And this is why the adult industry has such a bad rep...

[Libertine]

http://jailbaitgallery.com

Underage teens being used to promote porn and adult dating sites.

A big thumbs up for Teenrevenue and Fling.com, who have both known about this site for ages, but apparently don't mind the traffic

[comeplay]

they never promoted fling and teenrevenue until recently

[comeplay]

it was adbrite for the longest time btw

[Martin]

A lot of pay sites cater to the under 18 over 15 girl niche. TONS!

[Twig]

Wait I dont get it. So they show underaged porn? Or do they show underaged girls in skimpy clothes and then advertise legal porn? Or is it just girls that look young but are actually legal?

[tony286]

Fling accepts that?

[Martin]

Pig tails, teddy bears, lollipops etc in hardcore porn shoots..

[Deputy Chief Command]

Originally Posted by Martin

A lot of pay sites cater to the under 18 over 15 girl niche. TONS!

no shit captain .

[Libertine]

Originally Posted by comeplay

they never promoted fling and teenrevenue until recently

I seem to recall the same companies advertising on that site the last time I stumbled upon it, and that was quite a few months ago. Then again, it was quite a while ago, so I might be mistaken.

Originally Posted by Martin

A lot of pay sites cater to the under 18 over 15 girl niche. TONS!

And your point is?

Originally Posted by Twig

Wait I dont get it. So they show underaged porn? Or do they show underaged girls in skimpy clothes and then advertise legal porn? Or is it just girls that look young but are actually legal?

They show underaged girls in skimpy clothes, then advertise legal porn.

[minddust]

bump for bad rep

[Martin]

My point is where ya been the last oh... 7 years?

Not saying it's the best business practice, just that it's been going on awhile now.

[denny007]

I doubt there are many virgins on those photos. Whats with this fucking hysteria ? If these girls does not give you hard on you are a 100% FAGGOT

[Vick!]

Is it also illegal if the underage chicks post their pics for rating in skimpy cloths? asking because i dont know..

[Martin]

"Meet VERY young girls on Fling.com"

That's not good....

[Libertine]

Originally Posted by Martin

My point is where ya been the last oh... 7 years?

Not saying it's the best business practice, just that it's been going on awhile now.

I've been working in adult for over 10 years, so yes, I know this has been going on for a long time. People tend to just ignore this, though, so every once in a while it needs to be brought to their attention.

It's not just "not the best business practice", it's a danger to the industry. A parent who sees his 15 year old daughter's holiday beach pictures in bikini on a site like this, might just take action. Things like that can easily lead to media or political attention, which not only hurts the reputation of the industry, but can also lead to even stricter legislation.

Where do you think things like 2257 come from?

[Martin]

I fully agree with you man..

Checking out some of these pictures here and some of the girls in them are yoooooooooung..... Porn advertisements shouldn't be permitted on these sites.

[Vick!]

Originally Posted by Libertine

A parent who sees his 15 year old daughter's holiday beach pictures in bikini on a site like this, might just take action.

doesn't girls post their similar pics to myspace and other similar sites?

[Libertine]

Originally Posted by Vick!

Is it also illegal if the underage chicks post their pics for rating in skimpy cloths? asking because i dont know..

It might be, depending on the pictures. Several teens have been arrested for producing cp... that is to say, nude pictures of themselves. Since there have also been arrests among owners of non-nude underage sites, and judges have ruled that certain non-nude pictures can still be considered cp, it seems likely that self-posted pictures in skimpy clothes might be considered cp as well.

In the case of this site, though, that's beside the point, since the pictures on this site weren't posted by the girls themselves.

This site is almost certainly illegal simply because it infringes on the copyrights of the people who took the pictures. Moreover, the context can be claimed to be damaging to the subjects' reputations, which makes any "fair use" claim extremely weak and opens up the site owner to lawsuits demanding compensation for damages.

From my standpoint, however, the biggest problem isn't a legal one. It's that sites like this obscure the difference between the *adult* industry and underage content. Simply put, sites like this one create the impression among people outside the industry that the porn industry is filled with underage models.

[Libertine]

Originally Posted by Vick!

doesn't girls post their similar pics to myspace and other similar sites?

Yes, but that doesn't really matter.

Most parents have naked pictures of their children as babies, taking baths and stuff like that. In a photo album, those pictures are normal - though usually embarrassing for the subject.

However, stick them on a site next to pictures of Little Lupe sucking a cock, and they become something entirely different.

Context matters.

[denny007]

I tell you what gives adult industry bad rep:
Popup hells
Dialers and other scumware
Pre-checked cross-sales
Sites where people pay $30 and there is like 20 movies and 1000 pictures
Dating or escort sites with fake profiles
etc.

Definitely NOT photos of teenagers in swimsuits.

[Vick!]

gotcha..

[Fap]

hot?.....

[denny007]

However, stick them on a site next to pictures of Little Lupe sucking a cock, and they become something entirely different.

This one I agree, first that little bitch is ugly + the cock makes it even worse.

[denny007]

Another thing which gives bad rep - trick banners pretending to be live chat or a tube movie while its just clickable picture/flash, like this one:
http://promos.fling.com/static/flash...r&pg=&g=&prg=1

[Libertine]

Originally Posted by denny007

I tell you what gives adult industry bad rep:
Popup hells
Dialers and other scumware
Pre-checked cross-sales
Sites where people pay $30 and there is like 20 movies and 1000 pictures
Dating or escort sites with fake profiles
etc.

Definitely NOT photos of teenagers in swimsuits.

Judging by your previous post in this thread, you're an idiot and I shouldn't even waste time on you. However, I'll try and explain it to you just once.

The things you named are what gives porn sites a bad rep when it comes to trustworthiness. Those things cause people to be wary of visiting porn sites, trusting porn sites with their creditcard data, etc. Definitely a bad thing, but not half as bad as what sites like this one do.

I am fairly certain you are about 20 years old, and don't have children. You see girls like even the younger ones on this site as "fair game", which I suppose is normal.

The problem is that many older people, who may have daughters themselves, see girls like the younger ones on this site as children, and they freak out when they see a site like this.

In a world where anything even remotely related to cp drives people into a murderous frenzy, sites that feature both UNDERAGE girls as well as PORN ads are obviously a very dangerous thing - especially when the sites being advertised are part of the "mainstream" adult industry, and reflect upon the industry as a whole.

Judging by your earlier comment about how these girls probably aren't even virgins, you probably don't care a great deal about (underage) teen sex or (underage) teens being shown in sexually suggestive poses, at least when they're not being exploited.

Lawmakers and judges do care a great deal about these things, though. And lawmakers and judges matter to this industry. Laws like 2257 hit the industry as a whole.

[Matt 26z]

Originally Posted by denny007

I tell you what gives adult industry bad rep:
...
Definitely NOT photos of teenagers in swimsuits.

If seductive photos of underage girls are being used to draw in traffic to push "barely legal" porn, then yes, it's a very bad thing. Porn and underage do not belong in the same sentance.

I don't see how any ethical, legitimate adult webmaster would see it any other way.

[Iron Fist]

Originally Posted by Libertine

Yes, but that doesn't really matter.

Most parents have naked pictures of their children as babies, taking baths and stuff like that. In a photo album, those pictures are normal - though usually embarrassing for the subject.

However, stick them on a site next to pictures of Little Lupe sucking a cock, and they become something entirely different.

Context matters.

What he said ^^^^

[Shoplifter]

What script is he using?

The idea sucks, but I like the layout.

[american pervert]

those bitches are fucking hot!!!

[Angry Jew Cat - Banned for Life]

Originally Posted by Libertine

A parent who sees his 15 year old daughter's holiday beach pictures in bikini on a site like this, might just take action.

I'd think most parents cruising jailbaitgallery.com would pretty much keep their mouth shut about it

[MattO]

If you think that's bad do a google search for "deleted youtube"

[Angry Jew Cat - Banned for Life]

Originally Posted by Libertine

I am fairly certain you are about 20 years old, and don't have children. You see girls like even the younger ones on this site as "fair game", which I suppose is normal.

The problem is that many older people, who may have daughters themselves, see girls like the younger ones on this site as children, and they freak out when they see a site like this.

excellent point. hell i was still banging highschool sluts until i was like 22. i didn't feel bad about it then, i don't bad about having done it now. however if some guy n his 40s find sout his 16 year old daughter is in her bra and panties and somequasi-porn site i'm sure he'sgoing to flip his fucking top. which again brings me to the question of "what the fuck is he doing surfing jailbaitgalleries.com for?"..

[Libertine]

Originally Posted by ismokeblunts

I'd think most parents cruising jailbaitgallery.com would pretty much keep their mouth shut about it

Teen girls posts holiday beach pictures on myspace. Guy finds pictures on myspace and posts them on message board. Guy takes pictures off of message board and posts them on this site. Classmate of teen girl sees girl on this site. Classmate tells other classmates. Teacher finds out, alerts parents. Parents see daughter next to Little Lupe and big cock, freak out, start lawsuit and get media attention. Politician needing votes decides to take measures against the adult industry. Adult industry gets fucked.

Yes, I got the joke, but the story that I described isn't exactly far-fetched. All it takes is one attention-whoring teen girl with conservative, sue-happy parents, a slow news week, and a politician looking for votes.

[Angry Jew Cat - Banned for Life]

Originally Posted by Libertine

Teen girls posts holiday beach pictures on myspace. Guy finds pictures on myspace and posts them on message board. Guy takes pictures off of message board and posts them on this site. Classmate of teen girl sees girl on this site. Classmate tells other classmates. Teacher finds out, alerts parents. Parents see daughter next to Little Lupe and big cock, freak out, start lawsuit and get media attention. Politician needing votes decides to take measures against the adult industry. Adult industry gets fucked.

Yes, I got the joke, but the story that I described isn't exactly far-fetched. All it takes is one attention-whoring teen girl with conservative, sue-happy parents, a slow news week, and a politician looking for votes.

true enough....

i bet teenrevenue's stuff converts FUCKING FANTASTIC on that site's traffic...

[denny007]

I am fairly certain you are about 20 years old

You are certainly wrong. Probably quite often methink.

The problem is that many older people, who may have daughters themselves, see girls like the younger ones on this site as children, and they freak out when they see a site like this.

Question is - how they landed at that page at first place ? Mistake ? Not likely. They like young meat too.

you probably don't care a great deal about (underage) teen sex or (underage) teens being shown in sexually suggestive poses

Sex is allowed from 14/15 in normal countries and thats where for me starts underage (bellow 14/15). BTW I am double age of my current girlfriend and she looks like 15 (she is 18). Whenever we go somewhere I see most men look at her with lust, envying me my young cute little thing.

[Libertine]

Originally Posted by MattO

If you think that's bad do a google search for "deleted youtube"

The content on this site isn't what's bad. The fact that it has advertising from established adult sites is the problem here.

Anonib, the chans, message boards, etc. all have far worse content. But relatively few of those have prominent adult advertising.

My point isn't that this site is the evilest thing since Hitler, it's that the adult industry needs to stay clear of sites like this one.

[Libertine]

Originally Posted by denny007

You are certainly wrong. Probably quite often methink.

Question is - how they landed at that page at first place ? Mistake ? Not likely. They like young meat too.
Sex is allowed from 14/15 in normal countries and thats where for me starts underage (bellow 14/15). BTW I am double age of my current girlfriend and she looks like 15 (she is 18). Whenever we go somewhere I see most men look at her with lust, envying me my young cute little thing.

So you're 36 years old, and tell people on a message board that if they don't get hard-ons when looking at the 14 year olds on that sites, they're faggots?

Eh, yeah. I'm just gonna ignore you from now on, if you don't mind.

[MattO]

Originally Posted by Libertine

The content on this site isn't what's bad. The fact that it has advertising from established adult sites is the problem here.

Take a look through the 1st result for "deleted youtube" there are Etology ads on there, including Brazzers ads.
I don't think people who upload pictures of their young kids to youtube expect the videos to end up on a site like that.

[D]

That's the same site that AFF stopped advertising on months ago due to GFY pressure (?).

[denny007]

So you're 36 years old, and tell people on a message board that if they don't get hard-ons when looking at the 14 year olds on that sites, they're faggots?

14-18 year olds with developped bodies, yes thats what I am saying.

Eh, yeah. I'm just gonna ignore you from now on, if you don't mind.

Please.

Which are your favorite gaysites BTW ?

[Libertine]

Originally Posted by MattO

Take a look through the 1st result for "deleted youtube" there are Etology ads on there, including Brazzers ads.
I don't think people who upload pictures of their young kids to youtube expect the videos to end up on a site like that.

Ah, my mistake. My ad-blockers remove etology from pages, so I didn't notice those.

[Angry Jew Cat - Banned for Life]

Originally Posted by Libertine

The content on this site isn't what's bad. The fact that it has advertising from established adult sites is the problem here.

Anonib, the chans, message boards, etc. all have far worse content. But relatively few of those have prominent adult advertising.

My point isn't that this site is the evilest thing since Hitler, it's that the adult industry needs to stay clear of sites like this one.

Brazzers is 4chan's new big sponsor. Another classy client for Brazzers, lol...

[Kevsh]

Originally Posted by denny007

I doubt there are many virgins on those photos. Whats with this fucking hysteria ? If these girls does not give you hard on you are a 100% FAGGOT

99 posts in a little over 2 years ... with your mentality, I really hope its another 2 years before you hit 100.


Btw is it just coincidence they push Lupe on that site prominently?
I doubt it ...

[CDSmith]

I can't decide where most of the fault lies, with the webmaster and/or company that runs such a site and puts up the pictures,
or
the thousands upon thousands of young teen girls out there who seem to think it's cool to upload or otherwise send in these pics
or
the parents for not knowing what their precious darling little brats are up to on the computer.

[Jens Van Assterdam]

Meet VERY young girls on Fling.com:

WTF?!!!!!!!!!!!!

[denny007]

Originally Posted by Kevsh

99 posts in a little over 2 years ...

Useless cunts who has nothing else to do post on GFY a lot. Busy dudes making bucks post less.

[GatorB]

Originally Posted by denny007

You are certainly wrong. Probably quite often methink.

Question is - how they landed at that page at first place ? Mistake ? Not likely. They like young meat too.
Sex is allowed from 14/15 in normal countries and thats where for me starts underage (bellow 14/15). BTW I am double age of my current girlfriend and she looks like 15 (she is 18). Whenever we go somewhere I see most men look at her with lust, envying me my young cute little thing.

Hopefully one day you'll have a 14/15 year old daughter whom 30+ year old men will find "hot". Let's see how you feel then.

[GatorB]

Originally Posted by denny007

Useless cunts who has nothing else to do post on GFY a lot. Busy dudes making bucks post less.

Seems like you are to busy lusting after girls that look like they are 15.

in case any accuses me of calling you a pedo here are your own words.

"Sex is allowed from 14/15 in normal countries and thats where for me starts underage (bellow 14/15). BTW I am double age of my current girlfriend and she looks like 15 "

[denny007]

Originally Posted by GatorB

Seems like you are to busy lusting after girls that look like they are 15.

I am not "lusting", I am fucking them. Your people invented anal so what ?

[Jens Van Assterdam]

Originally Posted by denny007

I am not "lusting", I am fucking them. Your people invented anal so what ?

Thin ice your on atm...