So Now I Guess the Global Warming Naysayers Were Wrong - GoFuckYourself.com

Linkster · 03-16-2007, 08:21 AM

http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/wireStory?id=2956337

It must be true if the US Govt says so

Brad · 03-16-2007, 08:28 AM

Anyone living in and around Southwestern Ontario could have told you that. Not that I dispute Global Warming claims, but this article doesn't prove anything. It will be hard to know what the trends are until we have more data in my opinion.

psili · 03-16-2007, 08:33 AM

I think the "naysayers" dispute the claims that man is causing global climate change.

Quote:

"We don't say this winter is evidence of the influence of greenhouse gases," Lawrimore said.

Tom_PM · 03-16-2007, 08:33 AM

Dennis Miller will just joke about how we rely on records from some drunken farmer in 1890 to compare with today's records. Therefore it must be meaningless.

D · 03-16-2007, 08:36 AM

I think that few outside those that wear tinfoil hats while never bothering to go to the library and do their own research are debating whether or not the earth is warming. Much scientific evidence over the last 50 years backs up the assertion that it is.

The real debate is in whether or not humankind's actions are the cause of it.

Mediachick · 03-16-2007, 08:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Linkster

http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/wireStory?id=2956337

It must be true if the US Govt says so

No offense, but that's the funniest thing I've heard today

TSGlider · 03-16-2007, 10:10 AM

It really is something that now the weather itself is politically charged.
"Talking about the weather" up 'til recently was cliche for talking about nothing of consequence or value. Now the line, "What do you think of the weather we're having?" sparks debate, anger, suspicion of an agenda.

BradM · 03-16-2007, 10:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by D

I think that few outside those that wear tinfoil hats while never bothering to go to the library and do their own research are debating whether or not the earth is warming. Much scientific evidence over the last 50 years backs up the assertion that it is.

The real debate is in whether or not humankind's actions are the cause of it.

This is exactly what I have been saying all along.
As I have said before also, I want weather data from the last 500,000 years before I can show ANYTHING as being a "trend".

The Earth is old (yes, more than 5,000 years old - sorry Godfans) and therefore has gone through a LOT of weather changes.

Can God just install a new AC machine?

stickyfingerz · 03-16-2007, 10:22 AM

Mars apparently is also seeing side effects from our fossil fuel consumption..

http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/english...ent_479848.htm

XSV · 03-16-2007, 10:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BradM

This is exactly what I have been saying all along.
As I have said before also, I want weather data from the last 500,000 years before I can show ANYTHING as being a "trend".

The Earth is old (yes, more than 5,000 years old - sorry Godfans) and therefore has gone through a LOT of weather changes.

Can God just install a new AC machine?

I think you are slightly off on your estimate here... several sources online for this.

Modern geologists consider the age of the Earth to be around 4.567 billion years (4.567×109 years).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth

Human Species traces back about 200,000 years, modern man around 10-40000 years depending on the source and criteria.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human

Splum · 03-16-2007, 10:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Linkster

http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/wireStory?id=2956337

It must be true if the US Govt says so

Of course the Earth is warming up, so is Mars, it has NOTHING to do with man.

baddog · 03-16-2007, 10:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by XSV

I think you are slightly off on your estimate here... several sources online for this.

Modern geologists consider the age of the Earth to be around 4.567 billion years (4.567×109 years).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth

Human Species traces back about 200,000 years, modern man around 10-40000 years depending on the source and criteria.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human

oh jeez.

Dirty Dane · 03-16-2007, 11:04 AM

Dirty Dane · 03-16-2007, 11:06 AM

stickyfingerz · 03-16-2007, 11:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dirty Dane

Thanks for pointing out that as temperature increases c02 levels increase. Its a result of the temperature increase, not the cause.

Dirty Dane · 03-16-2007, 11:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz

Thanks for pointing out that as temperature increases c02 levels increase. Its a result of the temperature increase, not the cause.

lol.. no you can't put it that way. Thats like saying you were drunk before you consumed the alcohol

There is interaction in nature, but the man does not increase temperature directly. He pollutes co2, which cause the rise in temperature above the normal fluctuations.

Linkster · 03-16-2007, 12:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mediachick

No offense, but that's the funniest thing I've heard today

None taken - thats exactly why I posted it - noted also that the UN has decided that the temperature change is directly related to human activity in their recently released report

Of course the criminals running the US right now decided that scientists are no longer allowed to talk about their opinions if they travel abroad - they have a very specific "party line" that thye have to tow if they will be speaking outside of the US (including what they can say about polar bears LOL)
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...&feed=rss.news

fortunately in that same article the Dept of the Interior does specifically say that it is the US Govts position that global warming is due to greenhouse gasses

Splum · 03-16-2007, 01:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Linkster

fortunately in that same article the Dept of the Interior does specifically say that it is the US Govts position that global warming is due to greenhouse gasses

O'rly?

Quote:

Water vapor is a naturally occurring greenhouse gas and accounts for the largest percentage of the greenhouse effect. Water vapor concentrations fluctuate regionally, but human activity does not directly affect water vapor concentrations except at very local scales.

Jace · 03-16-2007, 01:04 PM

I agree that global warming is happening, I could care less how it is happening, because I know eventually mother nature will correct it

but it is going to get worse before it gets better, that is what worries me

but when mother nature corrects it, we better watch out

Dvae · 03-16-2007, 01:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dirty Dane

One degree in a thousand yrs?

Oh my god, we're all going to die!!

stickyfingerz · 03-16-2007, 01:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dirty Dane

lol.. no you can't put it that way. Thats like saying you were drunk before you consumed the alcohol

There is interaction in nature, but the man does not increase temperature directly. He pollutes co2, which cause the rise in temperature above the normal fluctuations.

You arent comprehending. Solar activity and fluctuations in the earths orbit and axis are more likely the cause. Its a natural warming trend. The c02 is a biproduct of the increased temperatures. Its also a natural thing that exists and is produced by nature.

Dirty Dane · 03-16-2007, 01:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz

You arent comprehending. Solar activity and fluctuations in the earths orbit and axis are more likely the cause. Its a natural warming trend. The c02 is a biproduct of the increased temperatures. Its also a natural thing that exists and is produced by nature.

You are right that the nature and cosmic events cause fluctuations. Winter/summer is a perfect example if you look on monthly scale.

But when you start looking at the longrange scale, from iceage to iceage, and you look at level of co2, it has never been as high as now. The humans has never polluted as much as now, and I doubt the correlation is a coincidence. If someone can prove this highest level of all time is caused by nature alone, well then its good news. Otherwise, lets stick to the facts and deal with it, as we did with the ozon-layer problem

Dirty Dane · 03-16-2007, 01:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dvae

One degree in a thousand yrs?

Oh my god, we're all going to die!!

Some have died already. Besides that, its historical data until today, not predictions

Dvae · 03-16-2007, 01:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dirty Dane

Some have died already. Besides that, its historical data until today, not predictions

You are so right.
Those that were born a thousand yrs ago are already dead.
Its only a matter of time for all of us.

Something needs to be done about it now!

Dirty Dane · 03-16-2007, 01:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dvae

You are so right.
Those that were born a thousand yrs ago are already dead.
Its only a matter of time for all of us.

Something needs to be done about it now!

We all gonna die, but why get killed early by a hurricane or something

GatorB · 03-16-2007, 02:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PR_Tom

Dennis Miller will just joke about how we rely on records from some drunken farmer in 1890 to compare with today's records. Therefore it must be meaningless.

Yeah it funny how people like hmm dismiss scientists that actually went to college and have degrees and have worked on this. Yet HE a person with absolutely ZERO scientific background is somehow correct. So non-scientists = correct, scientist = incorrect. Um...yeah.

The neo cons deny global warming because they think is will hurt big business to make changes. It won't. It will cost more when your business is wiped out by a hurricane or the city you're in is flooded out of existence.

I don't these type people. They refuse to buy compact fluorescent bulbs even though they SAVE you money. Who doesn't want more money in their pocket. And you're putting less CO2 in the air. This is bad how? You'd think neo-cons would like more money. If you swap out eight 60 watt bulbs with compact florescent ones you save over $400 over the the life of those bulbs. Maybe not a lot of $$ to some, but I can think of 100 things I'd rather do with $400 than give it to the electric company. In a few years when LED lights become the norm you'll save even more.

LiveDose · 03-16-2007, 02:12 PM

Anyone who invents the internet is probably right about everything else...

Dvae · 03-16-2007, 02:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dirty Dane

We all gonna die, but why get killed early by a hurricane or something

I could get killed by a car too or fall down the stairs.

Hurricanes are Weather-Related Phenomena
Didn't have those a thousand yrs ago right?

In any case life expectancy is way higher then it was just 200 yrs ago so it still proves nothing.

scardog · 03-16-2007, 02:18 PM

The government doesn't really believe man is causing the warming. They are just getting us ready for some new corporate regulations and personal carbon taxes.

Dvae · 03-16-2007, 02:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB

Yeah it funny how people like hmm dismiss scientists that actually went to college and have degrees and have worked on this. Yet HE a person with absolutely ZERO scientific background is somehow correct. So non-scientists = correct, scientist = incorrect. Um...yeah.

The neo cons deny global warming because they think is will hurt big business to make changes. It won't. It will cost more when your business is wiped out by a hurricane or the city you're in is flooded out of existence.

I don't these type people. They refuse to buy compact fluorescent bulbs even though they SAVE you money. Who doesn't want more money in their pocket. And you're putting less CO2 in the air. This is bad how? You'd think neo-cons would like more money. If you swap out eight 60 watt bulbs with compact florescent ones you save over $400 over the the life of those bulbs. Maybe not a lot of $$ to some, but I can think of 100 things I'd rather do with $400 than give it to the electric company. In a few years when LED lights become the norm you'll save even more.

So which of the following would you say polutes less

A. hybrid car-like a Preise
B. a Hummer
C. a normal car with good fuel econmy

crockett · 03-16-2007, 02:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dvae

One degree in a thousand yrs?

Oh my god, we're all going to die!!

It's one degree globally.. Meaning average.. But 1 degree in lets say Texas equals about 14 degrees where it really counts in the north pole.

GatorB · 03-16-2007, 02:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scardog

The government doesn't really believe man is causing the warming. They are just getting us ready for some new corporate regulations and personal carbon taxes.

FACT: CO2 is a greenhouse gas. Venus proves that. Even Mars proves it. It's cold, but it'd be 100 degrees colder if it didn't have any CO2.

FACT: Man has been putting CO2 into the air for 150 years.

FACT: Trees breathe in CO2 and produce oxygen

FACT: over the last 150 the amount of forrested in area in the world has shrunk.

So in other words more CO2 and less trees to consume it.

To say that man has no absolutely ZERO effect on our atmosphere is retarded.

GatorB · 03-16-2007, 02:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dvae

So which of the following would you say polutes less

A. hybrid car-like a Preise
B. a Hummer
C. a normal car with good fuel econmy

Would depend how much you use them.

A Prius owner that put 30,000 miles year on his car is going to pollute more than a Hummer owner than only takes it out once in a great while and puts maybe 3000 miles a year

GatorB · 03-16-2007, 02:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dvae

One degree in a thousand yrs?

Oh my god, we're all going to die!!

Don't be retarded you know between 1000 and 1850 man put almost no CO2 into the atmosphere. You have no clue about science and what number mean. I'm sure someon near the equator has not noticed any differences over the last 75 years. Go ask someone from Alaska if things are different. The difference are going to be felt first in the areas near the poles and those difference are going to be the most extreme.

I'm sure Russia loves global warming since that means Siberia will turn into the next great grain belt. Since Russia is basically turning back into it's former self if you are against reducing man made emmisions of green house gasses you support communism.

Dirty Dane · 03-16-2007, 02:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dvae

I could get killed by a car too or fall down the stairs.

Hurricanes are Weather-Related Phenomena
Didn't have those a thousand yrs ago right?

In any case life expectancy is way higher then it was just 200 yrs ago so it still proves nothing.

Your argument is just as useless as my websites. Just because medicine and medical care is getting better, does not justify polluting more.

Splum · 03-16-2007, 02:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB

FACT: CO2 is a greenhouse gas. Venus proves that. Even Mars proves it. It's cold, but it'd be 100 degrees colder if it didn't have any CO2. FACT: Man has been putting CO2 into the air for 150 years. FACT: Trees breathe in CO2 and produce oxygen FACT: over the last 150 the amount of forrested in area in the world has shrunk. So in other words more CO2 and less trees to consume it. To say that man has no absolutely ZERO effect on our atmosphere is retarded.

Quote:

Carbon dioxide is a chemical compound composed of one carbon and two oxygen atoms. It is often referred to by its formula CO2. It is present in the Earth's atmosphere at a low concentration of approximately 0.03%-0.06%

Wow thats a huge amount of CO2 thats causing global warming.

scardog · 03-16-2007, 02:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB

FACT: CO2 is a greenhouse gas. Venus proves that. Even Mars proves it. It's cold, but it'd be 100 degrees colder if it didn't have any CO2.

FACT: Man has been putting CO2 into the air for 150 years.

FACT: Trees breathe in CO2 and produce oxygen

FACT: over the last 150 the amount of forrested in area in the world has shrunk.

So in other words more CO2 and less trees to consume it.

To say that man has no absolutely ZERO effect on our atmosphere is retarded.

Mars is warming up too. How do you explain that?

Phoenix · 03-16-2007, 02:41 PM

i suspect people like splum and stickeryfingerz and 12 clicks are all fuckin retarded....they should be sterilized so they cant reproduce.

i mean give me a fuckin break

scardog · 03-16-2007, 02:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoenix

i suspect people like splum and stickeryfingerz and 12 clicks are all fuckin retarded....they should be sterilized so they cant reproduce.

i mean give me a fuckin break

Fuckin retarded really doesn't address their arguments. But when you are in the majority, everyone will cheer when you call them names. Let's hope you don't end up in the minority or someone may want to sterilize you too.

stickyfingerz · 03-16-2007, 02:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoenix

i suspect people like splum and stickeryfingerz and 12 clicks are all fuckin retarded....they should be sterilized so they cant reproduce.

i mean give me a fuckin break

Im pretty stupid, but I bet I would of gotten my car started without making a phone call if my battery was dead. Common sense goes along way lol. Like turn on the headlights and turn the key over. See if the lights go out.

No offense but you did just call me fuckin retarded, so a little jab back is due course Id say.

GatorB · 03-16-2007, 02:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scardog

Mars is warming up too. How do you explain that?

Good for Mars. You realize Mars and Earth are completely sperate. Explain Venus dipshit.

Phoenix · 03-16-2007, 03:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz

Im pretty stupid, but I bet I would of gotten my car started without making a phone call if my battery was dead. Common sense goes along way lol. Like turn on the headlights and turn the key over. See if the lights go out.

No offense but you did just call me fuckin retarded, so a little jab back is due course Id say.

well heres the thing..the car did turn over..it wasnt dead

i didnt know that it needed more to get going

anyway im all in jest

but seriously man....the evidence is all there

stickyfingerz · 03-16-2007, 03:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoenix

well heres the thing..the car did turn over..it wasnt dead

i didnt know that it needed more to get going

anyway im all in jest

but seriously man....the evidence is all there

You all talk about scientists watch this

https://youtube.com/watch?v=XttV2C6B8pU

former director of greenpeace even says its a crock of shit. Guys who had their name fraudulently put on literature saying they agreed with it. At least one guy sued to have his name removed. Scientists from MIT etc disagree with the c02 crap. Watch it then post.

Pleasurepays · 03-16-2007, 03:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoenix

well heres the thing..the car did turn over..it wasnt dead

i didnt know that it needed more to get going

anyway im all in jest

but seriously man....the evidence is all there

the evidence is all there, that there is a god and he created the universe.
the evidence is all there, that there is no god and he did not create the universe.

Penthouse Tony · 03-16-2007, 03:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Splum

Wow thats a huge amount of CO2 thats causing global warming.

Don't forget that most of that 0.03-0.06% of CO2 *isn't* man made.

GatorB · 03-16-2007, 03:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sagi_AFF

Don't forget that most of that 0.03-0.06% of CO2 *isn't* man made.

So if you have HIV you might was well not give a fuck about getting syphillis.

Pleasurepays · 03-16-2007, 03:13 PM

the humorous irony of these conversations is that science ultimately seeks truth... no matter what that truth might be. the people making these "scientific" arguments in discussions such as these, are 100% incapable of admitting that there is another side of the argument, much less accept the possibility that they might be wrong. the idea and controversy of Global Warming is degrading from what should be a scientific discussion, to a cult.

GatorB · 03-16-2007, 03:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scardog

Mars is warming up too. How do you explain that?

Huge ice deposits cover south pole of Mars

http://www.cnn.com/2007/TECH/space/0...eut/index.html

How do you get so much ice if it's WARMING up?

Oh by the way the Mars is warming theory is based on 3 years of data. Yet 120 years of earth data and the jury is still out.

stickyfingerz · 03-16-2007, 03:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB

Huge ice deposits cover south pole of Mars

http://www.cnn.com/2007/TECH/space/0...eut/index.html

How do you get so much ice if it's WARMING up?

Oh by the way the Mars is warming theory is based on 3 years of data. Yet 120 years of earth data and the jury is still out.

We are actually transporting suvs to mars in order to speed up the warming and melt some water so we can live there.

_Richard_ · 03-16-2007, 03:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz

You all talk about scientists watch this

https://youtube.com/watch?v=XttV2C6B8pU

former director of greenpeace even says its a crock of shit. Guys who had their name fraudulently put on literature saying they agreed with it. At least one guy sued to have his name removed. Scientists from MIT etc disagree with the c02 crap. Watch it then post.

stickyfingerz, do you believe that co2 doesn't cause global warming?

have you ever thought about what you're arguing for? if you're right, nothing really matters.

What happens if you're wrong? Frankly, i really hope you ARE right, but what happens dude, if you are wrong?

R

03-16-2007, 08:21 AM	#1
Linkster Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: DeltaHell Posts: 3,216	So Now I Guess the Global Warming Naysayers Were Wrong http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/wireStory?id=2956337 It must be true if the US Govt says so __________________ Porn Links Crak for your bank account - Get Addicted FREE LIVE CAM SHOWS

03-16-2007, 08:28 AM	#2
Brad Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Toronto Posts: 2,510	Anyone living in and around Southwestern Ontario could have told you that. Not that I dispute Global Warming claims, but this article doesn't prove anything. It will be hard to know what the trends are until we have more data in my opinion. __________________ Affiliate Manager/Media Buyer ICQ 376 978 529 Skype: bradleyjwscott [email protected]

03-16-2007, 08:33 AM	#4
Tom_PM Porn Meister Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 16,443	Dennis Miller will just joke about how we rely on records from some drunken farmer in 1890 to compare with today's records. Therefore it must be meaningless. __________________ 43-922-863 Shut up and play your guitar.

03-16-2007, 08:36 AM	#5
D Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: The Valley Posts: 7,412	I think that few outside those that wear tinfoil hats while never bothering to go to the library and do their own research are debating whether or not the earth is warming. Much scientific evidence over the last 50 years backs up the assertion that it is. The real debate is in whether or not humankind's actions are the cause of it. __________________ -D. ICQ: 202-96-31

03-16-2007, 10:10 AM	#7
TSGlider Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2006 Posts: 673	It really is something that now the weather itself is politically charged. "Talking about the weather" up 'til recently was cliche for talking about nothing of consequence or value. Now the line, "What do you think of the weather we're having?" sparks debate, anger, suspicion of an agenda. __________________ BaDoink skype: tsglider

03-16-2007, 10:22 AM	#9
stickyfingerz Doin fine Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2005 Posts: 24,983	Mars apparently is also seeing side effects from our fossil fuel consumption.. http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/english...ent_479848.htm

03-16-2007, 11:04 AM	#13
Dirty Dane Sick Fuck Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: www Posts: 9,491

03-16-2007, 11:06 AM	#14
Dirty Dane Sick Fuck Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: www Posts: 9,491

03-16-2007, 01:04 PM	#19
Jace FBOP Class Of 2013 Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: bumfuck, ky Posts: 35,562	I agree that global warming is happening, I could care less how it is happening, because I know eventually mother nature will correct it but it is going to get worse before it gets better, that is what worries me but when mother nature corrects it, we better watch out

03-16-2007, 02:12 PM	#27
LiveDose Show Yer Tits! Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Somewhere Out there... Posts: 25,792	Anyone who invents the internet is probably right about everything else... __________________ Scammer Alert: acer19 acer [email protected] [email protected] Money stolen using PayPal

03-16-2007, 02:18 PM	#29
scardog Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2004 Posts: 886	The government doesn't really believe man is causing the warming. They are just getting us ready for some new corporate regulations and personal carbon taxes.

03-16-2007, 02:41 PM	#38
Phoenix BACON BACON BACON Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Poems everybody, the laddie fancies himself a poet Posts: 35,457	i suspect people like splum and stickeryfingerz and 12 clicks are all fuckin retarded....they should be sterilized so they cant reproduce. i mean give me a fuckin break __________________ Skype Phoenixskype1 Telegram PhoenixBrad https://quantads.io

03-16-2007, 03:13 PM	#47
Pleasurepays BANNED - SUPPORTING TUBES Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: I live in a pile of boogers Posts: 11,913	the humorous irony of these conversations is that science ultimately seeks truth... no matter what that truth might be. the people making these "scientific" arguments in discussions such as these, are 100% incapable of admitting that there is another side of the argument, much less accept the possibility that they might be wrong. the idea and controversy of Global Warming is degrading from what should be a scientific discussion, to a cult.