swampthing

petiteteenager dot com

this guy has got galleries up on his site called "REALMIX"

look for the galleries that say "realmix"

They are amateur pictures of regular girls. These are not industry girls.

Now you cannot tell me this son of a bitch, has rights to use these pics.
If your program is sponsoring this guy, you might want to check it out and make your own judgment. You probably dont want your program to be associated with this individual. Some of these pics he is posting look pretty illegal to me.

notabook

I don't think Greg has anything to worry about.

__________________

Steve Awesome

I assume you were attempting to link to this?
http://realgirls.petiteteenager.com/1/realmix16/

__________________

swampthing

didnt want to link to it, But yes. Thats exactly what I'm talking about.

Don't tell me all that shit is legal, because I know fucking better.

swampthing

and why and how is that? do tell.

Big_D

looks pretty ok to me, just another teen tgp

swampthing

bullshit.

How in the fuck can you say that?

yahoo-xxx-girls.com

The domain name looks shady, however the "actors" seem to be 18+ ...

The required legal 2257 record is missing with the "custodian of records" info... This guy should be investigated...

Later,

.

RawAlex

Interesting selling technique.

swampthing

how can you say they seem to be over 18? seriously. These are not industry girls, where there is an ability to prove the age.

yahoo-xxx-girls.com

I have looked at the girls... thats why I said they seem to be 18+, however I did say that this guy should be investigated because he is missing the required legal 2257 record... where you would find the "custodian of records"... such proves the ages of the "actors"...

I am not siding with this guy swampthing...

Later,

rowan

From what I can remember the webmaster is Australian, so 2257 regs don't strictly apply to him. There are local regs to follow but none of the images look to be sexually explicit (I just quickly skimmed them)

However, using a likeness for commercial purposes without a signed release is definitely not legal.

There's also copyright violation to consider.

stev0

They don't look under 18...

If you're that concerned contact the webmaster, don't start a witch hunt trying to trash peoples reputations without any proof.

teg0

I enjoy those types of galleries

__________________
OV Tube - Tube Script Software

stev0

http://realgirls.petiteteenager.com/1/realmix7/13.jpg

isn't that a Kate's Playground pic?

yahoo-xxx-girls.com

I did a whois on this site and its in the US...

---
Westchester, CA , US
----

stickyfingerz

yup.......

rowan

Registrant Contact:
WhoisGuard
WhoisGuard Protected (e5934a01b4d04e1cbe3fe6b09e9c0c57.protect@whoisgua rd.com)
...

swampthing

Don't even try it. Do not even fucking go there.
This is no fucking witch hunt, you stupid fuck.

and secondly, I do not have to contact the webmaster.

There is not just one "realmix" gallery listed on his site. There are several.
I am also pretty disgusted at the fact that you probably are not the only one that will have this opinion. It is pretty fucking sad.

stev0

"Fuck fuckity fuck fuck fuck"

Don't get your panties in a bunch.

stickyfingerz

This thread is silly other than the Kate pic which needs to be removed.

stev0

Agreed...

that site looks like every other amateur/teen blog or tgp out there.

noone1

Is this thread a joke? I hope so, because it's fucking retarded.

"how can you say they seem to be over 18? seriously. These are not industry girls, where there is an ability to prove the age."

Are you kidding me? Maybe he has it in his desk in his office. They aren't "industry girls" because they don't have there own personal sites? Riiiiiight.

For all you know, he paid for those pictures and has all the info he needs for them.

I see nothing wrong with this. So unless you can prove that there is something illegal going on here, I suggest you just move along.

Edit: OMG http://realgirls.petiteteenager.com/1/realmix7/
Raven Riley? She isn't an industry girl!!!111

yahoo-xxx-girls.com

It goes by where the server is, from what I understand, and not the physical location of the webmaster... No matter... Rowan, his 2257 record is required by US law to display the "custodian of records" info, if its hosted in the US...

Down-under is strict on the adult industry... I must ask why do you think this guy is there ? and if so then why not use a server there ?

Later,

swampthing

I wouldn't want the readers of this thread to think that just because you found one pic of an industry girl, that the rest are legit.

What it does show, is that he is has no idea where these pics originated from.

commonsense

LOL x 10

Tell us, who the fuck are you?
















** Besides an ASSHAT

noone1

Are you kidding me? LOL. Petiteteenager has been around a while and is pretty damn popular. He knows very well that picture is of Kate.

Edit: Ok, I'm out of this thread. I think it's a joke and I've fallen for it. Damn.

swampthing

Your a fucking moron. Besides that, what in the fuck is he using raven riley and katesplayground to advertise FLING with?

and again, your picking out photos that are obvious girls in the indousty, 99% of those girls are not.

rowan

Yes, and that's why it's surprising. Surely he should know that such content is for direct promotion only, or is spunkycash allowing affiliates to use their pics to send traffic to fling these days?

swampthing

then why is he using them to promote FLING? that a seriuos violation of some TOS right there to say the least.

again, 99% of those girls are NOT industry!!

swampthing

who the fuck are you? and why should that even fucking matter. The stupidity level has gone through the fucking roof here.

Dont tell me what the law is, and you certainly cant make the shit up as you see fit.

stev0

What the hell are you talking about... There's no registry that "industry girls" subscribe to. He could have taken those photos for all you know, you don't know and THAT is the point everyone posting in this thread is trying to hammer into your thick newbie head.

The illegitimate photos that jump out to me are Raven Riley and Kate's Playground, those are copyright violations. I'm willing to say that because I'm quite certain that their use was not authorized on this site as it is not promoting Jaymancash or Kate's program. As for the rest... how the fuck would I know? and they're not mine, why should I care?

Ron2k1

mattz

Don't you have something better to do with your time like work or something? Rather than sit here and whine about some small site that you have nothing to do with.

commonsense

I'm a webmaster, and you?


I'm sure that site sends more joins to Raven and Kate's sites in a week than you will in a lifetime. Do you know for a fact that there is STOLEN content there, or that the content is used without permission?

It sounds like you're a newb or jealous webmaster that looked at the Alexa for that site and wonders why you're not doing better.

The fact that you don't know who those girls are or haven't seen them before doesn't mean a god damn thing.

Ron2k1

The site is pretty big actually http://www.alexa.com/data/details/tr...teteenager.com

swampthing

Im not a newb. Ive been in the industry since 96. Don't let the low post count or the nic fool you.

The fact that he would even have those pics in there with the rest, should prove to you that he has no idea who in the fuck those girls are, where they come from, or how fucking old they are.

swampthing

yes it is.

mattz

how do you know? And so what? This thread is lame, go do something productive with your time rather than sit here and try to find flaws in a site you have nothing to do with, more than likely to make it seems like you actually know something anout this biz. We all know thats far from the truth after reading this thread.

btw...who are you?

mattz

oh cool, doesn't really matter, he has nothing to do with this site, and should mind his own business rather than try to make it look like he knows something

directfiesta

get a job as a cop

__________________
I know that Asspimple is stoopid ... As he says, it is a FACT !

But I can't figure out how he can breathe or type , at the same time ....

Ron2k1

So if you're doing business for so long, how can you be so offended by a regular teen tgp which has been around for many years.

Your postcount doesn't matter to me, but you sound exactly like the regular newbie crybaby

D

The girls all look a probable 18+ to me.

Maybe the OP's at that "awkward stage" of growing up (early 20's), when you begin to realize that you're aging... when 18-year-olds look younger than you think they should?

When I was 22ish, I remember thinking: 'no way that girl's legal - she's at least 4 years younger than me........

...

oh.'

Otherwise, there could be more back-end drama here than I care to involve myself with - the fact that they're unknowns amounts to meaning absolutely nothing, and anyone actually in the business knows that. Whatever the case, imho, there's no way someone in their right mind can simply look at those girls and say that they're absolutely not 18.

__________________
-D.
ICQ: 202-96-31

yahoo-xxx-girls.com

I was wondering... does all of these pictures have watermarks to associate programs ?

swampthing

the crybaby shit, doesnt work with me, sorry. You are going to have to try harder then that.

but, you stupid cunts who are sticking up for this guy, keep posting, becuase you are proving good points. That there are alot of sorry mother fuckers in this industry who certainly do not belong here. You probably belong in jail, getting fucked up the ass.

Dopy

OK, page http://realgirls.petiteteenager dot com/1/realmix12/ - 20.jpg


This is a 14 year old girl from a currently active Russian non nude model site. I know there are others but this one is absolute proof.

commonsense

Your lack of common sense and attacking an established site with no proof is showing everyone you are indeed a newb. 11 years in the business you should of learned something. But then again, what did you do during those 11 years? Sites, programs, production, programming, distribution, retail?



FYI: Jerking off to porn doesn't mean you are "in" the industry.

swampthing

stop, this isnt lightspeed content. this isnt teenrevenue. This is not one of those types of threads.

Those sites can prove the age of those girls, this is something entirely different.

I totally agree with some of the statements you have made there, but that doesnt rule out the fact, that there very well, could be some illegal shit being used there, and he has no fucking way to prove that shit.

I hate 2257 but, thats the exact fucking reason why the powers that be want it.

Dopy

The guy who owns this site is pushing over the boundary and anyone who has been trading in the teen niche for long enough will recognise the content in his so called mix area.

TheSenator

Thanks for the site. Great amateurish flickerish myspacish photos.

__________________
ISeekGirls.com since 2005