CCBill, why do you keep processing for all these sites the use stolen content? - GoFuckYourself.com

aico · 12-02-2008, 02:18 AM

It's getting a little ridiculous, I've found two just today in one fucking thread alone.

It almost seems like you are supporting theft

edit *the use = that use

RenegadeCash Mark · 12-02-2008, 02:21 AM

Most processing companies dont check for this kind of thing, they do however in most cases pull such sites processing once they have been notified.

aico · 12-02-2008, 02:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RenegadeCash Mark

Most processing companies dont check for this kind of thing, they do however in most cases pull such sites processing once they have been notified.

They have been notified many times.

I mean seriously how much "checking" do you need to do to know that these sites are not full of stolen content?
http://www.teenagedecadence.com/foru...ctures-43.html
http://www.xposing.com/forums/f-pictures-43.html
http://www.herselfpics.com/forums/f-pictures-43.html

Zester · 12-02-2008, 02:57 AM

it might be just plain old greed

RenegadeCash Mark · 12-02-2008, 02:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aico

They have been notified many times.

I mean seriously how much "checking" do you need to do to know that these sites are not full of stolen content?
http://www.teenagedecadence.com/foru...ctures-43.html
http://www.xposing.com/forums/f-pictures-43.html
http://www.herselfpics.com/forums/f-pictures-43.html

If they have been notified then sure, they should pull them.

It is not just as simple as switching off the processing though.

Paul Markham · 12-02-2008, 03:18 AM

Send CCBILL a DMCA notice when you send one to the site, did not see any of my content on the sites.

rowan · 12-02-2008, 03:33 AM

Doesn't it require a reasonable number of DMCA notices "within a short time period" in order for them to pull billing?

Sounds ludicrous, but you have to remember that if they start playing police-the-net sooner or later they're going to make a mistake. They're not claiming ignorance, just saying they can't go switching people off at the drop of a hat...

Paul Markham · 12-02-2008, 03:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rowan

Doesn't it require a reasonable number of DMCA notices "within a short time period" in order for them to pull billing?

Sounds ludicrous, but you have to remember that if they start playing police-the-net sooner or later they're going to make a mistake. They're not claiming ignorance, just saying they can't go switching people off at the drop of a hat...

They have to be careful but as you say a few DMCA notices should do it. Or at least start the ball rolling.

commonsense · 12-02-2008, 04:34 AM

Send CCBill, the site and the host DMCA's. Enough abuses and CCBill will pull the processing or the host will pull the sites. Also know most of the thieves have other 'regular' sites as well. You can always fight fire with fire ;)

webmasterchecks · 12-02-2008, 08:20 AM

ccbill is not a company that would purposely hide a site like that. Once they get the official notices fro the copyright holder, they turn them off for good.

TheDoc · 12-02-2008, 08:33 AM

With CCBill and Epoch you send support proof that you contacted those sites with notices and they didn't respond. Also send over a scan (black out what is needed) that proves you own it. Now just showing proof may get something done from them, I guess it would depend on what is stolen or maybe how much, some factor at least.

"THEN" they will do something about it. Otherwise it's people "thinking" the content is stolen with no proof.

I'm not trying to back the sites in question, but if they respond to take down requests, or if nobody is complaining... I don't think they are going to do anything about them based on the theories of Webmasters.

12-02-2008, 02:18 AM	#1
aico Moo Moo Cow Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Washington State Posts: 14,748	CCBill, why do you keep processing for all these sites the use stolen content? It's getting a little ridiculous, I've found two just today in one fucking thread alone. It almost seems like you are supporting theft edit *the use = that use

12-02-2008, 02:21 AM	#2
RenegadeCash Mark Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Australia Posts: 1,002	Most processing companies dont check for this kind of thing, they do however in most cases pull such sites processing once they have been notified. __________________ Make Real Money With Your Traffic! Promote Unsaturated High Converting Micro Niche Sites Pissing, Diapers, Teen, Amateur, Thai & More

12-02-2008, 02:57 AM	#4
Zester Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2003 Posts: 5,344	it might be just plain old greed __________________ * Mainstream ? $65 per sale * new male contraception

12-02-2008, 03:18 AM	#6
Paul Markham Too old to care Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2001 Location: On the sofa, watching TV or doing my jigsaws. Posts: 52,943	Send CCBILL a DMCA notice when you send one to the site, did not see any of my content on the sites. __________________ Blowout deal. 880 videos, 2,400 image sets, plus many RAW videos. $500. PM me for a deal. Skype Paulmarkham70

12-02-2008, 08:20 AM	#10
webmasterchecks Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Phoenix Posts: 1,685	ccbill is not a company that would purposely hide a site like that. Once they get the official notices fro the copyright holder, they turn them off for good. __________________ Webmasterchecks Affiliate Payments - fully compatible with nats/mpa3

12-02-2008, 03:33 AM	#7
rowan Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Australia Posts: 17,393	Doesn't it require a reasonable number of DMCA notices "within a short time period" in order for them to pull billing? Sounds ludicrous, but you have to remember that if they start playing police-the-net sooner or later they're going to make a mistake. They're not claiming ignorance, just saying they can't go switching people off at the drop of a hat...

12-02-2008, 04:34 AM	#9
commonsense So Fucking Banned Join Date: Feb 2007 Posts: 1,790	Send CCBill, the site and the host DMCA's. Enough abuses and CCBill will pull the processing or the host will pull the sites. Also know most of the thieves have other 'regular' sites as well. You can always fight fire with fire ;)

12-02-2008, 08:33 AM	#11
TheDoc Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Currently Incognito Posts: 13,827	With CCBill and Epoch you send support proof that you contacted those sites with notices and they didn't respond. Also send over a scan (black out what is needed) that proves you own it. Now just showing proof may get something done from them, I guess it would depend on what is stolen or maybe how much, some factor at least. "THEN" they will do something about it. Otherwise it's people "thinking" the content is stolen with no proof. I'm not trying to back the sites in question, but if they respond to take down requests, or if nobody is complaining... I don't think they are going to do anything about them based on the theories of Webmasters. __________________ ~TheDoc - ICQ7765825 It's all disambiguation Last edited by TheDoc; 12-02-2008 at 08:34 AM..