U.S. government protects terrorist group - GoFuckYourself.com

Porn Farmer · 04-05-2007, 09:12 PM

Quote:

BAGHDAD, Iraq (CNN) -- An Iranian opposition group based in Iraq, despite being considered terrorists by the United States, continues to receive protection from the American military in the face of Iraqi pressure to leave the country.

It's a paradox possible only because the United States considers the Mujahedeen-e-Khalq, or MEK, a source of valuable intelligence on Iran.

Iranian officials tied the MEK to an explosion in February at a girls school in Zahedan, Iran. (Full story)

The group also is credited with helping expose Iran's secret nuclear program through spying on Tehran for decades. And the group is considered an ally to America because of its opposition to Tehran.

However, the U.S. State Department officially considers the MEK a terrorist organization -- meaning no American can deal with it; U.S. banks must freeze its assets; and any American giving support to its members is committing a crime.

The U.S. military, though, regularly escorts MEK supply runs between Baghdad and its base, Camp Ashraf.

"The trips for procurement of logistical needs also take place under the control and protection of the MPs," said Mojgan Parsaii, vice president of MEK and leader of Camp Ashraf.

That's because, according to U.S. documents, coalition forces regard MEK as protected people under the Geneva Conventions.

"The coalition remains deeply committed to the security and rights of the protected people of Ashraf," U.S. Maj. Gen. John D. Gardner wrote in March 2006.

The group also enjoys the protection of the International Committee of the Red Cross.

"The ICRC has made clear that the residents of Camp Ashraf must not be deported, expelled or repatriated," according to an ICRC letter.

Despite repeated requests, neither Iran's ambassador in Baghdad nor the U.S. military would comment on MEK, also known as Mojahedin Khalq Organization, or MKO.

But former U.S. Ambassador Zalmay Khalilzad said, "What we have here is a policy that described the people here from the MEK as a protected group, and one of our coalition partner countries is actually protecting them in the camp where they mostly are, but there is no change in our policy that the MEK, we still regard them as a terrorist organization."

When the U.S. invaded Iraq in 2003, Green Berets arrived at Camp Ashraf to find gardens and monuments there, along with more than 2,000 well-maintained tanks, armored personnel carriers, artillery, anti-aircraft guns and vehicles.

All 3,800 camp residents were questioned by Americans -- including, interestingly, a female tank battalion. No arrests were made, and the camp quickly surrendered under a cease-fire agreement -- an agreement that also guaranteed its safety.

"Everyone's entry to the camp and his departure are controlled by the U.S. military police force," Parsaii said.

The MEK denies it is a terrorist group. Both Iran and the Iraqi government, however, accuse the group of ongoing terrorist attacks, and the Shiite-dominated Iraqi government wants it out.

"We gave this organization a six-month deadline to leave Iraq, and we informed the Red Cross," said Shirwan al-Wa'eli, Iraq's national security minister. "And presumably, our friends the Americans will respect our decision and they will not stay on Iraqi land."

For now, however, the United States continues to protect MEK.

"There are counter-pressures, too," Khalilzad said. "There are people who say, 'No, they should be allowed to stay here.' And as you know, around the world there are people with different views toward them."

http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/meast/...sts/index.html

So now we have good terrorists and bad terrorists. Some should be killed and some should be protected. Talk about mixed messages.

ucv.karl · 04-05-2007, 09:23 PM

https://youtube.com/watch?v=qGsTmcFxrYo

https://youtube.com/watch?v=B1qedUIg7sI

directfiesta · 04-05-2007, 09:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Porn Farmer

http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/meast/...sts/index.html

So now we have good terrorists and bad terrorists. Some should be killed and some should be protected. Talk about mixed messages.

It has always been like this with the US....

Ask Chileans, and ask Columbians....
After all, wasn't Chicita Brands ( ex United Fruits ) paying milions to the UAC, a llisted terrorist group.....
Before 2001, Pakistan was bad guys, today they are good guys ....

minusonebit · 04-05-2007, 10:56 PM

And if you pay taxes, you are part of it.

yota71 · 04-05-2007, 11:00 PM

Their only good terrorist if they work for US

dynastoned · 04-05-2007, 11:53 PM

Thats politics for ya.

Ace_luffy · 04-06-2007, 09:38 AM

even japan denials on US attack in iraq...

then another issue come on....

US rocks again!!

04-05-2007, 09:23 PM	#2
ucv.karl Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Phx,Az Posts: 498	https://youtube.com/watch?v=qGsTmcFxrYo https://youtube.com/watch?v=B1qedUIg7sI __________________ It's better when you can Switch. ICQ: 263079754

04-05-2007, 11:00 PM	#5
yota71 Porn Blogger Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2006 Posts: 822	Their only good terrorist if they work for US __________________ ICQ-307696001 kingfisher.kj [at] gmail.com

04-06-2007, 09:38 AM	#7
Ace_luffy www.creationcrew.com Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: CREATIONCREW.COM CREATIONCREW.COM CREATIONCREW.COM CREATIONCREW.COM CREATIONCREW.COM CREATIONCREW.COM Posts: 12,111	even japan denials on US attack in iraq... then another issue come on.... US rocks again!! __________________ ++ Adult and Mainstream Websites Designs \| 10 banners for only $50 \| html5 Banners ++ email : [email protected] Telegram : https://t.me/creationcrew \| HTML5/Responsive Site - Div/CSS - ElevatedX - NATs - Wordpress

04-05-2007, 10:56 PM	#4
minusonebit So Fucking Banned Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: [email protected] Posts: 7,391	And if you pay taxes, you are part of it.

04-05-2007, 11:53 PM	#6
dynastoned mmm yeah! Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: roseville, ca Posts: 5,061	Thats politics for ya.