Where is the 2257 link on this page for the titties in the corner? - GoFuckYourself.com

Secksy · 08-07-2007, 12:35 AM

I'm just curious where the 2257 link is for the ImLive picture advert in the corner? Or the explicit banners that are posted here? Are forums exempt? I am somewhat confused

bobby666 · 08-07-2007, 02:56 AM

maybe somewhere .......

donborno · 08-07-2007, 03:12 AM

Whoever produces any book, magazine, periodical, film, videotape, or other matter which contains one or more visual depictions made after November 1, 1990 of actual sexually explicit conduct

RayBonga · 08-07-2007, 03:14 AM

OMFG! Wait until FIBI finds out

c-lo · 08-07-2007, 03:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by donborno

Whoever produces any book, magazine, periodical, film, videotape, or other matter which contains one or more visual depictions made after November 1, 1990 of actual sexually explicit conduct

That's part of the ancient regs...they've been updated. Now pretty much anything beyond a tight-fit tee needs documentation.

Secksy: I guess they think they're exempt.

LaoTzu · 08-07-2007, 05:33 AM

Best thing for the entire industry would be if the FBI went after GFY. See what happens when the government puts all those high post counts in jeopardy

I can't think of anything that would solidify the WM community better than that actually. Somebody dime in GFY!

Secksy · 08-07-2007, 07:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by c-lo

That's part of the ancient regs...they've been updated. Now pretty much anything beyond a tight-fit tee needs documentation.

Secksy: I guess they think they're exempt.

And that was what I gathered as well. Hmmm. Oh well

Kevsh · 08-07-2007, 07:36 AM

Going by that theory they would need 2257 for just about every 2nd thread posted on this site ...

TheDoc · 08-07-2007, 07:45 AM

With the current 2257 law, they don't need it for the girl... And since they know who the advertisers are they can point them to the people that have the records.

Not that hard to figure out.

LAJ · 08-07-2007, 09:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RayBonga

OMFG! Wait until FIBI finds out

Do you not think that someone from the FBI is on this site every day?

tranza · 08-07-2007, 09:55 AM

GFY never had any 2257 link...

c-lo · 08-07-2007, 09:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDoc

With the current 2257 law, they don't need it for the girl... And since they know who the advertisers are they can point them to the people that have the records.

Not that hard to figure out.

Her nipples are exposed, so they do. The fact that they know the advertisers means nothing. I know of all the sponsors that I get my promo material from, but that doesn't make me exempt from record-keeping.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kevsh

Going by that theory they would need 2257 for just about every 2nd thread posted on this site ...

I haven't found a clause in the current regs that says they don't have to. Assuming that they don't keep records, I would say it's for the same reason that many others don't; they doubt that they'll be inspected.

Quote:

Originally Posted by tranza

GFY never had any 2257 link...

That doesn't mean they aren't supposed to, though. Right?

I'm not meaning to argue here. I often wonder why they don't have a link as well. I'm sure there are feds on this site every day, so you'd think these guys would know that & prepare for it. But then again maybe they are prepared & just haven't posted a link.

TheDoc · 08-07-2007, 09:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by c-lo

Her nipples are exposed, so they do. The fact that they know the advertisers means nothing. I know of all the sponsors that I get my promo material from, but that doesn't make me exempt from record-keeping.

Nipples are fine under the current law. The banners, might, make them secondary producers, but they never reproduced anything and forums fall under some other laws too.

They probably should have a statement, at least listing the sponsor/banners with a 2257 link to the sponsors 2257 page, it's something which is better than nothing.

gandalfuy · 08-07-2007, 11:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LAJ

Do you not think that someone from the FBI is on this site every day?

c-lo · 08-08-2007, 03:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDoc

Nipples are fine under the current law. The banners, might, make them secondary producers, but they never reproduced anything and forums fall under some other laws too.

They probably should have a statement, at least listing the sponsor/banners with a 2257 link to the sponsors 2257 page, it's something which is better than nothing.

Oh, I had no idea there were seperate laws regarding forums. You don't know which laws exactly, do you? And yeah, they should definitely have something...to at least show they tried to comply (if they have to.)

just a punk · 08-08-2007, 04:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tranza

GFY never had any 2257 link...

Especially in all those "would you hit it" threads. Perhaps the img links should be disabled?

StarkReality · 08-08-2007, 04:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by c-lo

Her nipples are exposed, so they do. The fact that they know the advertisers means nothing. I know of all the sponsors that I get my promo material from, but that doesn't make me exempt from record-keeping.

That's in the new, proposed version, but not in the current one.

davecummings · 08-08-2007, 04:37 PM

I heard that genitals needed to be 2257 declared. But, boobs, too?

Dave

jeffrey · 08-08-2007, 04:39 PM

Oh am I glad to be Canadian.

davecummings · 08-08-2007, 04:41 PM

Also, see the important 2257 stuff here: http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showthread.php?t=756075

Dave

Hammer · 08-08-2007, 05:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDoc

With the current 2257 law, they don't need it for the girl... And since they know who the advertisers are they can point them to the people that have the records.

Not that hard to figure out.

You need to get a clue, or talk to an attorney instead of talking out of your ass. They don't need to worry about the girl in the corner showing her boobs, but there are plenty of explicit photos posted on this site.

Then again, the ex owner has his affiliates convinced that they don't need to docs if they hotlink his content either.

TheDoc · 08-08-2007, 05:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammer

You need to get a clue, or talk to an attorney instead of talking out of your ass. They don't need to worry about the girl in the corner showing her boobs, but there are plenty of explicit photos posted on this site.

Then again, the ex owner has his affiliates convinced that they don't need to docs if they hotlink his content either.

I always talk out of my ass, it's amazing to see in person.

The posted photos are what falls under the forum laws, they aren't making the post, they don't need the records. The closest thing on this board that would need records is the banners.

I don't know what ex owner or program you are referring too.

08-07-2007, 12:35 AM	#1
Secksy Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Brentwood, CA Posts: 244	Where is the 2257 link on this page for the titties in the corner? I'm just curious where the 2257 link is for the ImLive picture advert in the corner? Or the explicit banners that are posted here? Are forums exempt? I am somewhat confused

08-07-2007, 02:56 AM	#2
bobby666 boots are my religion Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Heart of europe Posts: 21,765	maybe somewhere ....... __________________

08-07-2007, 07:45 AM	#9
TheDoc Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Currently Incognito Posts: 13,827	With the current 2257 law, they don't need it for the girl... And since they know who the advertisers are they can point them to the people that have the records. Not that hard to figure out. __________________ ~TheDoc - ICQ7765825 It's all disambiguation

08-07-2007, 09:55 AM	#11
tranza ICQ: 197-556-237 Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: BRASIL !!! Posts: 57,559	GFY never had any 2257 link... __________________ I'm just a newbie.

08-08-2007, 04:37 PM	#18
davecummings Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: San Diego Posts: 2,922	I heard that genitals needed to be 2257 declared. But, boobs, too? Dave __________________ Dave Cummings www.davecummings.com www.davecummings.tv San Diego Email--- [email protected]

08-07-2007, 03:12 AM	#3
donborno Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Vienna, Austria Posts: 374	Whoever produces any book, magazine, periodical, film, videotape, or other matter which contains one or more visual depictions made after November 1, 1990 of actual sexually explicit conduct

08-07-2007, 03:14 AM	#4
RayBonga too cool for highschool Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: East side, West side, Worldwide! Posts: 12,164	OMFG! Wait until FIBI finds out

08-07-2007, 05:33 AM	#6
LaoTzu Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 350	Best thing for the entire industry would be if the FBI went after GFY. See what happens when the government puts all those high post counts in jeopardy I can't think of anything that would solidify the WM community better than that actually. Somebody dime in GFY!

08-07-2007, 07:36 AM	#8
Kevsh Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: TO Posts: 8,619	Going by that theory they would need 2257 for just about every 2nd thread posted on this site ...

08-08-2007, 04:39 PM	#19
jeffrey Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Alberta Posts: 1,864	Oh am I glad to be Canadian. __________________ Coming Soon!

08-08-2007, 04:41 PM	#20
davecummings Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: San Diego Posts: 2,922	Also, see the important 2257 stuff here: http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showthread.php?t=756075 Dave __________________ Dave Cummings www.davecummings.com www.davecummings.tv San Diego Email--- [email protected]