Court Strikes Down Age Verification For Adult Sites - GoFuckYourself.com

BOSS1 · 10-23-2007, 09:56 PM

How Appealing reports that a court has struck down age verification requirements for porn sites, as a First Amendment violation. Here is the ruling (PDF). While the average reader here has never been to such a site, porn has been a driving force in the economics and technology of the Net. The age verification requirements of U.S.C. Title 18, Section 2257 were yet another attempt to regulate to death what the government can't outright prohibit. The requirements intruded on the privacy and safety of performers and created headaches for sites like flickr and photobucket that host images. It is has long been thought that the requirements wouldn't hold up in court, but this is the first actual ruling.

full story at http://howappealing.law.com/102307.html#029204

seeric · 10-23-2007, 10:05 PM

thread title is misleading.

thought you were talking about using credit cards to verify consumers of adult materials.

BannerAnt · 10-23-2007, 11:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by A1R3K

thread title is misleading.

thought you were talking about using credit cards to verify consumers of adult materials.

from the title, i would have thought the complete opposite of you.

GirlsOnYou · 10-24-2007, 12:23 AM

So no more 2257 soon?

marketsmart · 10-24-2007, 12:46 AM

my penis is misleading... from the first sight, it seems like a very docile and nice appendage of myself, but when it goes to work, it is a very destructive piece of well trained machinery....

10-23-2007, 09:56 PM	#1
BOSS1 Confirmed User Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Montreal / Sparta Posts: 4,331	Court Strikes Down Age Verification For Adult Sites How Appealing reports that a court has struck down age verification requirements for porn sites, as a First Amendment violation. Here is the ruling (PDF). While the average reader here has never been to such a site, porn has been a driving force in the economics and technology of the Net. The age verification requirements of U.S.C. Title 18, Section 2257 were yet another attempt to regulate to death what the government can't outright prohibit. The requirements intruded on the privacy and safety of performers and created headaches for sites like flickr and photobucket that host images. It is has long been thought that the requirements wouldn't hold up in court, but this is the first actual ruling. full story at http://howappealing.law.com/102307.html#029204 __________________ NEW SITE: Stockings Kingdom Lesbians in Latex, Lesbians in Stockings, Granny Sex, BDSM Porn, Latex and Sex, Custom Foot Fetish, Femdom Movies and Kinky Porn Pass. 300+ hosted flvs, 500+ hosted galleries, Page Peel ADs.. NATS export and payouts twice a month

10-24-2007, 12:23 AM	#4
GirlsOnYou Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2006 Posts: 617	So no more 2257 soon? __________________ * Selling my adult sites. Email: furaldbullon48aol9com - Replace 48 with @ and 9 with .

10-23-2007, 10:05 PM	#2
seeric .......... Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: .......... Posts: 41,917	thread title is misleading. thought you were talking about using credit cards to verify consumers of adult materials.

10-24-2007, 12:46 AM	#5
marketsmart HOMICIDAL TROLL KILLER Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Sunnybrook Institution for the Criminally Insane Posts: 20,419	my penis is misleading... from the first sight, it seems like a very docile and nice appendage of myself, but when it goes to work, it is a very destructive piece of well trained machinery....