Looks like the 2257 injunction for secondary producers will be over soon - GoFuckYourself.com

Snake Doctor · 04-02-2007, 03:28 PM

Better get your records ready folks.

The court has required the FSC to demonstrate why it should not lose the secondary producer claim by April 16, 2007, given the passage of the Adam Walsh Act. The government must submit its response by April 30. At any time thereafter, the court could revisit its injunction decision given the fact that the Adam Walsh Act has essentially mooted the arguments that the regulations do not apply to secondary producers. It is likely that the injunction will be dissolved once the court renders its ruling on this issue, although the FSC may request a stay of that order pending a possible appeal.

Sarah_Jayne · 04-02-2007, 03:56 PM

oh yay..

Voodoo · 04-02-2007, 03:59 PM

Good shit!

Quentin · 04-02-2007, 04:54 PM

Here's some more information on Judge Miller's decision issued last Friday in FSC v. Gonzales.

The article is drawn primarily from the text of the decision itself, as the attorneys I talked to wanted a little more time to review the decision before commenting on it in detail.

- Q.

GigoloMason · 04-02-2007, 05:10 PM

Only the ultra vires claim is being addressed on the 16th, the injunction would still stand untill the other claims were addressed.

Although I'm sure it hasn't been fully digested yet, please read before you spew.

04-02-2007, 03:28 PM	#1
Snake Doctor I'm Lenny2 Bitch Join Date: Mar 2001 Location: On top of my soapbox Posts: 13,449	Looks like the 2257 injunction for secondary producers will be over soon Better get your records ready folks. The court has required the FSC to demonstrate why it should not lose the secondary producer claim by April 16, 2007, given the passage of the Adam Walsh Act. The government must submit its response by April 30. At any time thereafter, the court could revisit its injunction decision given the fact that the Adam Walsh Act has essentially mooted the arguments that the regulations do not apply to secondary producers. It is likely that the injunction will be dissolved once the court renders its ruling on this issue, although the FSC may request a stay of that order pending a possible appeal. __________________ sig too big

04-02-2007, 04:54 PM	#4
Quentin Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2002 Posts: 1,280	Here's some more information on Judge Miller's decision issued last Friday in FSC v. Gonzales. The article is drawn primarily from the text of the decision itself, as the attorneys I talked to wanted a little more time to review the decision before commenting on it in detail. - Q. __________________ Q. Boyer

04-02-2007, 05:10 PM	#5
GigoloMason Confirmed User Join Date: May 2005 Posts: 742	Only the ultra vires claim is being addressed on the 16th, the injunction would still stand untill the other claims were addressed. Although I'm sure it hasn't been fully digested yet, please read before you spew. __________________

04-02-2007, 03:56 PM	#2
Sarah_Jayne Now with more Jayne Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Los Angeles Posts: 40,077	oh yay..

04-02-2007, 03:59 PM	#3
Voodoo ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Porn Valley, CA Posts: 10,590	Good shit!