adult industry seems doomed for downfall, at least for U.S. webmasters. This is fucked up.
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Tampa yomebe -at- hotmail
Posts: 3,980
|
It will never work.
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Beer Money Baron
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: brujah / gmail
Posts: 22,157
|
It's already working in at least regard to the registrar's ability to place a lock on your domain names, and shut your domains down if you don't provide them with the photo IDs.
So I'm assuming if you run a thumbnail TGP you now need to have photo IDs for every sponsor hosted gallery you use. At least, if your domains are with DirectNIC you do now.
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
BANNED - SUPPORTING TUBES
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: I live in a pile of boogers
Posts: 11,913
|
i thought that was the law??? if you are a secondary producer, you are required to have all docs for every image that requires it. maybe i missed it.
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 74
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Beer Money Baron
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: brujah / gmail
Posts: 22,157
|
Quote:
Is it? I wasn't aware of that. That kills the whole RSSThumbs, Sponsor feeds, etc.. if they don't provide all the TGPs with photo IDs and such too then doesn't it?
__________________
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: /root/
Posts: 4,997
|
Quote:
its laughable how a company such DN (run by lawyers) justify their action with something that wasn't even approved. |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Too lazy to set a custom title
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Punta Cana, DR
Posts: 29,597
|
Quote:
__________________
I know that Asspimple is stoopid ... As he says, it is a FACT ! But I can't figure out how he can breathe or type , at the same time .... |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Too lazy to set a custom title
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Homeless
Posts: 62,911
|
Guys. As per the 2257 law, ONLY the DOJ and the FBI as appointed by the DOJ can ask for that information. Actually anyone can ask, but they have not right to. You only need present it to the DOJ or FBI.
__________________
PornGuy skype me pornguy_epic AmateurDough The Hottes Shemales online! TChicks.com | Angeles Cid | Mariana Cordoba | MAILERS WELCOME! |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
in a van by the river
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 76,806
|
That law is so fucking stupid the McCain is proposing..
"The legislation, drafted by Sen. John McCain and obtained by CNET News.com, would also require Web sites that offer user profiles to delete pages posted by sex offenders." Yes how the hell is anyone going to know that "user14526" is a known sex offender.. Something like that is impossiable to inforce. Same with the illegal images and videos. These stupid ass senators need to stick with what they know.. taking bribes..
__________________
In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator. |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
North Coast Pimp
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: 304-534-757
Posts: 9,395
|
Call your attorney......
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
Confirmed IT Professional
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Hollywood, CA
Posts: 3,744
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
The Best Affiliate Software, Ever. |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Southcoast, Mass.
Posts: 1,521
|
Curious why DirectNIC asked for a "state issued ID" when it's known many models and websites aren't in the USA.
__________________
Make bank by giving your surfers free pics every day and it costs you NOTHING! Use POTD Sponsors to find adult sponsors in more than 75 niches who offer a POTD feature! |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: NYC
Posts: 951
|
Is there a list somewhere of adult friendly lawyers and accountants by state? I'd love to ask someone some serious questions locally about all this. (NYC)
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Beer Money Baron
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: brujah / gmail
Posts: 22,157
|
Which one? The one's from FSC that say you don't have to.. or the ones from DirectNIC that say you do?
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#18 | |
Too lazy to set a custom title
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Punta Cana, DR
Posts: 29,597
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
I know that Asspimple is stoopid ... As he says, it is a FACT ! But I can't figure out how he can breathe or type , at the same time .... |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 6,163
|
Geriatric porn!
__________________
Coming Soon! A NEW revolution in black adult social networking! |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#20 | |
BANNED - SUPPORTING TUBES
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: I live in a pile of boogers
Posts: 11,913
|
Quote:
(2) A secondary producer is any person who produces, assembles, manufactures, publishes, duplicates, reproduces, or reissues a book, magazine, periodical, film, videotape, digitally- or computer- manipulated image, picture, or other matter intended for commercial distribution that contains a visual depiction of an actual human being engaged in actual sexually explicit conduct, or who inserts on a computer site or service a digital image of, or otherwise manages the sexually explicit content of a computer site or service that contains a visual depiction of an actual human being engaged in actual sexually explicit conduct, including any person who enters into a contract, agreement, or conspiracy to do any of the foregoing. |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#21 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Virgin - nee
Posts: 3,162
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |