Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Post New Thread Reply

Register GFY Rules Calendar Mark Forums Read
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed.

 
Thread Tools
Old 04-14-2007, 02:07 AM   #1
$5 submissions
I help you SUCCEED
 
$5 submissions's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: The Pearl of the Orient Seas
Posts: 32,195
Did this woman just OWN Albert Einstein?

http://www.news.harvard.edu/gazette/...08/99-hau.html

Albert Einstein and just about every other physicist insisted that light travels 186,000 miles a second in free space, and that it can't be speeded-up or slowed down. But in 1998, Hau, for the first time in history, slowed light to 38 miles an hour, about the speed of rush-hour traffic.
$5 submissions is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2007, 02:14 AM   #2
Musson
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 187
In a way ... YES.
__________________
NEW DATING AFFILIATE PROGRAM

http://partner.goldflirt.com/?affid=1366
Musson is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2007, 02:17 AM   #3
Paraskass
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: QC
Posts: 5,829
science is fucked up... just like life...

motherfuckers
__________________
Paraskass is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2007, 02:18 AM   #4
$5 submissions
I help you SUCCEED
 
$5 submissions's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: The Pearl of the Orient Seas
Posts: 32,195
There's tons of hurdles left but one possibly HUGE implication of this technology is COMMUNICATIONS. Fiber optics using "sculpted" light.
$5 submissions is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2007, 02:22 AM   #5
Paraskass
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: QC
Posts: 5,829
the point is, my penis is huge... & my sperm explodes at 187,000 mph. WAY faster than light, IMHO
__________________
Paraskass is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2007, 02:31 AM   #6
notabook
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Not a Library!
Posts: 9,748
I love her Hitler salute, so sexy.





Sieg Heil indeed.
__________________
notabook is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2007, 03:14 AM   #7
bobby666
boots are my religion
 
bobby666's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Heart of europe
Posts: 21,765
no no no e= mc2 always
__________________
bobby666 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2007, 03:19 AM   #8
Musson
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 187
Quote:
Originally Posted by notabook View Post
I love her Hitler salute, so sexy.





Sieg Heil indeed.
Right you are
__________________
NEW DATING AFFILIATE PROGRAM

http://partner.goldflirt.com/?affid=1366
Musson is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2007, 03:58 AM   #9
adultseo
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 365
Einstein was and still is right. Light travels at a constant 186,000 miles per second in vacuum.
__________________
The key to get ranked one in Google is to provide the best.
adultseo is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2007, 04:01 AM   #10
BusterBunny
perverted justice decoy
 
BusterBunny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: unborn still in the womb connected via blackberry
Posts: 19,291
Quote:
Originally Posted by notabook View Post
I love her Hitler salute, so sexy.





Sieg Heil indeed.
__________________
my sig caught gonoherpasyphilaids and died
BusterBunny is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2007, 04:23 AM   #11
Linkster
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: DeltaHell
Posts: 3,216
Quote:
Originally Posted by adultseo View Post
Einstein was and still is right. Light travels at a constant 186,000 miles per second in vacuum.
Yep - and unfiltered as well as unfettered by an atmosphere Unfortunately the author just uses that stupid shit as hype - she did it with clouds of artificially cooled atoms which, while a noble pursuit has nothing to do with Einsteins use of the speed of light in space in his calculations - and it was Roemer in the 1600s that actually came up with the first real measurement of the speed
Linkster is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2007, 07:52 AM   #12
Contra
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 437
It has everything to do with it. Einstein used light as the universal constant. If the speed of light varies then e=mc2 is wrong.
Contra is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2007, 08:13 AM   #13
LadyMischief
Orgasms N Such!
 
LadyMischief's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Oakville, Ontario
Posts: 18,135
Einstein never claimed to be perfect. He put forward theories, some proven right over time, some a little off, etc. Theory isn't THE WAY THINGS ARE, it's just a theory.
__________________

ICQ 3522039
Content Manager - orgasm.com
[email protected]
LadyMischief is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2007, 08:23 AM   #14
GatorB
The Demon & 12clicks
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: SallyRand is a FAGGOT
Posts: 18,208
Quote:
Originally Posted by Contra View Post
It has everything to do with it. Einstein used light as the universal constant. If the speed of light varies then e=mc2 is wrong.
I think you need to brush up on your physics. You're not getting it. This crazy bitches shit doen't effect e=mc2. I do suppose though if you built a chamber 5 miles X 5 miles X 5 miles and had the interrrior cooled down to 460 below zero and set of nuclear fission reaction you see what a nuclear explosion would look like in slow motion. Just a theory though.
GatorB is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2007, 08:35 AM   #15
Linkster
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: DeltaHell
Posts: 3,216
Quote:
Originally Posted by Contra View Post
It has everything to do with it. Einstein used light as the universal constant. If the speed of light varies then e=mc2 is wrong.

He used the speed of light in space - not the speed of light in a lab with atoms cooled to slow down the light - so the constant still works - not that it really matters because the E=mc2 isnt all together a correct statement anyway - but based on replies here I better not go into why - suffice it to say that the equation works with the matter known at the nuclear level - there have been many discoveries of smaller particles since then which while obeying the law of conservation - have other losses that weren't accounted for in that equation - if youre real interested - search for "binding energy"
Linkster is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2007, 08:42 AM   #16
GatorB
The Demon & 12clicks
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: SallyRand is a FAGGOT
Posts: 18,208
Quote:
Originally Posted by Linkster View Post
not that it really matters because the E=mc2 isnt all together a correct statement anyway - but based on replies here I better not go into why -
Why is that Einstien? Lt's see because c stands for "speed of light in a vaccuum" but even space is not a TRUE vaccuum. There are still atoms scattered about even in the most desolate areas of space even if they are spread very far apart. Is that why it's not completely correct?
GatorB is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2007, 09:47 AM   #17
Violetta
Affiliate
 
Violetta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 28,735
I wish Einstein was still around... I LOVE HIM!!!!!
__________________
M&A Queen
Violetta is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2007, 09:56 AM   #18
BOSS1
Confirmed User
 
BOSS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Montreal / Sparta
Posts: 4,331
Quote:
Originally Posted by Contra View Post
It has everything to do with it. Einstein used light as the universal constant. If the speed of light varies then e=mc2 is wrong.
wow... i guess is missed where the constant speed of light is in a vacum according to Einstein theory ....
BOSS1 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2007, 09:58 AM   #19
BOSS1
Confirmed User
 
BOSS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Montreal / Sparta
Posts: 4,331
Quote:
Originally Posted by Linkster View Post
He used the speed of light in space - not the speed of light in a lab with atoms cooled to slow down the light - so the constant still works - not that it really matters because the E=mc2 isnt all together a correct statement anyway - but based on replies here I better not go into why - suffice it to say that the equation works with the matter known at the nuclear level - there have been many discoveries of smaller particles since then which while obeying the law of conservation - have other losses that weren't accounted for in that equation - if youre real interested - search for "binding energy"
sounds like someone paid attention in school

these people will believe anything they hear
BOSS1 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2007, 10:18 AM   #20
Linkster
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: DeltaHell
Posts: 3,216
Quote:
Originally Posted by GatorB View Post
Why is that Einstien? Lt's see because c stands for "speed of light in a vaccuum" but even space is not a TRUE vaccuum. There are still atoms scattered about even in the most desolate areas of space even if they are spread very far apart. Is that why it's not completely correct?

No - actually the reason its not correct is that since Einstein first deveoped his theories, other little discoveries have been made leading to quantum physics which delves a little deeper into the energy equation - showing that there are some losses at the sub-particle level that cannot be explained away as energy or mass. The other explanation that might "weigh" in here is that the photon (which is what light is made up of) is assumed to be 0 mass - which is probably not correct - it probably has a very small mass approaching 0 but we cannot say for sure that it is perfectly 0

The second reason its not correct is that the speed of light does actually change - year to year - by a fraction due to the slowing down of the speed of rotation of the earth by 1/10E5 of a second - which changes the actual duration of a second in time - and since C is a measurement of speed which is in M/sec the changing of the duration of a second changes the constants' value

Third - lay-people usually make the same mistake when looking at this C constant - the primary way it is used is just the opposite measurement - it is used to measure the standard length for a meter by measuring the distance light travels in a particular time interval in a vacuum - Einsteins original theory just stated that the speed of light constant was in "space" - not a vacuum
Linkster is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2007, 10:22 AM   #21
teksonline
So Fucking Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: At My Desk
Posts: 2,904
fuck communications... we can now have postage stamp sized chips in our phones that contain entire countries of organized data, and can beam the answers to a implanted chip in our heads, so we remove the "learning curve"
and actually become correct "know it alls" in mere split second
teksonline is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2007, 10:36 AM   #22
smack
Push Porn Like Weight.
 
smack's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Inside .NET
Posts: 10,652
Quote:
Originally Posted by Linkster View Post
The second reason its not correct is that the speed of light does actually change - year to year - by a fraction due to the slowing down of the speed of rotation of the earth by 1/10E5 of a second - which changes the actual duration of a second in time - and since C is a measurement of speed which is in M/sec the changing of the duration of a second changes the constants' value
doesn't that just mean that the speed doesn't change. just our perception of it changes?

time wouldn't be changing anywhere else in the universe. just our measurement of it.
__________________
Cry havoc and let slip the dogs of war.
smack is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2007, 11:18 AM   #23
GatorB
The Demon & 12clicks
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: SallyRand is a FAGGOT
Posts: 18,208
Quote:
Originally Posted by Linkster View Post
The second reason its not correct is that the speed of light does actually change - year to year - by a fraction due to the slowing down of the speed of rotation of the earth by 1/10E5 of a second - which changes the actual duration of a second in time - and since C is a measurement of speed which is in M/sec the changing of the duration of a second changes the constants' value
That's retarded. WTF does the rotation of the earth have to do with the speed of light everywhere else in the universe? Or time for that matter.

Quote:
Third - lay-people
Who in the fuck are you? What you some super genius and we are all retards? I'm not getting into a "who has a bigger IQ" contest, but not everyone here is stupid. My IQ is at least 130. I was invited to take the SAT in the 6th grade and I could be in Mensa if really wanted to be. And I'm sure there are several others here that are equally or even more intelligent. So quit coming off as you know every fucking thing. You probably got that crap off of wikpedia or something anyways.
GatorB is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2007, 11:24 AM   #24
12clicks
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
12clicks's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: God's right hand
Posts: 19,788
[QUOTE=$5 submissions;12251215]Did this woman just OWN Albert Einstein?[QUOTE]
hell, I did that over icecream a few years back

http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showth...light=debunked
__________________
I'm not a dinosaur, I'm a crocodile. I've seen dinosaurs come and go and I'm left unimpressed.
12clicks is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2007, 11:25 AM   #25
mailman
Confirmed User
 
mailman's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 6,311
I have yet to read it but you think with the cost to go to harvard they could do up a better website!
mailman is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2007, 11:45 AM   #26
Linkster
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: DeltaHell
Posts: 3,216
Quote:
Originally Posted by smack View Post
doesn't that just mean that the speed doesn't change. just our perception of it changes?

time wouldn't be changing anywhere else in the universe. just our measurement of it.
Thats correct - but then that is exactly what the whole theory of relativity hinges on - our perception


Gator - see above - and sorry if you took "layperson" to mean something derogatory - wasnt meant that way - I used to teach nuclear physics and worked as a physicist for 20 years so I always used that term to differentiate between two ways of teaching
Linkster is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2007, 12:02 PM   #27
crockett
in a van by the river
 
crockett's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 76,806
So how much datta can we send on the internet in the future.. That's all I want to know 8)
__________________
In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.
crockett is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2007, 12:04 PM   #28
OzMan
Confirmed User
 
OzMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Los Begas
Posts: 9,162
Quote:
Originally Posted by adultseo View Post
Einstein was and still is right. Light travels at a constant 186,000 miles per second in vacuum.
True but it's a complete waste of time having that feature. I mean who the fuck vacuums at night anyway?
OzMan is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2007, 12:14 PM   #29
Babaganoosh
♥♥♥ Likes Hugs ♥♥♥
 
Babaganoosh's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: /home
Posts: 15,841
http://www.aip.org/history/einstein/essay.htm

A good read for anyone whether you're a fan of Einstein or not.
__________________
I like pie.
Babaganoosh is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2007, 12:43 PM   #30
theruyan
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 114
Quote:
Originally Posted by LadyMischief View Post
Einstein never claimed to be perfect. He put forward theories, some proven right over time, some a little off, etc. Theory isn't THE WAY THINGS ARE, it's just a theory.
You are woefully ignorant about science madam. A theory in science is not a "hunch" or a "guess" it is an explanation of the data. Unlike religion, science is not dogmatic. This is called falsifiability.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory

In science, a theory is a mathematical description, a logical explanation, a verified hypothesis, or a proven model of the manner of interaction of a set of natural phenomena, capable of predicting future occurrences or observations of the same kind, and capable of being tested through experiment or otherwise falsified through empirical observation. It follows from this that for scientists "theory" and "fact" do not necessarily stand in opposition. For example, it is a fact that an apple dropped on earth has been observed to fall towards the center of the planet, and the theory which explains why the apple behaves so is the current theory of gravitation.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falsifiability

In science and the philosophy of science, falsifiability is the logical property of empirical statements, related to contingency and defeasibility, that they must admit of logical counterexamples. In essence, for an assertion to be falsifiable, it must be logically possible to make an observation or do a physical experiment that would show the assertion to be false. This is in contrast to tautologies, formal and mathematical statements that are universally true as a logical consequence of the definitions and axioms they are based on..
theruyan is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2007, 12:43 PM   #31
Alex
So Fucking Banned (YEA!!)
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 10,963
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paraskass View Post
the point is, my penis is huge... & my sperm explodes at 187,000 mph. WAY faster than light, IMHO
Speed of light is 186,000 miles per second.
__________________
Care about me?
Who?
Me!
Who?
Alex is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2007, 01:13 PM   #32
darling2
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 345
Typical newspaper science.

Einstein said that this was the light of speed in VACUUM it can't be speeded-up or slowed down in VACUUM.

When light travels through materials, it slows down. If it wouldn't lenses would not work.

This lady made light pass through a "cloud of ultracold atoms" which is not vacuum.

The lady did a great job, but Einstein was still right!
darling2 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2007, 01:56 PM   #33
RawAlex
So Fucking Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: In a house.
Posts: 9,465
More importantly, it would appear that she has discovered a method to turn gold into lead. There are very few reasons to make light more move slowly, few good applications, it really isn't something everyone goes "wow, I wish the light moved more slowly" (Except maybe after a few too many tabs of E... but that is a different type of science).

The real trick is to find a way to make something (anything) move faster than light. That is the lead to gold conversion we all dream of.
RawAlex is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2007, 02:35 PM   #34
Linkster
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: DeltaHell
Posts: 3,216
RawAlex - funny thing was that even Einstein said in his general relativity paper that the speed of light could be changed - had to do with the bending of light for the curvature of space - but he still tried for the gold
Linkster is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2007, 02:48 PM   #35
Randyyy
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,240
albert was one cool mofo
__________________
need video editing done? hit me up!
ICQ: 10347906
Randyyy is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2007, 04:16 PM   #36
Persignup Qon
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: HeLL
Posts: 853
Quote:
Originally Posted by mailman View Post
I have yet to read it but you think with the cost to go to harvard they could do up a better website!
co-muthafuckin-sign
__________________
OnProbation.com | PerSignup.com - Now Paying PPS and RevShare!
{{ Portfolio: TKME | AC | BGDINT | ESP - More Here... }}
If You Really Get Paid in Adult, You Should Be Getting Paid By Us!
Persignup Qon is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2007, 05:31 PM   #37
BigBen
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: scv
Posts: 2,299
Quote:
Originally Posted by $5 submissions View Post
...slowed light to 38 miles an hour, about the speed of rush-hour traffic.
The author has apparently never been in rush hour traffic in LA.
BigBen is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2007, 05:37 PM   #38
$5 submissions
I help you SUCCEED
 
$5 submissions's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: The Pearl of the Orient Seas
Posts: 32,195
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigBen View Post
The author has apparently never been in rush hour traffic in LA.
Definitely. 405 and the 10 are HORRIBLE. Well, at least the cars MOVE. I thought that was the worst until I moved to the Philippines... Nothing can compare to Manila (SLEX) traffic between 6PM and 9PM.... damn.
$5 submissions is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2007, 06:01 PM   #39
DirtyDave
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: TX
Posts: 198
Quote:
Originally Posted by Linkster View Post
The second reason its not correct is that the speed of light does actually change - year to year - by a fraction due to the slowing down of the speed of rotation of the earth by 1/10E5 of a second - which changes the actual duration of a second in time - and since C is a measurement of speed which is in M/sec the changing of the duration of a second changes the constants' value
So this is WAY beyond me but I had a thought a couple of months ago and maybe you could explain this to me.

Our perception of things is affected by our speed. So what is the ralative net affect of the idea that people on earth are all moving at the same speed (or close enough). But we are on a rotating planet, going around a sun, that is moving around a galaxy, that is moving through a universe that has several galaxies.

As too what exactly do I mean? I already said this was WAY beyond me!

David.
__________________
DelanyDecolleur.com :: Satin and Nylon Nude Glamour Model
DirtyDave is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2007, 06:10 PM   #40
Fap
Just Du It
 
Fap's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 12,094
Only if women had the right to vote..
Fap is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2007, 06:33 PM   #41
12clicks
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
12clicks's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: God's right hand
Posts: 19,788
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsatchell View Post
So this is WAY beyond me but I had a thought a couple of months ago and maybe you could explain this to me.

Our perception of things is affected by our speed. So what is the ralative net affect of the idea that people on earth are all moving at the same speed (or close enough). But we are on a rotating planet, going around a sun, that is moving around a galaxy, that is moving through a universe that has several galaxies.

As too what exactly do I mean? I already said this was WAY beyond me!

David.
this is where most of these theories including Einstiens fall apart.
Perception has no place in science. "relativity" is a concept that doesn't hold water.
the speed of light *is*
time *is* it doesn't matter if the human perception of it has changed, time itself has not.
__________________
I'm not a dinosaur, I'm a crocodile. I've seen dinosaurs come and go and I'm left unimpressed.
12clicks is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2007, 06:33 PM   #42
dakota1358
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Baltimore,Md
Posts: 2,114
Does this mean I can download porn faster?
__________________
Carmen Cocks Rocks
dakota1358 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2007, 06:47 PM   #43
$5 submissions
I help you SUCCEED
 
$5 submissions's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: The Pearl of the Orient Seas
Posts: 32,195
Quote:
Originally Posted by 12clicks View Post
this is where most of these theories including Einstiens fall apart.
Perception has no place in science. "relativity" is a concept that doesn't hold water.
the speed of light *is*
time *is* it doesn't matter if the human perception of it has changed, time itself has not.
Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle (published in 1927) ?
$5 submissions is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2007, 06:48 PM   #44
$5 submissions
I help you SUCCEED
 
$5 submissions's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: The Pearl of the Orient Seas
Posts: 32,195
Quote:
Originally Posted by dakota1358 View Post
Does this mean I can download porn faster?
Eventually yes, as soon as "sculpted light" is commercialized. It will take a while. Then again, given how fast semiconductor speed ramps up and if there's a huge enough market, the timeframe will probably be sooner rather than later.
$5 submissions is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2007, 06:49 PM   #45
candyflip
Carpe Visio
 
candyflip's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 43,064
Just? Says she did it in 1998.
__________________

Spend you some brain.
Email Me
candyflip is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2007, 06:52 PM   #46
12clicks
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
12clicks's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: God's right hand
Posts: 19,788
Quote:
Originally Posted by $5 submissions View Post
Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle (published in 1927) ?
as I said, the perception is not the reality. Man's ability to measure may improve his perception but it does not alter or change that which is.
__________________
I'm not a dinosaur, I'm a crocodile. I've seen dinosaurs come and go and I'm left unimpressed.
12clicks is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2007, 07:02 PM   #47
GigoloMason
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 742
Quote:
Originally Posted by 12clicks View Post
as I said, the perception is not the reality. Man's ability to measure may improve his perception but it does not alter or change that which is.
Actually that's demonstrabally false Or more accuratly the biggest disconnect between Newtonian and Quantum physics.

And whoever posted this really needs to re-read what einstein actually wrote before slamming it, as what this lady demonstrated has nothing to do with Einstein's claims. In any event parts of einstein's theories have been proven wrong\incomplete before.

Shit all you need to prove you can change the speed of light is a glass lense.
__________________

Last edited by GigoloMason; 04-14-2007 at 07:05 PM..
GigoloMason is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2007, 07:13 PM   #48
Ace_luffy
www.creationcrew.com
 
Ace_luffy's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: CREATIONCREW.COM CREATIONCREW.COM CREATIONCREW.COM CREATIONCREW.COM CREATIONCREW.COM CREATIONCREW.COM
Posts: 12,110
Quote:
Originally Posted by notabook View Post
I love her Hitler salute, so sexy.





Sieg Heil indeed.
that's really great nice posture.....
__________________


++ Adult and Mainstream Websites Designs | 10 banners for only $50 | html5 Banners ++
email : [email protected] Telegram : https://t.me/creationcrew | HTML5/Responsive Site - Div/CSS - ElevatedX - NATs - Wordpress

Ace_luffy is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2007, 07:16 PM   #49
12clicks
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
12clicks's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: God's right hand
Posts: 19,788
Quote:
Originally Posted by GigoloMason View Post
In any event parts of einstein's theories have been proven wrong\incomplete before.
yes, dick, over icecream. I did it.
__________________
I'm not a dinosaur, I'm a crocodile. I've seen dinosaurs come and go and I'm left unimpressed.
12clicks is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2007, 07:18 PM   #50
Linkster
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: DeltaHell
Posts: 3,216
Quote:
Originally Posted by 12clicks View Post
Perception has no place in science. "relativity" is a concept that doesn't hold water.
the speed of light *is*
time *is* it doesn't matter if the human perception of it has changed, time itself has not.
And like Mason posted - this is where your "theory" falls apart - the speed of light *is not* - it is only based on mans' ability to measure using the best instruments (and the most accurate) that he has at that particular time in history - using the tools that are available today (pulse lasers and atomic clocks) we still see the effect of the slowing down of the rotation of the earth (an effect of the tides/oceans movements) causing the measurement of a second changing slightly - therefore it IS all relative

If you want to go to the philosophical side of things and say that time is a constant but mans ability to measure it changes daily - then I would say you have a good argument - but that has nothing to do with his perception - just his limitations

Last edited by Linkster; 04-14-2007 at 07:19 PM..
Linkster is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Post New Thread Reply
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >

Bookmarks
Thread Tools



Advertising inquiries - marketing at gfy dot com

Contact Admin - Advertise - GFY Rules - Top

©2000-, AI Media Network Inc



Powered by vBulletin
Copyright © 2000- Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.