New shared SEO plans now available. - Page 2 - GoFuckYourself.com

Rorschach · 10-21-2008, 01:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog

You know very little about what we do or how we do it, so you end up making lots of inaccurate assumptions.

Well I don't see you refuting any of my statements. The only way you could have true under-the-radar robustness as far as SE detection is if you have multiple hosts in separate geographic locations run as individual businesses, run from one back end; hence your multiple admin interfaces for each IP. Which is fine, but IMO if you're really a serious search engine webmaster you would be better off writing your own more flexible system to do the same thing, or pay someone else $500 to do it for you, rather than paying gotwebhost a hefty ongoing monthly premium.

baddog · 10-21-2008, 01:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rorschach

Well I don't see you refuting any of my statements. The only way you could have true under-the-radar robustness as far as SE detection is if you have multiple hosts in separate geographic locations run as individual businesses, run from one back end; hence your multiple admin interfaces for each IP. Which is fine, but IMO if you're really a serious search engine webmaster you would be better off writing your own more flexible system to do the same thing, or pay someone else $500 to do it for you, rather than paying gotwebhost a hefty ongoing monthly premium.

Actually, we have servers all over the country.

I have never disputed that you can go get hosting at 30 different hosts to accomplish the same thing as what we provide, but that means you will have 30 different control panels, 30 different bills, 30 different support contacts.

We just make it easy and offer support that is second to none.

baddog · 10-21-2008, 01:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BradM

Here's a question I've wanted to know and this is a good a place as any to ask it.
If I am interlinking my network, should each site be on its own class C? Say 20 sites. Does having them all on the exact same IP devalue the link weight?

Again, ask 10 experts, get 10 different answers.

Well respected SEO Bruce Clay observed the following:

Quote:

Yes! We recommend that any site serious about their rankings spend the money (it's only a few extra bucks a month) to be on a dedicated IP.

It?s important for a few reasons. First, we?re pretty sure it plays at least a small part in the search engine?s algorithms. The engines will use reverse lookup to determine what kind of IP you?re on. If you think they don?t care, consider this: It?s been said that about 3 percent of all Web sites have dedicated IPs, with the other 97 percent resting on shared IPs. Research was then conducted analyzing the top 50 results for certain queries in the various search engines. The research found that 90 percent of the top-50 results were using dedicated IP numbers.

Three percent of Web sites use them, and 90 percent of Web sites in the top 50 results have them. Counterintuitive, don?t you think?

We thought so. In fact, we?ve found it so odd we repeated the tests several times, and each time we got the same results. We?ve even seen cases where switching from a virtual IP to a dedicated IP number alone has caused an increase in rankings.

As far as interlinking sites sharing the same Class C (or IP), it has been suggested that linking two sites on the same IP carries about as much weight as an internal link.

baddog · 10-22-2008, 08:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by goodgirl

have you? Why would you want a "crazy" woman?

I was thinking we have been partners for over 6 years, if that was a marriage I guess it works with you being in CA and me in IN.

Who knows, maybe I would still be married if I had kept my wives 2,000 miles away.

baddog · 10-22-2008, 10:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shaze

didn't post pricing.

Got the plans published now. http://www.gotwebhost.com/shared-servers.html