![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
![]() ![]() |
|
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed. |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Too lazy to set a custom title
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 17,393
|
"Unlimited" data storage service?
Besides Amazon S3 are there any services that provide scalable, virtually unlimited storage/hosting services? I have a need to archive a growing amount of data and while I could just buy up HDs at this end it will cost a fair bit to transfer the data into the office in Australia (between $0.50 - $5.00 per gig)
At the moment building a custom server with a few 1TB HDs would be far cheaper than S3, but it doesn't scale for future needs (or reduce in monthly cost if I scale down the operation) Any ideas? |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: In a Tater Patch
Posts: 2,321
|
http://hadoop.apache.org/core/
http://kosmosfs.sourceforge.net/ distributed file type system might be worthwhile to look into for you/needs.
__________________
Managed Hosting - Colocation - Network Services Yellow Fiber Networks icq: 19876563 |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Too lazy to set a custom title
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 17,393
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Chatsworth, CA
Posts: 1,964
|
everything I've seen is really expensive. Much much cheaper to just store locally.
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Too lazy to set a custom title
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 17,393
|
Quote:
Then again if it's accessed infrequently enough it's pretty much a one-off cost... once to transfer data in, once to write it to a couple of HDs. With S3 you're paying per month for long term storage. |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |