![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
![]() ![]() |
|
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed. |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 2,731
|
Perfect 10 -0 Google - 1, But ...
Google wins adult photos appeal
A US federal appeal court has overturned a ruling preventing Google's image-search displaying small versions of photos from an adult website. Perfect 10, which publishes a pornographic magazine and website, launched its case against Google in November 2004. It later added the Amazon.com site to its complaint. Google said the thumbnail images were "fair use" and the court agreed they were "highly transformative" work. The original ruling had said that Google's thumbnails could undermine Perfect 10's efforts to sell small images to mobile phone users. "We are delighted that the court affirmed long-standing principles of fair use," said Google General Counsel Kent Walker. "Google services respect intellectual property and help people around the world find what they're looking for," he added. 'Might be liable' Perfect 10 also said that the thumbnail pictures on Google were helping users to find other websites that were using the full-sized images without permission. On that claim, the court said: "There is no dispute that Google... assists a worldwide audience of users to access infringing materials." It ruled that Google might be liable if it could have taken "simple measures to prevent further damage to Perfect 10's copyrighted works and failed to take such steps". The case reflects the growing discrepancy between technological change and the legal system, in particular over copyright and fair use. |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: westcoast usa
Posts: 4,007
|
not sure if it is good or bad news..somehow i am thinking that perfect 10 also gained some traffic from google searches..perhaps even some sign ups.
but calling Perfect 10 pornographic is by no means correct. Unless you also call playboy magazine pornographic..most do not. |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Show Yer Tits!
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Somewhere Out there...
Posts: 25,792
|
Norman will probably sue the court system now.
__________________
![]() Scammer Alert: acer19 acer [email protected] [email protected] Money stolen using PayPal
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |